Canada is under attack. This is how White people are responding.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Yes, and theres a reason why these attacks are happening now. In B.C. alone, mass graves were discovered on the grounds of two residential schools, with a total of 215 and 182 bodies each. Native children were sent to these schools and were subjected to severe abuse. They weren't allowed to speak their native language, they weren't allowed to learn about their culture, and they were subjected to mental, physical, and sexual abuse. Some of the children died of neglect, some killed themselves, while others died of disease or accidents.

None of these attacks are taking place in a vacuum. Context matters. You portray them as an attack on natives vs whites, when nothing of the sort is happening. This is an old grudge between the natives and the church, and they finally feel they have the chance to get payback. The arsonry attacks on the churchs have been condemned by the native leaders.

It is curious that these old crimes are only being unveiled and publicized now. Surely there is some hidden motive in the timing of all this. The abuse of natives at these schools has been a dirty secret in B.C. and the rest of Canada; everyone knew about what happened, for a long time. Why weren't the crime scenes excavated 10, 20 years ago?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You portray them as an attack on natives vs whites,

Because it is.

Look at how the media/Natives latches onto the stolen land myth. Yet why aren't Natives protesting immigration? Why not bomb the airports that bring in a record 400,000+ new immigrants a year who come to settle Canada?

Because the agenda only swings one way. Whites Canadians are easy targets, especially as they're not even defending themselves from these attacks.

Again, if it was any other country where the conquered people tried to get their "revenge" against the occupier, they would have been manhandled immediately. Israel/Palestine is a perfect example. Not a single rocket launched from Gaza isn't answered without Israel sending fighter jets to level them. In Canada, the churches and monuments are destroyed but Canadians haven't sent military Tanks to attack a Reservation in return.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Because it is.

Fine, then tell us how many have died in these arsonry attacks. Whats the death toll so far?

Look at how the media/Natives latches onto the stolen land myth.

Thats hardly surprising. Canadian media is dominated by Jews just as surely as American media. They will take whatever convenient excuse they get to denigrate whites. This is par for the course. But of course, they can only stretch the truth so far. Canada never officially had slavery, because we didn't become a country until 1867, by which time slavery had already been abolished for 60 years. Its not possible to criticise Canada for slavery in the same way that they can do in America, so instead the Jewish media latchs onto other things.

Whites Canadians are easy targets, especially as they're not even defending themselves from these attacks.

Again, you mislead. This isn't the Canadian equivalent of the BLM riots. No one has been physically attacked, let alone killed. These are arsonry attacks on old churchs, perpetrated by natives with a grudge. They and their ancestors were subjected to severe abuse at the residential schools. Its not all that surprising. The only real question is why these old crimes are being uncovered now.

Again, if it was any other country where the conquered people tried to get their "revenge" against the occupier, they would have been manhandled immediately.

There seems to be alot of Americans pointing at this incident in order to draw attention away from their own sorry situation. They are embarrassed from the BLM riots last summer, by the blatantly stolen elections, and the anti-white vitriol spilling out of every orifice of American culture. These magatards desperately want to convince themselves that boring, lame Canada is in just as dire straits as their own country.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fine, then tell us how many have died in these arsonry attacks. Whats the death toll so far? Again, you mislead. This isn't the Canadian equivalent of the BLM riots. No one has been physically attacked, let alone killed. These are arsonry attacks on old churchs, perpetrated by natives with a grudge. They and their ancestors were subjected to severe abuse at the residential schools. Its not all that surprising. The only real question is why these old crimes are being uncovered now.

BLM's movement escalated into attacking people. That's exactly the danger I'm trying to prevent. Both groups always maintained they were just "righting the wrongs of the past" but then all of a sudden, their demands got more and extreme over time.

It's why in the OP, I even said "Will White Canadians turn their back on Canada Day and let it become a day of mass arson?" Because that's the type of future they're inviting if they don't address the problem now.

