Is this a good alternative to reddit?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-06T10:53:46+00:00

This is exactly why I switched to this platform. The issue isn't only about free speech. The issue is with the whole moderating culture. Some rare subreddits are ok, but many have literally pages of vague posting rules that are ridiculous to read and impossible to follow.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T19:56:51+00:00

By your definition anyone who doesn't support Liberalism and is a socialist is a Nazi?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-22T19:59:48+00:00

115?? I have seen subs that number in the tens of thousands...like this sub... what is up with it?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-22T10:48:02+00:00

"murders his political opponents" A meaningless accusation

IamCleaver · 2021-10-22T10:51:56+00:00

There is a saying in Russia: if they foreigners detest our leaders, then they are doing something good.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T23:50:06+00:00

True. Are you saying the bottom part is "authoritarian"? What does that mean?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T23:36:48+00:00

It was hard to tell which one is which.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T21:36:08+00:00

Not all answers were mutually excusive. Sometimes I had a hard time picking an answer when two answers seemed to fit.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T21:34:00+00:00

So, according to your model, can you be both communal and hierarchical without being libertarian?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T15:13:15+00:00

Do you prefer the triangle over the compass? I took you test and here is where I ended up. https://crystalvulpine.github.io/PoliticalTriangle-old/results.html?left=2.78&right=7.22&lib=0&answers=l2r1r2r1r2l2r1r2r2r2l1

Just as a comparison, here is where I stand on the traditional 2D compass. https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2?ec=-5.13&soc=1.18

Given that I consider myself a conservative socialist, I expected to end up on the left. How do you define right and left?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T08:56:55+00:00

Somehow, ALL European countries have handed their medical power to the government and are doing just fine.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T02:07:41+00:00

Where I live it isn't mandatory.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T01:20:03+00:00

Oh. I am sorry. I assumed you were American. I am Russian BTW.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:47:05+00:00

Ah. Yes. That does make sense. I just find this particular alignment weird.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T21:24:22+00:00

Municipalities with more freedom? I am all for it. One question though: who will help out poor communities? Who will guarantee that a rich community shares its wealth with the rest? Who will build high-speed trains and other large-scale infrastructure that benefits the whole nation? Who will maintain the military?...you get the point: we need a strong central government non the less. If I were American though, I would advocate for reducing the rights of States and increasing the rights of municipalities while keeping the central government intact.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T19:58:31+00:00

Family values. Societal norms above personal freedom. Respect for traditions. That is the gist. I can give a more detailed breakdown if you want.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T19:56:06+00:00

To you I wish to loose everything dime you have so you would have to rely on welfare to survive. I hope that might teach you a lesson on why we need it. If you do get welfare, you might recover and stand up back on your feet again. Without social welfare, you would probably starve...

IamCleaver · 2021-10-15T23:12:54+00:00

Many subs. And posts got deleted for various reasons. Often they would get deleted by AI. If not then the moderators will come and delete my post because "it is the wrong subreddit for it". Honestly, given that most subreddits have pages worth of vague and arbitrary posting rules, most of my posts got deleted during this stage. The rare few that got past might get deleted the moment I write something other people dislike and my karma plummets...or the moderators personally remove my thread because my opinions are controversial.

I once wrote an essey about my experience with British education system, where in my list of dislikes I casually included open pro-LGBT propaganda in schools. I posted the thread on 4 or five different Britain related subreddits, and it very quickly go deleted everywhere. The funny thing that remark wasn't even the point of my essey...I was trying to get people to explain to me the upsides which I missed.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-10T00:41:44+00:00

Are you drunk?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-09T16:57:34+00:00

what?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T23:36:21+00:00

Which was exactly where I ended up... BTW, what do you mean by hierarchical?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-08T17:05:33+00:00

Ok. This is interesting. So you apply the term "left" and "right" to all spheres of life, both economical and social?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T02:09:35+00:00

I disagree. It can get out of control under certain conditions, but usually it doesn't. Humans are naturally tribalistic. We are adapted to fitting into the society we live it.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T01:10:46+00:00

