all 91 comments

[–]piss 73 insightful - 7 fun73 insightful - 6 fun74 insightful - 7 fun -  (28 children)

How on earth would you even judge who is in the majority? of the global population? of the subreddit's community? In America? Based on where your IP is posting from?

I really think if there was to be a final nail in the coffin for Reddit, this would be it. It's total clown world.

[–]AFutureConcern 43 insightful - 5 fun43 insightful - 4 fun44 insightful - 5 fun -  (21 children)

How on earth would you even judge who is in the majority? of the global population? of the subreddit's community? In America? Based on where your IP is posting from?

If you're white. It's based on if you're white. The rule will change the moment whites are not a majority.

I actually can't believe they added this clause. It's explicitly anti-white. They literally endorse hate against whites. In black and white.

[–]lggc 27 insightful - 4 fun27 insightful - 3 fun28 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

you're white. It's based on if you're white.

Also if you're female. Signed, GC.

[–]AFutureConcern 29 insightful - 3 fun29 insightful - 2 fun30 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

It's closer to "if you're female and believe that massive schlongs are not female" but I agree.

Such strange times we live in that feminists are now reactionaries. But that's clown world for you.

[–]dramasexual 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"If you're female and you say no"

[–]liberate 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've never heard a woman say no, you just must be doing it wrong. /s

[–]its1342 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

But hold on, if GC was shut down as a hate sub and by many woke accounts, the target of that hate was men.. shouldn’t we have been fine? Men are the majority after all, and hate speech isnt possible when directed at the majority

[–]pcpmasterrace 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Women are actually a slight majority.

[–]liberate 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

definitely are in my harem

[–]liberate 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you are over-thinking this by applying "fairness" - this is not about fairness this is power play to gain control of a media platform. this is politics. they could have said anyone who owns a cat is out. they still apply whatever they want and then add top-spin later. come on. wake up.

[–]Anonimouse 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just say the hate was towards trans, who are the most oppressedtm

[–]Whoscapes 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do not apply the Enlightenment notion of universal values / fairness to the Reddit admins. They have been infiltrated by post-modern wokies who literally do not believe in Western ideas of empiricism, rationality, universalism etc. They follow people like Foucault and believe in nothing but raw power. This was an application of that.

It's balls out retarded and represents the decline of the West as this mentality seeps into all of our institutions.

[–]basedaf1 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

plenty of misandryist subs left standing. Including all the pinkpill ones. GC wasn't banned for promoting hate against men, it was for promoting hate against TiMs. r/braincels was against women and shot down ages ago. r/theredpill and r/mgtow quarantined, r/theredpill at least for promoting "toxic masculinity" as it used to say in the quarantine message.

[–]BravoVictor 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Are you implying biological men can't be female?

transREEEEEEEEEEEEEEing intensifies

[–]piss 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

While I wouldn't doubt that was the intent it could be spun so many different ways. If you go by global population it's Asian. It just seems like a bizarre way to go about it / phrase it even if that is their intent.

[–]teelo 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

If you go by global population it's Asian.

Daily reminder: Asians are considered "people of colour" only if the person making the argument requires more people be affected by their argument, while if they need to show that "people of colour" are a minority then asians are to be considered "white people".

[–]liberate 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

hol up. what am I, fkin transparent? everyone is a color. you need to start using the right language here - nonwhite, nonblack, non-african american, whatever, the point is using PoC is incorrect and just a technique to lump everyone who is non-white into one club so they could batter whites with it. I can tell you now that any African-American trying to gang up with a black African it will not go well, their lives are too different. Also Indians and Africans, may all be PoC but they sure dont get along automatically, unless gathered together under the convenient political weapon of "PoC" then everyone gets to complain about whitey in one large non-white group, which is not a good way to continue. basically use the right terminoloigy to diffuse some of the identity politics. so non-white is fine, non-indian is fine...many non-whites will take exception to be referred to as people of colour.

[–]BravoVictor 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, it's obviously worded to imply whites. But that's just it, whites aren't the majority. Not globally nor even in many places in the US. I'm white. I live in a majority black city. Is it ok to "direct hate" towards me, according to Reddit?

Someone at Reddit HQ has completely lost their mind.

[–]pcpmasterrace 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All of this stuff, this censorship, these cultural revolutionaries burning down the cities... it's a last ditch effort of a dying system. Tomorrow belongs to us.

[–]JamalGinsberg 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Certain whites are still off limits though. Like the ones that own reddit.

[–]liberate 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

not true. whites have been sucking up that koolaid for decades, its the eternal white guilt-trip. there are many white-virtue signallers and white protestors who think they fight for black rights but are really just trying to appease their own sense of worthlessness by seeking validation.

