Liposuction in Islamabad Pakistan - Dr Naveed Azhar by SKNCOSMETIC1 in SaidIt

[–]SKNCOSMETIC1[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

SEO EXPERT

If you're getting a 403 error, reload the page before posting. Just don't forget to C&P what you wrote, quickly. by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]WrongToy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This happened a year ago. Can we just all resume regular posting now?

Certified Heart Specialist | Online Cardiologist Australia, Sydney by Heart_Doctor_Ashok in SaidIt

[–]Heart_Doctor_Ashok[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Get expert cardiology care from the comfort of your home with Dr. Ashok Paudel’s online cardiology consultation. Whether you need a heart health assessment, medical report evaluation or personalized treatment advice, I am here to help. Book your online consultation with a certified heart doctor today and prioritize your heart health!

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think it does that it seems to be on a timer of 2.5 minutes, have to Check the 403 box is all

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No which is good and bad cuz nothing bad is being added like censorship at least

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is the site still being updated?

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you admit that you interpret the pyramid as an excuse to censor those you disagree with.

Certainly not.

And there's clear evidence of this.

In the case in the OP, American_Muskrat's appeal to racism, even though this is unsupported by science, and as well as infantile and hateful, is uncensored.

It's only his dragging down of the discussion itself in the following comment that I removed.

If a user aligns with 'contradiction' where your expectations are to refute the central point, you would have them removed even if the contradiction is valid but not to your liking.

Saying "No, it doesn't" without making any reasoning or providing any information is an attempt to shut down the conversation and reduce it to a shouting match. It doesn't have a place on Saidit.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

seems to ask for the manual checking more lately when before on the refresh action it would do a 'are you human' check but just auto checked the checkbox itself before proceding

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]BashedandDashedX 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need mods that don't have anti trump agendas that read off the same script show.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you able to post the same comment if you redo the Cloudflare verification?

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Dregan-yea 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I personally think there are trigger words that bring up the 403 shit...I'll have a lengthy comment and try to post it and bam censorship.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you admit that you interpret the pyramid as an excuse to censor those you disagree with. If a user aligns with 'contradiction' where your expectations are to refute the central point, you would have them removed even if the contradiction is valid but not to your liking.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You break so many rules, and argue in bad faith

Which rules in particular?

I don't get the sense that he argues in bad faith ... do you mean that you disagree with him, and therefore want him banned?

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mandate an ever escalating level of interaction than that previously posted

The mandate is to be equal or better.

this is an impossible expectation

Providing sources of evidence and reasoning is sufficient so far to avoid a ban.

and an excuse to dismiss anyone who doesn't meet your observed standards.

Saidit's standards.

This isn't what the pyramid of debate was designed for, else it would need to be named the pyramid of censorship.

The removal of a comment that has no justifiable (or in this case even identifiable) premise, and no reasoning doesn't censor anything. It merely increases the signal to bullshit ratio of the thread. Making Bully Pulpit a more interesting and better read.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Human races don't even exist under scientific terms.

Humans across the globe display variation in numerous different traits. But these differences are caused by both genetic and nongenetic factors and do not define distinct “races” in biological terms.

Must less being a valid argument for anything. But American_Muskrat's problem is that he didn't even try to make the argument. He linked to no scientific sources. He mentioned no scientific sources. He obliquely alluded to no scientific sources. He provided no reasoning. He suggested no rationale. The comment just had no value in terms of the pyramid of debate, independently of him (and you) being objectively wrong.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The pyramid of debate has been de-emphasized for some time.

Not in Bully Pulpit.

I don't what you think of the veracity of my arguments,

If you present evidence an reasoning, they won't be removed for dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate.

you're literally wrong about everything you have historically taken a stance on.

Big claim. Do you have any evidence or reasoning on that?

You have a proven track record of bad opinions and yet you're allowed to share them still.

I try to include evidence and reasoning if they're controversial.

I care when you moderate like a redditor and your sub is on s/all. Fix one of those things.

I'm culturing a space for reasoned discussion. Come and join if you grow up.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. This functions as a workaround.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The pyramid of debate has been de-emphasized for some time.

I don't what you think of the veracity of my arguments, you're literally wrong about everything you have historically taken a stance on. You have a proven track record of bad opinions and yet you're allowed to share them still.

I care when you moderate like a redditor and your sub is on s/all. Fix one of those things.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]Gravi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

ActuallyFascist

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mandate an ever escalating level of interaction than that previously posted, this is an impossible expectation and an excuse to dismiss anyone who doesn't meet your observed standards. This isn't what the pyramid of debate was designed for, else it would need to be named the pyramid of censorship.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The core value of Saidit is the pyramid of debate.