BLM had its origins back in 2012 with the Trayvon Martin case. People didn't think much of it because it was seen as "peaceful protest". But this was clearly a ruse, and every year BLM did get featured in the media, did we see more violence and destruction get associated with it.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

BLM's movement escalated into attacking people. That's exactly the danger I'm trying to prevent. Both groups always maintained they were just "righting the wrongs of the past" but then all of a sudden, their demands got more and extreme over time.

I don't expect it to evolve into anything much more serious than arsonry. Maybe there are some Soros owned NGOs who plan to use paid protesters to stir up trouble and start fights. But that will be an artificial stunt that doesn't reflect the situation on the ground. Canada is not the same racial powder keg that America is.

I'm a longtime resident of B.C. I know the score in my own country. No one is in danger of being beaten up by natives, unless maybe they walk into the middle of a reservation by themselves on whiskey night.

It's why in the OP, I even said "Will White Canadians turn their back on Canada Day and let it become a day of mass arson?" Because that's the type of future they're inviting if they don't address the problem now.

Canadas situation is both better and worse than America. It is better because it doesn't have an enormous population of hostile blacks ready to riot at the drop of the hat, along with armys of coastal shitlibs willing to make endless excuses for their violence. It is also worse because Canadians are even more atomized, deracinated, and apathetic than Americans.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Canadas situation is both better and worse than America. It is better because it doesn't have an enormous population of hostile blacks ready to riot at the drop of the hat, along with armys of coastal shitlibs willing to make endless excuses for their violence. It is also worse because Canadians are even more atomized, deracinated, and apathetic than Americans.

Canada's situation is different from America, but not because the Natives can't go around attacking people, but because the demographics are shifting anyway. Remember my point about airports? That 400,000 new "colonizers" are actually Chinese and South Asians.

If the Natives tried attacking them, or started blocking flights, the Asians wont have any white guilt to hold them back from responding.

But either way, the results are still the same. White Canadians are being replaced, and the successor group has no interest in rebuilding churches or monuments that are in the process of being destroyed.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't the Canadian equivalent of the BLM riots. No one has been physically attacked, let alone killed. These are arsonry attacks on old churchs, perpetrated by natives with a grudge.

When you say "perpetrated by natives with a grudge", it sounds like you're describing the very definition of racial hate crimes.

[–]Republican58America First! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Tell me about the Jewish media companies in Canada.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tell who about what media companies where?

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Where's the evidence that this alleged abuse was any more severe than what any other child in care would have gone through in the 19th century? Also just finding graves does not mean a murder or even a crime has taken place. As for not learning about their own culture well yes it was the entire point of bringing them to the schools in the first place. Many similar measures were adopted here in Australia towards our aboriginal population. Despite the hysterical and ridiculous claims by usually the left on these types of measures no this wasn't some wicked genocidal scheme. In fact it was usually done with the welfare of the child in mind given the conditions the native children were growing up in. Now however misguided I think those policies are I've read about the conditions many of the aboriginals were living in before they were 'stolen' and hell on earth doesn't even begin to describe it. I'd be willing to bet that the conditions the native children in Canada were living in were comparable.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Now however misguided I think those policies are I've read about the conditions many of the aboriginals were living in before they were 'stolen' and hell on earth doesn't even begin to describe it. I'd be willing to bet that the conditions the native children in Canada were comparable.

Before Europeans arrived on the American continent, the "peaceful" Indians were use to sacrificing children and eating them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice_in_Aztec_culture#Tlaloc

Archaeologists have found the remains of at least 42 children sacrificed to Tlaloc at the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan. Many of the children suffered from serious injuries before their death, they would have to have been in significant pain as Tlaloc required the tears of the young as part of the sacrifice. The priests made the children cry during their way to immolation: a good omen that Tlaloc would wet the earth in the raining season.[42] In the Florentine Codex, also known as General History of the Things of New Spain, Sahagún wrote: According to the accounts of some, they assembled the children whom they slew in the first month, buying them from their mothers. And they went on killing them in all the feasts which followed, until the rains really began. And thus they slew some on the first month, named Quauitleua; and some in the second, named Tlacaxipeualiztli; and some in the third, named Tocoztontli; and others in the fourth, named Ueitocoztli; so that until the rains began in abundance, in all the feasts they sacrificed children.[43]

No doubt if we had left them alone, they would go back to doing this again. Lol.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Before Europeans arrived on the American continent, the "peaceful" Indians were use to sacrificing children and eating them.

