Tucker Carlson’s Interview with Steve Witkoff Reveals Surprising Ignorance by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is, and he's making it even more likely with his ardent support of genocidal Israel, and his determination to support them no matter who in West Asia they target as enemies of their Greater Israel plan.

Disney is Pushed to Commit to Free Speech Amid Concerns Over Past Ties to Censorship-Driven Ad Cartels by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same.

Disney is Pushed to Commit to Free Speech Amid Concerns Over Past Ties to Censorship-Driven Ad Cartels by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't the parent company also heavily invested in weapons manufacturing?

The European Union’s Collective Suicide by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was a very good discussion of this in the video you posted on reddit of Nima and Wilkerson. Wilkerson is no fan of Trump's but he agreed with much of what Vance and Hegseth said at the Munich security conference.

@caitoz: Democrats are as happy as a pig in shit right now. Suddenly they get to pretend all the unfathomable evils their president inflicted upon our world never happened, just because there's a different president doing bad things who people are feeling big feels about. [...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He also lets them feel outraged and indignant, and they enjoy that too.

I'd say they enjoy it even more than all the rest.

The Most Dramatic Narrative Shift in Modern History ⋆ Brownstone Institute by Promyka5 in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A strange thing happened in 2020.

Most governments at all levels across the globe turned on their people. It was a shock because governments had never before attempted anything this audacious. It claimed to be exercising mastery over the whole of the microbial kingdom, the world over. It would prove this implausible mission as a valid one with the release of a magic potion made and distributed with its industrial partners who were fully indemnified against liability claims.

Suffice it to say that the potion did not work. Everyone got Covid anyway. Most everyone shook it off. Those who died were often denied common therapeutics to make way for a shot that clocked the highest rate of injury and death on public record. A worse fiasco would be hard to invent outside dystopian fiction.

The controlling forces in every nation traced to something else we did not normally think of as government. It was the administrators who occupied agencies that were deemed independent of public awareness or control. They worked closely with their industrial partners in tech, pharma, banking, and corporate life.

The Constitution did not matter. Neither did the long tradition of rights, liberty, and law. The workforce was divided between essential and nonessential in order to survive the great emergency. The essential people were the ruling class plus the workers who serve them. Everyone else was deemed unessential to social functioning.

@ExxAlerts: 17 AG’s now looking to bypass Biden pardon and prosecute Fauci on state level. by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if their efforts fail, it would keep him and the role he played and the lives he harmed front and center in the public's mind.

Disney+ puts ads into premium, ad-free tier;, just pirate it all. by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On a side note, I learned a lot from his talking about NYC real estate, why storefronts go empty year after year - 1) because, for example, they're going for $75k a month; and 2) because these buildings are owned by so many people, many of whom don't even know they're part of their investment portfolio, that it would be impossible to get the necessary consensus from investors to lower the rent. Meanwhile, small business owners who could use the retail space can't afford the cost.

The Grayzone: New ICJ president plagiarized in the name of Christian Zionism | Julia Sebutinde is a dedicated Christian Zionist who stood alone in rejecting South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. [...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This bit is also interesting:

The ICJ’s President Nawaf Salam resigned on January 14, 2025 to become Prime Minister of Lebanon

I'm hearing from the analysts I follow that the new government of Lebanon is working closely with the US and Israel to push Hizbullah out. On the other hand, Hizbullah appears to be even stronger than before and with even broader support.

The Grayzone: New ICJ president plagiarized in the name of Christian Zionism | Julia Sebutinde is a dedicated Christian Zionist who stood alone in rejecting South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. [...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With new countries joining South Africa’s case accusing Israel of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip, and a ceasefire potentially enabling war crimes investigators to gather fresh evidence of Israeli atrocities, a leadership shakeup at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) threatens to undermine the campaign for legal accountability.

The ICJ’s President Nawaf Salam resigned on January 14, 2025 to become Prime Minister of Lebanon, and was succeeded by Justice Julia Sebutinde of Uganda. Many observers were stunned when Sebutinde voted “no” on all resolutions introduced by South Africa in January 2024, placing herself in opposition to all ICJ judges, including her Israeli colleague, Aharon Barak.

The Ugandan judge rejected the court’s call for the Israeli military to halt deliberate assaults on civilians, end its policy of forced displacement, and cancel its planned invasion of Rafah. In a previous advisory case on the legal consequences of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian Territories, Sebutinde insisted that Palestinians had not been subjected to any military occupation whatsoever. In fact, she concluded that Israel may have the right to maintain a permanent presence in the West Bank and the whole of Jerusalem on the basis of purely biblical claims.

After probing deeper into Sebutinde’s bizarre dissent, a Princeton University graduate student named Zachary Foster discovered that large sections of it had been plagiarized from sources including neoconservative operative Douglas Feith and the Jewish Virtual Library.

Sebutinde’s fanatical adherence to Israel’s agenda does not appear to be the product of manipulation or enticement, however. The views expressed in her dissent on the South African case were much more likely a reflection of the Christian Zionist belief system she developed as a member of Watoto, a Pentecostal megachurch in the Ugandan capital of Kampala.

@Megatron_ron: Trump called the Danish Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, and demanded that Denmark hand over Greenland to the United States - Financial Times reports citing five European officials. The conversation was a disaster. [No shit...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Assuming that the European officials weren't lying. Yes, Trump has made stupid comments about Greenland but demanding that Denmark "hand over Greenland" sounds like the typical hysterical utterances made by these morons. After all this time did they suddenly become rational, trustworthy sources?

Disney is Pushed to Commit to Free Speech Amid Concerns Over Past Ties to Censorship-Driven Ad Cartels by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

https://archive.md/oNql2

I'm posting this mostly because of information it provides on the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which is part of the Censorship Industrial Complex.

GARM, a 2019 initiative designed to ensure “brand safety,” has faced accusations of marginalizing conservative news outlets and viewpoints by influencing advertising practices. Though the initiative was dissolved in 2023 amid antitrust scrutiny, critics worry that its goals may persist through corporate practices.

The ADF (Alliance Defending Freedom), representing Disney shareholders alongside Bowyer Research and Patron Partners, had pressed the entertainment giant to affirm its support for free expression. However, Disney reportedly stated that issuing such a declaration was not in its “best interest.”

More recently, the organization has turned its attention to corporate policies it views as suppressing conservative and religious perspectives. Jeremy Tedesco, ADF’s senior vice president of corporate engagement, described their broader mission: “We’ve helped shareholders file about 10 resolutions this shareholder season related specifically to GARM, but we’ve also filed over 50 resolutions on issues like de-platforming [and] DEI in vendor contracts.”

...concerns about corporate censorship, particularly in light of GARM’s past activities. The initiative, backed by major corporations such as Coca-Cola and Unilever, reportedly encouraged its members to cut advertising ties with platforms like X after Elon Musk’s 2022 acquisition. A subsequent House Judiciary Committee investigation found that GARM’s practices likely violated federal antitrust laws, describing its actions as “colluding to suppress voices and views.”

Although GARM has officially disbanded, critics believe its agenda persists... [Tedesco] also raised concerns about the emergence of similar initiatives, suggesting that companies could continue leveraging advertising dollars to silence disfavored views.

Due Dissidence Does Jimmy Dore - The Douglas Macgregor Interview by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks you for providing these links, it's hard to track down all the segments sometimes.

Manufacturing Consent For Regime Change In Syria by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Monitoring corporate media performance for 25 years – week after week, war after war – has done little to diminish our dismay at the robotic automaticity of ‘mainstream’ enthusiasm for US-authored regime change.

Each time, without fail, thousands of media commentators function, not as critical-thinking individuals, but as cookie-cutter cogs in a propaganda printing machine stamping the word ‘GOOD’ on the public mind.

It is not that we are told what to think – they know we mostly just skim the headlines – we are told what to feel. The result is a thin veneer of symbolic headline ‘news’ painting a positive picture followed by ‘in-depth’ content that hides as much as it reveals. This ‘coverage’ is not comprehensible and is not intended to be because it serves the needs of power rather than truth.

The latest propaganda blitz is particularly remarkable given that the Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group led by Mohammed al-Jolani that overthrew Syria’s Assad dictatorship in December is a proscribed terrorist group under UK law.

None of this has deterred the ‘mainstream’ cheerleaders using endless pictures of smiling Syrians, with women notably to the fore in a brazen attempt to exploit #MeToo kudos.

No surprise, then, when media reported:

‘UK could consider removing proscription of Syria’s HTS, says minister’

Economist and former politician Yanis Varoufakis captured it perfectly:

‘The Western media’s duplicity has broken all records. When jihadists entered Kabul, ousting the US regime, it was the end of the world. Now that jihadists have entered Damascus to overthrow a secular enemy of the West, it is a triumph of the human spirit.’

Data Exposure at MyGiftCardSupply Highlights Risks of Digital ID Regulations by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excerpt, bold added:

The issue came to light when a security researcher, known by the alias JayeLTee, discovered an unprotected storage server linked to MyGiftCardSupply. According to TechCrunch, the server, which lacked even basic password protection, contained hundreds of thousands of government-issued IDs, including driver’s licenses and passports, as well as selfies submitted by customers. These documents are required by the company to comply with US anti-money laundering laws, which mandate identity verification for certain transactions.

Despite an attempt by JayeLTee to notify MyGiftCardSupply about the exposure, the company did not respond until TechCrunch reported the breach.

According to JayeLTee, the server, hosted on Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform, contained over 600,000 images of identity documents and selfies from approximately 200,000 customers. These materials are a part of controversial KYC procedures, intended to confirm identities and prevent fraud.

This incident not only underscores the dangers of mishandled personal data but also raises broader concerns about the risks associated with escalating data collection mandates.

As governments worldwide push for stricter KYC regulations and the implementation of digital ID systems, companies are being compelled to gather and store ever-larger amounts of sensitive information. Such expansive data requirements, while aimed at curbing fraud and enhancing security, also increase the likelihood of breaches, exposing customers to significant privacy and security risks.