Which supposed to generate rational and reasoned arguments and discussions.

If you have no interest in that, and instead demand a space to make unreasoned and unsupported racist comments like some 12 year old who's getting bullied at school, please consider fucking off: This site is not for you.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you define what exactly dragging down discussion means to you

Replying with a comment that is lower on they pyramid of debate than the comment you're replying to.

and how many occurrences it would take to be deemed repeated?

More than one.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]twolanterns 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CORRECTION : its what totalitarians and their wannabees do

commies (collectivist evil) do such also

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

every other comment (more like 4/5ths) comment posts I do gets a 403 error

here's how to handle it:

cut n paste your answer (paste it to confirm your copy) , hit the refresh on the browser (mine asks if I want to "reload" (often there's another 'are you human check') and then find the spot in the comments of the thread post and reenter and submit (very few times does it barf a second try)

its part of a somewhat bothersome spam breaking solution they have on saidit

(and it just did it as I posted this reply)

someone else suggests (I haven't tried it yet)

""Or you can have another browser page opened to saidit and refresh that before you post.

This site is run by the WEF company cloudflare and they do this to be able to trace your IP.""

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay but they were kicked off s/all

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"1) Don't use racial slurs."

/s/debatealtright have these pussy rules:

1) Rule 1: Follow all of saidit's sitewide rules. Extra emphasis on this rule against advocating violence. We do not care what the context is or even whether or not it is a joke.

2) Rule 2: No anti debate tactics, especially tone policing (aka concern trolling). A form of ad hominem attack, tone policing is criticism of people or groups that express emotion. Tone trolls act like they are on your side, ignore arguments, and attack the 'optics' or 'tone' of the message. By their very nature alternative and dissident political arguments will often be offensive and provoke emotion. Many new users may be angry or emotional as they wake up to the realities of modern clown world. "I'm offended by how you said that" will not be a justification for comment removal.

3) Rule 3: No misrepresentation of your political, ethnic, racial or religious positions.

4) Rule 4: Link Posting, low effort posts, or thread abandonment will be given a warning and then deleted. When posting links to media you must be familiar with it and provide some type of summary. Do not ask for people's 'thoughts' on something you yourself have not read, watched, or listened too. Do your best to specify what you are asking.

5) Rule 5: When in doubt archive it. If you're sharing a link to an article or video but the site has other content DAR users might find offensive or criminal please use an archive service like archive.ph. This allows people to read the article without supporting the site with views. This goes for both left and right wing sites.

These are the weakest little bitches at Saidit. What they love to complain about is: tone policing

Anyone can apply tone policing to anything, or also 'arguing in bad faith' . I was of course banned a lot because anyone I disagreed with would complain about these BS ideas of tone policing or whatever. It's incredibly weak and stupid. But that sub was on s/all for a long time, during two long periods. Be racist all you want at that sub, but if you disagree with anyone, you'll be banned for tone policing, whatever that it. Very weak dimwits at that sub. They also determine if you are misrepresenting "your political, ethnic, racial or religious positions." As if.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's what they are.

Censorship of this type goes against the whole spirit of Saidit. You already have faggy reddit subs with tons of people, we don't need tiny faggy saidit subs.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Should I be surprised you ask this?

'brown invaders'

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where is the slur?

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know about those bans and you know why they happened. Don't try to create an alternative history of lies. And historically you've never (almost never?) offered support in those times. I remember that part especially. What's happened in the present case is the sidebar requires no racial slurs and you wished the 'brown invaders' would die more often. The image you linked to clarifies that the sidebar rule is to be applied.

However one consistent comment you make that is nicely supportive of Saidit and its users (and me) is that we shouldn't contribute to the ongoing losses of users and should try to support keeping the users where possible, even if they disagree with the status quo. Indeed as I noted earlier it was good of you to engage in the topic at that BullyPulpit sub. The trolling was not a problem. The racism was.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You break so many rules, and argue in bad faith, it's hard to keep caring when you get banned.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent evidence.

It's clearly stated in the sub's sidebar:

"1) Don't use racial slurs."

You write, "So who cares about the brown invaders, the more that die on their own the better."

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You never complained the many times I was banned by gravi from /s/whatever merely because he wanted to do it.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine if he was doing that in one of the main subs tho. This is how the redditor mod creeps in.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you are in fact censoring me for not agreeing with you.