[–]Lastrevio 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're white. It's based on if you're white. The rule will change the moment whites are not a majority.

Or male, or straight or cis. Also instigating violence against cops is ok.

Basically whatever considers the left to be "privileged".

[–]al-Amira 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The majority is whoever the 25+ subreddit mods who helped write the new rules decide it is.

[–]Eisenteddy 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Well, poor people are undoubtedly the largest majority in the world. So, according to Reddit, from now on it's okay to dehumanize them, while rich people need to be protected at all costs, because there are so few of them. I don't think they've thought this through very well.

[–]teelo 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The vast majority of people in South Africa are black.

Someone make /r/killallblacksouthafricans

[–]Article10ECHR 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Whites make up only about 10% (at most) of the worldwide population. So they are obviously protected by Reddit's hate speech rules. /s

[–]spezz 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because an even smaller minority doesn't want you to know that

[–]Girlwiththeraventat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They weren't that worried about who it applied to. They just wanted to be able to ban whatever they wanted. The ultimate echo chamber. Soon we'll be hearing about thought crimes.

[–]kilo 31 insightful - 4 fun31 insightful - 3 fun32 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

So basically anything that the hive mind of Reddshit feels like hating on. That is exactly what that says

[–]SaidOverRed 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As Dr. Jordan Peterson is vocal about: There an infinite number of ways to carve up people into majorities or minorities. There is no liberal holy grail; the arbitrary criteria are really just a mirage to seize power. And don't forget virtue signaling while they do it.

[–]Marou 25 insightful - 5 fun25 insightful - 4 fun26 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

They specifically exempted anti-White hate, because they knew they'd have to ban most of the site if held to that standard.

[–]King_Brutus 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You can post explicit hate about MEN and WHITES but if you post a meme or joke about ANYONE ELSE then you're outta there. So ridiculous now.

[–]lggc 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You can post explicit hate about MEN

Nah, GC got banned. Pinkpill is private. They're coming for the feminists too apparently

[–]King_Brutus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well damn, then I really have no idea what the criteria are anymore. Just glad I'm off that hellsite.

[–]ZeWombat 20 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

GC got banned for saying that trans women are men, not women. That's the world we live in now.

[–]Current_Year_Acct 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's the same criteria it's been for a while, just being enforced at the most extreme they literally can now. Which basically the intersectional stack. All the stuff those whacky people who get called "alt right" or "nazi" all the time (who are mostly moderate liberals growing more conservative by the day) have been going on about for several years now.

[–]liberate 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

whenever anyone claims to be stopping "hate speech" what they actually mean is they are about to start pushing a narrative to control who is able to speak. This is censorship of freedom of speech in action, while they pretend to be in support of that freedom, they then block those people they do not like. usually this boils down to politics.

the underlying truth is that "hate speech" is a lie, and is the weapon used in Identity Politics to control and suppress certain people they dont like or want anyone to hear from. Every tyranny in history began with this method of control and censorship and subsequent exclusion (or execution).

Say goodbye to Reddit as we know it, because its going to become dictatorship run by left- leaning identity police and false-truth brigading.

[–]High_and_Lonesome 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Yesterday on reddit, I personally received at least 4 replies with very hateful and absurd language about conservatives.

[–]AFutureConcern 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Please remember that the word "hate" has two meanings:

  • The ordinary definition: expressing extreme dislike of something
  • The newspeak definition: expressing any kind of anti-egalitarian thought; that one group is better than another in some way

The newspeak definition is used to enforce what the blogger Spandrell has termed "bioleninism" - the raising up of the weak at the expense of the strong. Given that the weak cannot succeed on their own, this means they have greater loyalty to the bioleninist system which gives them unearned power. It's made explicit in the chosen categories; "race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability" are stated, and this means people of color, Muslims, foreigners, immigrants, genderspecials, and disabled people form the bioleninist coalition.

The definition would never cover "hate" against conservatives because that can't exist; the only purpose the term serves is to raise the weak up, and since conservatives generally oppose that, no amount of hatred would ever count as "hate" against conservatives.

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The bioleninism thing is gay because it restates the obvious and acts like the means are the end. The true end is the destruction of the white race, not some silly drive for power qua Orwell. So let me fix a sentence:

The definition would never cover "hate" against conservatives because that can't exist; the only purpose the term serves is to raise the weak up, and since conservatives generally oppose that, no amount of hatred would ever count as "hate" against conservatives.