Because it isn't taking ALL the profit. Just as much as it can get away with while still making the business a valuable asset for its owner. Let me clarify if: I was probably a bit too harsh. A business can provide benefit for a society in multiple ways. Taxes is the most obvious one but others include providing jobs, providing necessary services that a government is unable to effectively provide, etc. The point is: business should exist for the benefit of the society, not the other way round. If the business is not socially valuable in any other way, then at least it should be milked for taxes. Just because somebody is making a profit doesn't mean the business is socially valuable.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T01:02:04+00:00

If a welfare program is being exploited by those who don't need it it is a badly designed welfare program. That should have been accounted for before its implementation. A good example of a safeguard would be giving out food instead of hard cash. Or giving a card that can only be used to buy particular products.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:58:55+00:00

From Google's dictionary: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned OR regulated by the community as a whole" That is at least on of definitions. By this definitions, businesses might not be directly owned by the government, as long as the government is keeping them in check. I believe in strong government regulation of (mostly) privately owned business. If you support a stricter definition of "socialism" then you have that right, but for now, the term fits my meaning, at least in sensu lato.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:53:24+00:00

Our taxes? It isn't our taxes. I might not be paying any taxes because I am a hobo on the street. What good would it be for me if the government were to stop collecting taxes from people and entities who can afford to pay them?

Corporations should only exist for the purpose of producing taxing them. They are the milking cows. When your cow stops producing milk you slaughter it and eat it.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:49:16+00:00

First, no. Secondly I said you should respect the values and customs.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:47:52+00:00

"Socialism is government ownership of business." That is a narrow deffiniton. That isn't what I mean when I say "socialism". The businesses can be owned by anyone (unless it is a strategically important business, in which case the government should indeed have the majority of the shares), but the government should make sure that they are producing as much taxes as possible and that those taxes are benefiting the whole society and providing help for the needy.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:44:22+00:00

Are there any Socialist conservatives? I don't see a contradiction between socialism and conservatism.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:35:17+00:00

Russia. It is a pretty common world view here. It seems to be almost absent in the West from what I have gathered.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:32:40+00:00

I the people like you rare in the US? Are there any influencers who fall in this camp?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:53:30+00:00

"That really needs to stop." That is never going to stop because that is just how humans evolved to operate. We are social creatures who take up the traditions and customs of those around us. We should praise it and accept it.

"With humans, it always is." By your definition perhaps...

"For some people it is" But for most it isn't. The majority shouldn't conform to minority. If it is hard for you but fine for 90% others then tough luck. Seven don't wait for one as the saying goes.

What social norms are you so firmly against anyway. I never found it that hard to follow the norms of the society I grew up in and when I did it was my problem - not that of the society.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:45:41+00:00

"Keep saying that but someday its worst enemy Jesus will return and overthrow the power it unrightfully stole." Or maybe Zeus. Or perhaps Vishnu...it is hard to guess. I prefer to assume non of those guys.

"But I never joined society. I was forced into it, and so was everyone else. We were kidnapped. We are slaves." What? Maybe where you live that is the case, but I personally was BORN into the society.

"If no one can be themselves, if no one can live life, what's the point of living at all?" If by your standard, being yourself is breaking the rules then you are causing more damage to others then they are causing to you (since you are one an they are many). I have no trouble living without causing discomfort to others.

"And what's the point of having a society meant to improve peoples' lives if it ends up making it worse?" The way I see it, a prosperous harmonious society is the key to improving people's lives.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:28:33+00:00

Yes, I understand that, but I was under the impression that you were saying that conservative socialism is somehow against human nature.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:25:21+00:00

Why is that evil? We live in a society. We are its members. The society is the source of morality (because there isn't anyone else). If there is a consensus that wearing a certain element of clothing is unacceptable then don't wear it publicly. Don't make people angry on purpous. As members of the society, I strongly believe it is our duty to conform to its norms. The more a society is homogeneous the less there is room for conflict, the more stable it becomes. Don't rock the boat unless it is absolutely necessary.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:19:54+00:00

The issue is that this arrangement is unique to the west. Where I live, we have the total opposite situation: we have liberal capitalists and conservative socialists (the majority). The are some liberal socialists but I am yet to meet a conservative capitalist.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:15:36+00:00

Can you not "enjoy" the society without going against it?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:14:36+00:00

"How do you define socialist?" In broadest terms, for me, a socialist is someone who believes that the economy should serve the society and not the other way round.