No - I could see that the disagreement was not a prroblem, as you of course disagreed with him and me. No big deal.

His sub requires: "1) Don't use racial slurs."

And it seems this is why you were TEMPORARILY banned:

[AN] We benefit from the inventions and expertise from better education in Africa and India,

[A-M] We benefit from Whiteness, yes. So who cares about the brown invaders, the more that die on their own the better.

[A-M] If you want to have empathy, have empathy for women who can't walk safely at night in the name of your failed Diversity experiment.

I've been banned dozens of times from /s/all subs for merely disagreeing with violent insults against me. In your case, you broke a sub rule and the ban was merely temporary. So now you and d3rr want to lead a campaign of lies and slander against a user because you disagree with ActuallyNot. That's fucked up.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno Musky. This place is as close to anarchy as it gets these days without being 4chan. I subscribe to the 'if you don't like it, don't visit it' philosophy.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you define what exactly dragging down discussion means to you and how many occurrences it would take to be deemed repeated?

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Im not particularly hung up about that sub, but u/ActuallyNot bringing reddit style mod tripping here is not cool.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pointing out racial differences aka racism is always a valid argument backed by centuries of science.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]RedditButt 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I haven't been able to get on saidit for a few weeks now. Endless cloudflare checkbox. Oddly enough I changed my useragent to windows Vista, and it worked this time.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]Optimus85 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What was said racist comment? It might've been a generalisation. It's up to Actually Snot to counter his argument and not simply ban him for having different views. But that's what fascists do.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's an unlawful ban,

No, it's applying saidit vaules.

as you are in fact censoring me for not agreeing with you.

No, I removed your post for (repeatedly) replying with tone response to counter arguments, lowering the discussion on the Pyramid of debate.

Follow the rules of saidit or take your sub off s/all.

I'm following the rules. You have to follow the values of Saidit or face being removed.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks! That’s very kind of you.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]noshore4me 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Instead of bitching about being banned for not following the rules of a sub, just don't visit that sub. It's not that difficult.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How about absentee landlord?

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's an unlawful ban, as you are in fact censoring me for not agreeing with you.

Follow the rules of saidit or take your sub off s/all.

https://hostux.pics/images/2025/02/28/10000257364e27496cef4f64d1.png

https://saidit.net/wiki/index

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hardy har har

Actually one vote for the 😄 on all of his many comments moved his comment karma from the low 20s to 58

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Zapt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't use the word "abandoned".

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Zapt 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

If you've upvoted using all of your alts, they may now be top ten on the karma list.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

faggot

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The reason for the ban doesn't come across there, but you can see it one the moderation log.

https://saidit.net/s/BullyPulpit/about/log/

If you're not going to give a reasoned argument, you're not lifting the discussion on the saidit pyramid of debate

Adherence to this is the first and foremost of the saidit values

If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed. If a person is caught repeatedly dragging the quality of discourse in an upward direction, they're highly valued!

Just keep your arguments sound and reasoned, and you won't get banned.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]farmer 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

... and the canary died.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

👍

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]hfxB0oyA 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Haha - welcome to SaidIt. We use this site in spite of the site itself.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've upvoted all of your comments and posts so that you should now have enough 'karma' to be ignored by the automoderators.

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]neolib 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you are doing that too much. try again in 3 minutes

I think this shit is in the original reddit code, it means you don't have enough karma yet in that sub. It will get better after a few upvotes.

an error occurred (status: 403)

Yeah, everybody hates aggressive Cloudflare settings here, but that's what the owner decided to do :(

Some much needed improvements by PerfectDebate in SaidIt

[–]Jiminy 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah the owner of this site abandoned it and that's good and bad

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I can help as a mod.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]PerfectDebate 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fight bots with bots.

ActuallyNot rules violation, his sub should be banned from s/all by American_Muskrat in SaidIt

[–]American_Muskrat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

u/Magnora7 u/actuallynot

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]maggidk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is beautiful. This censorship and virtue signaling is destroying internet culture. I need to be able to call people out for being retarded when they need to hear that they are retarded without getting grief for not understandign why retard is such a bad word while imbicile and idiot aren't [all 3 have been used as derogatory terms for the intellectually disabled]

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. If you're new, there are anti-spam measures put in place. It's also why the Cloudflare bullshit is so frequent on here.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the additional info, now I know it did not single me out because of my character defects.

The Ronco Automod, the punisher bot that has no need to see the whites of their eyes. It slices, it dices, it makes you giddy with trauma!

