you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (25 children)

if they didn't control the country in the 40s why did USA enter WWII

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

FDRs cabinet was full of Jews who pushed for war with Germany. Lindbergh and Coughlin of America First, the pre-eminent anti-war organization in the US, were taken out by pro war Jewish media. Kevin McDonald's writes about this in the preface to The Culture of Critique.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yep and rosenfeld was jewish himself

so yeah they controlled USA at that point

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Name me the jews on his cabinet.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Look them up yourself.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and Germany declared war.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

FDR cut Japan off from its oil supply, an act that he knew meant war.

He also fought an undeclared war against Germany in the Atlantic. It was mentioned in the declaration of war.

All so the bankers' investments in Europe could be saved. Germany sure wasn't going to pay back those loans.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The reason he did this was due to Japan's threat to American and Western influence in Asia aswell as Japan's brutality in the chinese war and he had reason to be hostile to Germany and wanting to assist the UK.

[–]Chipit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Apologia of warmongering. Way to defend the powerful there.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The US was getting involved in the global economy after their success in the first world war, especially in Britain and Western Europe. German dominance of these regions would mean american economic interests would be cut off hence why the US offered the UK material support in the atlantic war. Germany's jingoist outlook under the nazis and their agreement with the Soviets also put the 2 nations on negative terms.

[–]Chipit 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, now you're defending the banks. Go ahead! Try for a three-fer of the intersection of power and oppression! Be the chud whisperer!

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The US was getting involved in the global economy after their success in the first world war

Before it too.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nonsense. More official excuses.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

FDR cut Japan off from its oil supply, an act that he knew meant war.

Devil's advocate, by why does America have an obligation to supply any country with oil in war time?

Not that I support either side in the Japan/China conflict (especially as China would go on to become Communist which was far worse), but from a neutrality point of view, America helping Japan violated that.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Because cutting a country off from its energy supply is an act of war. War is bad, mmmkay?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Because cutting a country off from its energy supply is an act of war.

Japan doesn't own America. If they want oil, they could always build their own pumps, or buy it from someone else.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

OK now you are just deliberately trolling. Build their own pumps, uh-huh. That would have done it.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So you really believe Japan had rights to America's natural resources? I like Japan but I'm not stupid. Like I said, they should have addressed that problem earlier on, rather than trying to fight a two-front war against both China and the U.S.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not only did Roosevelt break trade treaties which were mutually beneficial with the Japanese because of his pathetic and misguided affection for the Chinese he collaborated with British and the Dutch and their eastern colonies to do the same. In other words Japan a country reliant on imports to maintain its industrial and war economy was now left with no ther choice than to attack. There was now effectively a total embargo on imports vital for them sustaining their nation. That is an act of war. Plain and simple.

Of course this is exactly what Roosevelt, Stimson and others wanted -- this is all well known now and even mainstream historians acknowledge it -- and its exactly what they got. Your points about 'Why don't they just build their own pumps' and 'well America doesn't have to sell its oil to anyone' are bizarre and totally miss the bigger picture.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't deny that Japan wanted their oil. I just deny that they have an inalienable right to it.

Of course any future enemy would use this to their advantage, because it's treated as leverage.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

why did japan bomb pearl harbor

we were already at war, question is why

Wer should have been allies with germany and maybe then germany wouldn't have been desperate to make allies with idiots like the italians and delusional japanese.

Why did germany start the war? It was because of the results of WWI and the great depression. Caused by jews.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Planned about by Prince/King Edward in the 1800s. Queen Victoria was a reclusive junkie and her son was a rarity: intelligent, driven, and merciless (whereas most leaders are virtually useless puppets). He lead the globalists plan for the two world wars though he didn't live to see them both.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Japan bombed pearl harbor in retaliation for US sanctions, which were in response to the threat Japan posed to American and Western interests in Asia as well as the brutality of Japan's invasion of China.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yep and why?

oil

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The UK's sanctions and blockades forced Japan to take action dragging the reluctant USA into the war.

/u/Popper