"This could range from GOP's minimum wage to communist tyranny." You can overdose on anything, communism is the extreme form of socialism which has been proven not to work. I am not a fan of minimal wage. Not because I don't am against minimal income but because it promotes illegal hiring to circumvent it. It is much better to tax the companies and redistribute the income through various means to the needy.

"Extremist far "Left" Social Justice Warrior cult." From what I have seen it seems that anyone who is economically a socialist tends to at least sympathise with these ideas. I would be glad to be proven wrong.

"This could range from the Moonies to all religions." What makes all religions better then the moonies? I have no hostility to Zoroastrianism, but when it comes to Abrahamic religions I see them as a huge burden on the society.

"What about corporate media and celeb "conservatives"?" What about them? I don't exactly know what you mean. I am not from the US.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T21:24:50+00:00

What are you trying to say?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T20:57:58+00:00

Ok then. I am a SOCIALLY conservative socialist. I believe that the societal norms and traditions are above the wishes and freedoms of individuals. That doesn't mean that the individual is irrelevant, but one should not do what is considered socially unacceptable. You are free to express yourself as you wish as long as the society at large doesn't disapprove of it.

What do you mean by "corporations"? As in private commercial companies? I believe they should never be allowed to have any say in matters of politics and the society. Their sole function should be the generation of wealth that could then be taxed and used by the government for the good of the society. I completely agree that individuals should have more rights than corporations.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-16T11:33:42+00:00

I have heard about the horrors of asian schools. Thankfully, neither Russia nor the UK are like that (although Russia does require more memorisation , often excessively, particularly when the teacher isn't good). One positive thing I noticed about the British system is that the teaching quality doesn't depend as much on the teacher herself. Maybe the teachers are better trained in general, maybe the bad teachers don't stay for too long in the UK, but I remember only two teachers who made their subjects unbearable. In Russia it is always hit and miss. The teacher is the deal-breaker

IamCleaver · 2021-10-16T10:52:59+00:00

Does the actual teaching approach change once you are past GCSEs?

IamCleaver · 2021-10-15T23:14:42+00:00

I would have liked your comment if I could, but you are literally saying what I was thinking.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-09T12:25:28+00:00

BTW, what do you mean by hierarchical

IamCleaver · 2021-11-09T11:13:31+00:00

Ok, fair enough. I like that.)

IamCleaver · 2021-10-16T10:50:20+00:00

Given how reddit is toxically liberal it is a breath of fresh air.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-31T11:24:34+00:00

"Suffering for the rest of your life" More like for a day or two with a slight fever. I trust my country's ministry of healthcare.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-31T11:13:24+00:00

"There is no "free market"."Very true. That is why I support tight government regulations.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T09:08:23+00:00

"judgemental" So?

"Not everyone is able" Most are.

"or willing" if you aren't "willing" than it is YOUR problem, not mine.

I repeat my question: "What is it you are doing that makes everyone so angry"

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T09:00:15+00:00

I wouldn't mind it that much. I would take the vaccine tomorrow if I were to get at least a hundred dollars for it. Not having access to free healthcare and having to take loans to go to university is a much bigger deal for me.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T08:57:15+00:00

You blind faith in the market is unsettling.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T02:13:17+00:00

Capitalist? I don't usually use this term but the opposite of socialist. Free market. Reducing government involvement in the economy. Against social welfare, free healthcare etc.

Liberal? Somebody who puts the freedoms and needs of an individual above social norms, traditions and needs.. Supports LGBT, feminism, gender non-conformism...

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T01:53:25+00:00

"Ripe for rampant abuses." How so? Most countries manage to do with a single, nation-wide legal system just fine. "...collectively..." That is what the national parliament is for.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T01:15:21+00:00

"you can only allow a central government to be strong if the nation has a strong, nationalist leader." True. The system should promote strong nationalist leaders.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:42:32+00:00

"Tyrants." Sounds like a straw man.

