What do you think of this thread crying racism over Liz Truss leading the Tory leadership election polls? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I did some digging a while ago and found out what state he lives/lived in, but even then it would be like looking for a needle in a haystack. And we have no idea if he even got arrested, that's just one of the many possible reasons for his sudden disappearance. He doesn't seem like the kind of guy who would do things that get you arrested, but on the other hand, it's Australia and they have very strict "hate speech" laws so who knows.

What do you think of this thread crying racism over Liz Truss leading the Tory leadership election polls? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To u/literalotherkin? I have no idea unfortunately, but I really hope he's still alive and doing well. I also got along very well with him, to the point where we had basically become internet friends.

When I just became an admin for this site back in february this year, when it was about a month ago since literalotherkin last commented, I asked Magnora if he could look up if the IP log showed any activity for literalotherkin since he last commented at all, but sadly Magnora refused, telling me that would require getting into the backend of the site which would be a very tedious process.

It could just be that he's still lurking here once in a while but doesn't really feel the need to say anything anymore though (I also haven't posted or commented here in months but I was still browsing DAR and liking posts and comments all this time).

I really hope that this is the case and that he'll eventually pop up here again, but I wouldn't get my hopes up; his r*ddit activity stopped simultaneously with his Saidit activity, meaning he probably either died, got arrested, or just decided move on from Saidit and r*ddit or decided to completely quit the internet.

What do you think of this thread crying racism over Liz Truss leading the Tory leadership election polls? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let them eat each other, obviously. The Tories are about as culturally right wing (nationalistic and socially conservative) as Joe Biden, if not less. These woke anti-white cretins will forever keep demanding more, no matter how much their opponents (or whites in general) have already caved in.

To paraphrase u/literalotherkin, we might as well put those fake "conservatives" (like the Tories) and woke anti-white marxists/shitlibs together in the same prison cells (or insane asylums) so they can argue with each other about who of them are "the real racists" all day.

I have some honest questions. by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In retrospect, I could've simply replied this and saved myself the wasteful effort of replying with a serious wall of text towards this troll, who probably just gets off us feeding him anyways.

A map of Israeli settlements and outposts in Palestinian territories. Sure are a lot of them. by Chipit in maps

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey buddy, I was just wondering, what would be your feelings about Palestinians mass-aborting themselves hypotethically? Would you still show the exact amount of "outrage" which you very passionately showed at blacks aborting their offspring in white nations? Should Zionists be held morally culpable for those Palestinian abortions, and also go to hell, just like the dissident right should for black abortions according to you? If not, why? Since you've decided you're gonna take the moral high ground on this issue, it would be quite ironic of you to suddenly completely change your mind as soon as it involves a group of people you hate (Palestinians) instead of a group of people you "love" (to weaponize against whites).

I have some honest questions. by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, I haven't heard such a ridiculous strawman in a very long time. In reality, a huge portion of the dissident right strongly oppose abortion, and almost all of those who don't strongly oppose it at least oppose late term abortion. The proportion of the dissident right actually celebrating this is a very tiny minority, and you know it. I myself am mostly against abortion, although I don't really mind very early abortions.

That being said, if blacks really desperately want practice self-imposed eugenics in this manner, who are we ultimately to stop them from doing so? Doesn't the fact that they like aborting their offspring so much just go to show they themselves should take responsibility to "do better at getting in touch with God", by your own logic? Why should we as white people be held morally culpable for blacks aborting themselves? By your own logic, Jews should be held morally culpable for whites aborting themselves. Or do you only selectively apply that standard to whites, since you hate us so much?

By the way, I very highly doubt that you genuinely care about God or Christianity or any of that stuff, you're probably an atheist woke leftist/shitlib who just abuses religion for your own end, for concern trolling and emotional blackmail of people you oppose on political grounds while not actually believing in it yourself (which would be very stereotypically Semitic of you), since this is almost always the case with your type. Also, you're pushing it regarding the Pyramid of Debate with the content of this post; don't do that.

Saidit CSS updates April 2, 2022 by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I liked the old layout much better

Every Single Time. Behind every shitpost... by disidentHR in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who's yous?

Every Single Time. Behind every shitpost... by disidentHR in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who's Salos?

Hollywood and porn hub stop the distribution of their products in Russia by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I'm from Amsterdam, but with ancestry mostly from Frisia, Noord-Brabant and the far east of Gelderland

Imagine being this stupid by DisastrousDepth14 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Speaking of Bulgaria, does anyone know what happened to bulgarianpatriot? He used to be very active in the subreddit, and he used to be here as well in the beginning.

Hollywood and porn hub stop the distribution of their products in Russia by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's complicated, they're sort of mutually intelligble but also not really. For me personally, written German is a lot more intelligble than spoken German, since German is very similar to Dutch regarding grammar and vocabulary, whereas pronounciation is very different.

What makes German especially difficult for someone like me, who's only fluent in Dutch and English, is the huge amount of declensions in German, and the fact that German has a lot of false friends (words that exist and are gramarically correct in both Dutch and German but mean something different in either language).

German, Dutch and English are all West-Germanic languages, but I'd say generally speaking Dutch has more in common with English than with German. If you're fluent in Dutch, have a very basic grasp of German, and can imitate a German accent, like I do, you can probably have a basic conversation in German with Germans using "fake German" (German accent but with Dutch grammar and only Dutch words), but when I'm in Germany I just end up speaking English with them since that's easier for both of us.

Hollywood and porn hub stop the distribution of their products in Russia by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Belgium should be part of the Netherlands, as well as French Flanders. Maybe we can give Wallonia to France as a bargaining chip for French Flanders, since it isn't really Dutch anyways. I support the Netherlands being part of a greater Germany though, but obviously not by means of invasion.

Have you all seen the Russia craze on Reddit? by FuckYourMom in One

[–]YORAMRW[A] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Please don't advocate violence. You're really walking on thin ice now.

Poland is refusing to let in "Ukrainian" niggers by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[A] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't understand how you're not banned yet.

He might be soon if he continues his current behavior.

Poland is refusing to let in "Ukrainian" niggers by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[A] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

For someone who claims to care so much about the POD, you've been making quite a lot of POD violations in this thread. Please stop doing that, or we might have to ban you.

New to saidit by kiwiheretic in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, I just do this for fun. I you don't like it here, feel free to fuck off back to r*ddit. No one is stopping you

New to saidit by kiwiheretic in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW[A] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

this shit hole bans people more often than reddit does. the pyramid of debate means nothing.

Can you name some examples of people you think we've unjustly banned? It's probably technically true that Saidit is more heaviliy moderated than r*ddit proportionally speaking, but that's mostly due to the small scale of Saidit; if r*ddit was the same size as Saidit, it would probably be one of the most heavily moderated places on the internet.

What's much more important than the rate at which people get banned, in my opinion, is for what kind of reasons people get banned. R*ddit bans people (and subs) for the most ridiculous reasons, mostly for "hate speech", whereas Saidit mostly just removes spam, violent threats and incitement to violence, illegal activity, and repeated targeted harrassment.

If you think you or someone else has been unjustly banned or censored, you're always free to write me or another admin an appeal via PM, containing the username of the person you want unbanned and the reason why you think he should be unbanned.

Inflatable Donkey - Sex Doll Realistic Love Doll Inflatable 1 Hole by Antarchomachus in whatever

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I need Derek Chauvin and George Floyd sex dolls rn

Anyone want to help be content admin for saidit? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you so much for adding me, I'm very excited!

Anyone want to help be content admin for saidit? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seems fine to me, I'm ready to go! :)

Anyone want to help be content admin for saidit? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm interested! Gonna send a PM with further info right now

Why Hypermodernity is good actually by lolikon69 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Big agree here. Before the internet, our ideas were mostly confined to the fringes of society in Europe and North America, but places like /pol/, edgy meme pages, and all the pro-white content creators on YouTube, allowed our ideas to rapidly expand and gain some acceptance among more normal white people between roughly 2015 and 2019. If it wasn't for the internet, most of us would probably still be glued to FOX News and CNN just like boomers, view politics through the kosher "libtard vs. cuckservative" lens, worship MLK and not have much racial awareness.

