‘A Portrait of the Breakdown of Hope and Meaning in America’ New documentary about incel culture. by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is this another piece, pittying those poor males while either ignoring or playing down the plight of women and girls? Women who are still not out there, despite everything, killing and abusing moids en masse? Because I really can't stand another one of these pathetic pieces. How are men supposed to solve their very own problems when they can't even be honest with themselves? They should rot in their eternal self- declared victim state while the women continue to work on/ fight for themselves (i mean hopefully we do, at least some are starting to get a grip, although there are still enough handmaidens out there).

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

What percentage of violence is committed by men. by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What are you trying to accomplish here, starting some unnecessary drama an play us off against each other? We obviously do and can have different opinions and might discuss stuff, and that is okay. So what if some people are more direct or not as "nice" and mellow as others would like them to be. I still have seen much more mutual support in female only groups than what you claim to be common in such settings. If you are a male trying the good old divide and conquer game: sorry, it is not working.

The loving husband. by Lady_Montgomery in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The part where she thinks she is into rough sex because "it helps her feel powerful" (and of course the loving husband helps her with that, he is an abuser who gets off of her trauma) is fucked up, and a therapist should know that, but oh well... psychology and therapy has always been a tool to brainwash women. You always should be very critical of your therapists and doctors.

What percentage of violence is committed by men. by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am sorry, maybe I didn't made it clear enough that my statements above were meant sarcastically (no 2 especially). They were in relation to the nonsense written on this poster to explain the behavior of violent males (lol conditioning) and still claiming being a "real man" is something good. Maybe it is because my English (notmyfirstlanguage) could be better. I am xx.

Teen rapes kitten and denies all responsibilities. - I have no hope left. by Lady_Montgomery in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  1. Of course the male vet did not document what really happened, these males cover the crime of their own just not to look too bad.
  2. Ashamed and done of all the" human race" and "people" again? it is MALES, the one girl here was caring and helped the cat.
  3. Yeah sexual education won't help here. If anyone needs more education (inclusive REAL sexual education) it is girls.

Remember, he’s someone’s Son, Dad, nephew. by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very accurate meme.

Moid logic: denying men sex is domestic violence and justifies murdering women by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But in nature not all males are even meant to be able to have Sex and procreate. Only the fittest are able to procreate.

What percentage of violence is committed by men. by Happy_face_caller in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Let's lose the tough guise and start being real men."

  1. As if all that violence is only conditioned behaviour, and not consistent throughout human history everywhere on earth (and some of our nearest animal relatives as well).
  2. But being a "real man" is very different than that, because obviously being a man can't be anything than a glorious thing!

The sub that mass reported us now goes after gay men..... by RadioSilence in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If this ever happens, yes the game might be over for them, but guess who will be blamed for all that fuckery? Women and "feminism" of course.

Male depravity - (x-post from fds) by catharticoverdrive in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No they just really write, talk and think like that. They are just showing what is truly going on inside their thick skulls.

Announcing /s/Gender_Critical: An women's ideology-neutral alternative to /s/GenderCritical for discussing gender and female prosperity by [deleted] in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How is it going to be different from GenderCritical?

Ignore the men by Smurfette in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, but opposing views from women would be welcome to me, how else can this be a debate sub as interesting as the original one used to be. Don't know how this will be possible with all the males inevitably coming here and trolling, the reddit sub had a huge problem with those despite the banning optins there. So let's see how this will work out here.

Husband’s ignorance leads to an unhealthy woman having to put her body through a risky, potentially damaging pregnancy. So quirky and silly of him! Haha :) by its1342 in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"people" ??? This is typical male bs. "So funny quirky I am for no empathy for my fuckdoll-babyfactory rofl ".

Ignore the men by Smurfette in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Educating and sharing with males is what mainstream feminism always tries to do and it never leads to owhere. We don't need males to "find solutions" (lol as if they know everything better about our experience, they will only try to impose their views without even trying to understand your arguments first just as we all have experienced it before). Educating males: You are not their nannies. They can do their own research or just read what women have to say before asking question or bringing up points that have been discussed and refuted in radfeminism of bpfeminism 101 already a million times already. Like a group of scientists discussing their topic of research do not need to talk to religious antivavccers at the same time or "educate" them. There might be places specially dedicated to such debates, but it makes no sense in any way to let any fringe outsider spout their bullshit at all times. Focus on women, don't engage in discussions with people who just want to engage in bad faith.

Female Narratives: Irena Sendler by radfem in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why have I never heared about that woman, she is such a hero! Please keep those posts comming (and maybe make a blog or something?). I love them so much! So many women go unrecognized or are ignored my history, I think your series is great enrichment for PPF.