"How's this suit you?:" Not really. I would want to live in a unified nation. I would prefer something like this:

Strongest: National

Weakest: State

Strong: Municipality

If I were American, I would want unify the criminal code for all states and hand the authority over it to the central government. Same for education standards. Healthcare, universities and highways should be handles by the States, but that is pretty much it.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-30T00:16:53+00:00

"Yeah, tell me about why you chose to be born. Oh right, you didn't, nor did you choose where, from what parents, your sex, your genetics, your looks, your talents, or anything." Well, If you don't like being born than go hang yourself (don't! I am not promoting suicide, just making a point). If you were born and raised in a society then you should have automatically picked up on its traditions and norms. Respect them.

"They will attack me for not being identical to them" Unless you really stand out in a way that is unacceptable nobody cares. What is it you are doing that makes everyone so angry (a genuine non-rhetorical question, you got me intrigued)? If you are not causing anyone discomfort then nobody should attack you.

" A collective is merely the sum of its individuals, thus the individual is what matters." I don't get that leap of logic. The collective is indeed the some of its individuals. It is the mean opinion of all its members on all matters important to them. Unless you have a very divided, unhealthy society, the majority of people should share the majority of values. The minority conforms to that collective majority.

Obviously, those few who really stand out in a way that the majority sees as unacceptable, would not like this arrangement. But they are just that. The few; the minority. Seven don't wait for one. If the majority finds it offensive for men to dress like women, then nobody should dress like a women.

IamCleaver · 2021-10-29T23:27:22+00:00

Well, if you grew up in it so you probably should share most of its values and customs. Respect them. Besides, unless it is a very unhealthy prescriptive society, it really isn't that hard to follow social norms.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T15:05:05+00:00

Again, that is why we need the state to control it.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T15:02:20+00:00

"When you say "less fortunate", or otherwise claim that fortune is the reason someone has more, then YOU are saying they didn't earn it."

No I don't. That is a false conclusion you drew so it would fit your argument. I largely don't care how worthy somebody is of having wealth. All I care is that he, being wealthier then others for whatever reason , would help others improve their well-being.

If he isn't going to share his wealth with the rest of society, what need does the society have for him? Why shouldn't the society simply expropriate everything? If he isn't serving his function in the society, if he doesn't want to be a part of it, if he doesn't want to share, if he os not part of the team WHY should the society provide him with security and protection???

Of you are not part of the group, you are an outsider, and if you are an outsider, what moral reason dors the society have not to simply take everything away from you???

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T14:52:42+00:00

To prevent all that from happening, we have welfare where the "strong" take care of the "weak" and try help them get stronger.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T14:48:43+00:00

You are putting words into my mouth. I don't care whether they "earned" it or not. They have more, therefore they can afford to share more and that is all I care about.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T14:34:56+00:00

That is what every capitalist thinks until an angry mob reminds him of his true place with a pitchfork.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T13:03:11+00:00

If it wasn't for the society, he would be in Savannah chasing his week's meal. If it wasn't for the society, anybody with a bigger stick would be able to take everything away from him. We are social creatures. We live in a civilization without which we would be nothing more than hairless apes walking on back legs.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:59:36+00:00

Stealing is taking in secret something that doesn't belong to me. Until the wealth has been taxes it isn't yours. The society (represented by the state) takes the share it deems fair in the form of taxation, and lets you keep the part that is now yours. Feel free to do with it what you want.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:56:23+00:00

I don't see how it is relevant. A thief breaks tho society's rules.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:54:47+00:00

I don't need to because I don't see how it is relevant. It could be one or the other or a mixture of both. The point is that I still believe that those who are better of owe it to those who are less fortunate.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:52:40+00:00

Depending on what you mean by "lazy" and "provide". I believe that food, shelter, basic education, security and healthcare are human rights that every citizen must have access to regardless of anything. If a person simply doesn't want to work then he should still be provided with food and a bed in a clean and safe environment. If your economy can afford it, then swap "bed" for "room". Healthcare includes psychiatric help and education includes helping someone find a job.