Separately, according to the report, JayeLTee recently uncovered another exposed cache of KYC-related data involving Roomster, a roommate-matching platform. The breach included approximately 320,000 images of passports and driver’s licenses.

After NATO's Romanian Coup, Where Next? by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's as if there was a pattern somewhere in there.

In flashing neon lights.

After NATO's Romanian Coup, Where Next? by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On December 6th, Romania’s constitutional court made an extraordinary decision to inexplicably overturn first round results of the country’s November 24th presidential election. Conveniently, the ruling was made mere days before a runoff that, according to polls, would’ve seen upstart outsider Calin Georgescu win via landslide. In the process, citizens of all NATO member states were provided with a particularly pitiless, real-time crash course on what could now happen in their own countries, should the ‘wrong’ candidates be elected fair and square.

Georgescu’s stunning victory in the first round caught Romania’s political elite and their Western sponsors off guard, while leaving him the most popular political figure in the country. Campaigning on a traditionalist, nationalist platform, he extolled views some might consider unsavoury, but also advocated nationalisation, and state investment in local industry. Perhaps predictably, the Western media has universally smeared him as “far-right”, “pro-Putin” and a “conspiracy theorist”, among other now-familiar sobriquets commonly levelled at political dissidents.

No official reason has been given for Romania’s constitutional court voiding November’s vote, despite days earlier signing off on the results. Nonetheless, in the intervening time, Bucharest’s security apparatus released declassified reports intimating - without making direct accusations or providing any evidence whatsoever - Georgescu’s victory may have resulted from a wide-ranging, Moscow-sponsored influence campaign, delivered via TikTok.

The plot further thickened in late December, when it was revealed the TikTok campaign that purportedly boosted Georgescu was in fact financed by Romania’s National Liberal party. This backing helped propel the hitherto obscure candidate to national prominence, the objective potentially being to harm the National Liberal party’s arch nemesis Social Democrats. No evidence of Muscovite funding, let alone support, for Georgescu has ever emerged. Nonetheless, despite these disclosures, the narrative of Russian destabilisation catapulting him into power has since been invincibly minted.

Bucharest’s sprawling territory is home to multiple US missile facilities, and a giant NATO military base, scheduled to soon be greatly expanded, explicitly in service of decisively changing the region’s “balance of power” in the West’s favour. Meanwhile, Romanian presidents wield significant clout in domestic and international affairs. They dictate foreign policy, serve as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and appoint prime ministers. All of which points to a far more likely rationale for the presidential election’s abrogation than “Russian meddling”.

Genuine “Power Politics” in Ukraine and Eastern Europe by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And then you have this: EU targeting of Orbán should worry other member states:

Hungary is set to lose more than €1 billion in European Union cohesion funds, the result of an ongoing conflict with Brussels over the country’s alleged violations of the rule of law.

The reality is that the rule of law is, more than anything, a convenient pretext for targeting dissenting governments that resist aligning with the EU’s expanding supranational authority and broader political agenda — including on matters largely unrelated to the rule of law, such as economic and foreign policy. This is why the EU is happy to ignore rule-of-law violations when pro-Brussels governments are involved, so long as they comply with Union policy on the issues that really matter, such as Ukraine.

Poland is a textbook example: within a year of the Left-liberal, pro-EU coalition led by Donald Tusk taking power, the country has experienced an unparalleled attack on the rule of law. The new government has launched an authoritarian power grab against the media, the judiciary and its political opponents. Yet all this has been met with silence in Brussels — and even cheered on.

When You’re Losing a War, Try Terrorism — The Ukrainian Gambit by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On the other hand, they may have less energy to expend on Russia as they struggle to deal with the decline in their living standards brought about by the ruling class.

When You’re Losing a War, Try Terrorism — The Ukrainian Gambit by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've heard the 1 million estimate already as far as killed and wounded to the point of not being able to return to battle. What an horrific thing to do to the Ukrainian population; it seems likely they would have overwhelmingly opposed the war had they been given a choice, not because they loved Russia but because they know who pays the real costs of war.

When You’re Losing a War, Try Terrorism — The Ukrainian Gambit by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This soldier’s testimony is consistent with the losses reported in Andrei’s video — Ukraine has suffered more than 500,000 killed and wounded in 2024 alone. The numbers are horrific for the Ukrainian side, and these kind of losses are not sustainable. The curtain is coming down on Ukraine.

@jimmy_dore: We’ve done it folks. We’ve reached the “it’s antisemitic to rightfully call out bribery of member of Congress by Israel and its U.S. consigliere.” - @EndoceneHunter by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

@Terrence_STR

There is nothing more Antisemitic than Ethnic Cleansing in an Apartheid State! ~ Terrence Daniels


@TorahJews:

Antisemitism nowadays is largely impacted by the false notion that Jews are represented by Israel.

It only harms American Jews when our leaders fail to divide Judaism from Zionism.


@henazo

They always get real active around times when Israel starts ramping up its genocide.


@UniversalMind99

Here's the trick. Control the narrative lead the controversy. Divide and Rule. We get Soros/Davos on one side and AIPAC/Israel on the other, while high ranking positions are filled their players. Meanwhile central banks hum along and 'sellout politicians' fleece America.


@MrHapRaker

Prostitutes should have thicker skin.


@bakerjd91

It's antisemitism to NOT accept the bribe. Only true believers will take the bribe and stay silent during, what most other countries are condemning, a genocide. I feel bad for all the humanitarian workers that were slaughtered in the process, but i guess that's antisemitism too


@JohnElkaz

In any other country lobbying as it is in the US would be classified as bribery and corruption. The US might as well advertise itself as a government for hire: Have military, will travel.

BREAKING: In latest threat to German democracy, dangerous fascist Elon Musk tweets six words about Alternative für Deutschland (/s for those unfamiliar with eugyppius) by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Disclaimer (which I resent feeling the need to make BTW): This is not intended as an endorsement or expression of support for Milei or Musk, I'm posting it because it's yet another example of the hair-on-fire reaction to WrongThink that is becoming distressingly pervasive. Excerpts, bold added:

German democracy, which has existed undeterred since 1949 but is somehow always shaken to its foundations whenever anybody sings the wrong song or holds a televised debate with the wrong person, is once again on life support.

<snip>

Elon Musk then brought down the hammer on the German democratic order, retweeting Seibt’s video and remarking that “Only the AfD can save Germany.”

Today a lot of very important and influential people got out of bed and took to their keyboards to denounce Musk’s election interference. His statement might be illegal, at any rate it is very likely fascist and certainly it is beyond the pale for an American to voice an opinion about German politics. Germans absolutely never, ever, utter the slightest word about American politics and certainly would never advance negative opinions about the American president in the middle of an election campaign. Our Foreign Office would never try to fact-check an American presidential debate! Our journalists would never depict President Donald Trump dressed as a Ku Klux Klan member or offering the Hitler salute or decapitating the Statue of Liberty! That’s just not done!

Like a great stream of green diarrhoea, the outrage is pouring fourth.

That’s right, Musk wants to make American government more efficient so that he can suspend elections and establish himself as American dictator. It takes truly perceptive journalists, like whoever wrote this unsigned Spiegel screed, to see through his clever lies.

He is like a little antidemocratic Hitler, is Elon Musk, just tweeting whatever he wants, receiving guests, influencing … things.

But the gold medal for most outrageous reaction must go to Florian Harms, editor-in-chief of t-online... Harms is clearly highly opposed to platforms where anyone can just post anything. People should only be allowed to post things of which Harms approves.

If Musk were attacking AfD, of course, Harms would be totally thrilled with it.

If any of these people sincerely believe that Musk’s tweet will have any influence on the German elections in February, they are clinically insane. The only thing here that might influence something, is the unceasing hysteria of German establishment discourse, which seems intent on alienating powerful figures at the centre of empire, all for the indecent and passing thrill of a cheap moral orgasm (stealing this). Any political order that is truly threatened by a six-word remark from anybody – even should it come from the wealthiest, most antidemocratic, fascistic and powerful man in the world – is not a political order worth having.

Sanders tells Biden to consider preemptive pardons since Trump sounds like a ‘tinpot dictator’ by hfxB0oyA in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's been painful to see how far Bernie has fallen, which is why I generally avoid any posts about what he's saying anymore.

Slam Jamming Russiagate or "How I watched Hillary Clinton, MSDNC, FBI, CIA, and NSA try to distract me from their failures" - [Archive of 25 Mar 2019 post as removed by Reddit] by Inuma in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just found where someone apparently archived your original post: https://archive.md/WDesr

The day the media decided militant jihadism was respectable by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Excerpt:

Here is a very strange thing. For years, western media outlets and politicians have been recklessly indifferent to the fact that Hamas is not a jihadist movement, like al-Qaeda or Islamic State, but a specifically Palestinian national resistance movement – if one underpinned by an Islamist ideology that distinguishes it from secular Palestinian national movements like Fatah.

But Hamas, unlike al-Qaeda and Islamic State, is not seeking to recreate a caliphate embracing all Muslims wherever they live, indifferent to national borders. It wants to create a Palestinian state in Palestine.

Hamas does not demand strict adherence to religious law, and it does not prioritise Islam over Palestinian national identity.

It is not, as Israel and its apologists in the West try to persuade us, part of some Islamic crusade, waging a global war against the values of a supposed Judeo-Christian “civilisation”.

Hamas does not oppress Christians (a Christian community existed quite peacefully in Gaza until Israel started bombing their churches), or force women to wear the veil.

I raise this matter not to praise Hamas (see the legal disclaimer below) but to highlight the current, outrageous hypocrisy of the entire western media corps.

We now have an al-Qaeda offshoot in Syria, rebranded as HTS. And western journalists, led as ever by the BBC, are falling over themselves to explain how the group has transformed itself overnight from head-chopping jihadism into a moderate, "diversity-friendly" Syrian national resistance movement.

The point is: the western media is quite capable of understanding the difference between jihadists and Islamic nationalists when they want to. But they only want to when the British and US national security states tell them to.

