What are the arguments for segregation?

submitted by KimiORabu from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Yeah, so both of you are idiots who think our lives should revolve around race and social classes instead of treating people like people.

This was the conservative position and still sort of is on this issue. But more and more people are abandoning it for an excuse to fight.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

We don't want to fight. We just want self determination. Africa for africans, Europe for Europeans, Asia for asians, etc

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Why is that necessary, to separate and exclude people for no reason?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You can have your multiethnic society too. We just don't want to live in it

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

If we can have our multiethnic society, then why are you trying to take over the United States of America and other multiethnic societies?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

am I? I live in Denmark

I just want my home country for my own people. It is not too much to ask. You can make your own multiethnic country. Don't invade ours.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There is a huge faction trying to take over the United States. And a lot of people are forced to play along with it because they "need" this to stop the radical left.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You can just make your own multiethnic state or nation. the US was founded as a white only union. Why do you have to invade what we, whites, have created?

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It was not founded as a white-only nation. Only some visionaries wanted that, and though they ultimately won after a few decades, we almost all agreed to go back on that more than a century ago.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

False, the first naturalization act was for whites of good character only.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why is race "no reason" to you?

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you have a reason that's yours to explain. You don't get to have your position presumed and the burden of proof always on everyone else.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

This doesn't address anything that's been said. You're just calling everything evil and saying we want to kill all your precious blacks and fags. Literal nonsense responses.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yeah, people being individuals with God-given rights, and authoritarian governments and discrimination and persecution and torture being wrong. What utter nonsense.

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is utter nonsense. People don't have "god-given" rights. And authoritarianism isn't "wrong" in and of itself. We decide whether or not something is wrong

You decided it's wrong. I decided it isn't. Both libertarianism and authoritarianism are synonymous with breach of "right" to liberty. You "force" yourself on authoritarians, not letting them do what they want to do. Authoritarians "force" themselves on you, not letting you do what you want to do. I would go as far as to say libertarianism is authoritarian. Own up to it

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

People have God-given rights. And if not, it's simply common sense. We don't want to be harmed, so let's not harm each other if possible.

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not common sense. It's an opinion. And who said I don't want to be "harmed"? People make me want to bang my head against a wall and cut myself, which I do, and I still get in useless "discussions" with them

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fine, you don't want to be forcibly harmed by others.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Who is talking about torturing people? Who said people can't be individuals? You're just spewing nonsense liberal slop.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're seeing everyone in social categories, you aren't seeing individuals.