Other then that I say the society shouldn't needlessly waste resources on those who simply refuse to give back despite being able to.

A lot of things that a society should provide isn't direct support of individuals. We should be building fairer cities that can be navigated without a car. Mixed neighborhoods that prevent the growth of economic segregation, cheap, high quality public transport etc.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:30:42+00:00

But it is not free and you are deluding yourself by using that language.

You are the one deluding yourself. Free is something you don't pay for. There is no other definition.

"working harder" Or is perhaps lucky. Regardless, we are all part of the same society and must provide for the less lucky. Those who want to hoard the wealth for themselves with delusional thoughts that they earned it themselves should to jail and lose their ill-gotten gains.

"The reality is that rich people avoid taxes" As I said, the US has a terrible taxation system. That is not an excuse to stop taxing at all. I would primarily tax corporations - not private individuals.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:24:46+00:00

I am not from north america, but even then not everyone is eating healthy where you live. You have terrible urban environment, very unequal education, NO FREE HEALTHCARE!!!!. In the 21 century it is ridiculous. As long as some person doesn't have access to free healthcare you should bleed the greedy bastards with taxes.

"make something of themselves" The society allowed that him to grow wealthy. No it is time for him to repay his debt.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:10:05+00:00

We agree on something. I guess now we only need to agree how much freedom and where is too much.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T12:08:24+00:00

"Your birthright is that which your father provides you, and citizenship. That's it." Sincerely disagree with that. I was born into the society and it owes me as much as I owe it. A society that owes me nothing is a society that I will not be part of.

First, I don't turn my nose away from private initiatives (charities?). I am all for them as long as they are in addition to and not instead of the state programs. You see, a charity is just that: a charity. It can help you but it forces you to rely on other people's kindness. That is degrading. If I am in need I the help is my right. I shouldn't come begging to some charity. I should be able come proud banging my fist on the table. I am a member of the society and I am in need - it should be the state's duty to help me.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T11:42:31+00:00

"They simply want as much freedom and autonomy as possible" I am not sure that is what I want. Freedom is good, but too much freedom in wrong areas may lead to chaos and social anarchy. That is not what I want.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T11:13:58+00:00

"Why do you call it free when it isn't free?" I am not paying for it therefor it is free for me. The people who are paying for it are those who can afford to (at least that is how it should be). A rich person isn't going to starve if you tax him so there is nothing immoral in making him share his wealth with those who need it more. A rich person is a part of the society. A society that has allowed him to get rich. He owes that society for that. Marxists-Leninists would say that we ought to take away all his riches and redistribute them equally. I am more liberal in this regard. I say that as long as the richer people do their duty and support the poorer ones by paying taxes, they should be allowed to keep their wealth as a "reward" for having generated it. Everyone must do their duty for the good of the society as best they can. The poorer ones do their duty by working and the richer do their duty by by managing wealth production and paying taxes.

"forcing one person to pay for the benefit of someone else" If this someone else needs it more, it is our duty to make the rich person share instead of hoarding his wealth for his greedy self.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T11:04:45+00:00

"Not providing all your wants" My state provides me with most of what I believe is my birthright. It could be of higher quality and that is worth trying to achieve, but at least it is something.

"It's the fact that the government always provides a very poor value for the money that is taken which makes for the most compelling argument to limit government as much as possible, not to expand it with infinite welfare programs." That is the most ridiculous argument I have heard. If the state is inefficient at helping people then we shouldn't help people at all? If you were in need, would you rather you were helped inefficiently or not helped at all? The whole point of having a government is to redistribute wealth. Tax the rich, support the poor. It is its primary function, this and law enforcement. Besides, a lot of inefficiencies can be easily removed with better planning.

"very poor value for the money" If you know a better way of redistributing money to the needy I would be glad to hear it.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T09:59:22+00:00

"The only apparent difference in what we have and what you want is the amount of welfare and wealth redistribution." Of cause. Welfare is key. How the wealth is created is irrelevant. Free healthcare, free (yet meritocratic) education, accessible housing, high quality (preferably free) public transport. What is the point in supporting the state if it doesn't support you back as best it can?

