What are the arguments for segregation?

submitted by KimiORabu from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Why is that necessary, to separate and exclude people for no reason?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You can have your multiethnic society too. We just don't want to live in it

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

If we can have our multiethnic society, then why are you trying to take over the United States of America and other multiethnic societies?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

am I? I live in Denmark

I just want my home country for my own people. It is not too much to ask. You can make your own multiethnic country. Don't invade ours.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There is a huge faction trying to take over the United States. And a lot of people are forced to play along with it because they "need" this to stop the radical left.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You can just make your own multiethnic state or nation. the US was founded as a white only union. Why do you have to invade what we, whites, have created?

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It was not founded as a white-only nation. Only some visionaries wanted that, and though they ultimately won after a few decades, we almost all agreed to go back on that more than a century ago.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

False, the first naturalization act was for whites of good character only.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If it had been originally founded for "whites of good character" only, then they wouldn't have had to pass a naturalization act 13 years later. And most historians think the real purpose of the law was to prevent the entry of immigrants who were likely to oppose the Federalist party.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The naturalization act was part of the founding

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why is race "no reason" to you?

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you have a reason that's yours to explain. You don't get to have your position presumed and the burden of proof always on everyone else.