all 6 comments

[–]badMADam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think it is a bit harsh, having to state that dissenting opinions are being removed, this is not how the original PPF or even GC worked, and this is not a healthy way to develop a community. But a general consensus sometimes is important for any fruitful further discussion, so how can we solve that issue?

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Why would it be harsh to state that dissenting opinions are being removed if they're being removed?

I guess the other option is to not remove dissenting opinions and instead stick to the pyramid of debate and the topics at hand, allowing anyone who wants to, to weigh in from their perspective.

I think if it's going to be an XX space like the original PPF then that needs to be stated though and you'd still need to take it off /all, even if dissenting opinions from female people are not removed.

[–]MenAreFragileBabies 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You need to be able to kick men off the sub, or at least remove their shit. Otherwise they'll just try to invade this space too.