Not my gendercritical by DustyKitten in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is also noteworthy that the male comments usually got very much upvoted, and if some of them would happen to make useful or insightful comments some women would also write things like "This is the most intelligent thing I have ever read" when women already made those points before (Litterally! I have really seen this over there!) I think a lot of women are still conditioned to see males as some sort of intellectual authority, and they do not want to question themselves enough about their interlalized sexism. When a male shows some sympathy for women, even if just performative, these kinds of women are gushing because they feel so validated by a man, and it seems that this is the most important thing for them. i don't mean to demean those women because they pften aren't aware of their responses, but people need to be more self- aware about those things especially in feminism (or when dealing with other conditioned behaviours and reactions like with racism). You want to change something in the world? Do some really hard self- questioning first. Sorry about my English at the moment, I am tired.

Eventually they'll just call women numbers to make it even less gendered by russkayacabbage in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

So they suggest using "Internal Organs" instead of Uterus/Ovaries, but the bad word suddenly is okay to use instead of Period/Menstruation, as they suggest to use "Uterine Bleeding" but then a woman is supposed to be called "Person who menstruates"... wow.

Also the disparity between "Person who menstruates" and "Person who pr o d u c e s sperm doesn't sit well with me at all! The adequate counterpart to a "Person who produces sperm" would be a "Person who produces ovule" (But maybe this is not passive and dehumanizing enough in comparison to males, just like "Birthing persons" sounds somewhat passive and ridicculous). What would be a more fitting counterpart to a person who menstruates? Maybe a person who ejaculates?

Not my gendercritical by DustyKitten in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't get it either, as if there aren't places to discuss these topics together (we even had some men ppst on GC or women post on GCG), or as if we were soo hard on males. Libfemmy sugarcoating and coddling of male egos did NEVER actually get us anywhere. So why do some women need to associate themselves with males all the time, as if discussing and being with "only" women for once isn't enough for them? A group being mainly female always has a very special dynamic, and if enough women can make positive experiences with such groups this can be very empowering for them and their self- confidence. This helps them in participating in mixed spaced as well. As a young woman, I hardly had this chance any more in real life. I absolutely hate it when some women turn up and moan about the lack of males, as if we need their validaton and authority all the time.

Some good things that have come from this... by reallylovesguacamole in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The new fascist movement comes with an disturbing entitlement of feeling morally superiour and "woke", and anyone (especially women) with a dissenting opinion is a cruel subhuman nazi bigot terf totally deserving of vicious bullying and the most cruel violence because MoRaLiTy. Now lets all together shout some slogans or else...

We are the minority here!!! by DustyKitten in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, we might be the minority here for now, but does that mean we should once again leave all the space to males? We need to spread our opinions just as well. Spinster is fine, but is doesn't have the reach all the mainstream sites have and we need to reach outsider and as many women as possible.

From Reddit by LisbonMuse in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why? Because hate against women is okay, it always has been the norm everywhere throughout history, and women's pain never counted anyhow. But women speaking up? Wow, that must be painful for them.

r/BanFemaleHateSubs is banned. here is the list : by AlissonHarlan in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because you know women and their imaginatory privilege, let's shit on them and promote misogyny and pretend like males never act as badly. Totally okay. \s Btw. how about all those males getting away with vicious violent crimes, CP and all sorts of abuse? Penispass anyone?

From Reddit by LisbonMuse in BlackPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I was not super active over there, but I was often reading the sub. Is anyone here in the BPF discord and has contact with some of the old members and mods? It would be awesome if they joined us here as well.

Sub rules & SaidIt rules by [deleted] in PinkPillFeminism

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it is a bit harsh, having to state that dissenting opinions are being removed, this is not how the original PPF or even GC worked, and this is not a healthy way to develop a community. But a general consensus sometimes is important for any fruitful further discussion, so how can we solve that issue?

Argument with boyfriend last night about Reddit's censorship of women, and he called me a transphobe by sosorreal in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Am I fucking crazy? Am I bigot? Am I bad person? I literally wanted to die last night because I could not tell up from down

So you actually do care about other people and just want to be fair to everyone? How can you think you are a bad person then, even if you hold an opinion that might offend some. On the other hand how can your boyfriend make you feel so bad because your opinion is different than his? An opinion about a topic that deeply affects YOU as a woman? If he had even an iota of real respect and would really see you as an equal he at least would be willing to you and discuss the topic rationally, without name-calling and without gaslighting you.

There's some censorship going on in the newly popular feminist subs and it needs to be openly addressed. by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't know that means that anyone can now join any discussion and dumb the discussion down as they please. Let's go to any science sub and talk about flat- eart then. Or maybe subs should actually be allowed to make their own rules and set their own standards, and people who wish to discuss the topic from another point of view can make another sub? If scientists wish to debate flateartehrs they could male a sub XdebatesY, which GC and other feminists actually had on reddit.