There are two major events that kinda ruined it for us, though: The first being the optics nuclear disaster of Charlottesville 2017 (which in turn also got sabotaged by antifa with help from the police, and then framed by the anti-white media). Secondly, and more relevant to the topic, the (still ongoing) great big tech deplatforming spree of spring 2019 (right after the totally not a false flag Christchurch shooting), followed by the sudden aggressive promotion of anti-white "BreadTube" garbage through algoritmic manipulation, pretty much put the final nail in the coffin regarding our ability to effectively spread our views to white normies in large quantities. This second event and its outcome also very solidly debunks the retarded boomer cuckservative notion that "deplatforming doesn't work".

Like I've mentioned earlier, a long time ago, there's nothing inherently woke, cucked, anti-white or degenerate or whatever about the internet itself. Sure, it has definitely played an essential role in turning recent generations to shit, but this is purely due to the people, governments and corporations that currently control the internet. To further counter this, like I mentioned earlier in this comment, if it wasn't for the internet we probably would've never even become aware of just how much anti-white hatred there truly is, and would just be slowly boiled like frogs while believing in MLK and Nelson Mandela like boomers. The internet on its own is neutral, much like a weapon it can be used for good or evil. If we ever manage to (legally, of course) seize power, we could simply do the reverse of what they did to us, deplatforming anti-whites and then aggressively promoting dissident right content through algoritmic manipulation.

If Jews control everything how was Ghislane Maxwell convicted? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if jews truly have any omnipresent unquestionable godlike rule over their retarded golem, IE the USA

First off, this is a massive strawman of the JQ. No one believes that all Jews collectively have power, nor that it's exclusively Jews who have power, let alone that they're literally invincible. We just acknowledge that a small subgroup of (mostly American) Jews are overrepresented among higher income levels and hold disproportionate influence in western institutions and large corporations, and we care about this due to the way in which this (mostly negatively) affects western politics.

Bringing up the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell got convicted despite being rich, Jewish and in a position of power isn't the own against us you think it is. Back in the 19th century and early 20th century, when white gentiles (most importantly, the French, the British and white Americans) held a global hegemony similar to that of today's Jews, rich and powerful white individuals also sometimes got convicted for crime despite their race and status, yet by your logic this somehow disproves the disproportionate power white gentiles used to hold.

Should we retake Constantinople? by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's kinda ironic, considering Greeks coined the name "Istanbul" in the first place.

Tucker openly mocks Jewish surname by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fox News is the only major news corporation that's fully controlled by white gentiles (source), so no surprise it's also the least evil one.

Communism must never be allowed to succeed by MAGA1776 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why did you fuck your sister tho?

Hispanic Fellow Beats to Death Two Year Old Daughter of his Girlfriend by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're "Courbeaux"/"valkyria1488", aren't you?

Hostile rhetoric from minorities in media towards the majority population is increasing in Europe by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the Netherlands those types of black immigrants (especially the ones from Suriname), as well as other woke anti-white leftists, usually bring up the atrocities of the VOC (Dutch East India Company) and the WIC (Dutch West India Company) in an attempt to guilt trip us for our past.

Suriname (a former Dutch colony that became independent in 1975) and the Netherlands Antilles/Caribbean (still sort of a Dutch colony) used to be WIC-owned colonies where black African slave labor was used until we abolished slavery in 1863 (hence why most blacks in the Netherlands are from those areas), similarly to other former European colonies like Haiti, America, and Brazil (even though the scale of Dutch slavery pales in comparison to American slavery, and the scale of American slavery in turn pales in comparison to Brazilian slavery), so from their perspective, bringing it up is an effective tactic to deface Dutch history and instill white guilt in us.

The key to completely absolving ourselves from white guilt is realizing that whatever atrocities our ancestors might've committed were also committed by practically any other race, in an at least as brutal if not more brutal fashion; it's just that our ancestors often did it at a larger scale, simply due to the fact that we were technologically and intellectually superior and thus more effective at it, not because of some supposed inherent capacity for evil unique to the white race, which anti-white scum love accuse us of.

What is the Alt Right? (Varg) by fschmidt in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I appreciate the positive feedback, but I nonetheless disagree with the idea that most people in this sub are morons. As the replies to this thread show, most people here don't actually hate others purely on the basis of their race or ethnicity. Like someone else in this thread also pointed out, I think there's a lot more common ground between you and this sub than both you and people on this sub are willing to realize or admit. Aside from the fact that you're ethnically Jewish, the only major difference between you and us seems to be how important you consider race to be. Sure, it's one very major difference, but still...

Hostile rhetoric from minorities in media towards the majority population is increasing in Europe by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have an example of this anti-white hatred from prominent non-white figures in my own country. In the Netherlands we have an actual explicitly anti-white (and anarcho-communist/syndicalist) political party named "BIJ1" (pronounced as "bijéén", meaning "together"), previously named "ART1KEL" (pronounced as "artikel één", or "article one", referring to the first amendment of the 1980s revision of the Dutch constitution, which bans all forms of "racism" and discrimination and mandates absolute equality). "BIJ1"/"ART1KEL" was founded by Sylvana Simons, a black woman of Surinamese descent with narcissistic personality traits, who's a radical feminist and self-proclaimed "anti-racist".

The party's slogan is "radicale gelijkwaardigheid" ("radical equality/equity"), but of course, this party isn't truly about equality, but rather about promoting the interests of non-white immigrants in the Netherlands (more specifically immigrants of black African descent) at the expense of the white Dutch population. If you think Sylvana Simons herself was already terrible enough, she's actually one of the least bad people in the party: Explicit demonization, dehumanization and other hatred and hostility against white people is very much common place among the more radical elements of the party, especially amongst its youth wing.

As expected, this party seeks to outlaw Sinterklaas and Zwarte Piet (likened to blackface and sometimes even associated with slavery by "BIJ1"/"ART1KEL" and like-minded anti-whites), seeks to remove all statues of important Dutch historical figures from public spaces, seeks to make it even easier for non-white immigrants to enter the Netherlands and obtain Dutch citizenship, seeks to implement extreme affirmitive action that would force all companies as well as all governmental institutions to have a minimum percentage of non-whites employed and an upper limit on the percentage of whites employed, and they even seek to implement an Orwellian "racism register" which employers would be able to check to make it pretty much impossible for white "racists" to get a job anywhere.

This party currently has already one seat in parliament, and will probably grow much larger in the coming decades, as more and more African migrants will pour in, and as the boomers will die off.

Dozens of US nuclear scientists sue over vaccine mandate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

?

Dozens of US nuclear scientists sue over vaccine mandate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If toxic metals and/or vaccines were the cause of autism, you wouldn't expect it to just affect a tiny fraction of the population. Maybe toxic metals and/or vaccines exacerbate the effects autism and other mental illnesses in people already prone to it, but the primary cause of autism is much more likely to be genetic.

Dozens of US nuclear scientists sue over vaccine mandate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree that climate change is probably overexaggerated, but why take the risk if we have technology (nuclear energy) that's both more efficient and more carbon neutral anyways? If the sea levels start rising, this will flood low-lying coastal areas that are too poor, high time preference and/or low-IQ to build the infrastructure necessary to fend off the sea (i.e Bangladesh, Maldives, New Orleans), causing much more destruction than all nuclear disasters combined have ever caused.

Dozens of US nuclear scientists sue over vaccine mandate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The nuclear power plant in Fukushima had outdated reactors (which are a lot less safe than more recent nuclear reactors), and it was also built in an area prone to tsunamis. Also, the death rate by the Fukushima disaster pales in comparison to the death rate from the 2011 tsunami itself.

Dozens of US nuclear scientists sue over vaccine mandate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nice try, Shell.

What are your thoughts on space exploration/space travel? by YORAMRW in nonmorons

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We can't predictably influence what will happen over that much of a long term

We might not be able to directly control the future beyond our own lifespans, but if we had enough political power we could definitely strongly influence the future through the decisions we make today, by delaying gratification and planning ahead. Or at least, whites and east-Asians can, I don't know what race you are.

and in any case the mainstream cosmology you are relying on is almost certainly bullshit anyway.