I am not sure what you were trying to say in your first paragraph. Are you saying that what I want isn't socialism but some form of capitalism? In which case, I really don't care how someone calls it - I care about the substance. What would you call it?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T09:46:20+00:00

With that attitude you wouldn't get far in life

IamCleaver · 2021-11-02T00:15:08+00:00

I am not talking about Luke. I am talking about how I dislike how autocratic leaders are being automatically assumed to be evil.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T23:49:27+00:00

"It's not society that should make those decisions, it's the mall owners." Ok. Replace the mall with the park. BTW, I say the mall owners should have no say in how their customers dress. That is not their business.

"No good will come from it. " A healthy society with healthy families and a healthy population growth. The total sum of human happiness increases.

"Some are good, some are pointless, and some are bad." Who are you to decide which ones are which?

"be proud of your nation" Let me rephrase it for you: be a patriot.

"nor is it even close to worth what was taken from us." It is not for us to put a price on our duty.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T23:44:30+00:00

"My mere existence does not affect you unless I start bothering you" True. Innocent until proven guilty. As long as I don't see or hear you breaking social norms I wouldn't care.

"I'm not surprised you hate Christianity too" Why should I like it? A antihuman religion of bronze age savages.

"Which is why capitalism is superior. " Capitalism refers to the control over means of production. Private or public. It has nothing to do with social norms.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T23:33:01+00:00

I think that is the very definition of a political strawman. The emperor is evil as to make democracy look good. I myself despise (liberal) democracy.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T23:30:21+00:00

The truth is not good nor bad. It is what it is.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T23:29:15+00:00

The term isn't "conspiracy", the term is "conspiracy theory".

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T21:56:00+00:00

The emperor of star wars is a caricature of what liberal-democrats see as evil. I see liberal democracy themselves as the ultimate evil.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T21:53:38+00:00

I know mine

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T21:48:36+00:00

Of cause you need that. Nobody says that the government should be able to come and take your property... just tax you out of existence if it deems so necessary.

As long as business has no say in politics, pays its taxes and adheres to government policies it should be left to its own devices.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:31:46+00:00

"especially when they have not been wronged" Not following the socially accepted norms wronging others. You don't go naked to the mall even if it is a hot day. The society does not approve of it and you conform to that regardless of what you think of it yourself.

"morals or principles to live by" No morals or principals that you agree with you meant to say... My morals are simple and straightforward: perform your gender roles, support your family, respect your traditions, be proud of your nation, make sure everyone in you society does their part. In return, you nation owes you your basic amenities, security and protection when you need it.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:24:41+00:00

I am not interested in anecdotal reports and conspiracy theories.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:23:33+00:00

"Did you know it's illegal to live off the grid?" What? Not where I live.

"But what does order accomplish except to benefit the elites?" Benefits everyone else who are happy to live a quite life? To me, stability and predictability is the ultimate value. Stability is the soul of prosperity. Those who rock the boat damage that stability threaten that prosperity: my prosperity.

"I also find it interesting how you are almost exclusively obsessed with gays and "men dressing like women"." This is what bothers me most in the West. Those kinds of abominations. I would also want to eradicate Abrahamic religions, but given the choice of one, I would prioritize preventing LGBT/feminism etc.

"A city is made up of thousands of separate properties" What has property to do with anything? It is a city of thousands of INDIVIDUALS you wanted to say? I agree. It is not only up to me to decide. It is up to the whole crowd. If the crowd (society) agrees on something then the few non-conformists should go fuck themselves.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:16:24+00:00

"nfiltrators, false flags, and other ways they can manipulate you into being their tools of oppression." What?

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:15:35+00:00

Natural Law

That would entitle me to form a tribe and try to take you out. THAT is out natural state. Do you want that?

"Fuck all intolerance" Tolerance is weakness.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:13:28+00:00

The truth is the truth. It is what it is. We should accept it and act accordingly.

IamCleaver · 2021-11-01T00:12:05+00:00

"tax payers are paying for it" Good. If they have the money to spare they should pay their taxes which could be used to help the needy.

"And it is a distraction not a tool they use to better themselves." Another conspiracy theory? You are using it right now.

IamCleaver