That is the behaviour of what we are told is a “free press”.

Syria, Mission Accomplished? by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sums it up nicely.

Syria, Mission Accomplished? by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they derive greater $$$ benefit from allowing chaos to reign.

Matt Stoller: An Assassin Showed Just How Angry America Really Is by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

In his speech for the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, Senator John Sherman of Ohio made a number of legal points about how to understand competition. But the thrust of his argument was about law and order, for the specter of violence was hanging over a nation that had within living memory experienced a massive and traumatic civil war. And there had been significant, and violent, strikes involving railroads, sometimes nationwide.

Sherman believed America as a free people simply could not sustain the rise of immense concentrations of power in the industrial corporations he saw in his day. Congress had to act, or chaos would reign. Here’s what he said:

You must heed their appeal or be ready for the socialist, the communist, and the nihilist. Society is now disturbed by forces never felt before. The popular mind is agitated with problems that may disturb social order, and among them all none is more threatening than the inequality of condition, of wealth, and opportunity that has grown within a single generation out of the concentration of capital into vast combinations to control production and trade and to break down competition.

Just two years earlier, President Grover Cleveland, in his 1888 State of the Union, discussed that same social chaos in the wake of the rise of large corporations and the inequality they brought.

Communism is a hateful thing and a menace to peace and organized government but the communism of combined wealth and capital, the outgrowth of overweening cupidity and selfishness, which insidiously undermines the justice and integrity of free institutions, is not less dangerous than the communism of oppressed poverty and toil, which, exasperated by injustice and discontent, attacks with wild disorder the citadel of rule.

The social contract, in other words, goes both ways. It’s not just mean for a small clique to run a corrupt system, but Americans who are put upon, if given no peaceful options, will fight back violently.

...one school of political thought is that a key way to maintain social order is through legitimacy. The people had to be persuaded that corporations and government were on their side. “If we desire respect for the law,” said Louis Brandeis, “we must first make the law respectable.”

Early on Wednesday morning, an assassin killed UnitedHealth Care CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan. UnitedHealth Care is the biggest health insurer in America, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, which is the largest employer of doctors, a giant pharmacy benefit manager, a technology firm, and so forth, basically a giant health care platform. (I wrote up how these types of firms formed in 2020 in a piece called How CVS Became a Health Care Tyrant).

We don’t know why the killer did it, though he scrawled “deny” “defend” and “depose” on bullet casings, indicating that he at least wants people to believe it’s a result of unjust and routine denials of care by the health insurance giant. "There had been some threats," his wife Paulette Thompson told NBC News. "Basically, I don’t know, a lack of coverage?” While I’m immediately suspicious of such a neat and clean-sounding motive, if you do take it on face value, that does sound a lot like the mob rule Jefferson, Sherman, Cleveland, and others warned about.

... almost everywhere outside of such official channels, pouring out through every seam of the internet, was a different message, a message of raw unadulterated hatred, of “this guy deserved it.” This picture, for instance, came from a Reddit channel dedicated to nursing. Yes, these are the people who heal for a living, and they are mocking this guy’s death. “My patients died while those bitches enjoyed 26 million dollars,” said one. There are endless angry comments about Thompson from people who try to stop people from dying. That’s how bad it is.

While I really dislike a lot of these people, none of us should want to live in a country where assassination becomes a method of political expression. It’s hard to see democracy surviving if elected leaders and corporate leaders feel they might be shot at any point. And that’s why we have to actually get our laws working again. I hope that men like Carl Nichols and Fortune 500 CEOs start to wake up, and see that there is deep rage outside their clubby environs that can’t be fixed with security measures but must be addressed by some measure of social obligation to the people who live here.

After all, societies that give citizens no way to control their own lives, but put the fate of their people in the hands of distant masters with no concern at all for their wellbeing, invite disaster. We’ve always known that. It’s one of the main reasons for the passage of our antitrust laws. So I hope we can get some control over our society again, before we truly do spin out of control.

Why I think Ritter is wrong when he says the jihadist offensive against Aleppo is backed by Turkey by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think you're right. Since I posted this I've learned more details and it's obviously Erdogan at work. The idea just seemed and still seems like an insane move to me because whatever he gains is going to be offset by what he loses.

Duran: Russian economy and Gazprombank by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Alexander starts by explaining why he thinks the dollar got stronger following Trump's election: Aside from his talk of tariffs, etc., what's probably been happening is a massive outflow of funds from Europe into the US. This is because there's a political crisis in Germany with one brewing in France as the Germans have been talking about doing away with their debt brake. Germany has been the anchor for the euro so this likely has bond markets and financial investors worried about Germany's long-term financial position; by contrast, the US looks to have a more solid economy and the influx of these investments pushed the value of the dollar up relative to other currencies.

We have this discussion about the ruble every year around this time because it always weakens in late autumn and early winter; this is a structural issue. First because we're moving toward a new year and the holidays and this is the biggest shopping season in Russia as in most countries. As a result, there's usually a rush of imports into Russia that have to be paid for with foreign currencies and that causes the ruble to decline. Russians have experienced lots of wage growth so they have a lot of money to spend.

Another and more important reason is that Russian corporates tend to pay off their loans toward the end of the year. So if they've borrowed in foreign currencies, as some still do, they have to convert rubles into those foreign currencies to pay off the loan. The ruble historically strengthens in January when Russian corporates pay their first tranche of corporate taxes to the Russian government, meaning they convert any foreign currency they have to rubles.

I think the fall we've seen over the last few days is due to the sanctions put on Gazprombank because it was the only Russian bank that was still allowed to operate within the SWIFT system. It was through Gazprombank that Western buyers of Russian oil and gas products, including Turkey, settled their payments. So with Gazprombank now out of the Western financial system, there's less ability for Westerners to buy Russian oil and gas, which has put further downward pressure on the ruble. Erdogan is complaining about this, asking for an exemption.

The important thing to remember is that it doesn't matter. Russia is running a strong trade surplus: because of the fall in the price of the ruble, Russian exports have become even more competitive. Their growing trade surplus looks like it will translate into a budget surplus. Just a few weeks ago the finance minister was talking about a budget deficit of around 1% of GDP which is quite low but it looks like that might turn into a surplus.

There's very little external debt so we're not looking at this bleeding through into the banking system as we've seen with previous ruble crises like the famous one in 1998; in 1998 Russian banks had lots of liabilities in Western currencies that they couldn't meet because the ruble fell, which caused a general collapse of the banking system. There's nothing like that now, the Russian banking system is very healthy.

This is not going to have a big effect on Russia's external trade. 82% of their exports and 78% of their imports are paid in currencies other than the dollar like RMB, the ruble, etc. So it's not going to have a significant effect on the Russian economy overall; it will cause inflation to be a little higher which does concern the central bank.

As we've discussed in previous programs, Russia does have a problem of their economy overheating. The central bank has raised rates to counter this but data shows it's still growing faster than they would like because it leads to inflation. Right now their inflation rate is 8-9% of GDP which is not that high historically, but if it starts inching into the double digits the central bank and the government as a whole will take more radical action.

Russian inflation figures are very accurate - even the Financial Times admitted in years past that they're the most advanced collectors of inflation statistics in the world. You can't say the same about the West. Here it's widely acknowledged even among mainstream economists and commentators that inflation is being consistently understated.

The Gazprombank sanctions in the short-term will provide a talking point for the Biden administration but in the medium- to long-term it's going to cause increasing problems in the West.

Gazprombank was previously exempted from the sanctions and allowed to continue in the SWIFT system because the US wanted a mechanism of control over the international energy markets, something that was very important to the Biden administration before the election. Now that Trump has won, it will be his problem.

The sanctions also make it difficult for Europe to continue buying Russian LNG; they've been buying more LNG from Russia than from the US because it's cheaper so this will add to the rising prices that Europe is paying for energy. Eventually Russian LNG will probably start displacing LNG from the US and Qatar, etc. in places like China and India. The market will find some kind of stability but at higher cost because every sanction of this kind increases the complexity of the general trade in energy and leaves the price of energy structurally higher than it would otherwise be.

The ones getting crushed by all this are the Europeans and you're not hearing a squeak from their leaders.

Waiting for Oreshnik by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The video discussion between Larry Johnson and Pepe Escobar is excellent. Still only half-way through but it does not disappoint.

@EricLDaugh: The House COVID Committee has released its final report after a 2-year investigation. [...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump's Operation Warp Speed was a success.

That one stands out like a sore thumb.

Why I think Ritter is wrong when he says the jihadist offensive against Aleppo is backed by Turkey by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Update: Well, hell. Mark Sleboda and Rybar unequivocally disagree with me about these jihadists not being backed by Turkey.

(about 38:05) Mark: These jihadists are now a combination of two forces because the initial push from the West was these forces of Hayat Tahir Al-Sham and the Turkistan Islamic Party out of Id Lib. But now there's also a push from the north by the so-called Turkish-Syrian National Army...

Rybar: Hayat Tahir Al-Sham is controlled by Turkish special forces and (unintelligible) as well. So it's no longer a project directed by Western agencies, it's a project directed by Turkey. We know that Turkey is directed by MI6 from Britain, projects in the Middle East are all about Britain.

Interesting bit of trivia that I didn't know: Rybar was an interpreter with the Russian military contingent that liberated Aleppo (if I'm understanding him correctly) in 2016.

Why I think Ritter is wrong when he says the jihadist offensive against Aleppo is backed by Turkey by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get the part about wanting to send the Syrians back to Syria but don't see how having jihadists basically reactivate the civil war there is the way to stabilize things.

M. K. Bhadrakumar: Atlanticists mobilise to salvage NATO as Russia toughens its stance - Indian Punchline by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No doubt, NATO is very concerned about the emergent situation but still won’t accept a Russian victory. Hotheads in the West are once again talking about the deployment of troops by NATO countries to Ukraine for combat operations, which was originally mooted by French President Emmanuel Macron in February.

