What's wrong with miscegenation?

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

[deleted]

all 28 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

members of the same species tend to mate and reproduce without regards to their subspecies/breed. it's normal and natural, all animals do it, why should there be an exception for humans?

Utter horseshit monkey garbage -- excuse my language. I was reading about a certain type of north American finch the other day that is so particular in its mating habits that it won't mate with this other sub-species of finch that ornithologists did not even know know was a separate sub-species until they dissected one and found incredibly minor anatomical differences. Just looking at them they seemed exactly the same but the finch knows and won't mate with them. There's many such cases in nature.

understand demographic concerns and things like that but I don't see why it'd be inherently wrong, as long as there's no large scale demographic consequences (like if a white person and a japanese person move to Japan and have children there) there shouldn't be an issue

Well you just nailed it. That's exactly the problem with our birth rates and mass immigration there are large scale demographic consequences hence why we oppose it. It needs to be said though that despite the relentless and unending amount of propaganda especially directed at whites designed to glamorise and normalise interracial relationships the vast majority of whites still do the natural thing and marry within their own race. 98 percent from the 2010 census.

(also just so that people don't get the wrong impression: I am non white)

Thanks for being honest. So the real thing here is that you just want unfettered access to white women, right? I get it they're the most beautiful women on the planet. Problem is you can't make any more of them.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I have no idea what your last question means but my answer is the one that will mean you'll stop asking me ridiculous questions. So if the right answer is 'yes' then I'm a big 'yes' guy on that question but if it isn't then oh boy the answer is NO, NO a thousand times no.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    So the real thing here is that you just want unfettered access to white women, right?

    Me too! 🙋

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Don't we all. :)

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I am non white

    That explains a lot.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    i understand demographic concerns and things like that but I don't see why it'd be inherently wrong, as long as there's no large scale demographic consequences

    Small scale race mixing on a long enough time line produces large scale demographic consequences especially when it's promoted by powerful institutions.

    (like if a white person and a japanese person move to Japan and have children there) there shouldn't be an issue

    If enough people do this it destroys the uniquness of whites and Japanese.

    The alt right isn't really opposed to one mixed race couple that are 'in love' with eachother. We are opposed to mass importation of non whites and promotion of race mixing by large media outlets. We oppose incentived race mixing. The race must be not only preserved but strengthened.

    (also just so that people don't get the wrong impression: I am non white)

    Do you think we would get the wrong impression if you were white? I'm not really sure what you mean by wrong impression here.

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Small scale race mixing on a long enough time line produces large scale demographic consequences especially when it's promoted by powerful institutions.

    Depends on how large the non-white population being assimilated is but within context I can agree there's too many non-whites being brought in and too many already in the US.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    What's wrong with miscegenation?

    Compare these two countries: Brazil & the USA.

    Both where founded around the same time, exist on the same continent, control large amounts of geography, and have a large population.

    Yet why does America have a GDP of $21 Trillion and Brazil has only $1.4 Trillion?

    Answer: White Brazilians bred with all their slaves, whereas America kept theirs separate. Brazilians turned half their country into Africa, whereas Americans kept their country looking like Europe.

    [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

    Yet why does America have a GDP of $21 Trillion and Brazil has only $1.4 Trillion?

    The true answer is that America had more Jewish businessmen, doctors, scientists and engineers to build America.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    The entire U.S Jewish population is comparable to the size of Israel, yet they only have a GDP of $397 Billion. So that can't be it.

    Compare America's GDP with the entire European Union, and you almost get the same number ($15 Trillion vs $21 Trillion).

    Edit: To be fair, America's numbers are slightly skewed because they take the best immigrants from all over the world. But if you compare the number of Whites who actually live there, it's obvious they're the ones doing the heavy lifting.

    [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Jews built America, you're welcome! That's why America is a superpower and Brazil is a third world dump. Remember, Portugal used to be a world power until they made the colossal mistake of expelling Jews out of Portugal.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Oh, I get it. You're one of those gimmick online accounts. I'm not interested in roleplaying, sorry.

    At least CatboyKami did funnier Jewish impressions.

    [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes, you have me figured out, you're so smart.

    ✡️

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Anglos are vastly superior to Portuguese. sure the Italians aren't half bad, but still inferior to the Germanics.

      So why did Portugal & Spain colonize the entire world before Britain did? Or before that, why was the Roman Empire much more developed than any Celtic people and conquered England?

      I believe there's a lot of nuance missing to actually explain the current European gap, rather than just blame it on inferiority. For example, Germany after WW2 got split in half, but in no way was the East [Communist] side in any way superior in wealth or standard of living to Mediterranean countries. Western Germany may have been better, but that's also because the USA & NATO were pumping a lot of money into rebuilding the country and have it act as a buffer against the Soviets.

