You might have to link me to that ruling.

I linked to the written dissent that gives the relevant details. If you want the original ruling, you can find it yourself.

The Reuters article you mentioned is inaccurate as it describes the case being about counting "mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day" but that is incorrect. Both NPR and PBS reported that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court allowed ballots without postmarks to be counted even if they arrived after election day. The SCOTUS allowed that ruling to stand.

So in 2020 Pennsylvania was counting mail-in ballots that arrived after election day without postmarks. Two years later the Pennsylvania Supreme Court changed their mind and ruled that undated ballots don't count in the 2022 midterms.

All I can find is that they refused to hear the case.

Right. That's the point: almost none of the cases have been heard by the courts. The courts typically refuse to hear them. Almost none of the fraud claims have been genuinely judged on their merits.

Which case is the one you reckon is about the 2020 election?

Page 25 onwards.

That was an out of court settlement.

Yes, you are correct, I confused myself. Sorry.

there were victims who suffered financial loss.

Since the case never actually got decided on its merits, it is impossible to say that there were victims who suffered financial loss. Dominion may claim that they suffered financial loss, but they haven't had to prove it, and its frankly a ludicrous claim. The people who most believed Fox's claims are not customers of Dominion, or potential customers. They're just voters, whose opinions don't count and don't matter.

Dominion's claims for damages are based on a report they paid for, half of which remains under seal. The half that has been made public seems to have over-valued Dominion to a ludicrous degree, e.g. claiming that the company's value increased by a factor of 10 in less than two years (that's 450% growth per year!), and claiming without evidence that they had to abandon "growth opportunities" worth $643 million. Dominion CEO John Poulos claimed that the company expects to lose customers and is unlikely to stay in business, but since 2020 Dominion has increased its market share of the voting machine market, so I'm rating Poulos' claim Five Pinocchios. NPR found that Dominion machines will be used in 1861 U.S. jurisdictions in 2024, 700 more than in 2020. That's sixty percent growth in two years, during a time that Dominion is crying that nasty old Fox is going to put them out of business.

It seems that claims of election fraud has been very good for Dominion and its shareholders. They should pay Fox to defame them some more.

You should have let fox know.

Fox knows. They could have fought the case if they wanted to. Hell, they could have bought Dominion out.

For Fox, $787.5 million is not a lot of money:

• Their revenue is about $12-15 billion a year.
• The company is valued at $15.27 billion, and enterprise value of $18.33 billion.
• They keep cash reserves of $4 billion.

If they wanted to bolster the Democrats or Never Trumpers in the Republican Party, and hurt Trump's re-election chances, giving Dominion $787.5 million and filling the media with a thousand stories about "Fox admits election fraud claims are a lie" is money well-spent.