The aztec weren't in Canada. The important thing to understand with native nations is that they are all quite culturally different. Do you have evidence that Canadian native tribes were sacrificing their children? The Sioux and other plains tribes were certainly not engaging in this. I'm not sure about the Canadian prairie tribes but I would assume they were closer to plains tribes than 'aztec' tribes.

Obviously the native groups were very different then anglos but it's silly to speak about natives as some homogeneous group. That makes right wingers look stupid (sometimes I wonder if this is really your goal here). Republicans might lack historical nuance but as you've been told a hundred times already the alt right is not a conservative or republican group. It's a third position.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Obviously the native groups were very different then anglos but it's silly to speak about natives as some homogeneous group.

They're closer to each other, than say actual Asians or Blacks.

And Human sacrifices were found all over the continent. I have no idea why you think [the rest of] North America would be exempt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice#North_America

The peoples of the Southeastern United States known as the Mississippian culture (800 to 1600 CE) have been suggested to have practiced human sacrifice, because some artifacts have been interpreted as depicting such acts.[92] Mound 72 at Cahokia (the largest Mississippian site), located near modern St. Louis, Missouri, was found to have numerous pits filled with mass burials thought to have been retainer sacrifices. One of several similar pit burials had the remains of 53 young women who had been strangled and neatly arranged in two layers. Another pit held 39 men, women and children who showed signs of dying a violent death before being unceremoniously dumped into the pit. Several bodies showed signs of not having been fully dead when buried and of having tried to claw their way to the surface. On top of these people another group had been neatly arranged on litters made of cedar poles and cane matting. Another group of four individuals found in the mound were interred on a low platform, with their arms interlocked. They had had their heads and hands removed. The most spectacular burial at the mound is the "Birdman burial". This was the burial of a tall man in his 40s, now thought to have been an important early Cahokian ruler. He was buried on an elevated platform covered by a bed of more than 20,000 marine-shell disc beads arranged in the shape of a falcon,[93] with the bird's head appearing beneath and beside the man's head, and its wings and tail beneath his arms and legs. Below the birdman was another man, buried facing downward. Surrounding the birdman were several other retainers and groups of elaborate grave goods.[94][95] A ritual sacrifice of retainers and commoners upon the death of an elite personage is also attested in the historical record among the last remaining fully Mississippian culture, the Natchez. Upon the death of "Tattooed Serpent" in 1725, the war chief and younger brother of the "Great Sun" or Chief of the Natchez; two of his wives, one of his sisters (nicknamed La Glorieuse by the French), his first warrior, his doctor, his head servant and the servant's wife, his nurse, and a craftsman of war clubs all chose to die and be interred with him, as well as several old women and an infant who was strangled by his parents.[96] Great honor was associated with such a sacrifice, and their kin were held in high esteem.[97] After a funeral procession with the chief's body carried on a litter made of cane matting and cedar poles ended at the temple (which was located on top of a low platform mound), the retainers, with their faces painted red and drugged with large doses of nicotine, were ritually strangled. Tattooed Serpent was then buried in a trench inside the temple floor and the retainers were buried in other locations atop the mound surrounding the temple. After a few months' time the bodies were dis-interred and their defleshed bones were stored as bundle burials in the temple.[96] The Pawnee practiced an annual Morning Star Ceremony, which included the sacrifice of a young girl. Though the ritual continued, the sacrifice was discontinued in the 19th century.[98]

Republicans might lack historical nuance but as you've been told a hundred times already the alt right is not a conservative or republican group. It's a third position.

It doesn't stand to reason being alt-right/third position doesn't have its own nuances. Even when it comes to history, I would argue all sides of the political spectrum pick and choose which side they prefer to focus on.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They're closer to each other, than say actual Asians or Blacks.