Becomes:

The definition would never cover "hate" against conservatives because that can't exist; the only purpose the term serves is to destroy and attack white people, and since conservatives are generally white and at least pretend to be for white interests, no amount of hatred would ever count as "hate" against conservatives.

[–]AFutureConcern 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think that the observation that these disparate groups would actually be more loyal due to their lack of earned status is a unique and useful one, so I don't think bioleninism merely restates the obvious.

You are right that the end goal is the destruction of the white race, I think that it's driven largely by envy of success which ties into the bioleninist concept. I'll accept your rewritten sentence though, it's correct. (Speculation upon what would happen were whites less successful is maybe a nice intellectual exercise but it's not particularly useful)

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

, I think that it's driven largely by envy of success which ties into the bioleninist concept. I'll accept your rewritten sentence though, it's correct. (Speculation upon what would happen were whites less successful is maybe a nice intellectual exercise but it's not particularly useful)

I still think you got it wrong here. Let's be real - it's probably due to the Holocaust and the destruction of the 2nd temple. If whites were less successful it'd just be quicker.

I think that the observation that these disparate groups would actually be more loyal due to their lack of earned status is a unique and useful one, so I don't think bioleninism merely restates the obvious.

I think it's a wrong idea insofar as it's not totally trivial. Black people like welfare paid for by whitey? Who knew. Spandrell is the new intellect for the 21st century... not. There's a reason why he's a one post wonder. Quite frankly he wreaks of Moldbug's tribe and his post is a distractor from the JQ.

As for how loyal they are compared to others -- I didn't see the citations on this. Wasn't this just blatant speculation? Hardly good work.

Not to mention: who cares? What does people being slightly more loyal have to do with anything? Do Jews know this? No. It's about destroying white people. So you side with nonwhites and sick whites. That's why. It's not because they're secretly biolenist enlightened NRxers.

[–]AFutureConcern 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I still think you got it wrong here. Let's be real - it's probably due to the Holocaust and the destruction of the 2nd temple. If whites were less successful it'd just be quicker.

This is true of elites, but can't explain why the masses go along with the program.

Not to mention: who cares? What does people being slightly more loyal have to do with anything?

The mystery is why does a misfit bunch of degenerates not fall apart within 5 minutes? Purely racial in-group theories of loyalty don't explain what keeps these people relatively cohesive. Of course the explanation is speculative but it makes intuitive sense.

Do Jews know this? No. It's about destroying white people. So you side with nonwhites and sick whites. That's why. It's not because they're secretly biolenist enlightened NRxers.

I agree here, actually. I don't think that it's planned out using NRx theory. I do think that NRx is a useful way to view what's going on, though.

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is true of elites, but can't explain why the masses go along with the program.

Oh, that's just because the masses are a domesticated slave race lmao. Occasionally aberrations like me and maybe you happen and we end up dead if in a shithole country or posting stuff like this if not.

The mystery is why does a misfit bunch of degenerates not fall apart within 5 minutes?

What do you mean? I don't know of any trannies at the top or anything like that. The people who make the decisions are generally intelligent, 120+ IQ based on some studies. Most are in fact Jewish men. They also might formally coordinate.

Of course the explanation is speculative but it makes intuitive sense.

Nah, it's a totally race-blind red herring that makes way too many assumptions.

I agree here, actually. I don't think that it's planned out using NRx theory. I do think that NRx is a useful way to view what's going on, though.

It's totally not because it's a race blind red herring. Meanwhile these people occassionally actually write about wanting to abolish whiteness and being mad over the Holocaust. My theory is literally what they're thinking, not a race blind mental masturbation session that is only relevant to reality because it results in similar outcomes if true (it doesn't result in all the same outcomes which is why it's wrong. This gets at another issue with NRx writers - they're really reckless and negligent epistemically. They put out these grand theories with 5th grade understandings of the facts at hand. It's obvious Spandrell knows the bare minimum level of detail about the Bolsheviks and what is going on today from the way that he only engages with the vaguest of notions, and only says the broadest understandings. The writing is totally devoid of historical detail. Same with Moldbug. For some reason they thought that this poor understanding was good enough to start forming theories with. They obviously write more than they read, a huge no-no.)

[–]AFutureConcern 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, it's a totally race-blind red herring that makes way too many assumptions.

I wouldn't count neoreaction as race-blind. Most neoreactionaries are very HBD-aware.

Meanwhile these people occasionally actually write about wanting to abolish whiteness and being mad over the Holocaust.

Yeah this was embarrassing from Moldbug, though I suppose what you'd expect given his heritage.

The writing is totally devoid of historical detail. Same with Moldbug. For some reason they thought that this poor understanding was good enough to start forming theories with. They obviously write more than they read, a huge no-no.