There's some censorship going on in the newly popular feminist subs and it needs to be openly addressed. by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]badMADam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe give the mods something like that free reign but impose community oversight.

Yeah something like that should be possible. While I completely agree that censorship is shitty and general discussion shoul be allowed and encouraged, I also think in practice this is difficult to realize on such a platform. Some smaller communities (lets say a sceptical atheis community) might be in danger by being completely overrun by a mayority of other pissed of communities with different views (lets say a plethora of religious groups concern trolling, or even "academic theologists offering the same opinions again and again to be "discussed") and as there never are black and white truths out there in the end such subreddits just become battlefields subjected to stupid power- plays, when they were meant to be for a specific community who wants to explore or develop their own argumentations (if you know what I mean). In the end this would just again mainly further and promote opinions that are mainstream anyhow.

Maybe you could see the whole thing like different sports teams, they need to play and train together and not make nonsensical mixes (like we have two ballet dancers training with five football players). But then they can meet in a neutral field of play to compete under fixed and fair rules. This is why I think subs should be allowed have their own rules as long as they are transparent, no trolling and brigading should be allowed, but we can have some battle/ discussion subs where different factions can confront each other.

Argument with boyfriend last night about Reddit's censorship of women, and he called me a transphobe by sosorreal in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or being with a person who never takes your views seriously enough to even look into them but just keeps insisting he is right. Do you think that person really sees you as an equal?

There's some censorship going on in the newly popular feminist subs and it needs to be openly addressed. by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is why they had the ask GC or ask PPF subs, for questions from outsiders, but having to refute and discuss the same really stupid assumptions and questions IN the actual subs just took away from the discussions, mostly those "skeptics" aren't adding anything of value and could answer their question just by reading the recommendated resources first. It is not about "knowing" you are right but about already having had a deeper analysis about a topic and then some wannabes who "know it better" come in, bring exactly the already refuted arguments again and keep discussing stupid shit. Again, those subs actually had extra discussion for this, which most subs do not have.

None of my subs got banned by Turnaround in Introductions

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't want to have weeks on end of posts about sexual harassment and crap in there. All of a sudden every male player whose >looked sideways at a female is being slammed

Big lol, because that is a problem created by males, and if you don't like it more males should stand up against bullies instead of calling themselves "simps". Cry me a river about your victimhood, the bullying still is more evil than this poor innocent strawman you made here. Great that there are still women out there who enjoy computer games despite those fucking bullies, and males trying to cry "WoMeN AnD ThEiR ViCtIm CoMpLeXeS" when they just talk out about this phenomenon while crying for being such victims (ooH I cant even look at women any more) are hypocritical irrational weaklings.

Welcome to Saidit btw, where people are allowed to participate despite consenting opinions. Don't like mine? Accept it or go back to Reddit.

Argument with boyfriend last night about Reddit's censorship of women, and he called me a transphobe by sosorreal in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is crazy that you would need to put in so much effort (writing a fucking essay so he doesn't need to do anything by himself?) instead of just being able to give him your points and him either thinking them through on his own like a grown up, or doing some extra research if he really wants to refute your points or if he is sceptica. Actually it is okay to be sceptical of an opinion from a person you respect, but how would you react in this case? Go doing some research if the topic is important to you and then discuss it with your partner maybe or resort to name- calling. But hey, at least he agreed to read an essay you made about it. I am curious how he would react to the essay. But thb even if he finally saw your points I would then leave this person, as I wouldn't see it as my job to "educate" any person with so much effort on anything important to me because they refuse a normal discussion.

I mean writing an essay for yourself is great, but lol at his "generosity" that he might read it, how very courteous of his highness?

Argument with boyfriend last night about Reddit's censorship of women, and he called me a transphobe by sosorreal in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is sweet in ways and tries

Really? Why is it then, the moment he would truly need to show he respects you, he fails so miserably in doing so? Acting sweet and all that is easy, but it is through actions like this that he shows how he truly respects you as a person with their own thoughts. Or does he truly think you are an awful bigot or you are not as intellectual capable as he is and therefore you can't evaluate the things going on in a way he could and so he just doesn't need to believe you?

Coming From Gender Critical by [deleted] in Introductions

[–]badMADam 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No worries, this will be our new home.

To all the men already here by bananasaft in GenderCritical

[–]badMADam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No GC still was a forum mainly by and for women, this IS one of the reasons why it worked so well. For men there is r/GenderCriticalGuys (same content, still on reddit).