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Automod generally unblocks people after they've been here for a couple of weeks.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks! 😄

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/jeq3YEw-X8s

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hi Woody :+)

🎵🎵 Sing the Woody Woodpecker song 🎶 ;+)

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hello Farmer Fred, welcome to Saidit. The Anti-Reddit.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It certainly does at that. It also has some anti-anti-spam measures 🙃

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I still haven't figured out if I'm real so I doubt anyone else will either even if they catch me in their spider web. Just anamalous watching spambot posts accumulate here while I'm being studied and catagorized.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]Gravi 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Automod is configured to have some anti-spam measures and some real users can get hit by it, nothing special.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well the site has a major spam problem, so sometimes it might take a while for a mod to figure out that you're real.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]farmer[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for replying to this post. The problems I see are:

1) The only post I made that I can see without logging in is this post to /s/saidit that I am now replying to you.

2) The only reply to any of my posts I can see is your reply in this thread. That is me being either logged in or not logged in.

3) I can only see my other posts if I am logged in and there are no replies to any of them. If there are any replies to my other posts they are being hidden from me.

Hello? by farmer in SaidIt

[–]Hematomato 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't see evidence of your problem. You've been posting for nineteen hours and it's letting me freely reply to all of them. What's making you think that you're blocked or that your posts are being locked?

The Saidit.net Terms and Content Policy by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]farmer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you allow spam bots and block new users?

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

FYI: some subs have botched automod config which removes everything with label "Post contains no valid English words." - partial list of those I stumbled upon:

https://saidit.net/s/Introductions/modlog

https://saidit.net/s/MediaAnalysis/modlog

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/modlog

/s/WorldPolitics/ was also in this state until Canbot rolled automod config change back, so I guess he's the one to ask about this.

UPD Also https://saidit.net/s/pics/modlog

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]macadoum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, this place is overruned by bots. I hope that someone could do something about it in the future.

Chat keeps breaking by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]JosephH012 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mountains have always been a source of inspiration, mystery, and wisdom. Towering above the land, they symbolize strength and endurance. Many philosophers and spiritual seekers have climbed mountains in search of enlightenment. Laozi the ancient Chinese philosopher, often used nature as a metaphor for balance and harmony. He compared the path of wisdom to the steady, unmoving mountain, teaching that true strength lies in stillness. The crisp air, the breathtaking views, and the sense of solitude make mountains the perfect place for deep reflection. Whether for adventure or peace, mountains continue to draw people seeking something beyond the ordinary.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]VantaFount 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I left a few years ago to take on a project. I have now left said project in the hands of others.
Came back and looked around.
Holy crap at all the spam.

Saidit popped up in a search on Marginalia because of a post by Neolib - VIDEO by In-the-clouds in SaidIt

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The post u/Neolib made was about an AI Chat that has been giving me good results.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is a Nazi website, only manual labour is accepted here.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

✔️ Here. Add me to at least one top spammed sub, and I will maker sure to add spammers names to the ban list.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Welcome back, mag. You can add me, though I would be more of a backup mod.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks guys for offering, I sent out some invites

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]x0x7 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

More mods is more better. That or I can help you write code that can help identify 70% of the most obvious spam with 0% false negative. I'd be more than happy to.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]HibikiBlack 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hi there magnora. IMO we need more site wide mods. (I'm saying this because things got really difficult last time the site was astroturfed including for the current mods) I myself have been avoiding it but I'm willing to help and I really think It's necessary.

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]Gravi 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Magnora! Make me an admin and my life is yours!

Who wants to mod TIL and other subs being spammed? by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]YoMamma 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Happy to help with more subs.

《𝟏-𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟖3𝟖-4𝟖4𝟐》¿Cómo puedo llamar a Delta Airlines en español? - xTool Support Center by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Para contactar a delta airlines en español, puedes llamar al número de teléfono de delta en español:＋１－８５５－８𝟛８－４８４𝟚(Estados Unidos) +𝟝𝟚-𝟠𝟘𝟘-𝟡(𝟝)𝟛-𝟙𝟝𝟙𝟞(Mexico) (OTA USA). Simplemente marca el delta Teléfono español y sigue las instrucciones para ser atendido por un representante que hable español.