But plainly put, unless the US is willing to put boots on the ground, the rest of NATO simply run around like a headless chicken. The UK with a 80000-strong army has very few combat units; the 175,000-strong German army has forgotten how to fight; and France is in deep political and economic crisis. As for the US, the public opinion opposes wars and president-elect Donald Trump cannot ignore it.

However, petrified that Trump may turn his back on the war, there is a school of thought in Europe that they could offer something interesting to incentivise him other than the carrot of Ukraine’s vast stores of critical minerals that Americans lack — eg., more trading incentives for America; greater spending on NATO; more pressure on Iran; “peacekeeping boots on the ground” inside Ukraine; help in Trump’s upcoming economic skirmishes with China and so on. Meanwhile, much brainstorming is going on in the US too as to how to save NATO from Trump’s scalpel.

A Guardian columnist wrote, “If the EU and UK seize the $300bn of Russian state assets sitting in Euroclear, money Putin has long written off, we can bring serious funding to the table. Trump does not need to spend any more money on Ukraine – we can buy the weapons. America can even make a profit while securing peace in Europe. Trump would be able to show how he got those parasitic Europeans to cough up, prove his detractors wrong by rebooting America’s most traditional alliances – all while putting “America first”.”

All this testifies to the angst in the European mind that Oreshnik has forced a paradigm shift in the Ukraine war. The triumphalist betting that Russia would be bluffing on nuclear deterrence has given way to fear, since Russia now may not need nuclear weapons to retaliate against attacks on its territory. Oreshnik is a non-nuclear weapon, it is by no means a weapon of mass destruction but is a high-precision weapon of immense destructive power that annihilates its targets — and Europeans have no means to defend against it.

Indeed, the only logical explanation for Biden’s brinkmanship in collusion with the Atlanticists in Europe in the lame duck phase of his presidency is that Oreshnik has upstaged his best-laid plans. Saner voices in Europe are speaking up. In a hugely symbolic act of defiance, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico disclosed on Wednesday that he has accepted an official invitation from Putin to the events in Moscow in May commemorating the 80th anniversary of Victory in World War II. Slovakia is a member country of both EU and NATO.

Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer in a telephone conversation with Trump, reaffirmed Austria’s readiness to serve as a platform for international peace talks on Ukraine. During the conversation, Trump reportedly evinced interest in Nehammer’s previous exchanges with Putin on Ukraine.


As for the Guardian columnist's wishful thinking, no amount of money in the world will pay for weapons that don't exist and that cannot be produced fast enough to head off Ukraine's inevitable defeat. That's simple reality and it's obscene when armchair warriors sitting thousands of miles from the battleground glibly throw out suggestions like this that would only result in more needless deaths of Ukrainian soldiers.

@Megatron_ron: [2:41PM UTC] Israel and Lebanon have agreed to the terms of an agreement to end the Israel-Hezbollah conflict - Axios citing U.S. Official / [7:58PM UTC] Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich, Israel won't respect any agreement with Lebanon by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think being eternal victims is necessary to them, the sycophantic West treats it like a "get out of jail free" card for them to do whatever they want with impunity.

@RnaudBertrand: Absolutely perfect illustration of what we enable with the way the media and the Western political class framed what happened in Amsterdam. There was a football match between Israel and France yesterday [...] a horde of Israeli supporters openly lynched some French supporters [...] by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fans should boycott any game involving Israeli teams and should consider boycotting the competitions totally - why is an Israeli team participating in a European competition anyway? Political leaders don't give a rip about the people but maybe the Daddy Warbucks-types who own these franchises and see a hit to their bottom line will raise enough hell to get things to change.

The TDS Meltdowns Have Begun (Look at the stress of these poor souls who are our fellow citizens) by Promyka5 in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't disagree with you but must point out that for any reconciliation to occur, both sides have to want it and be committed to it. It isn't fair to continually expect one side of a conflict to "be the better person", something we've seen with the calls for amnesty for those who were promoting the most egregious acts against opponents of Covid mandates, including vaccination. The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions succeeded because the wrongdoers admitted to their wrongdoing.

As for what the overlords will do, they'll do it anyway because they always find and try to exploit the fault lines. I'm as concerned about the polarization as you are but the answer IMO is fully airing the grievances, lancing the boil so to speak so that healing can begin; otherwise the resentments will just stay buried and will fester. The grievances don't have to be one-sided, the anti-Dem, anti-Kamala cohort had some bad actors as well because we don't teach people how to disagree civilly and respectfully and we've been conditioned over decades to have hair triggers that lead to impulsive, emotional responses when rationality, perspective and reasonableness are what's needed.

The TDS Meltdowns Have Begun (Look at the stress of these poor souls who are our fellow citizens) by Promyka5 in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What you say about the divisiveness being harmful and being media-driven is right but you can only have reconciliation if both sides are willing to own up to the role they played. I'm perfectly willing to concede that we have been openly critical of and hostile to Democratic Party loyalists but our criticisms never reached the level of vitriolic abuse they've hurled at us since 2016. Their recognition of that fact has to be the starting point.

The TDS Meltdowns Have Begun (Look at the stress of these poor souls who are our fellow citizens) by Promyka5 in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Damn, that was brilliant.

Note to the Democrats by stickdog in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent rant, totally spot-on.

From Arnaud Bertrand - This is quite something: Takashi Kawakami, the principal foreign policy advisor to the Japanese PM, says that if Trump wins the presidential election it will be an opportunity for Japan to "finally become independent". by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Full tweet:

This is quite something: Takashi Kawakami, the principal foreign policy advisor to the Japanese PM, says that if Trump wins the presidential election it will be an opportunity for Japan to "finally become independent". https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/PM-Ishiba-adviser-s-revolution-comment-on-Jan.-6-attack-stuns-U.S

He said that given Trump's "America First" mantra, he will have little interest in U.S.-Japan or U.S.-South Korea relations and that as a result "Japan will have to conduct its own foreign policy [and] find a skillful way to manage the power balance with China, Russia and North Korea... This should be a golden opportunity for Japan. We can take back the initiative and become a truly independent country."

Kawakami also expressed frustration that 85% of Japan's skies are, in effect, "America's skies" (a large portion of the airspace has been reserved for the exclusive use of American forces since the end of World War II) and that "U.S. military bases account for a substantial acreage of land, too" - a status quo he called "abnormal."

I've myself argued the exact same point for Europe since the very first Trump administration: when Trump was threatening to exit NATO, Europe should immediately have taken him at his word and jumped on this amazing opportunity to take over NATO and thereby remove the stranglehold that the US has over the continent. By the same occasion, they might have been able to prevent the Ukraine war by throwing the Americans out and stop it being the "CIA theme park" described by journalist John Pilger (https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/13/ukraine-us-war-russia-john-pilger).

Unfortunately it looks like Europeans are a bit (even a lot) slower to understand geopolitics than the rest of the world... Everyone else around the world sees them as clueless vassals being sacrificed on the altar of the American empire but they themselves are largely oblivious to it. Heck ask most EU politicians and they're immensely worried at the notion that they might one day be independent, it's something they largely want to prevent, which is terrifyingly depressing...

Armchair Warlord: I've never liked the term "woke." Frankly, it means little and carries too many positive connotations. Allow me to propose a new term: Paraliberalism. by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Tweet continued:

What is paraliberalism? It's right there in the word: false liberalism.

Wikipedia defines liberalism as, "A political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law." Paraliberalism is thus an ideology that seeks to invert liberalism in the guise of furthering its goals. And this definition neatly encompasses the excesses of "woke culture." Let us address these in order.

A liberal believes in inalienable rights belonging to individuals. A paraliberal believes that individual rights must bow to the collective interests of favored groups and society at large.

A liberal believes in, well, liberty. Freedom of expression, association, action and transaction. A paraliberal believes this is very dangerous and that people should be censored and cancelled (or worse, sometimes far worse) if they do not censor themselves.

A liberal believes in governance by consent of the governed. A paraliberal views electoral victory as a mandate for tyranny for (at least) the remainder of the prescribed term - and an invitation to put a finger on the democratic scales going forward.

A liberal believes in political equality - one person, one vote. A paraliberal believes in political equity - an apportionment of power among interest groups.

A liberal believes in private property, and with it market capitalism - risk and reward in equal measure, benefiting those who dare, innovate, and succeed. A paraliberal believes in crony capitalism - the extraction of wealth from captured institutions into favored private hands.

A liberal seeks equal justice - the same punishment for the same crimes. A paraliberal seeks equitable justice - the same total amount of punishment apportioned among favored and disfavored groups.

Thus "woke" paraliberals seek to undo everything that Western liberalism has accomplished under the guise of being the progressive vanguard of that very ideology. As I'm sure you have gathered by now, it is not a belief system that I particularly care for.

@krime_1: No I don’t want to be the “better” person, yes I will dunk on IOF soldiers offing themselves. by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That and the guy he's probably talking about (featured in another war-criminal-as-victim story in NYT or WaPo) was said to be traumatized but he wasn't the least bit remorseful about what he'd done, still basically saying all Palestinians including children were terrorists.

What Does the Leak of Top Secret Documents Have to Do With Israel’s Promise to Attack Iran? by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The jury is still out per Larry Johnson on whether these documents are legit. But the comments on his post as usual are interesting:

Honzo

I doubt anyone in Iran is feeling complacent. However, the underlying math still holds- any serious attack on Iran by Israel means the destruction of Israel. If the US participates, it means the closing of the strait of Hormuz and the destruction of US bases and assets in the ME and possibly elsewhere, along with the oil infrastructure of the gulf monarchies.

It’s hard to see how the IAF can conduct a meaningful strike against Iran without US refueling planes, so is the US willing to take the hit? I doubt it.


Reply to Honzo from Walter Wirlo (broken up into more digestible paragraphs):

The ruling class are a bunch of aparatchiks working for the real owner of the US, Israel. You make the few extremely wealthy and they will help you subjugate their own people for you.

