you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

they tend to lash out at powerless people for not sufficiently being up to the standards set by the powerful.

That would be a silly reason to lash out. More valid would be lashing out at 'powerless people' for mal or poor function. The baseline standard for an organism is functionality sufficient to maintain life, with abilities to reproduce or enjoy a particular type of life being a bonus.

Is it really only the powerful who care about functionality? I know we celebrate dysfunction, retardation, and a poor genetic code these days, but that's only because they cede more power to the state.

[–]NeoRail 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

More valid would be lashing out at 'powerless people' for mal or poor function.

From their perspective, it is the same thing.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Now I'm unsure who the "they" is that Markimus referred to. By the sentence construction, it appears to be "the disaffected". By the content, it seems more "the Oversocialized".

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I was referring to the Oversocialised. My point is that his analysis only really applies to those people, not actually disaffected people. Even when it does apply to the Oversocialised, it still doesn't really apply to them that much.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"the Oversocialized"

I like that term.

The propaganda overcooked their brains.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.google.com/search?q=oversocialization+ted+kaczynski

One of the more interesting users of that term.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You haven't seen cancel culture, antifa, feminists etc 24/7 attacking right wingers, ruralites, the working class etc for not being up to speed with hollywood's latest social agendas? This is all the 'left' has been since the New Left was invented, just Oversocialised people policing people for racism, sexism, homophobia and whatever else capitalists decide to push.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Cancel culture IS those who celebrate dysfunction, retardation, and poor genetic codes.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, and they are attacking ordinary people for not being retarded dysfunctional bootlickers like themselves.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Given the reality of the limitations a 100 IQ confirs, it's inappropriate to refer to ordinary people as non-retarded. The ordinaries come up with a variety of beliefs to demonstrate their fantastic views of reality. Then they fight over those beliefs.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

...and authority, limitations of freedom, "the greater good", social credit scores, and virtue signalling as if it were actually productive.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps you'd be interested in posting about the "Oversocialized" or other useful things in /s/Terminology. We need better vocabularies to more accurately describe things clearly and to resist tyranny better.