I think this is a very unfair characterization, at least of Moldbug. Watching some recent interviews with him he seems to be very well-read. In fact many have noted that a lot of his ideas simply piece together older reactionaries as well as Hoppe's ideas on democracy and monarchy, so if anything the criticism is that he's unoriginal. Spandrell... maybe you have a point, though I've not read too much of his stuff.

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is an addendum to my comment below rewriting your comment. The difference is subtle yet bold. This expands on the idea below that this concept is really just a way to try to remove race from the equation.

...

Please remember that the word "hate" has two meanings:

  • The ordinary definition: expressing extreme dislike of something
  • The newspeak definition: expressing any kind of pro-white thought; that whites are better than another group in some way (or that they don't deserve to be destroyed)

[note: the idea that ANY anti-egalitarian thought is hate is untrue. Leftists hate children and young white men, for example. It is also allowed in other contexts like sports and business. This shows that the left isn't REALLY about "egalitarianism." Egalitarianism is really only used selectively insofar as it helps destroy whites. Where hierarchy is useful in destroying whites, egalitarianism is forgotten about.]

The newspeak definition is used to enforce what is called "anti-whiteness" - the censorship of pro-white speech and the exaltation of anything that harms the West. It's made explicit in the chosen categories; "race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability" are stated, and this means people of color, Muslims, foreigners, immigrants, genderspecials, and disabled people form the anti-white coalition. There is of course an exception for members of the "majority," which means white people.

The definition would never cover "hate" against conservatives because that can't exist; the only purpose the term serves is to destroy and attack white people, and since conservatives are generally white and at least pretend to be for white interests, no amount of hatred would ever count as "hate" against conservatives.

[–]BravoVictor 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only 4?

Rookie.

[–]kangarooninjadonuts 11 insightful - 9 fun11 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

Well, the majority on reddit is the far left. So... kill all commies?

[–]Zero_1 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Wouldnt being conservative on reddit make you statistically, a minority?

[–]Current_Year_Acct 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

But it would also make you a literal nazi in their minds, who, also in their minds, are the majority and hiding behind every street lamp and corner.

[–]redditsabsenteedad 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As a white guy who grew up in the ghettos of Buffalo and Chicago reddit's new policy can suck my ass dry and choke on shit til it dies. Never in my life had my white ass been the majority anywhere I've ever lived, worked or spent my time and money and I've got the scars to prove it.

[–]Whoscapes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry man, your white privilege means I get to call you fragile and if you find that offensive then that's just demonstrating your fragility! Genuinely though, fuck Reddit, fuck Robin DiAngelo.

[–]Dr_Bukkake 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just go to blackpeopletwitter, that sub especially the posts marked “country club” which means only black people can comment is full of white hatred. They justify killing cops and attacking white people among other shit that would get a user banned it they replaced the word white with black.

[–]djhdlkguhaeil 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

"immigration status"

I can fucking guarantee they don't mean legal immigrants like myself who actually pay taxes and love America.

[–]bagano1 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're utterly destroying themselves. It's beyond nuts. They have got to get Big Tech out of the West Coast. There is such a thing as being TOO LIBERAL.

[–]spezz 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Whites are fucking minority on this planet, so by reddit's own logic they are discriminating against a minority group

[–]liberty_primer 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no logic to it. They're just looking for any excuse to be biased against White men (and women of the gender critical persuasion).

[–]Tallest_Skil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Hate speech doesn’t exist, conceptually. You’re justifying the existence of jewish propaganda by entertaining its very right to exist.

[–]liberty_primer 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I'm a half Jew and I don't deny that Jews are over-represented among the "woke authoritarian" crowd, but it goes way way beyond merely "Jewish" propaganda.

Examples:

You can see that the media began talking about race more and more after Occupy Wall Street ended. They want to pit everyone against each other based on race, because that means we're fighting each other rather than rightfully looting the billionaire classes. See the link below for graphs.

https://twitter.com/ZachG932/status/1133442958773104640

[–]spezz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

bobby fischer, are you back from the dead?

but still these are just the guys who created the apps not the ones who financed them, and we can also prove this with non-jewish example like Tencent investing in redding leading to pro-chink censorship

[–]liberty_primer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If only ... I wish I could be as brilliant as him.

I Googled it, and it looks like Advance Publications is the majority shareholder. The family that runs the show is, in fact, Jewish.

Thing is, I don't think it's just financiers and bankers in general. I think it's "influencers" and "creators", many of whom could always find another investor.

