all 20 comments

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Funniest part is little San Marino with something like 30,000 people getting half the medals India did.

Also how is the USA punching above its weight? It's been a perennial leader at the Olympics for decades from the time when it was 90 percent White up until today. How is any of it 'sad' as well?

And the exact same trends exist for other the top gold medalists. Australia, UK, France, Germany, Italy Canada and even Brazil still ranked really high despite their own White populations being already minorities in their own countries or are at great risk of becoming one.

Australia, the UK, Germany and Italy are all around 90 percent White and again Australia, Germany, Italy and the UK usually do well at the Olympics -- Australia especially which is my country and has a very small population has always done amazingly. WTF are you even saying?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Australia, the UK, Germany and Italy are all around 90 percent White

Germany and Italy are around 90% white.

The UK is around 85%. I don't know about Australia though.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Somewhere around there. I didn't follow it much but from what little I've seen most of our Aussie winners have been Whites from rural areas. Sports clubs and sporting culture really do serve as a unifying communal force especially in small Australian towns.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Read the last sentence

or are at great risk of becoming one.

The USA was once overwhelmingly White yet that changed pretty quickly...

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The USA was once overwhelmingly White yet that changed pretty quickly...

What does any of that have to do with the Olympics?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

China's huge population doesn't matter that much becaue the mongoloid race is physically not that strong. They don't have body hair, have weak eyesight, weak jaws, small penis size, short stature and weak physical prowess in general.

The vaunted Japanese army in ww2 had an average height of 5 feet.

In contrast, tiny west indies islands rake in gold and silver medals hand over fist because they have west African populations that underwent a significant eugenic process. Pure black nations in Africa don't do any well in the olympics but carribean blacks do.

My guess is that slavery for sugar plantations had a very eugenic effect. 11 million negroes were imported by spain to those islands and 90% of them died. Only the strongest and most physically virile most likely survived the rigors of sugarcane farming.

Blacks also have a natural advantage in the area of athletics and sports since most of sports involve sprinting. Blacks were evolutionarily selected for sprinting. Nordics are the physically strongest race and they dominate strongman competitions with slavs being neck and neck with them.

Despite the sterotype of the Italian stallion and the Spanish bull, of these countries' men being the most virile lovers, they are the physically weakest Europeans. The ancient Romans noted that Gauls and Germans would generally always win in single combat against Romans. But Romans beat them in war due to superior organization, equipment, greater money and manpower reserves.

In any case, the US becoming 50% white doesn't matter in terms of olympics because the absolute number whites is still there. There are still 190 million whites in America and theoretically Brazil has 90 million.

In any case, the olympics or sports don't really matter. Japan or south korea wins few medals compared to the West Indies but no sane person would say they are weaker countries than Jamaica or Trinidad.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

While this is generally true, you can't take the Roman account as an hard-proof, because those accounts were written with a double goal: to depict other populations as barbarians, and to prove that they were good enough to be deserving of the Roman civilization. So the authors described them as bearers of the common traits of the barbarians (lack of laws, practicing obsolete cults that involved human sacrifices, strong individually but unable to coordinate themselves) while also saying that they would fit the empire if they had a chance. You have to keep in mind that it's unlikely that the Kelts were as uncivilised as they result from the Caesar's depiction, for example, since they had, just a century before, a pretty large confederation able to deal with Rome.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You also should keep in mind that, while now it isn't the case in Europe, until AT LEAST the end of the feudal age, phisical prowess was depending more on the diet that on genetics. The food was scarse, expecially animal protein sources. This was a major factor in the development of strength.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://olympics.com/tokyo-2020/olympic-games/en/results/all-sports/noc-medalist-by-sport-united-states-gold-medal.htm

Just did a quick check and out of all the individual gold medal winners 21 are White for the US. That's around 85 to 90 percent of all their individual wins.

Again what exactly for a racialist makes these Olympics sad? (Giving a fuck is sad I'll grant you that but much like with the Italian win in the Euro's recently all I can see is Whites as usual doing fucking brilliantly at everything.)

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just did a quick check and out of all the individual gold medal winners 21 are White for the US. That's around 85 to 90 percent of all their individual wins.

Steve Sailer on suicide watch. His negro supremacy theory didn't hold up.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really. He doesn't have a negro supremacy thing either he quite rightly notes that west Africans have advantages when it comes to sprinting and this Olympics once again proved the hbd people right. Also a lot of the medals im talking about were in things like swimming where any hbd person would agree that whites have a massive natural advantage.

Probably the weirdest part of the whole games was a Chinese athlete breaking the 10 second barrier in the 100 and getting to the finals. Gotta be juicing.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

in Arabia... whoops, I mean "Paris" in 2024

*new sudan

[–]president_camacho 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So the gist of this post is basically see dummies, diversity really IS our strength?

The OP just tacked on some disengenous shit at the end about white majorities because hes doing some weird larping as a WN.

I debated this dude at length months ago and he was one of the most obtuse pigheaded establishment shitlibs ive ever debated. At one point i asked him to list ONE controversial opinion he had that might get him cancelled, and he refused to do it. Now suddenly he's turned into andrew anglin? I dont buy it.

Anyway who gives a shit about olympics sportsball bullshit. The Soviet Union was winning shitloads of medals up until they collapsed so the olympics are a pretty stupid way to gauge whether a country is in decline.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Now suddenly he's turned into andrew anglin?

I feel flattered. Personally, I compare myself to old stock nationalists like Enoch Powell or Oswald Mosley.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    So why the sudden 180? A few months ago u refused to concede any point anyone made. Now suddenly u make posts using an even stronger exaggerated version of the same points you stubbornly denied. Seems completely disingenuous to me.

    Probably because they're correct?

    I see nothing wrong with White Nationalism tbh, and I was never a real fan of mainstream politics either.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    By the way, if you want to know who the biggest loser is, look at India.

    They have 1.3 Billion people, but they could only win ONE gold medal, and they came in 48th place overall.

    Take note of this, because Indians are rapidly replacing White countries.

    https://www.immigration.ca/where-will-canadas-401000-immigrants-come-from-in-2021

    [–]Nasser 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Sporting skill isn't really tied to race.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So it's just a coincidence all these athletes are Black? Even when they compete for non-African countries in the past 50 years?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqz4R4jMR8U

    [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Yes and no. Per capita China outperformed the US.

    Total number of competitors for the US is 615

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics#Competitors

    Total number of competitors for China is 406

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics#Competitors

    If you assign a value of 3 for gold, 2 for silver, and 1 for bronze, the US scores 232, divided by 605 you get 0.38 medals per competitor sent.

    For China, you get 196 points, divided by 406, you get 0.48 medals per competitor sent.

    The other part of this is the proportion of the athletes in Western countries that are immigrants. Safe to say that everyone who won a medal for China was Chinese while you can't say the same for US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and various European countries.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I understand that. That chart is obviously sorted by number of gold medals first. I assigned points to simply show the overall performance relative to the number of competitors sent. If you want to just use the number of golds won then the ratio is even more in favour of China's athletes.

      US = 39/615 = 0.06

      China = 38/406 = 0.09