The "mainstream cosmology" I'm relying on already existed long before the current Jewish world order existed, the new order just didn't change it because there's no incentive for them to do so, and even if there was an incentive for them to change it, they probably couldn't do it as it would require them to manipulate and distort our perception of reality to such a degree that literally everyone with more than two brain cells would see right through it. The cosmology I'm relying on was invented by exceptionally intelligent white men, the same type of white men who explored, mapped and conquered the earth, and gave us electricity, airplanes, trains and cars.

In any case there is no-one to take us to the stars, assuming they even exist as they are envisaged.

That's also what people 200 years ago thought about airplanes, or what people a 100 years ago thought about space travel. If we would run rigorous eugenics programs for long enough, and figure out how to genetically edit undesirable traits out of humans and insert genetically beneficial traits into humans, the eventual accumulation of more and more geniuses would exponentially accelerate the rate of technological advancement. If you manage to get enough geniuses to collaborate on researching and developing space travel and other technologies, this group of geniuses would be much more productive than the sum of its parts (the individual geniuses working seperately combined), through a principle called emergence.

It seems unlikely that the affirmative action NASA will be capable of heavier than air flight for much longer and Fake-X is clearly a scam.

I definitely agree with this, hence why we need to destroy the current Jewish world order that stifles and sabotages the betterment and advancement of mankind and poisons scientific fields with woke anti-white crap like affirmitive action, before we can seriously consider things like interstellar space travel, as I mentioned in my reply to u/fschmidt's comment in this thread. Nonetheless, what NASA is doing currently to advance space travel is still better than if they did nothing at all, and it would still give us a headstart, so for that reason I'm against defunding/abolishing NASA.

What are your thoughts on space exploration/space travel? by YORAMRW in nonmorons

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First a correction. The alt-right is a subset of the dissident right. I hate the alt-right but not the dissident right. I support people on the dissident right like E. Michael Jones and Varg Vikernes (white nationalist but not alt-right), and I would consider myself on the dissident right.

I see "alt-right" and "dissident right" as practically interchangeable categories, as most people who now call themselves dissident right used to call themselves alt-right. But going by your definitions, I'm definitely part of the dissident right but I don't know if I'd also be part of the alt-right.

I'm a pan-Germanist and white nationalist, I strongly support eugenics, I lean towards social conservatism, I'm economically center-left, and I want to dismantle the predominantly Jewish-run current progressive anti-white order (often called "ZOG" or "globohomo"), and restore the old white-centric order that gradually got dismantled between around 1914 and the 1970s in favor of said new order. As you might've noticed, I talk a lot about the Jews in a quite negative manner, but I don't even necessarily hate the Jews as a whole, I just hate most of the Jewish elites because they're the current establishment and responsible for destroying the old white world and bringing about the progressive anti-white hellscape the world is today; ideally, I would want even the Jews to be eventually re-integrated into the broader white community, after we've taken out the malicious and anti-white ones through eugenics, given Jews are still genetically predominantly white.

I honestly don't see what motivates you to support E. Michael Jones and Varg Vikernes of all people. E. Michael Jones is a Catholic traditionalist, whereas you're not even Christian, and he's strongly against eugenics, whereas you support eugenics. Varg Vikernes is, like you said yourself, a white nationalist, whereas you think race is irrelevant, he (I assume) hates Jews on a biological level whereas you're Jewish, and I don't think he supports eugenics either.

.

Now about space travel, I am currently against it. Humanity is facing an immediate crisis of genetic decay. Anything that doesn't deal with this issue is a waste of time. If this isn't solved soon, humans will degenerate to the point that they can no longer sustain current basic technology. Edward Dutton discusses this issue at length.

Then we are in complete agreeance on this, I strongly support rigorous eugenics programs, and I also see eugenics as essential to accelerating the advancement of space travel (and technology in general) to the point where we can develop interstellar space travel.

My ideal eugenics program would prohibit the following types of people from reproducing (not necessarily, but if necessary, through forced sterilization): Anyone with a low IQ (below 85-90), anyone with severe mental illness (schizophrenia, borderline, psychopathy, severe autism, etc.), anyone with serious heritable diseases, people who structurally use welfare despite having been offered incentives and opportunities to be productive, violent criminals and problematic drug addicts, malicious elites (both Jewish and non-Jewish), and anyone who's explicitly anti-white, anti-eugenics or is some other type of fanatical woke leftist.

My ideal eugenics program would strongly encourage and incentivize the following types of people to have as many children as possible: People with a high IQ, people who are very mentally stable, people who are very socially skilled, men who have the ability to adequately provide for their wives and children, people who are very productive to society, people with special talents (being very creative, being the inventor of groundbreaking technology, being an architect who has designed wonderful buildings, being very good at sports etc.), people who strongly support eugenics, people who are pro-white, people who support healthy traditional family values, people who look attractive, people who are physically strong and healthy.

.

For someone to be involved in space travel today, they would have to be part of the current dominant system. So they would in fact be part of the problem. Good people should disengage from the dominant system and try to support alternatives that have the potential to produce good culture and good genetics.

I think you've misunderstood what I was trying to say. I don't support the current dominant system at all (in fact, I want to destroy it as I've mentioned earlier), and I agree we shouldn't send people to colonize other planets under the current dominant system (that wouldn't even be possible anyways). When I talk about space travel, I'm thinking much more long term than that, assuming the current dominant system has long been destroyed by the time we get to send people to colonize other planets.

That being said, I don't see anything wrong with supporting research and development regarding space travel in the meantime, as that would still give us a headstart once the current dominant system has been destroyed. I'd still rather have our taxpayer money in the current dominant system go towards something like NASA where it's actually put to good use, than to, for example, wokeness/diversity policies or subsidizing blacks in sub-Saharan African to pop out 10 more children per family.

.

While I do regard race as irrelevant, I would support any attempt to solve the genetic problem even if I disagree with its assumptions. I am open minded and I welcome attempts to prove me wrong. I would welcome a group of whites setting up an all-white community in a place like northwest Mexico where they would be left alone. At least this would be a test of their assumptions and everyone would be able to see the results.

That's interesting, because I also support whites settling sparsely populated lands in backwater regions in third world countries where ZOG has less direct influence as a means of creating independent white ethnostates and reversing the decline of white proportion of the global population (Orania in South Africa and the German settlements in Southern Brazil come to mind).

The problem is that if whites manage to create a successful independent homeland outside of Jewish control, the Jewish elites will probably get the powerful countries they control (such as the US) to start wars against that white homeland. So in order for this to be effective, we'd have to put our efforts into destroying the current dominant system (ZOG) while simultaneously creating independent homelands.

What is your most controversial opinion? by [deleted] in whatever

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What alt-right views would you consider the most moronic?

Excellent video from Keith Woods showing the Anglo-Jewish led globalization movement via the CFR by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I myself am not an Anglo (I'm Dutch), but I most strongly support groups that have benefited the white race the most. The Anglos have disproportionally contributed to the invention of modern technology (which has greatly benefited whites, as well as humanity in general), and through their colonial efforts they've given whites additional "Lebensraum" larger than Europe itself and as a result caused the white proportion of the global population to massively increase at the expense of non-whites (mostly during the late 19th and early 20th century), so in both regards Anglos top the list of greatest contributors to the white race. America, founded by Anglos, was literally the first explicit white nationalist country in the world (and one of the few ones to ever exist, aside from Australia, South Africa, Rhodesia and arguably Canada, all Anglo colonies as well).

You can try to direct the blame for the clusterfuck the world is today away from the Jews and towards the Anglos, but the direct correlation between the proportional decrease of WASPs and increase of Jews in positions of power in America and the transition from the old white-centric order towards today's order is simply undeniable. In retrospect, the biggest mistake the Anglos made was trusting the Jews too much, if the Anglos had been more aware about the Jews and simply barred them from any positions of power (and politics in general), the Anglos would probably still rule the world instead of Jews; it wouldn't be a perfect world, but it would no doubt still be many times better than the shitshow we're in today.

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that post where he talks about being 400lbs and fucking his sister is ironically the only thing I believe from him

My fucking sides lmao

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My wild guess is that it was something showing how "probgoingtohell" (the sister fucker account, which Salos admitted to be one of his alts by the way) and "ayotollahsiniran" are the same person. It's so annoying that Saidit removes deleted replies to your own comments from your inbox, but it's probably intended to protect the privacy of users who delete their comments.

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What did the deleted comment say?

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Coming from someone who himself constantly includes personal attacks in his bad-faith replies full of anti-white blood libel, but when other people push back suddenly starts crying about getting "bullied" and "muh pyramid of debate" lmao. Reminds me of a certain Polish proverb, something about crying out in pain.

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Someone who sees "nazis"/"fascists"/"white supremacists" behind every tree and thinks men in dresses are women calling us paranoid and mentally ill, oh the irony. You should be grateful you're even still allowed to post here despite months of trolling our sub, the mods are very generous towards you. Consider yourself lucky I'm not one of the mods on this sub, because if I were I would've banned your ass months ago.

I found u/ayotollahsiniran on the old reddit DAR archive. He/she pretended to a british actress. by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Totally unrelated question, but why did you fuck your sister?

I hear salos6000 has been permabanned. What was his offense? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Socks never misrepresented himself

Not true, "socks" falsely presents himself as an egalitarian who equally loves/hates all races and is merely against "racial injustice" and "racial hatred/supremacy", but in practice he's just anti-white, since he'll automatically take the 180 degree opposite side of what's good for whites in any argument, pathologize ingroup preference from whites and whites only, and scapegoat whites for all evil in the world. That's definitely misrepresenting yourself, and it's exactly the same as with any other woke reddit leftist/shitlib.

I hear salos6000 has been permabanned. What was his offense? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion, but while I agree that Salos is annoying, as well as probably borderline retarded or mentally ill (or both), I still tend to think permanently banning him takes it a step too far. There have actually been explicitly anti-white trolls and shills (such as "socks") active on this sub for months, if not years, who still haven't been banned up to this very day despite constantly arguing in bad faith and violating the Pyramid of Debate, so I personally think we've got bigger fish to fry than some dull boomer cuckservative (whether genuine or a concern troll) who constantly bitches about optics. Of course, to the mods, this is just my personal opinion. It's your decision, and I also understand that you finally have had enough of Salos after all those years.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As far as I know, pretty much all of the old guard pro-white alt-right figures, including but not limited to Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer, David Duke, Henrik Palmgren and Lana Lokteff, Millennial Woes and Mark Collett, have nothing against women. A more recent example would be CatboyKami. Being both pro-white and anti-woman is inherently contradictory anyways, and I suspect a lot of the anti-women stuff is probably coming from hapa, pajeet and mestizo incels, rather than genuine pro-whites.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is nonsense. David Duke has been doing non-supremacist pro-white stuff for decades with the framing of human rights activism, this was always very popular. "A homeland for every race, Africa for Africans, Europe for Europeans" etc was always way more common than Richard Spencer's imperial ambitions. This is a massive retcon by you.

You're either misinterpreting or deliberately misrepresenting me. My point wasn't that the alt-right used to be fully comprised of people with "supremacist" attitudes, I know it wasn't, but to illustrate how its explicitly white nationalist character got subverted by people who think like OP. It's undeniable that "supremacist" attitudes were much more common in the alt-right before it started getting subverted a couple of years ago.

I have nothing against pro-whites/white nationalists who are non-"supremacist", such as David Duke, but that's totally different from actively pushing for white guilt and ethnomasochism and defacing our history (like OP is doing). By the way, "supremacist" in the way people like you use it is an anti-white slur anyways, which is used to pathologize healthy ingroup preference in whites and whites only. It's perfectly natural to want your race to have power, and among all other races people with strong ingroup preference hold "supremacist" attitudes (often far more extreme than those found among white nationalists), but somehow only whites are supposed to be pacifist isolationists and just let black and brown people dominate the world.

Alt right was a big tent descriptor for everyone pro-white, and even broader than that until Charlottesville lol. Both isolationists/nativists and white supremacists were included. You both are talking out of your arses pretending it specifically referred to one particular strain. Especially when it used to be such a broad tent that before Charlottesville it included non-racialist classical liberals who just didn't like muh crazy sjws and dumb shit like that.

The non-racialist and non-JQ part of the alt-right was never truly part of the alt-right to begin with (just like the previously mentioned retards and shills who've flooded it in recent years), that's the alt-lite and it emerged years after the alt-right itself emerged. A lot of "anti-SJWs" and other alt-liters turned alt-right though, as they watched the alt-lite get BTFO'd by the alt-right in debates (such as the famous Richard Spencer vs. Sargon debate). The alt-right itself was undeniably founded as an explicitly white nationalist movement, considering Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer and ironically enough also David Duke, key figures in the formation of the alt-right, were all explicitly pro-white.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Third worldism is based.

Being white but ethnomasochistic is based? If non-whites and governments of non-white countries that are anti-ZOG want to collaborate with us in fighting against ZOG, no problem, but they can't also be explicitly anti-white. Most non-whites however, even the ones who also supposedly hate the Jewish elites, will just laugh at you and spit in your face if you're white and try to pitch the idea of "muh one struggle" to them, and it's honestly laughable for those non-whites to claim to hate ZOG/the Jewish elites while also being anti-white, since anti-white ideology is literally the product of those same Jewish elites they claim to hate in the first place.

Duginism is a bogeyman used by neocon ZOG apologists, so it's based too because it makes all the right people seethe.

"The right people" being people who are unapologetically pro-white? I thought you considered yourself to be pro-white. Neocons are against Dugin because, according to them, Dugin is a "racist" white nationalist who wants Russia to annex Western Europe. People like me are against Dugin because we know he's anti-white, literally the opposite reason from why neocons are against him. The enemy of your enemy isn't always your friend, sometimes it's just another enemy.

primitivism/luddism

Nothing better than destroying the Aryan folk ways, folk soul and tribal culture in favor of globalism, muh progress and capitalist exploitation. BASED!

Such a pathethic strawman. Having modern industrial and advanced technology is totally separate from ZOG/globohomo and woke culture. You might as well say that using a AR to defend yourself against a murderer is being pro-ZOG, since ZOG also uses ARs to enforce their power. Being a primitivist/luddite and being pro-white are literally inherently contradictory, since getting rid of technology in white society will both cause mass-death and suffering among whites as well as leave us extremely vulnerable from external attacks. Other intelligent peoples, like the Jews and the Chinese, will never get rid of their technology like you insist us whites should do, so they could just come in and instantly BTFO us if we refuse to pursue the same technological innovations as them. I'm also pretty economically left-leaning, so your claim about capitalist exploitation doesn't make much sense either.

I was wondering if you were Brandon Martinez up to this point. Martinez is a hardcore incel but otherwise is on board with your views.

Isn't Brandon Martinez also unapologetically pro-white? In that case, I'm not really surprised that you equate me to him. I've indeed heard that he's very anti-woman, which is very cringe though.

He used to be a pro-Russian Duginist who was sympathetic to the European New Right. Now he's just a midwit vaccine shilling liberal and probably a glowie.

Funny enough, I also used to like him more in the past, and now don't like him anymore. Is he even still pro-white? He doesn't even come off as pro-white anymore nowadays. And although I disagree with Keith Woods pretty strongly (on mainly the same things I disagree with you), I also think it's very low how Richard Spencer constantly attacks Keith Woods nowadays.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Vietnam and Afghanistan are completely powerless in any meaningful sense (just like most other third world backwaters that managed to fight off invaders), and it took them devastating wars on their own soil to not get conquered, so if anything you're actually further strengthening my argument in favor of being imperialistic rather than just defensive. The truth of the matter is that in geopolitics you're either on the long end of the stick or the short end of the stick, so in geopolitics there isn't really room for morality and moral consistency in the same way there should be on an interpersonal level.

That doesn't mean, however, that we should just oppress and exploit non-whites living in countries to be colonized or indirectly controlled, which I strongly oppose. Under the type of imperialism I advocate for, we would build infrastructure, farms, schools and hospitals for them, help them improve through eugenics, and give them access to the same social safety net and public facilities as people in white countries in general. In exchange, they aren't allowed to leave for white countries anymore, can't have too many children, and have to give us whites unlimited acccess to the valuable resources located in their lands. This would be a win-win scenario: They won't have to live in poverty anymore and get to enjoy a Western standard of living, while we get to curb non-white overpopulation and gain access to the resources needed for our advanced technology.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Originally, "alt right" was supposed to mean a third positionist movement that would introduce people in the English speaking world to people like Alain de Benoist, but it ended up just meaning old-fashioned colonialist white nationalism.

You got it the other way around. The alt-right's main focal point used to be race realism/human biodiversity, the JQ, and being unapologetically pro-white (which also means being at least open to, if not outright supportive of, the idea of bringing back some form of white colonialism and global white hegemony).

In recent years, however, the alt-right has seen an ever-increasing (probably mostly astroturfed) influx of retards, schizos and shills injecting it with ridiculous LARP ideologies that suvbert the alt-right's original white nationalist character and intentions, and in many cases would be even explicitly harmful to white racial interests (i.e third worldism/Duginism, Islamism/"white sharia", primitivism/luddism, flat earth theory, boomer cuckservative religious fundamentalism, incel/anti-woman views, etc.).

Furthermore, it's kinda ironic how the very same people who most strongly hold the views you hate the most about the alt-right, such as Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer, are actually the ones who in part originally founded the alt-right to begin with.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imperialism itself wasn't what introduced blacks into America, they were introduced by Jewish slave traders who bought them from African tribe leaders. Canada and Australia are unquestionably a product of imperialism, yet they have basically no blacks as slavery was already banned when their colonization really kicked off, and Canada and Australia used to be almost 100% white until the recent non-white mass-immigration.

Imperialism doesn't have to lead to large-scale miscegenation either. The former Spanish and Portuguese colonies mostly consist of mestizos today, because the Spanish and Portuguese sent mostly single men to their colonies and let them fuck anything that moved. The Anglo colonies, on the other hand, prove that it's perfectly possible to maintain racial purity under imperialism, by sending both men and women from the UK to the colonies, and by having a "racist" value system that condemns whites who miscegenate as race traitors and punishes non-whites who try to miscegenate with whites. Hence why even the US, despite its large slave-descended black population, used to be over 85% white until the 1965 Hart-Celler immigration act (read: white genocide act).

The idea that non-white mass-immigration into white countries is just a natural consequence of white/European imperialism, rather than something deliberately facilitated by subversive, malicious Jewish elites in order for them to gain more control over the whealthy white countries, is basically just woke anti-white nonsense. Don't let anti-whites guilt you into blaming our people for all our current problems and defacing our own history. I still appreciate it that you still support Columbus Day even though you morally disagree with him though, that's the unapologetic nationalist spirit I want to see more in our circles. For the same reason, I'm against slavery but at the same time I'm strongly against tearing down statues and monuments of Confederates.

Regarding imperialism itself: Even if you morally disagree with imperialism in principle, it's basically a tragedy of the commons. If we as whites are unwilling to reclaim our dominant position on the global stage, which would also mean either directly or indirectly taking back control over most non-white countries we used to occupy, some other race or civilization (such as the Jews or the Chinese) is going to take our place and do it anyways. So if you're opposed to white imperialism/colonialism, what you're essentially implying is "I want whites to be powerless and get dominated by the rest of the world, and I want more power to the Jews and the Chinese!", which is inherently contradictory to being pro-white. I'm not saying you think like this or that you aren't pro-white, I'm just taking the idea of being white and being against white imperialism to its logical conclusion.

Columbus Day isn't based by Noloben in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

imperialism is based

FTFY.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some of his posts and comments remind me of what a Jewish neoliberal thinks the alt right believes. For instance in his the wrong side won ww2 post the FIRST thing he lists as the number one negative effect of ww2 is the eventual destruction of Rhodesia? lmao. Jewish liberals seem to think Rhodesia figures greatly into alt right thinking for some bizarre reason. I guess because some old school white nationalists use to talk about it.

Assuming u/radicalcentrist and his sudden change in political views are genuine, he might've actually picked up the bit about Rhodesia from me. I regularly talk about Rhodesia (as well as Apartheid South Africa), about how I think it was a shining example of how a country or territory with a white minority and a black majority should be organized, and I also specifically mentioned Rhodesia and Apartheid South Africa a lot in my first discussions with radicalcentrist back last February.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not fully convinced u/radicalcentrist is necessarily a shill, but it's definitely at least peculiar how his views changed so drastically in such a short period of time, hence why I asked him to explain himself earlier in this thread.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've just search "valkyria1488"'s profile, but I didn't find any "yous". He/she/xir/it did, however, constantly bring up the exact same talking points as Courbeaux/Noloben, and similarly accused anyone who disagreed with him/her/xir/it of being anti-white or a ZOG shill.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible, but I don't really see how a troll/shill starting out as a shitlib and then changing his persona into a white nationalist would benefit the left. Usually when the left wants to "deradicalize" people like us and sabotage our communities, they'll do the opposite, pretending they used to be one of us but "escaped the rabbit hole" (i.e: "Faraday Speaks").

You have to keep in mind that a lot of us used to be shitlibs/leftists, or at least some type of liberal or normie cuckservative, ourselves before we started to develop awareness of the attack on white people and started to develop more white ingroup preference as a result, so it could just be the case that radicalcentrist is genuine but just late to the party.

To u/radicalcentrist, maybe it's the best if you explain for yourself what caused you to change your political views in such a short period of time.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt whether "valkyria1488" is Salos. His/her/xir/its behavior and writing style are both very different from that Salos. "valkyria1488" also had a different writing style and persona from Courbeaux/Noloben, playing more of a low-IQ meth-addicted trailer park skinhead character, whereas Courbeaux/Noloben acted as a more intellegent Duginist NazBol LARPer, but in essence all three of them spewed the same talking points and used similar rhetoric.

The wrong side won WW2. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After a space of 100,000 or even 10,000 years, our descendants would be so far apart from us that they'd feel like a different species altogether.

It doesn't really matter. However different they will be from us, they will still be the closest thing resembling us genetically and phenotypically compared to other races and species. Maybe you don't care about your descendants surviving long-term, but I sure do. Of course, assuming we will win, eugenics and human genetic modification can also do its part in "fossilizing" traits common in whites, while making beneficial traits in whites more prominent and dysgenic traits less prominent. But no matter how different our descendants will be from us in hundreds of thousands of years from us, this will be such a gradual evolutionary process that we won't even notice it. Whites from 10 000 years ago were pretty much the same as us genetically and phenotypically, so assuming we will manage to stop dysgenics by implementing eugenics and human genetic modification, whites from 10 000 years in the future will still be very similar to us, definitely similar enough to the point that they would be biologically classified as white by today's standards.

The wrong side won WW2. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't it seem excessive to plan "hundreds of millions of years" into the future?

I don't see why. If we're serious about the survival of our race and our species, and their descendants, I think there's no such thing as thinking too long term. I consider low time preference to be a very virtuous trait which whites (and also East-Asians) possess, and I don't think we should be ashamed to fully embrace it.

Of course, all the nihilist propaganda by the progressive Jewish media would have us give up low time preference: "lmao why do you care if your great-grandchildren will be living as a hated minority in their own country, you'll be dead by then", "lmao why do you care about stuff that doesn't affect your personal life, we're all just stardust/molecules"

It would be interesting to see if humanity can even reach a million.

If the current psychopathic Jewish elites will remain in power for the foreseeable future, humanity (except maybe some East-Asian countries, because they're both intelligent and industrious like whites, but are more politically independent of the ZOG world order unlike us) definitely seems to be heading towards a path of "self"-destruction: Usury, plutocracy/kakistocracy, endless wars, forced dysgenics, forced racial integration, forced mass-immigration of low-IQ non-whites, a culture celebrating weakness, uglyness and insanity and demonizing strength, beauty and normalcy, etc.

In the period roughly between the 1880s and 1960s, before the current Jewish elites managed to completely take over America (and therefore its satellite states in Western Europe), we were definitely going in the right direction: Eugenics, racialist immigration policies, rapid advancements in space travel (and technology in general), ever-increasing prosperity, increasing pan-European cooperation, etc. But somewhere around the 1960s and 1970s, we gradually saw an almost 180 degrees inversion of those things, and people who still supported those things were suddenly called "racist", "white supremacist", "nazi", etc.

I hope that we as whites will manage to remove the current Jewish elite from power as soon as possible and replace them, so we can continue with what we were doing between the 1880s and 1960s, and eventually, in the coming centuries and millennia, create a utopian white civilization and establish the presence of our race and species throughout the Galaxy. If the path we were on between the 1880s and 1960s never got sabotaged and inverted by the current Jewish elites in the first place, we probably would already have managed to build a permanent moon base and put a man on Mars by now.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really. Part 1 and 2 are just patterns I've noticed over a longer period of time. Part 3 literally just required me to do three quick Google searches.

The wrong side won WW2. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have no idea what you people see in space exploration.

Within a couple of hundreds of millions of years from now, the Sun will become so bright that it will boil the Earth, guaranteed to kill all complex life on Earth. In around 5 billion years, when the Sun will start to reach the end of its life cycle, it will massively grow in size and literally swallow the Earth.

So for people like me, reasons for supporting space exploration aren't just because "it's cool" or "I F*CKING LOVE SCIENCE!!", it's literally about survival. If you want the white race, or the human species as a whole, to survive long term (which I do), developing interstellar space travel, and the subsequent colonization of Earth-like exoplanets, will be an absolute necessity.

Alternatively, we could try to develop highly advanced technology to move the Earth further away from the Sun, and try to harness enough energy from the Sun (with a Dyson sphere or something similar) to be able to actually power this technology, but given how unfeasible this would be even compared to something like interstellar space travel, we're probably better off continuing to focus on developing more advanced and efficient space travel technology in the hope that it will eventually enable us to reach for the stars and spread our posterity all throughout the Galaxy.

The wrong side won WW2. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just some advice: Use more spacing in your replies, to cut them up into more paragraphs. Right now, your reply is basically just unreadable (except for the beginning part, where the spacing was done correctly).

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't really believe Salos and u/Soylent (Blork3D) are the same person at all. As far as I know, Soylent/Blork3D used to be something like a woke shitlib years ago (which a lot of us used to be before we started to become pro-white), and used to troll our sub back then (before I was even part of this sub), but has since bettered his life and now more or less holds the same views as us (similarly to u/radicalcentrist, who also came here as a shitlib last February but has since gradually become pro-white), so I don't really have an issue with him anymore. When Soylent/Blork3D replies to Salos, this could just be genuine disagreement on his part, and I can't imagine he'd put so much effort in those replies if he was just another alt account run by the same person as Salos.

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know about "WeestGang", but I just checked his profile and he definitely also seems like a troll/shill. "Courbeaux" is probably the same person as "Noloben", and possibly also "valkyria1488" (I thought there were more of them, but those three are the only ones I can recall off the top of my head). All three of those accounts were self-proclaimed Duginist NazBols, constantly celebrated white criminals and prison gangs, and "white trash" culture, and insisted we should ally ourselves with them and talked about how people who support any type of legal system or police force (even for in a white ethnostate) are anti-white because that would also get white criminals killed or imprisoned, and all three of them behaved very similarly in general. I really doubt whether Salos is also behind Courbeaux/Noloben/valkyria1488 though, those accounts seem to be run by a different troll, judging by the behaviour (or Salos must have really good acting skills).

List of evidence suggesting "Salos", "probgoingtohell", "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" are almost certainly the same person by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ok wow man, wait a minute. I'll admit one of my old accounts was probgoingtohell but I'm neither of those other 2. ayotollahsiniran is a liberal and Republican58 is probably some 60 year old Republican beginning to open up to nationalist views.

Of course, the evidence for "probgoingtohell" being you is the strongest, and it turns out I was right about that one as you've just admitted, while the evidence for "Republican58" being you is the weakest. "probgoingtohell" fitted every pattern of being you: Acting in the same way on this sub, making the same grammar and spelling mistakes as you, using, and having a history of posting on the same specific subreddits on reddit as you. "ayotollahsiniran" presents himself as having different poltical beliefs than you, but he also shows similar behavior to yours on this sub, has a history of posting in the same specific subreddits on reddit as you, and also uses "yous" just like you. "Republican58" only behaves the same as you, uses the same grammar and spelling mistakes as you, and also uses "yous", but I still think even that is too much of a coincidence for him to not be one of your accounts.

ayotollahsiniran is a liberal and Republican58 is probably some 60 year old Republican beginning to open up to nationalist views.

Just because "ayotollahsiniran" and "Republican58" present themselves as having different politcal beliefs than you, doesn't necessarily mean they aren't you. You could be playing different personas based on the account you're logged into at the moment. And like I already said, "ayotollahsiniran" also just so happens to have a history of posting in the same specific subreddits on reddit as you, as well as saying "yous" just like you, coincidences so unlikely that they could otherwise only be explained by magic.

I agree with the JQ but not to insane schizophrenic levels, and most of the Nationalist ideology, I think being en garde against users that have the potential for violence is a positive since those incidents are the equivalent of strikes to the balls for our movement globally as well as all round horrific.

If what you're saying here is true, we're on the same level regarding nationalism and the JQ. But I remember you praising Dwight D. Eisenhower for his violent enforcment of desegregation policies against white people, which is an extremely weird thing to do for a supposed white nationalist, to say the least. Regarding the part about right-wing hate crimes and people on our side who are prone to violence: I'm also against those things, and so are most people on this sub I assume, but there's no reason to constantly whine about it on this sub. Instead, if right-wing hate crimes or terrorist attacks are brought up by someone (whether complaining about it or praising it), simply denounce it and move on, and if you see people on this sub advocating or threathening violence, simply use the report button and move on.

.

The word yous isn't evidence either and I've seen it used a ton on this site. Am I supposed to say something like "gang" or "you guys"?

You can simply do a Google search on ["yous" site:saidit.net] and see for youself. Only one of the many results are from someone else, all other results are from you, "ayotollahsiniran" or "Republican58". "You" on it's own is already also plural, so there isn't really a need for using "you guys", "yous" (black Ebonics), "y'all" (mostly used by woke leftists, aside from blacks and Southerners), but none of these forms is technically incorrect so it's up to you.

.

What's your sources for point 3? I don't recall ayotollahsiniran even being on reddit.

I'm not gonna waste my time fetching all the URLs from all your reddit posts on those subreddits just for you, you disingenuous prick, I'm not your fucking dog. I just did Google searches on ["salos10000" site:reddit.com], ["probgoingtohell" site:reddit.com] and ["ayotollahsiniran" site:reddit.com], which is how I came across your posts in the same specific subreddits (r/victoria2, r/victoria3 and r/TNOmod) from all three of those reddit accounts in the first place. If you, or anyone else who happens to read this, wants a sOuRcE, just do the same Google searches I just mentioned.

.

In general, what was the point of this post? Why couldn't you have put this energy into an actual post with meaning rather than pointless infighting which is the bane of nearly every White Nationalist cause?

I'm not posting this out of hate against you, to start a fight with you. The point of this post is to clear things up for everyone else in this sub, by publishing my findings, so everyone can make up their own minds about it. You are very obssesed with this sub, in a very weird and unhealthy way, as your behavior from all of those fake accounts has shown, and whenever people ask you why you do this in private messages you won't even respond to them, so this isn't infighting. Infighting would be someone on this sub (or another dissident right community) claiming to be a Pagan and constantly talking shit about white Christians, someone claiming to be a Christian and constantly talking shit about white Pagans, someone claiming to be Nordic and constantly talking shit about Mediterranean whites, someone claiming to be Mediterranean and constantly talking shit about Nordic whites, etc.

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, how on earth could forcing companies and institutions to reduce their Jewish proportion cause massive riots that would be able to seriously disrupt American society? It will be mostly Jews who would be mad about this, and they're only 2% of the US population and don't have it in them to violently riot anyways. Blacks definitely wouldn't riot over this either, they only riot when something bad happens to another black person or a group of black people, and they don't really like Jews and generally don't distinguish between Jews and white gentiles anyways (so given that they might even celebrate this policy).

I also don't see how these companies going on stike would be able to long-term paralyze the economy; these companies would mostly just destroy themselves and go bankrupt, and other companies that are willing to comply would fill in the void they left behind and benefit from it.

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To answer your question seriously: Effective ways to force companies and institutions to keep the compostion of their leadership positions (or their workforce as a whole) at max. 2% Jewish without having to force them to fire already employed Jews, would include:

  • Forcing companies and institution to not hire any more additional Jews until the Jewish proportion has dropped to max. 2%, in the same way companies and institutions are currently forced to not hire any additional white people until the white proportion has dropped to the required percentage under affirmitive action/"diversity" hiring policies.

  • Forcing companies and institutions to implement anti-loxism training courses which all Jewish employees will be required to follow before they can start or continue their job, in the same way companies and institutions are currently forced to implement "anti-racism" training courses which all white employees are required to follow. These anti-loxism training courses would filter out most Jews with Jewish supremacist attitudes and convert the fence-sitters to anti-loxism, in the same way the current "anti-racist" training courses filter out most white people with pro-white sentiments and turn the fence-sitters into self-hating whites.

  • Simply hiring additional white gentiles, until the Jewish proportion had dropped to max. 2%, thus expanding the total workforce of companies and institutions. To make up for the inefficiency forcibly expanding the workforce of companies and institions would cause, they'd have to start firing people more quickly for incompetence.

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another "yous" again, definitely very suspicious at this point. 🤔

u/literalotherkin

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice try, fed.

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What would happen under the current affirmitive action policies if a white guy refuses to quit his job and the company/organisation he's employed at refuses to fire him and goes on strike if police arrive to "remove" him?

A question about point 4 of the NJP's platform by ayotollahsinIran in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yo, u/Blackbrownfreestuff told me that you post pictures of yourself pretending to be a British actress. Why do you do this? What mental illness do you have?

Please debunk this TRA article by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What makes this even weirder is that those accounts all have an organic comment history, all talking about trans-related stuff in those subs. Assuming all of those accounts are just alts from the same person (which they probably are), why on earth would he use all of those accounts to talk about the same topic, instead of just using one (on top of continuing to spam the same post for so long, which on its own is already very weird)?

SaidIt Survey: Which non-default subs do you think should be added to default and/or which subs do you think deserve more attention and/or subscribers? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You clearly take issue with the idea of our sub being added to default subs, or else you wouldn't have felt the need to write your initial reply to me, but nice backpedaling. Either that, or you're just poor at communicating, and shifting the blame on me for misintepreting you in order to avoid having to admit fault.

SaidIt Survey: Which non-default subs do you think should be added to default and/or which subs do you think deserve more attention and/or subscribers? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In that case you're not really in the position to complain about our sub being added to default subs, let alone complain about it being on s/all.

SaidIt Survey: Which non-default subs do you think should be added to default and/or which subs do you think deserve more attention and/or subscribers? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]YORAMRW 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's a "mute sub" button below every post on s/all for a reason. If you press it on any post from s/DebateAltRight, you'll never have to see another post post from our "idiotic" sub ever again.

What do you think of this anti communist argument? by Salos60000 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Want who to make a what?

What do you think of this anti communist argument? by Salos60000 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How?

What are your thoughts on recreational weed/marijuana? by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're a ZOGbot? Got it.

What are your thoughts on recreational weed/marijuana? by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you base your morality on the law (written by Jews and shabbos goys), instead of your own sense of right and wrong, and on what's best for our people? What if being a white nationalist became illegal tomorrow? I'm assuming you're also pro-white.

Chinese state media label George Soros a ‘terrorist’ by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wtf I love ching-chongs now

The jews aren't White theory doesn't really have a strong basis to be honest by Salos60000 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know, but Neanderthals weren't one of those three ancestral populations. Those three (proto-)white ancestral populations emerged thousands (if not tens of thousands) of years after the Neanderthals were still around and the mixing occurred. Those three acestral populations were the Western Hunter Gatherers (Nordic whites, Northwestern Europe), Indo-Europeans/Yamnaya (partially Nordic whites, eastern Ukraine and the Caucasus), and Neolithic Farmers (non-Nordic whites; Southern Europe, North Africa and the Levant/Near East). All three of those ancestral populations of mordern-day whites already had Neanderthal admixture, just like non-white Caucasoids, Central Asians (Caucasoid-Mongoloid hybrids) and East Asians (most pure Mongoloids).

Furthermore, West-African blacks (Congoid Negroids) have admixture of up to 20% of previously unknown "ghost DNA", which has recently been revelead to have been a hybrid of Homo Sapiens and Homo Erectus (a now extinct human subspecies which is known for looking like a racist caricature of a black man, which has been found to have been very lazy and low-IQ), meaning modern day blacks are the closest thing still alive to the Homo Erectus.

The jews aren't White theory doesn't really have a strong basis to be honest by Salos60000 in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, you have to keep in mind that, although modern-day whites are technically a mix of three ancestral populations, those three ancestral populations were by no means different races. Based on the archelogical evidence, those three ancestral populations were distantly related to each other and would all fall into the Caucasoid category based on physical characteristics, and were at most different sub-races.

So modern-day whites aren't a mixed people in the way mestizos and and South Asians are for example, and comparing the "mixed" origins of whites to the actually mixed origins of mestizos and South Asians (as "socks" was likely going to do, thinking it's an "own" against us) would be like comparing people who are half German half English to people who are half German half Somalian.

The suffragettes were rabid eugenicists by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why go to the trouble of writing this while making insulting comments? Are you not confident in what you write? Do you know the definition of 'disingenuous'? Do you really want to lower the discourse while you make your arguments? Do you think anyone will take you seriously when you do this? (No, they won't.)

Of course that's the only thing in my reply you're focusing on, instead of focusing on the actual substance of it, because you can't come up with any rational arguments of your own. This is tone policing by the way, and thus a Rule 2 violation on this sub, considering you yourself are all about people following the rules. Me throwing insults in at you in my reply has nothing to do with confidence, I do this because pathological liars and sophists like you require this in order for the arguments to get through your head, since you clearly aren't responisive to logic and reason on its own.

Judging by the amount of likes my reply verus your reply has gotten so far, I'm clearly the one that's being taken more seriously than you here, and almost any white person who has ever had biology classes (except for a small minority of brainwashed woke anti-white Reddit freaks like you) would definitely take my side regarding eugenics when presented both of our sets of arguments, as any sane person who has any grasp of evolution would simply have to lie to himsels to deny that I'm right on this.

And yes, "disingenuous" is actually a perfect description for someone who falsely claims that there's a risk of inbreeding depression with a population of millions of people just because some pathological traits have been removed from it, whereas in reality all scientific evidence suggests inbreeding depression can only occur without any deliberate actions of incest in very small, isolated populations of a couple of thousand people or less.

.

It amazes me the lengths to which people will go to try to justify the recent rise in "scientific" racism. I see that they are very serious about it and have a substantial, which is doubly worrying. Comments like these help me learn about the resurgence of interests in eugenics (but at the cost of dealing with insults from insecure people).

That was a long-winded way of telling us we're living in your minds rent-free. We were already aware of the fact that the alt-right lives in everyone's minds rent-free nowadays, even more so in the minds of woke anti-white leftists and shitlibs like you, but thanks for the additional confirmation. Keep coping and seething. ;)

.

The other problem is that those who favor the resurgence of eugenics are now primarily arguing for the hatred and removal of (or distancing of) the 'other' - to breed a better race - rather than for 'science' and 'humanity'

My support for eugenics has never been about hatred, or at least not primarily, it's about improving the white race, and by extension humanity as a whole, and about creating a safer, more prosperous and more socially cohesive future for my people and humanity in general. If you've actually paid any attention to my statements (including my previous reply to you) on eugenics from the past couple of years, you'd have known that I regularly talk about how I'm of the opinion that those who shouldn't be allowed to reproduce (the dumb, the weak, the ugly, the disabled, the mentally ill, etc.) should still be taken care of by the government, should still retain most of their other rights and freedoms (except for the right to vote and actively participate in politics), and should still be treated with respect by the rest of society. I do hate anti-whites (regardless of whether they're white themselves, Jewish or non-white) with a burning passion though, and they are obviously among the first who should be considered for forced sterilization under any eugenics policy.

PS: Furthermore, anti-eugenicists (like you) are on the same level of either delusional insanity or pathological lying for political purposes as flat earthers, young earth creationists and people who unironically claim 2 + 2 = 5, the only difference being that your lie/delusion is currently backed with money, propaganda, censorship and violence by the ruling elites, whereas the other lies/delusions aren't. So I sincerely hope that one day, once we've managed to remove the current elites, and your pro-dysgenics/anti-eugenics (bioleninist) shilling doesn't have any institutional support anymore, we can just simply neuter you, put you away in an insane asylum together with the other woke Reddit freaks, and be done with it, for the betterment of the rest of society.

Worm Farming--Based or Not? by Frenologist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I can already imagine the ADL declaring worms a hate symbol, and many hitpieces from woke leftist newspapers about it being written: "White Supremacists' Most Recent Obsession: Worm Farming, And Why We Should Be Worried About That" lmao

Worm Farming--Based or Not? by Frenologist in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The "New Worm Order"?

Keith Woods & Joel Davis vs Logo Daedalus & Infrared Haz by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's a full-blown Marxist now? Well, that explains a lot. Some of his anti-white tweets have very strong Michael Moore energy: The condescending, gleeful anti-white radlib attitude towards working class whites, by expressing fake pity for the bad situation they're in coupled with concern trolling along the lines of "If these dumb rednecks stopped being so racist they might actually be able to unite with the black and Hispanic working class against the capitalist pigs and defeat them", if you know what I mean.

Keith Woods & Joel Davis vs Logo Daedalus & Infrared Haz by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Logo Daedalus is a Jewish supremacist, anti-white piece of shit. Just search for his username plus "white" or "jewish" on Twitter and you'll see what I mean.

The suffragettes were rabid eugenicists by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

regardless of whether negative or positive [eugenics] policies are used, they are susceptible to abuse because the genetic selection criteria are determined by whichever group has political power at the time.

This is a very common lolbert talking point. The same tactical nihilism you anti-eugenicists apply to eugenics could just as well be applied to any type of policy backed by state power. The eugenics example of this argument with some other examples to put it into perspective:

  • "Using state power to implement eugenics that promotes traits we deem good and selects against traits we deem bad is dangerous and hypocritical, because that would justify our enemies using state power to implement eugenics that promotes traits we deem bad and selects against traits we deem good if they ever take over the state from us in the future!"

  • "Using state power to prohibit, restrict or deplatform white nationalist groups is dangerous and hypocritical, because that would justify white nationalists using state power to prohibit, restrict or deplatform antifa and BLM if they ever take over the state from us in the future!" (something someone who's on your side or is a concern troll who pretends to be on your side might say)

  • "Using state power to sentence rapists and serial killers to death is dangerous and hypocritical, because that would justify rapists and serial killers using state power to sentence people who hate rapists and serial killers to death if they ever take over the state from us in the future!"

Of course, this lolbert argument is totally ridiculous and has no bearing in practical reality, since any serious politicians and elites who genuinely want to enact certain policies will do everything they can to achieve this, regardless of whether their opponents are as fanatical as themselves (such as people like me) or whether they are lolbert cucks and boomer cuckservatives who refuse to play their enemies' game because "muh principles" (hence why they will always lose out against their more machiavellian opponents).

.

Furthermore, many criticize negative eugenics in particular as a violation of basic human rights, seen since 1968's Proclamation of Tehran as including the right to reproduce.

LOL, the same "human rights" council that considers any form of "racism", prohibiting fags from adopting and molesting children, or pointing out that MTF trannies will never be real women "human rights abuses". Also, in a lot of countries, including the Netherlands, people who are more severely mentally disabled (around sub-75 IQ) are already de facto prohibited from reproducing, and in the rare occasion they decide to reproduce regardless the child is usually forcibly taken away and put up for adoption. So a lot of countries, the Netherlands included, already have a form of eugenics, albeit an extremely soft one. Maybe you can go cry crocodile tears at the UN "human rights" council and set up a petition for "free love for the retards" or something.

.

Another criticism is that eugenics policies eventually lead to a loss of genetic diversity, thereby resulting in inbreeding depression due to a loss of genetic variation.

Eugenics doesn't lead to a loss of diversity and inbreeding, you disingenuous prick. Inbreeding depression only occurs when you have a tiny, isolated population of less than 100 000 people, which definitely isn't the case with eugenics, as it would only prohibit a small minority of the population from reproducing and would allow for any genetic traits not deemed dysgenic to continue spreading.

The only way eugenics could cause issues with loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding would be if it was done in a similar way as how dogs were bred for specific traits, forcing generations of people with certain traits to mate with their siblings and cousins just because they also posess those traits, but that's a woke leftist strawman definition of eugenics that has no bearing in reality regarding the ways in which eugenics has actually been historically practiced from the late 19th century up to around the 1970s.

Actual eugenics in the way almost all eugenicists historically advocated for and how it was actually practiced is totally alien from your ridiculous strawman conception of eugenics as "breeding humans like dogs", instead it just seeks to prohibit a minority of the population with traits deemed dysgenic from reproducing and to positively incentivize a minority of the population with traits deemed good to reproduce the most.

.

Yet another criticism of contemporary eugenics policies is that they propose to permanently and artificially disrupt millions of years of evolution

If you're truly that concerned about millions of years of evolution being "artificially disrupted", you should be very upset at the fact that governments are, through incentives like non-discriminatory (or even low-income specific) child benefits and foreign aid to Africa, artificially enabling (or even rewarding) specifically the low-IQ and mentally ill in our societies to shit out as many babies as they want to like rabbits, instead of just letting them undergo sterilization but allowing to them keep their welfare in exchange. Many of those low-IQ and mentally ill people either would've had way smaller families or simply would've died off before the industrial revolution, but now that we have eugenics it would just be cruel to let them die off if we can also achieve the same outcome by simply paying them to get themselves sterilized.

But of course, you have no problem with that type of (actual) artificial disruption of evolution (dysgenics), you only have a problem with our type, the one that would actually improve and benefit humanity (eugenics). Whenever people (like yourself) insist we actively encourage and incentivize the dumbest, ugliest, weakest and most mentally ill members of society to reproduce the most, it's either ignored or applauded by Jewish leftists and other bioleninists (like yourself), but when people (like me) insist we do the opposite and actively encourage and incentivize the smartest, most attractive, strongest and most mentally stable members of society to reproduce the most, it's considered evil nazism and we're told that it wouldn't work and would "artificially disrupt" millions of years of evolution.

Also, if eugenics in favor of traits deemed positive would supposedly "artificially disrupt" millions of years of evolution, then by your own logic, so would any natural evolutionary selection pressures that had/have similar effects on humans (such as the selection pressure the Ice Age had on the humans that left Africa for Europe and eventually became modern-day whites), so this would mean evolution itself "artificially disrupts" millions of years of prior evolution, making your argument self-refuting.

The suffragettes were rabid eugenicists by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm reading through this thread together with my wife's Black boyfriend's beautiful Brown sons, and they started applauding and told me that this gives them hope of a brighter, more diverse and equal future, despite the dark times we're going through in the current white supremacist Amerikkka with Drumpf's legacy! Wholesome Reddit moment!! Science says racism bad!

The suffragettes were rabid eugenicists by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]YORAMRW 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

So true!! Charles Darwin, much like Jesus, was also a trans queer lesbian intersectionalist who supported drag queen story hour, wanted to abolish the police and wanted to enrich white majority countries with endless diversity! But most people are ignorant bigots who don't know any of this, because the history books in school (written by the racist white devil) don't teach us any of this! All "science" before the 1930s was just medieval quackery, because it was a bunch of old racist white males who believed in problematic constructs such as "genetics", but thankfully the enlightened Jewish heroes came along to save the day and tell us that eugenics is incorrect and the greatest evil in human history, and rightfully shut down anyone who disagreed with them, so now it's all good and I f*cking love Science!!!