It’s the old English empire trick. Israel owns the US and owns US foreign policy, those in charge in the state department are nothing more than biased zionist agents working not for the greater good of the US but for the good of project greater Israel no matter how criminal, barbaric and genocidal that satanic cult happens to be. The US military is Israel’s shabbat goy army, the US congress is Israel’s shabbat goy congress and he US president is Israel’s shabbat goy in chief.

As we can see, both candidates for US president are trying their hardest to show Netanyahu they are far better at kissing Israel’s tuchus and with greater aplomb than the other candidate. That is the most important and only required qualification of a US presidential candidate, no matter how ignorant that candidate may be. In fact, the dumber the better, makes it easier to manage the fool. As the former Israeli PM Sharon stated in public decades ago “the US does what we tell it to do.”

The ruling class, US oligarchs, will not take a hit, all their ill gotten blood money lies in Swiss banks. You are rather naive to think otherwise, it is the regular hard working US taxpaying citizen, the greatest and the real benefactors to the world’s largest welfare and belligerent state know as Israel who will take the hit. How ironic. .


jimmywalter (abridged)

Mr Johnson and other reliable sources have said that Russia has supplied Iran with great numbers of their S400 air defense system, the best in the world, which some say is capable of bringing down F35’s and F16’s.

The Israeli fighters will have to fly 1000 miles to attack Iran, each way, and MAY have to be refueled in the air, Israel Says they do not... Israel has been practicing refueling which is an indication that they will have to be refueled, at least on one leg.

The refueling planes are not stealth and will have to refuel the fighters at high altitude, easily seen by radar and satellites, therefore vulnerable. And, it is a bombs or fuel question, the more fuel carried, the fewer bombs carried.


Wolf69 (abridged)

Air launched ballistic missiles? Failing being nuclear tipped? That would be another nothing burger. Realistically, how many could Israel launch? I believe Israel has 39 F35’s. Positing a 50% readiness rate of this aircraft (charitable), you are looking at +/- 20. Not counting their aging F16’s of course, and I have no idea if they are weapon compatible. And I do not believe the US would aid in “offensive” actions right now.

That ain’t Dresden carpet fire bombing. If Israel does strike soon, it will be a “nothing burger”. If Israel is going to go mad dog, they go during the height of election season and legal paralysis when the US is effectively politically frozen.


Honzo Reply to Wolf69

It seems unlikely that the US would aid Israel in attacking Iran, which raises the question of what Israel can attack Iran with without in-flight refueling. I think it’s also worth considering the possibility that Russia/Iran are capable of tracking and shooting down the F35.

And let us not forget that Iran has promised to bomb anybody that lets Israel overfly their country to attack Iran.

@Hamza_a96: I’m sorry but if Russian bombs rained down on displaced Ukrainians in a hospital courtyard & they were burnt alive, there would be wall to wall media coverage. Keir Starmer would do an emergency address to the nation. The world would stop. But Palestinian lives don’t matter. by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The apologists in that thread, guess it's not surprising: "But Hamas...", "But the hostages...", "Russia bombs hospitals all the time..."

CIA personnel land in Lebanon, ramp up intel gathering to support Israel's war by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excerpt:

The CIA has sent additional agents to Lebanon and has increased its communications with Lebanese military, security, and political officials in an effort to obtain information about Hezbollah, and may have played a role in Israel’s recent attempt to assassinate a Hezbollah political leader, Al-Akhbar reported on 14 October.

Three senior officials in the official security services acknowledged that Western parties, primarily the US, have initiated intensive daily communication with all Lebanese military and security forces since the outbreak of the open war between Lebanon and Israel, Al-Akhbar editor Ibrahim al-Amin wrote.

The same official revealed that a security team of 15 CIA officers arrived at Beirut airport last Thursday, 10 October, and moved in a convoy of armored cars without license plates to the headquarters of the American embassy in Awkar.

The official said he knew of “five working visits by Lebanese officers of various levels to the United States, who held meetings with American intelligence officials at their headquarters in Langley.”

In this context, Amin reports that these contacts between the CIA and Lebanese security officials may have played a role in Israel’s recent attempt to assassinate a Hezbollah political leader, Wafiq Safa.

The official stated that the US wanted to kill Safa, who has no military role in Hezbollah, as part of a campaign launched by the US Ambassador to Beirut, Lisa Johnson, who recently “called on Lebanese political and non-political forces to begin working to establish the stage of “post-Hezbollah Lebanon.”

werewolves losing control of the speech of others by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i suspect they simply have no idea how bad this is or how it's going to play and every time they get a bad response, they assume that it's because they did not add enough cringe last time.

watch BO scolding “black men” like some sort of school marm. can he seriously think this is going to work and that “the brothers” are going to ignore the content of her character (and her brain pan) to focus only upon the color of her skin? is this “you ain’t black if you don’t vote donkey”?

the smug entitlement is galling.

the taking for granted is pure chafe.

they are used to being the only ones speaking. they are used to being the only ones who know stuff. others getting to speak and knowing stuff too seems like wild horror and incredible slant to them as they mistake a return to “equal” from “massively biased” for “biased toward the other side.”

cancel culture has lost its ability to intimidate and drive self-censorship.

and the resultant atmosphere is glorious.

The Grayzone: "Atrocity Inc: How Israel Sells Its Destruction Of Gaza" by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Israel rolled out its new phase of propaganda at its own United Nations Mission in November 2023... the speeches were complemented by protests outside the UN Headquarters featuring literal crisis actors, women impersonating rape victims, dramatizing events for which no concrete evidence existed in order to pressure feminist organizations into more vocally supporting Israel's murderous assault on Gaza. As usual the Western mainstream press reverted to its role as Tel Aviv's obedient stenographer.

25:15

The tsunami of atrocity porn culminated with a front page article in The New York Times purporting to demonstrate beyond the shadow of a doubt that Hamas had engaged in a "pattern of gender based violence on Oct. 7th", sexually assaulting Jewish Israeli women as part of a calculated campaign of terror.

At the Grayzone, as we began examining the sources in the article, it quickly became clear we were witnessing yet another atrocity hoax. An especially cynical one which exploited the real crime of sexual violence against women in order to manufacture consent for an ongoing campaign of ethnic cleansing.

When Ha'aretz asked their country's police for forensic evidence to back up Shapir's outrageous decapitation schemes they said they'd come up empty-handed.

29:19

Perhaps most tellingly, the casualty intended as Exhibit A of Hamas savagery in the NYT article, was a woman called Gal Abdush dubbed by the Times as "the woman in the black dress" referring to a grainy cell phone video of her clad in a tight-fitting black dress splayed out dead next to a burned out vehicle.

The Times' stubborn insistence that Abdush had been raped despite a lack of forensic or visual evidence proved to be too much for the young woman's bereaved family. On January 2nd Abdush's sister took to Instagram to write in to the NYT, stating matter-of-factly that her sister "was not raped...there was no proof she was raped." She also pointed out that the timeline between her sister's last message to her family and the time of her reported murder made it impossible for a rape to occur: "how in 4 minutes were they also raped and burned?" The NYT article had unraveled on every level...

31:00

At around the same time the pro-Israel tech oligarch Sheryl Sandberg was preparing to release a documentary aimed at sustaining the propaganda, building on the NYT article. She also relied on videos of Palestinian prisoners filmed by Israeli interrogators in which they appeared to confess to brutally sexually assaulting Jewish Israeli women on Oct. 7th.

As we demonstrated at The Grayzone, the most outrageous confessions by Palestinian prisoners did not match up with any atrocities documented on Oct. 7th. Worse, there's simply no way these confessions had not been coerced through threats and hideous acts of torture, a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions Article 17 governing the treatment of prisoners of war.

So in providing a platform for violently coerced false confessions to advance the dubious narrative of her propaganda film, Sheryl Sandberg had violated one of the most important tenets of journalistic ethics and therefore become a party to Israel's crimes.

33:27

In an especially dark twist of irony, the hoax advanced by Sandberg, the NYT and so many other Western publications would soon be revealed as de facto policy by Israeli soldiers against defenseless male Palestinian prisoners held in Israel's archipelago of torture dungeons.

In a shocking report relying on testimony from 55 former Palestinian prisoners, the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem demonstrated that the Israeli prison system after Oct. 7 had been transformed into what the group called "a network of camps dedicated to the abuse of inmates as a matter of policy." According to B'Tselem these facilities, in which every inmate is deliberately subjected to harsh, relentless pain and suffering, operate as de facto torture camps.

34:26

At the heart of Israel's network of torture centers is Sde Teiman, a facility in the Negev desert that was built after Oct. 7th to imprison the thousands of men captured by the Israeli military in Gaza. Human rights groups across the world have demonstrated that many of those languishing in the facility are innocent civilians, including physicians kidnapped from hospitals in Gaza and subjected to sadistic acts of violence and torture.

At almost the exact time when Israel's propaganda apparatus was pitting out concocted stories of Hamas militants sexually assaulting Jewish Israeli ravers on Oct. 7th, members of the shadowy Israeli military unit known as Force 100 were actually gangraping defenseless Palestinian men in Sde Teiman.

35:30

We know this is true not only from the testimony of former prisoners who told the media and human rights groups that they'd been sodomized by Israeli soldiers with electrified metal rods but because there was actual video evidence. The soldiers responsible for these hideous crimes were clearly filmed sexually assaulting the prisoners. Once again, an allegation Israeli propagandists made against Palestinians was exposed as a confession.

The soldiers' culpability for sodomizing Palestinian prisoners was never a matter of dispute. In fact, a dozen members of Force 100 were charged and indicted in an Israeli military court for sexually abusing the prisoners. What happened next exposed how hollow the prosecutions actually were.

Because as the soldiers were transported to a military based in the occupied West Bank, Israeli nationalists launched a series of riots to support the accused gang rapists. And no one was arrested in the riots. As protests continued across Israel in support of the soldiers and the practice of sodomizing Palestinian prisoners, calls for exonerating the soldiers came from top Israeli ministers. According to a poll by the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies, 65% of Jewish Israelis opposed prosecuting the soldiers.