Depends. If you look at a genetic map of all native groups in north and south america there's quite a wide genetic variation.

Check out this video at the one minute mark

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpE7-sQos9M

The confusion comes because not just one tribe came over the Beringia land bridge. Also not all those groups that traveled over the bridge racially mixed. North and South america are quite large so some stayed isolated from other tribes. There was a european skeleton found in a stream with arrows in it so we know some Europeans crossed the bridge as well.

Everything is even more complicated because modern academia plays games. Every time they find a skeleton on tribal land the 'tribe' gets to decide on the testing and if those results will be shared. We already know of one incident where a white man was found on tribal land and the tribe covered it up because it would mean they were not the 'first nation' in the area. There are a lot of politics involved. I'd also encourage you to look into the Solutrean Hypothesis. It gets even more complicated when you start looking into the fact that giants (8 foot and up) all over north america and are still being found today but frequently get covered up because they don't jive with the current academic explanation of north and south american genetics. Politics and the keeping up the anti white narrative is more important then truth for the current commissars that control us.

Even when it comes to history, I would argue all sides of the political spectrum pick and choose which side they prefer to focus on.

Many whites have a Faustian spirit. Truth, fidelity to an idea, and exploration at all costs even if it hurts yourself or your tribe. This just isn't a common quality in many other racial groups. It lets white be creative and break new ground but can also be used against us so it's a double edge sword. Sam Dickson does a good job talking about the pros and cons of the white faustian spirit in his chat with Jared Taylor a few years back. Have you watched that video? Regardless I would disagree with your statement that whites are just as ethnocentric and power hunger as other races when it comes to historical research and politics.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The confusion comes because not just one tribe came over the Beringia land bridge. Also not all those groups that traveled over the bridge racially mixed. North and South america are quite large so some stayed isolated from other tribes. There was a european skeleton found in a stream with arrows in it so we know some Europeans crossed the bridge as well.

Edit: I'm going by the Indians who are alive today. If they found European bones, then those people are still dead. But North American & South American tribes are nearly indistinguishable from one another.

https://www.google.com/search?q=amazon+indians&rlz=1C1CHBF_enCA871CA871&sxsrf=ALeKk03PnyyOy1k7w2cZ_4BEkPIoYaNqjA:1625334638105&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi85fqtu8fxAhVZbc0KHZWiCHEQ_AUoAXoECAsQAw&biw=2560&bih=1297#imgrc=XKcPhoqID8PXaM

https://www.google.com/search?q=aboriginal+tribes+canada&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwidruOuu8fxAhWHgE4HHS2lBYkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=aboriginal+tribes+canada&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzIGCAAQCBAeMgYIABAIEB4yBggAEAgQHjoECCMQJzoECAAQQzoFCAAQsQM6AggAOggIABCxAxCDAToHCAAQsQMQQzoECAAQGFDPnAJYu7wCYO29AmgAcAB4AIABYIgBuQ2SAQIyMpgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=b6PgYN26MYeBuuoPrcqWyAg&bih=1297&biw=2560&rlz=1C1CHBF_enCA871CA871#imgrc=tCfkOV_SjKOCbM

Same jet black hair, leathery tanned skin, Asian-esque eyes, etc.

Edit: For the Indians living in Canada, their skin is lighter because they live farther away from the equator. Same phenomenon can be observed in China or Japan and even Africa (i.e the San people of South Africa are no where as dark as the Nilotic tribes of Sudan. But both them are still "black" or the same race).

The only Europeans I'm aware of who came to the Americas before Colombus, where the Vikings. But the historical "Vinland" was basically the surrounding areas of modern day Quebec. There's no records they attempted to colonize the entire continent before the first Spanish Conquistadors had made similar attempts.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is an old grudge between the natives and the church...

WTF is "the church"?

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The residential schools where native children were taken to were administered by Catholic missionarys. The children were also abused at churchs by Catholic priests.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, them. Not a big surprise for an anti-Christian sect.