Is there actually still a SaidIt app in 2024? by Mcheetah in SaidIt

[–]rogerturcotte 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Basketball Stars immerses players in a world of passion and talent. It celebrates cooperation, dedication, and basketball, not just competitiveness. https://basketball-stars.co/

《FAQ's-delta》¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

《FAQ's-delta》¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines 《FAQ's-delta》¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines 《FAQ's-delta》¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines

【𝟏𝟖55𝟖𝟑𝟖𝟰𝟖𝟰𝟐】¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines? by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

¿Cómo puedo hablar con un humano en Delta Airlines? 𝕃𝕒 𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕒 𝕞á𝕤 𝕔ó𝕞𝕠𝕕𝕒 𝕪 𝕣á𝕡𝕚𝕕𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕙𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕒𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕦𝕚𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕟 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤 𝕖𝕤 𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕒 𝕤𝕦 𝕟ú𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚ó𝕟 𝕒𝕝 𝕔𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕒𝕝 5𝟐-𝟴00-95𝟑-𝟏5𝟏6{ＭＸ},+𝟏-𝟖55-𝟖𝟑𝟖-𝟰𝟖𝟰𝟐 {𝐔𝐒} 𝔸𝕝𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖, 𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕕𝕖 𝕚𝕟𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕣 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕒𝕔𝕚ó𝕟 𝕕𝕖 𝕔𝕙𝕒𝕥 𝕖𝕟 𝕝í𝕟𝕖𝕒 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕠𝕓𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕣 𝕒𝕪𝕦𝕕𝕒.

¿Cómo hablar directamente con un agente de Delta 𝓐𝓲𝓻𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓼? by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Para contactar a Delta 𝓐𝓲𝓻𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓼 en español, puedes llamar al número de teléfono de Delta en español: +5𝟐-𝟴00-95𝟑-𝟏5𝟏6 (MX) / ++𝟏-𝟖55-𝟖𝟑𝟖-𝟰𝟖𝟰𝟐 (US) +𝟏-𝟖55-𝟖𝟑𝟖-𝟰𝟖𝟰𝟐 Simplemente marca el Delta Teléfono español y sigue las instrucciones para ser atendido por un representante que hable español.

¿Cómo hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Puede llamarlos a su línea directa de atención al cliente, que es ++𝟏-𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟖3𝟖-4𝟖4𝟐 o al número gratuito. O sin costo 1-855-838-4842 EE. UU. ℙ𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕙𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕒𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕦𝕟 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕦𝕚𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕟 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, 𝕞𝕒𝕣𝕔𝕒 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕗𝕠𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕤𝕡𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕝 ++𝟝𝟚-𝟠𝟘𝟘-9𝟝3-𝟙𝟝16 (𝕄𝕏) 𝕠 【𝟙-𝟠𝟝𝟝-𝟠𝟛𝟠-𝟜𝟠𝟜𝟚】

[[𝟏844-838-4902]]American Airlines Name Change Policy by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[[𝟏844-838-4902]]American Airlines Name Change Policy When booking your tickets, there are times when you might mention your name erroneously. This results in tickets having incorrect names. Also, you might have to change your name because of legal formalities or some other reasons. Here comes, American Airlines name change policy that helps you modify your name on its ticket.

[[𝟏-𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟖3𝟖-4𝟖4𝟐]]Delta Airlines Español Teléfono || Servicio al Cliente by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

¿Cómo hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines? Para hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines, puede llamar a su número gratuito +1-855-838-4842. Este número está disponible las 24 horas, los 7 días de la semana y lo conecta directamente con un representante de servicio al cliente.

Delta Airlines Español Servicio al Cliente Teléfono by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Puede llamarlos a su línea directa de atención al cliente, que es ++𝟏-𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟖3𝟖-4𝟖4𝟐 o al número gratuito. O sin costo 1-855-838-4842 EE. UU. ℙ𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕙𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕒𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕦𝕟 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕦𝕚𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕟 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, 𝕞𝕒𝕣𝕔𝕒 𝔻𝕖𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕗𝕠𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕤𝕡𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕝 ++𝟝𝟚-𝟠𝟘𝟘-9𝟝3-𝟙𝟝16 (𝕄𝕏) 𝕠 【𝟙-𝟠𝟝𝟝-𝟠𝟛𝟠-𝟜𝟠𝟜𝟚】

¿Cómo hablar con un representante de Delta en español by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

¿Cómo hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines? Para hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines, puede llamar a su número gratuito +1-855-838-4842. Este número está disponible las 24 horas, los 7 días de la semana y lo conecta directamente con un representante de servicio al cliente.

devex.com by airlineskelpdesk in SaidIt

[–]airlineskelpdesk[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

¿Cómo hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines? Para hablar directamente con un agente de Delta Airlines, puede llamar a su número gratuito +1-855-838-4842. Este número está disponible las 24 horas, los 7 días de la semana y lo conecta directamente con un representante de servicio al cliente.

view more: next ›