37:25

Meanwhile the Force 100 soldier charged as the ringleader of the gang rapes in Sde Teiman, Meir Ben-Shitrit, was transformed by Israeli national media into a folk hero. One mainstream media pundit said the only problem with the raping of prisoners is that it hadn't been institutionalized as military policy, to exact revenge against the "mass rapes" he was convinced had been committed by Hamas on Oct. 7th.

The deceptive coverage by Western mainstream media created real world consequences for Palestinians who had been placed under siege in Gaza, branded as human animals, then kidnapped and hauled off to torture centers. As long as these outlets refuse to retract or even correct their lies, US politicians on the largest stage in the world will continue to repeat them.

When Navi Pelai, the judge in the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda, convicted three media personalities for supposedly inciting the Rwandan genocide, she said the following: "You were fully aware of the power of words and you used the medium of communication with the widest possible reach to disseminate hatred and violence. Without a firearm, machete or any physical weapon, you caused the death of thousands of innocent civilians."

Those words can and should also be directed at the media outlets that trumpeted Israel's bogus Oct. 7th atrocity propaganda, helping it generate international support for an assault on Gaza that has killed, injured or disappeared close to 10% of its total population by this point.

That indictment should also be directed at the powerful elected officials who to this day continue to repeat the lies about what happened on Oct. 7th.

So what can we - the citizens of the countries backing Israel's destruction of Gaza - do in the face of all this? The first thing we need to do is recognize our power. We might not have endless resources like Israel and its army of propagandists be we have something more powerful: it's the truth, and we're using it to get to them.

Take it from Alex Karp, the ultra-Zionist CEO of Palantir, a private military contractor that is pioneering AI targeting systems and testing them on the people of Gaza, when he discussed the importance of the intellectual battle being waged right now: "We kind of just think these things happening across college campuses are a sideshow; no, they are the show. Because if we lose the intellectual debate, you will not be able to deploy any army in the West, ever."

Alex Karp is actually right, and that's a good thing. He's saying we still have the power to challenge the war machine he represents, which is raking in record profits from the war on Gaza and beyond. So we have to continue our efforts, to never let them rest; to bring our protests, voices and independent media to every place we can. We have to use our power while we still have the right to do so.

The Grayzone: "Atrocity Inc: How Israel Sells Its Destruction Of Gaza" by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(First few minutes is a montage of claims by Israeli and US officials and Western media)

3:54

The source for the beheaded babies story was a single soldier, David Zion. When not in army uniform Zion serves as political leader of the Shomron Council, a group that represents 35 illegal settlements in the northern West Bank. Just prior to Oct. 7th Zion incited deadly riots against Palestinians in the town of Huwara, declaring "the village of Huwara should be wiped out, this place is a nest of terror and the punishment should be for everyone." So is this violent fanatic a credible source? Mainstream media outlets didn't even bother to ask.

The Israeli army and government press office, as well as the Biden White House eventually walked back and retracted these claims altogether. But once it was plastered across the front pages of papers all across the US and Europe, the damage was already done, no matter how fabricated it might have been.

And Israel had all the political space it needed to carry out one sadistic act after another in the Gaza Strip, the livestream slaughter made possible by Washington, Berlin, Brussels and the mainstream press that functioned as these government's megaphone.

Even as the beheaded babies story was exposed as a complete and total hoax, Israel and its proxies fed the media new tales of atrocities that were even more lurid than before. Most of these came from one single individual, Yossi Landau, a religious fanatic from a self-described rescue organization known as ZAKA.

One fact Landau did prove was that the business of fabricating atrocity porn is extremely lucrative. Before Oct. 7th his ZAKA organization was nearly broke but in the aftermath of the propaganda bonanza they fueled they raked in over $13 million in donations in just a short amount of time.

One of ZAKA's competitor organizations, United Hatzalah, was eager to cash in as well. It sent its director, Eli Beer, to a Republican Jewish Coalition fundraiser where he rattled off a slew of lies.

12:04

Among Israel's key talking points, dutifully repeated by its stooges in the US media, was that the death toll on Oct. 7th represented "the largest killing of Jews since the Holocaust."

The implication of this line was obvious: Hamas had set out to kill Israelis simply because they were Jews, not because they were military occupiers. But was Hamas solely responsible for the death toll?

According to the official Israeli line, Hamas slaughtered 1400 completely innocent people on Oct. 7th. But it has since been confirmed that at least 380 of the dead were actually uniformed Israeli soldiers engaged in maintaining the siege of Gaza. After several weeks, the official death toll was reduced to 1200, of which 695 were Israeli civilians, after coroners determined that at least 200 Palestinians, including fighters and average citizens who entered Israeli territory, were included in the original count.

The Electronic Intifada was the first Western outlet to publicize an interview given by a survivor from the Kibbutz Bieri, who recounted how an Israeli tank crew deliberately shelled a home filled with Israeli civilians who had been taken captive on Oct. 7th, knowing they would all be killed.

17:17

Multiple mainstream Israeli and Western papers, as well as Israeli officials themselves, have since admitted that Tel Aviv enacted a mass Hannibal [Directive] on Oct. 7th. Even Ha'aretz, which previously attacked us (at the Grayzone) acknowledged that we were actually right, revealing that the Israeli army employed the Hannibal Directive in at least 3 separate locations inside southern Israel... The paper published an official order that read, "Not a single car can return to Gaza."

18:34

As US mainstream media took its cues from the Israeli propaganda apparatus, repeating obviously dubious narratives and sweeping the lies they were told under the rug when they were eventually exposed, they also refused to report on one of the most shocking aspects of the war: the stated intention by Israeli officials and average Israeli citizens to commit genocide in Gaza.

But for the millions and millions of Americans following the war through social media this horror was impossible to ignore. They couldn't look away from the gruesome, nakedly fascist snuff videos Israeli soldiers were posting on Tik Tok and Instagram from inside the ruins of Gaza.

20:48

Or the viral videos average Israelis posted showing themselves mocking the suffering of Gaza residents with no electricity, water or medicine while trying to survive under siege.
Or the propaganda Israeli media was creating for its own citizens showing children singing in support of annihilating everyone in Gaza.

After decades and decades of grinding military occupation, Israel has become a comprehensively sick society, with masses of citizens primed for the destruction of Palestine. But you'd never know it if you limited yourself to consuming old legacy media.

The US public's initial support for an Israeli military response to Oct. 7th began to dwindle after several months, with polls showing that a strong majority (over 70%) of Democratic voters favored an immediate ceasefire. In the face of this PR crisis, Israel groped for a new propaganda construct...Israel turned to Frank Luntz, a celebrity pollster who in the past had helped the Republican party shape its tax-slashing corporate agenda. He also designed the famous Global Language Dictionary, which advises pro-Israel activists on which focus-tested words and phrases to use to maintain American support for Israel in its war on Palestinians.

This past March I received a tip from a political insider who had attended several briefings Luntz delivered for New York State lawmakers and various influencers. It consisted of slide shows of data Luntz had collected through focus groups he'd conducted on the war in Gaza. In one focus group Luntz asked participants to identify which alleged Oct. 7th Hamas crime upset them the most; a majority responded they were most upset by the claim that Hamas "raped civilians".

So it's abundantly clear that Luntz's research influenced the next stage of Israel's propaganda blitz as Tel Aviv quickly pivoted from beheaded babies and other made-up atrocities to the suddenly discovered plague of systemic rape by Hamas on Oct. 7th.

Col. Douglas Macgregor: Israel is getting slaughtered in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On Ukraine's missile attack on the Nuclear Power Plant in Kursk region:

The Ukrainians launched these missiles ostensibly as an act of desperation. You destroy and potentially damage a nuclear power plant, that has implications for a large region. The good news is the Russians report no radiation leaks and others in the region that are monitoring these say they don't detect any radiation leaks.

This act of desperation is designed, I'm afraid, to do to us in Ukraine what Netanyahu is doing to us in the Middle East, which is to drag in the US. What has to happen in Ukraine is the president needs to shut down this regime. It's dangerous. This is a careless, irresponsible action and we don't want something like this to happen in the future and succeed.


On the nearly 7,000 Americans trapped in Lebanon

We should keep in mind we do have a Marine Expeditionary Unit in the area, almost 6,000 Marines; normally the reason we maintain Marine Expeditionary Units is to rescue American citizens in this kind of situation.

The Israelis have killed 7,000 people in and around Beirut over the last several days. That makes it very difficult for commercial airlines to fly in and pick people up. It's a bad situation and I don't know why we waited this long because it's been clear for some time Netanyahu planned to attack southern Lebanon.


On the status of Israel's incursion into Lebanon

I've been hearing the same thing from my sources, that when the special forces went in on the ground to try and "clear the way", they weren't able to make much progress and many of them were wounded or killed. The troops that came after them were subjected to the same kind of ambush tactics the Israelis saw back in 1982 though these may be worse because of the weapons systems they're using. Someone told me, and this is now a day old, that the Israelis had taken 149 casualties. That may be true. We know the Israeli Defense Minister, when asked about casualties, said "high losses are a cost of fighting this 'just war'."

Other (potential) players

I know from reports that Russian bases in Syria were bombed by the Israeli air force (note below). Not a good way to do business if you're trying to minimize the number of people against you. So Putin has essentially told Israel to get out of Lebanon.

(Note: Clayton clarifies that it was a weapons depot the Israelis struck but I'm not clear from various reports whether it was Russia's or Iran's. Max Blumenthal said yesterday that "Israel struck a weapons storehouse in Latakia on the coast of Syria directly adjacent to the Russian air base at Khmeimim, the largest Russian air base in the Middle East; also near a Russian naval base in Tartus.")

The other group we haven't talked about is the Turks. A million people have already fled Lebanon and guess where they go? They flee to Turkey. The Turks already have 3-4 million refugees from the Syrian war, now they'll get more from Lebanon and the foreign minister said that's unacceptable. I'm getting the impression the Turks are nearing the point of intervening militarily if the IDF doesn't end its operations in Lebanon.

On what Israel's response to Iran will be

The Israelis have not yet responded, which is interesting if the Iranian attack was as strategically irrelevant as they claim. I don't have the Battleground Damage Assessment, I don't get to look at the satellite photography. I'm told that Iran's attack involving 180 missiles, some of them hypersonic, actually damaged airfields and aircraft.

The lack of Israeli response does suggest the Iranians had some impact in that area because they're almost entirely dependent on the air force. That's one of the reasons the Iranians made clear they know where the aircraft are and are going to target them because without close air support for the Israeli army on the ground, they're probably not going to get very far in Lebanon and the Israelis know that.

On what Iran's subsequent response will be

Iran has been listening, as everyone in the Middle East has been listening, to Vladimir Putin and secondarily President Xi and their repeated counsel has been "don't act rashly, exercise restraint, don't give reason for someone to go to war against you." They've listened to this and have now concluded this restraint hasn't worked.

On where the US fits in

I'm sure you've seen the reports that we, through our representatives on the ground over there, had told Hizbullah that we were ready for a negotiated ceasefire with Hizbullah and that was the reason for the meeting. That meeting was identified, found and targeted by our capabilities; without our participation, without our ISR capabilities, our electronic capabilities, the Israelis could not carry off something on the scale you saw in Beirut recently against Hizbullah. Everyone knows that, it may be a secret to the American people that we're that involved but everyone in the region knows it and so does President Putin.

Cyprus and Azerbaijan

And I think Iran has now said, that's it, we're not going to exercise any more restraint and we have the ability to deliver punishing strikes. I've seen estimates that for at least 4 or 5 days Iran could launch 100 missiles an hour against Israel. The Iranians also know where the Israelis will go, i.e., Cyprus, and that's why Erdogan has said "don't try to use Cyprus as a launch pad against Hizbullah, if you do that we'll become involved."

Then there's Azerbaijan, which has been providing oil to the Israelis through Turkey and Erdogan has allowed it to move without interruption. That could end soon because the Turkish population is furious and wants it stopped. And I think the Azeri Turks, whatever their dislikes of Iran, are probably equally sensitive to this. Remember, the Azerbaijani were supported in their last war with Armenia by the Israelis, who helped them with unmanned aircraft.

But the Iranians know the Israelis have been given license if they want to go into Azerbaijan where they can set up, refuel and then launch strikes against Iran. I suspect that if the Israelis do it, Azerbaijan will be drawn into the war unless Erdogan, who's very close to the Azeri Turks in Azerbaijan, intervenes to stop it.

This has always been my concern from the very beginning, the tendency to treat everyone in the region - Arabs, Turks, Persians - with contempt, as though they're some sort of backwater, there's no human capital, there's no sophistication, there's no technology. Well, that is wrong and we're going to get an education the hard way very shortly, and I think it's going to be the death knell of Israel.

In a sane world the President of the United States would intervene: pull the plug on Kiev completely and give Netanyahu 48 hours to come up with a negotiated agreement to end what Israel is doing throughout the region or risk the US walking away and leaving them on their own.

That would require a president who had a clear picture of our true national interests. We have no national interests in a war with Russia or Iran or anyone else in the Middle East. But both Zelensky and Netanyahu are trying to drag us into their conflicts. It needs to stop.

SITREP 10/5/24: Post-Ugledar Landscape Unfurls into Dark Ukrainian Future by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This SitRep has a lot of detail about the fall of Ugledar but the most important part of the post IMO is highlighted below:

But some of Ukraine’s elites are now scrambling for a way to keep the conflict from being frozen, in order to sustain their lives and livelihoods. The method is simple: create a big enough provocation against Russia that Russia refuses any sort of ceasefire. Arestovich also gave a nod to this method in his earlier interview.

Listen carefully to what he says in response to the interviewer asking how Ukraine can positively disrupt any potential ‘peace summits’: (clip)

“Blow up the Kremlin.”

Besides the above, he also names a terrorist attack with large amounts of civilian victims, particularly one on a nuclear power plant. This is precisely Zelensky’s backup plan if the West absolutely pushes him to end the conflict under the duress of withholding further weapons supplies and allowing Ukraine to do provocative “deep strikes” into Russia for the sole purpose of bringing NATO into the conflict.

Here Zelensky himself states that the war is unwinnable without these ‘deep strikes’: (clip)

But one thing is certain, there are deeply radical groups within Ukraine that will not allow any capitulation or negotiations. Journalist Leonid Ragozin highlighted another new Azov statement, for instance, which is a response to the earlier FT article (bold added).

Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Merezhko told FT that the far right will dub any talks with the Russians capitulation and called them “a threat to democracy”.

One can engage in cheap and silly talk about “only 2% of Ukrainians supporting the far right” but they have all the military and political capability to upset any peace and they care little about 98% of Ukrainians. They succeeded in derailing the 2019 Paris agreements between Putin and Zelensky. Together with other far right movements, they staged a menacing campaign to prevent Zelensky from reaching a last-minute deal on the eve of the Russian full-out invasion in 2022. They are a major political and military force that should be reckoned with when peace talks start in earnest. If peace is finally reached, these professional soldiers and especially drone operators will fill up the ranks of organised crime in Europe and beyond.

writing history to avoid repeating it by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

history is written by the winners and given where we are right now, what happens next seems to be of unusual import because these last 5 years have been some strange days indeed.

the simple fact is that 2020-1 was a golden age of state sponsored propaganda (and trust me, we are not out of the woods on this yet)...the chicken little brigades that fell for and cheer led this departure from civility and from reason seem to be adopting a stance of “well, it’s over now,” “it was a long time ago,” and “let’s just forgive and move on” because “the experts meant well and were doing the best they could with uncertain information in a scary rapidly evolving situation.”

flatly, this is unmitigated tripe and apologia for deliberate misbehavior, manipulation, and profiteering.

this was not an accident. this was not uncertainty or “honest errors.” it was deliberate, deliberately dishonest, and done in the most manipulative of fashions with malice aforethought by agencies and agents who specialize in doing exactly that.

you guys know me well enough to realize that my base prior is generally not “conspiracy” but rather “stupidity, cupidity, incentive, and emergent behavior.”

but i think we’re long past the point where one can make that claim about what’s going on with government and its messaging of late.

we’re being attacked.

but señor cat, we already know most if this, it’s old news, old hat. why are you bringing this up again now?

because now is when it matters.

we’re having an election and who wins will, to great effect, determine whether any of what just happened EVER sees the light of day. you cannot fix what you cannot see or what you cannot speak about...

...the scope and reach of the tentacles here passes WAY beyond public health and into all manner of history and the right of dissent.

it comes for speech, guns, borders, elections, schools, culture, and even the idea of facts.

and her imperious world salad queen would not be a president to rein this in, she’d be the one where it REALLY got control because she’s even weaker, dumber, and more puppetable than biden.

y’all know i have no great affinity or even respect for trump, but at least with him we could get a chance to dig out and find some accountability and RFK might be some real help there.

who has the power to expand or curtail agencies, to hold them to account and open them up to daylight or to sweep their misdeeds under the rug is going to matter a lot. worth considering as one evaluates the election.

and if one were seeking a simple heuristic for good decision making, you could do a lot worse than “do the exact opposite of whatever these people tell you to.” (screencap: "Scientists Explain Why 'Doing Your Own Research' Leads to Believing Conspiracies")

@PushBidenLeft: Biden/Harris promised to cancel our student debt. Instead, they're turning on late fees, negative credit reporting, and defaults/collections for millions of voters 35 days before the election. It's not just wrong, it's bafflingly stupid. by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Replies:

Don’t think I’ve ever seen a president sabotage their own party to such an extreme in an election year before

People could buy houses and solar but instead they gotta bleed money forever to enrich the bank accounts of the 1%

How else could they pay for their wars?

Because they've been too busy funding a genocide

This is because our student loan debt got bundled with all kinds of other debt that the billionaires have used to do the shadiest of shit and now they can’t unbundle it without crashing the stock market :)

Max Blumenthal addresses UN Security Council on Ukraine aid by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, that was impressive. And what's so great about his presentation is that he cited mainstream media and government officials for so much of what he laid out.

The resolution just passed by the EU Parliament on Ukraine is a sad illustration of how undemocratic and dangerously deluded it's become. by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Related tweet:

This is truly beyond parody 🤦‍♂️

A MEP argues in EU parliament against prolonging the war in Ukraine.

They immediately cut his mic, and lecture him on how there's "no democracy and no freedom of speech" in Russia...

The resolution just passed by the EU Parliament on Ukraine is a sad illustration of how undemocratic and dangerously deluded it's become. by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Tweet continues:

Undemocratic because it acts against the will of the people. Deluded because it asks for things everyone knows are impossible.

First of all, what do Europeans want? All the surveys are crystal clear (for instance this recent one by @EurasiaGroup👇): approximately two-thirds of Europeans want their leaders to "push for a negotiated settlement for the war in Ukraine".

Yet what does the resolution (which passed with a 425 -131 vote) say?

It calls for "support in every possible way until Ukraine’s victory", which it defines as "allowing Ukraine to liberate all its people, re-establish full control within internationally recognised borders"

In other words, it supports the exact contrary of pushing for a negotiated settlement: it supports a victory of Ukraine until it re-establishes "full control within internationally recognized borders", which by the way include Crimea which Ukraine hasn't controlled in 10 years.

For this purpose the resolution "calls on Member States to immediately lift restrictions on the use of Western weapons systems delivered to Ukraine against legitimate military targets on Russian territory".

In other words, a dramatic expansion of the war: no limits anymore.

And of course, you'll have guessed it: more sanctions! Because sanctions have been working so brilliantly so far...

But what shall we do with the European people who don't want all that?

Not to worry, the resolution has this covered too: it "calls on the European Commission to engage in strategic communication" (a codeword for propaganda) to explain to the people what they ought to think...