      [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

      What's wrong with miscegenation?

      In the altright, miscegenation is bad when Jamal, Mohammad and Juan want to procreate with white women. However, those in the altright have no problem with miscegenation when it comes to white men and Asian women. The reason why you see a lot of white altrighters with Asian women is because they couldn't get a white woman so they are forced to visit the orient to get a girlfriend/wife. After they procure their mail order bride, they go on to say that Asian women are "more traditional" than white women, even though that traditional Asian woman they're with was a bar girl.

      [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      You say you see a lot of alt right men with Asian women so I have a little fun test I do with people who make these types of claims that I've never seen any evidence for. You said you see a 'lot' of them so you only have to name three. Give three specific examples. One caveat they have to be self described racialists. Im not talking about Gavin mcinnes or someone like him.

      Three examples.

      [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      I have a little fun test I do

      Oh you do?

      One caveat they have to be self described racialists.

      What does self described racialists have to do with the altright? When did I mention "self described racialists"? Think of another fun test Professor.

      [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      The alt right is white racialism. If you're not a white racialist you arent alt right.

      You can even name two, shlomo. Two of these many, many alt right people who have Asian partners. I mean you made the claim so surely you can at least come up with two -- I can think of one right now.

      Or were you just doing that typical jew thing where in lieu of an argument you make nasty assertions about the alleged sexual inadequacies of those you dislike? You people really can't help yourselves can you?

      [–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      So according to you, the favorite weekend hobby for white men is running around shouting 'where dem Asian women at?'

      [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      This isn't Blazing Rickshaws pal.

      [–]AidsVictim69 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The reason why you see a lot of white altrighters with Asian women

      The vast majority of White - Asian relationships take place in liberal urban areas and the men who date them are mostly white liberal nerds.

      [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It's great if you don't care about preserving your race. The only race going through this large scale global miscegenation experiment is Whites. There are massive pure isolated groups of every other major race that will be around long after Whites have been bred out of existence, at this rate.

      [–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      members of the same species tend to mate and reproduce without regards to their subspecies/breed.

      Geographically adjacent (i.e. no major isolation) subspecies do not always mix. There isn't any hard rule either way as far as I'm aware.

      it's normal and natural, all animals do it, why should there be an exception for humans?

      The basis of human civilization is manipulating and controlling nature. "Animals do it" is antithetical to a lot of desirable human behaviour (No one wants to live in a civilization where rape and murder are common because they had a "natural" impulse to do so). Cultivating desirable human behaviour/genetics is important for creating a better society. In whites cases there's really nothing to be gained from mixing - the offspring tend to be deficient in one way or another and even if not tend to correlate with social trust disintegration and dysfunction (tribal behaviour based on appearance is also "natural") if they're not outright hostile to the interests of whites. A lot of American blacks are heavily mixed - they're less intelligent, more impulsive (usually leading to more negative outcomes regarding violence, family formation, and sex), and frankly uglier than their white equivalents, or arguably even their African ancestors. There hasn't been a single positive outcome of the great race mixing experiment in North America with perhaps the sole exception of explosiveness in cardio in certain sports (which seems to be enough for the media to deify them as physically superior) Asian mixes ("hapas") tend to be socially deficient, uglier, and adding an IQ point or two is basically worthless in light of that. Mestizos don't really have anything going for them besides their propensity for breeding.

      The world is already filled with examples of human miscegenation - in no case are the results more desirable than what the "white" races already offer.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Do you mean mulattoes? Mulattoes tend to race mix with whites far more than blacks do. They also reach successful positions outside sports (Obama, Markle) whereas blacks do not. In pretty much every way they are a better breed than Africans.

        Almost all non immigrant black populations in the US have significant white ancestry. African Americans are less socially stable than their African counterparts and only a bit more intelligent (or significantly less intelligent if you're talking about the elite blacks that tend to be recent immigrants). AA are the real future for any white-black mixed race. I've been around "pure" Africans and AA, I will take the Africans every time over AA (exceptions for Somalians). "Mulattos" (assuming you're using the term here to mean immediate white ancestry) are better at navigating white society but eventually they will regress to the mean over a generation or two like the standard AA.

        Not really, many Eurasian mixes tend to be very attractive.

        I disagree entirely. People really cherry pick Eurasian people. The average happa I see is not attractive in the least and are predominately Asian looking. But I find Asians particularly ugly to begin with.

        [–]peaceful✞ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        It seems like most animals don't mix: reptiles, birds, aquatic life, etc.

        [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Its wrong for whites because we are going extinct and because it would be lowering the quality of our offspring.

        It also allows for harmful traits in nonwhite populations to gain train rail access into the white population.

        [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        members of the same species tend to mate and reproduce without regards to their subspecies/breed. it's normal and natural, all animals do it

        No it's not and they do not.

        [–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression