all 35 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He was the greatest man ever. My thoughts are posted in this thread

There are men who have been similarly successful but from starting points of privilege and less resistance to themselves like Napoleon and Alexander. Never has a man come from Hitler's position and became the most powerful man in the world through his own merit, not only this but Hitler did this when the entire world, which had WAY more power than Germany, was working to actively suppress and destroy Germany. There really isn't anyone comparable to this man, even if you're a jew who despises Hitler this can't really be disputed. There's a reason Hitler has replaced god as the central figure of western culture, even if he is supposed to be the embodiment of all evil rather than all good.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

My honest thoughts are that he was the most important man of the 20th century and a truly great man. He fought to save the world from rapacious capitalism, Jewish power and Bolshevism and no man has ever come so close to slaying those awful dragons that still haunt every White life to this very day. As Markimus pointed out as well his life really is the stuff of legends. Kennedy was right in his diary that the man had a certain magic about him.

Happy Birthday, Adolf.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Claiming that Jesus didn't exist is something even Jews wouldn't say.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    He should have won.

    [–]Lugger 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    A power-crazed douchebag; retard who is largely responsible for why the Western world is the way it is today.

    The war he started to get some Slavic land and secure Germany's hegemony in Europe resulted in tens of millions of Europeans losing their lives, the continent being divided up by the Americans and Russians and his beloved Germany itself burned to the ground

    He did more damage to the West than any other European ruler that ever existed; not only materialistic, but also ideological as the atrocities commited by the Natzees were used by the liberals as a banner to suppress any notions of nationalism in yt countries and steamroll their agenda with little to no resistance.

    Wait a second... did I notice in the comments above remarks that he was actually all about "fighting the k*kes"? Really?

    Murdering tens of millions of Europeans to own the Jews! Peak Nazi supporters' logic!

    [–]asterias 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

    He chose the wrong path the moment he had Strasser executed.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I agree with this too.

    Germany needed more worker's rights. What the National Socialists proposed was extending work hours, while secretly creating their own class of ultra rich elites. The same problems that currently exist with Capital today would have made its way to Germany, but without the woke nonsense.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I'd like to hear your reasoning more. You wouldn't have had the 12 year miracle with Strasser's policies. You wouldn't have prevented a future international conflict with strasser's policies.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Strasserists said that a second revolution was necessary as was the plan from the start and wealth should somehow be redistributed instead of continued support to a capitalist model. Hitler said that that wasn't necessary because of the planned expansion to the East and the eradication of Poland. Horia Sima has written a lot about the German policy towards other countries, which finally left Germany alone.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Source.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Horia Sima wrote a number of books where he gives an extensive account of the Legionnaires and their relationship with Germany.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I was more looking on the source that says Hitler planned on 'eradication' of Poland and expansion east.

    Most of the OST plan and lebensraum shit is Jewish bullshit related to the 'Hitler planned to exterminate all races' propaganda.

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12639

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Obviously the "planned to eradicate all races" is typical hysteria, but I don't think he didn't plan it for the Polish.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Obviously the "planned to eradicate all races" is typical Jewish hysteria, but I don't think he didn't plan it for the Polish.

    As a matter of fact, the military old guard that SA opposed had played a vital role in the execution of the Jewish plot for the eradication of the Christians of Asia Minor and they were eager to repeat the same process in Poland. Hence the well known phrase "who remembers the Armenian genocide anyway?".

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yeah I agree man, Hitler should've just let people perform a coup of his state and murder him, 100%.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Strasser had left politics and was working for a living. His execution was just out of spite. I would add that history proved that Strasser was right and Hitler destroyed his people.

    [–]AngryBannedRedditor 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Guy's an idiot, he should have left Russia alone. Invading Russia ended up with Russia occupying a huge chunk of Germany for over 40 years. Russia was just too much for Germany to handle.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Hitler knew he couldn't face down the entire world. After many offers of peace to Great Britain, he SPECIFICALLY went East to DEMONSTRATE to the West that he was no threat to them. Hitler was such an honorable man that he believed his fellow white leaders also had some honor in them when in fact they had Jewish influence replace any honor at all.

    You see, GB and the West in general went to war with Germany because of Versailles but it wasn't really in their interest to go fight Germany. Hitler knew this. He knew it was against other nations' interest to invest in a war that meant nothing to them, and even worse, might mean letting communism loose in the world. So he goes and fights communism and came very close to winning.

    Little did big H know that the subhuman parasites had already wrapped most governments in their filthy tentacles and gained control. Hitler probably only figured out that he was facing a WORLDWIDE CONSPIRACY to bring down white man at the very end of his life.

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    My main issue is that is should have been more forward thinking with the goal of a new European Civilization rather than a new German Empire. This new order still could have been lead and dominated by Germany. He wanted Empire in the East and was perfectly fine with liberal democracies in the West and even sought a world order lead by Germany in the continent and liberal Britain overseas. The anti slavism is exaggerated and there was no extermination goal but they clearly sought Empire in the East at the expense of Eastern populations.

    It should have been more pan European and while temporary alliance with liberal UK could be done for convenience the goal needs to be the defeat of all liberal systems in the West.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Back then, Western Liberalism was hugely different from the dangerous and evil communism of the East.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    I changed my mind about him.

    He should have retired in 1943 and offered to return Germany's borders back to where they were at the start of the war. Millions of lives would have been saved, and Churchill could have gotten his wish to invade the USSR much more earlier. But dragging the war out when it was obvious there was no path to victory was pure egotism. It also showed his popularity was waning, since even his closest generals were getting fed up, and either wanted him assassinated (which was the case with Operation Valkyrie), or they planned on surrendering to the Western Allies instead (i.e Heinrich Himmler, who was head of the SS, deserted Hitler when it was over).

    It's one thing to be pissed at how your nation got screwed over by a treaty, but plunging the entire world into said misery and chaos is beyond mean spirited and only makes your cause look hypocritical.

    [–][deleted]  (7 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      Japan got nuked twice yet 99% of their home islands stayed the same after the war.

      Churchill and Roosevelt would never allow anything that wasn't a inconditional surrender.

      They should have just ran with it. The alternative was fighting until Berlin collapsed, and then watching Germany get split in half for the next 45 years.

      Edit: I forgot to include the Italians. They surrendered earlier but they too got their country back when the war ended.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Japan is not white and it was seen as insignificant compared to Germany, Germany was the natural enemy of the jew.

        Well Italy is White, and they surrendered just fine without losing more Italians.

        [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        Both Japan and Germany unconditionally surrendered. Hitler could not end the war without unconditional surrender.

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Japan surrendering unconditionally instead of continuing to fight after the atom bombs dropped saved most of the islands. There would have been a full scale invasion + more atomic bombs dropped if they tried to drag the war out longer and Japan might not even exist today had it came to that (especially with the U.S having a complete naval embargo on the islands. They would have starved to death).

        If Germany had surrendered in 1943, it's a fact a ton of lives would have been saved.

        [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Your original post implied you thought Germany could ask for peace and everything would go back to normal. Surrendering meant complete loss of Germany sovereignty. They weren't going to do that until they were left with no other choice.

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Surrendering meant complete loss of Germany sovereignty.

        What does this mean? Germany would have been occupied? German people couldn't live in Germany? Germany has no Army?

        Again, looking at what happened to Italy & Japan, none of those conditions appear to exist. Unless you're implying that Germany should have been allowed to keep the territories they invaded and expelled after 1939, then no, I do not support them annexing France, Norway or Polish lands.

        Edit: Which sounds like a crazy request anyway, since I doubt France would be ok sitting at the victory table, with half their country missing.

        They weren't going to do that until they were left with no other choice.

        They had already waged a two front war at that point and were getting beaten. Surrender was inevitable.

        [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        The hero who became the villain

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        That's exactly what set me on the path of historical revisionism and eventual stumbling on the truth.

        I remember clearly that my very first Question was: "Why are they trying so hard to drill into us that Hitler was evil? OK we get it, genocide isn't cool, but why do you have to just KEEP. ON. RAMMING. IT. INTO. US.?" Some years and reading later, I watch Alan Greenspan talk about how everything is rosy and a beautiful time to be on the stock market just before the 2000-2001 bear market. And a few months later you have Rumsfeld "vanishing" a couple trillion, and magically the next day there's a "terrorist attack" that destroys the buildings in which all the records about these trillions are kept.

        "Hmmmmm now waitaminute..."

        [–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        He had some admirable qualities but his German nationalism ruined Europe and is responsible for millions of deaths. Now he exists as a bogeyman to justify every deranged anti nationalist and anti white ideology destroying the West.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        IMHO he was the second greatest man ever, after Horus. The Jewish story of "Jesus" as a Jew is simply Jews taking over a historical fact of the story of Horus and appropriating it for their own ends.

        He might get overtaken by the guy who developed the exact science of the mind, Mankind's only hope against the demonic jewish rot. We'll see.

        [–]TheWorldToCome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        After he became the unchallenged leader or Germany and built it up to prosperity he should have made every effort for peace in Europe

        [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        He did.