This is, of course, completely deluded. There is no expert worth his salt who honestly believes that Ukraine can win and regain all its territory.

The public is correct in thinking that the only possible prospect here is a negotiated settlement that puts an end to the suffering.

The only scenario where Ukraine could potentially have a fighting chance would be if it managed to goad NATO to officially enter the war on its side.

Which by the way is precisely what following the recommendations of this resolution might result in.

Putin said as much: allowing long-range strikes into Russia "changes the very nature of the conflict" and means direct war between Russia and NATO.

But then this is even less what Europeans want and even more deluded: a direct conflict between 2 nuclear powers is potentially a civilization-ending event...

Even at the height of the cold war rulers weren't this irresponsible.

I'm old enough to remember a time when the EU was sold to us Europeans as an instrument for peace and prosperity.

Sadly we're forced to recognize it's instead become the exact contrary: an instrument of war and economic decline, guided by leaders who seem to have lost touch with both reality and the will of their own people.

Israel Commits to Full-Scale War in Lebanon by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've also further solidified their reputation throughout the world as a rogue, terrorist state.

public health as public disgrace by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

meet dr jay varma, NYC’s senior public health advisor, cuomo’s top guy during the “lock down, mask up, and vent till you die.”

and it turns out that like so many others from gavin to SAGE to fancy nanci, it’s always “one law for thee and another for me.”

but here is varma in his own words telling you that he’s an awful person, that he lied, that he did not believe any of his own dictates enough to actually follow them, and that worst of all, he knows this. THAT has impact. that changes minds. it’s objective proof that trust in public health should never be uncritical and that perhaps skepticism even outright distrust constitutes a better base prior.

some have argued that this is unfair or unjust or somehow “dirty” and more akin to spying than journalism.

i heartily disagree.

this is real public interest public service work. this is finding the truth about the people who deign to rule us.

Inside FICO and the Credit Bureau Cartel by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This article is several months old but chock full of information I did not know.

Excerpt:

The director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Rohit Chopra, coined the term ‘junk fee,’ and has begun restructuring how financial markets work, removing medical debt from credit reports, fostering competition in credit cards, and examining big tech’s entrance into payments. And yet, for ideological reasons, to many bankers, Chopra is a villain running a government agency full of bureaucratic demons, whose goal is to force them to do paperwork on behalf of nebulous ‘consumers.’

So it was a weird day last month when Chopra had a room full of mortgage bankers nodding their heads in furious agreement, and even angry at their own trade association for helping a monopoly take advantage of them.

...Chopra went on stage a few hours later and discussed an increasing cost center for banks, which is the credit bureaus and FICO.

“Mortgage lenders in the U.S. increasingly face a lack of competition when it comes to accessing data and reports needed for loan origination,” he said. “In many cases, a handful of firms have cornered the market, allowing those companies to levy a tax on every mortgage application or transaction in the country.” Three firms dominate credit reporting: Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion. And just one company handles algorithms, the Fair Isaac Corporation, which sells the FICO score. “Mortgage lenders have shared that costs for credit reports and scores have increased,” he said. “Sometimes by 400% since 2022.”

Even if a lender thinks the customer would be a good risk, the lender has to buy a FICO score regardless. Mortgage bankers don’t carry the capital to hold the mortgages they make. Instead they make a loan, and then send it onward to the capital markets.

Mortgage bankers aren’t typical Wall Street bankers. While mortgage lending can be done by the big guys, real estate is an inherently localized industry with a clubby network of realtors, title insurers, and various other specialists in the home-buying process, so independent players have a strong foothold. There are roughly a thousand independent mortgage lending firms nationwide, and these lenders live everywhere.

Credit scoring used to cost a relatively small amount of money, but now it can be up to $60 per pull, with the price quadrupling over the last two years for no reason whatsoever. Only one out of every ten prospective customers ends up taking out a mortgage, so higher prices fronted by mortgage bankers add up. And it’s starting to be a major expense, driving some of the mortgage lenders out of the business entirely.

There were two thousand credit bureaus across the U.S. when FCRA passed. By the 1990s, due to this law and to a relaxation of antitrust, they consolidated into three main firms, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion... The credit bureaus, fostered by regulatory choices and consolidation, were the first wave of big data firms, laying the groundwork for corporations like Google and Facebook years later.

These firms aren’t just private entities, but have become key parts of governance. If you want to verify someone’s work and income, for instance, or manage unemployment insurance claims at scale, you use one of these bureaus...

Though contract terms [between the credit bureaus and FICO] are still confidential, some details have come out in an ongoing antitrust suit in Illinois by banks against FICO and the three bureaus. The claim is that the four firms are now a cartel.


(more information and lots more detail at the link)

Bangladesh: A US Coup with Profound Geopolitical Repercussions – OpEd by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Military coups, Counter-coups, assassinations, treachery… the history of the young 53-year-old Bangladesh has more intrigue than a Shakespeare novel. While the repercussions of all the drama have been restricted to South Asia so far, the recent coup has direct involvement of the US.

Bangladesh is a country of 170 million – larger than Russia, Japan or Germany. And it’s strategically located right next to India. While the US has encircled China in the east, the US has no presence in the south. Moreover, the Bay of Bengal region is close to the Malacca Strait and can be theoretically used to disrupt China’s trade. (See map below)

Ideally, the US would like to use Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia to control the Malacca Strait and contain China. However, all those ASEAN countries have refused to be America’s geopolitical pawns, and have explicitly told the US to take a hike in this matter. The next best option for the US is to build bases in the Andaman Nicobar Islands, which overlook the Malacca Strait. These islands, of course, belong to India, which has also staunchly refused to allow foreign military bases in its soil.

The person who was convicted of trying to assassinate [PM Hasina] in 2004 – Tarique Rahman – has been living in London for the last sixteen years. He is also the acting chairman of BNP, the opposition party, which is now poised to rule Bangladesh. This reveals how the West has taken a clear position in the internal affairs of Bangladesh.

Hasina’s biggest geopolitical “crime” – according to the US – was to embrace strategic autonomy. Her government was equally friends with India, Russia, China and the US.

In 2016, Bangladesh joined China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Since then, China has spent tens of billions of dollars in infrastructure projects, loans and aid in Bangladesh. Hasina also enhanced defense cooperation with China – she bought a couple of Chinese submarines and built a naval base with China’s help.

Hasina also invited Russia to build a nuclear power reactor in Bangladesh; and when the US threatened sanctions, she used Chinese yuan to pay Russia. Overall, in just 14 years of Hasina’s rule (from 2008 to 2022), the GDP of Bangladesh grew a whopping 360% – from $100 billion to $460 billion.

Along with that, Hasina wanted to join BRICS. If all those “crimes” were not enough, she refused to let the US build military bases in Saint Martin Island.

In summary, she welcomed neutrality and the multipolar world with too much enthusiasm, which was unacceptable to the US Empire.

A way to beat the blackout? by BobQuasit in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a good idea. However limited the reach of such a campaign, it's taking positive action and it's something most people would be able to do fairly easily.

[MoonOfAlabama] - "West Experiences Blowback From Fostering Fascists In Ukraine" by mzyps in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Katchanovski said that the valorization of the Azov Regiment is comparable to how the West initially supported the predecessors of the Taliban in their fight against the Soviet Union’s intervention in the war in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and also risks inspiring yet more far-right activists from other countries to join the conflict in Ukraine in order to gain military experience, potentially causing a blowback effect if they make it home.

As more people start to think about potential ways to end the war in Ukraine the far-right in Ukraine is threatening to use violence to prevent that:

A serviceman of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign "Madyar" openly and "without drama" threatens the Ukrainian government.

According to him, if someone negotiates with the Russian Federation "not in the interests of the Ukrainian people", then a million fighters will return from the front and overthrow such a government.

Members of Azov and other 'nationalist' groupings in Ukraine are now experienced fighters. The have the means to fight as there are lots of Ukrainian weapons in unaccountable hands (machine translation):

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Russia in Ukraine, more than 270,945 weapons have disappeared or been stolen.

These weapons can be easily smuggled into Europe to target any politician who dares to pressure Ukraine into accepting an end of the war.

The attempted assassination of Trump is only one of the first of such incidents. (The motives for the assassination attempt against the Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico are still unknown.)

In the face of escalating migrant crime and dimming electoral prospects, the German political establishment finally conclude that mass migration may not be so great after all by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For nearly ten years, migration has felt like one of the most intractable problems in our entire political system. However crazy the policies, however contradictory and irrational, there was always only the towering mute wall of establishment indifference.

Suddenly, it no longer feels like that. Over the past weeks, a perfect storm of escalating migrant violence and electoral upsets in East Germany have changed the discourse utterly.

...the failure of of the Eurocracy to limit migration is gradually undermining the credibility of the EU itself. This is because nation states are much better at border security than international bureaucratic behemoths. Should a major EU member state decide that it has had enough of mass migration and elect to close its borders, the migrant pressure on other EU states would increase... A sufficiently fierce reaction could substantially undermine the authority of the EU itself, and would certainly spell the end of the Schengen Arrangement.

Germany, despite all its recent crises and setbacks, is still the dominant industrial nation of the EU, and also its most populous state. By keeping its borders open and enticing migrants with generous benefits, Germany hopes to reduce migrant pressure on its neighbours and prevent the anti-migration chain reaction from getting off the ground.

The problem is that the snake has begun to eat its own tail. The energy crisis and the lunatic anti-nuclear and anti-carbon radicalism of the Greens have taken a huge bite out of German prosperity. Open borders have lost their appeal, Alternative für Deutschland are,pounding at the door, and no amount of staged public freakouts about “the extreme right” can restore the balance.

There are two surefire signs Democrats feel like they're about to eat shit in an election. One is they start complaining about the Green Party and about Sanders voters staying home. Another is they start blaming the voters. by RandomCollection in WayOfTheBern

[–]penelopepnortney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It hasn't been too long, I just noticed it a month or so ago but I got the impression Maniak was not miffed, precisely, but disappointed it took that long for someone to notice.