To the extent that it is bankers and financiers ... a lot of them are of Irish descent too. And no, I have no idea why.

Just a hunch ... but I think Alexis Ohanian, Spez, and the whole motley crew of Reddit really buy into this idea of woke corporatism hook line and sinker.

Part of the reason I have this POV, is that the ever shrinking number of Jews I actually interact with are, basically regular people. Most who do marry, intermarry outside the "tribe" (as most modern American Jews do). As such, I've never seen this dual loyalty dynamic play out IRL to the extent that lot of people that buy into Jewish control conspiracy theories say. At least not among my generation. I'd be lying to you if I said I didn't see it play out among the boomers, but they're gonna be dead soon. Almost every SJW Jew that's millennial or younger sincerely believes in the general "party-line".

Sorry if that was too long.

EDIT: I failed to mention that there's also a lot of conservative Jews. My basic thesis, that I failed to say is that, to the extent that Jews do push propaganda, it seems to be all over the ideological spectrum. You know ... just like all the other propagandists.

[–]BravoVictor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

bobby fischer, are you back from the dead? If only ... I wish I could be as brilliant as him.

Meh, Bobby Fischer, may have been a brilliant chess player, but he was otherwise an all around douchebag, who also suffered from serious mental illnesses. That's what happens when you're told by everyone from a young age that you're brilliant and don't have to work or hold a job or socialize like everyone else, and then spend your entire life doing only one thing.

I remember reading about one story where a guy offered to host a young Fischer while he was in town for a chess tournament, but he mentioned that his wife was also in the house and deathly ill with pneumonia or something, and Fischer just replied with something like, "That's ok, I don't mind."

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The problem with Jews (or rather the problem faced by Jews) is that you don't have to count just Jews who are into all kinds of subversion activity, but also a large number of their non-Jew affiliates who always happen to be some pretty nasty characters. So you have a mass that provokes negative feelings, and manages to outweigh any positive contribution made by Jews.

And since you mentioned the specific situation, (Jew) Aaron Swartz is largely forgotten by the public while some like the ones you mentioned made a fortune by playing the game and jumping on the "fight whiteness and censor antisemitism" wagon that ADL started. So, instead of having people like Aaron Swartz as an example of Jews in the public sphere, you have the ADL/AJC crowd along with their large group of orbiters and ohanians that represent what is wrong in this world.

[–]spezz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

based mischling

[–]Tallest_Skil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you listed three non-jews out of several hundred thousand jewish positions of power and expect anyone, anywhere, to fall for your NAXALT fallacy? Okay. However you’d like to out yourself as a shill, I guess. Of course your brainwashed subhuman communist useful idiots are going to be calling for the things you want. They’ve never known anything else for the 75 years you’ve been exclusively propagandizing them.

they want to pit everyone against each other based on race

  1. No, that’s literally how biology works. Races are not equal. They are not even equivalent. We are already fundamentally, definitionally against one another. They are doing nothing to cause that.
  2. They are explicitly PREVENTING a race war, and have done absolutely nothing in their entire fucking existences EXCEPT prevent race war. They know that if a genuine overt race war happens, the entire world is completely cleansed of nonwhites within 20 years. If the white man ever actually wakes up to the meaning and purpose of his race, there won’t be anything left to stop him from securing the existence of his people and a future for white children. They can’t let whites know that their goal is overt genocide, because that removes all excuses for us not to wipe them out in return. And they know we not only can, but that we will.

rather than rightfully

No no, communist. No one gives a flying fuck about your bullshit. Collectivism exists. Hierarchies exist. These are natural things. We’re not going to be overturning them. Ever. Anyone who tries will be hanged. You have my word on that. Don’t try. “Wealth inequality” is only a problem insofar as it exists within a Keynesian system with currency decoupled from specie. The billionaires who will be killed are the ones who either are jewish or who do what jews want. The corporations dismantled will be the ones responsible for white genocide, for globalist policies, and for supranational integration. All the rest can stick around. You don’t deserve what someone else has simply because they have more than you.

the billionaire classes

FUN FACT. DESPITE BEING 0.002% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION, JEWS MAKE UP 49% OF ALL BILLIONAIRES. THINK REALLY, REALLY HARD ABOUT WHETHER YOU, PERSONALLY, WANT US HANGING BILLIONAIRES. Not that we won’t still do it, of course. Because they deserve it. Just think about whether you want it to happen.

half jew

There’s no such thing as a half jew, by the way, but of course you already know that. You’re a jew.

[–]liberty_primer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Wew! Who pissed in your Cheerios today?

Races are not equal or equivalent.

I think we're more the same than different, but it would be foolish to deny that some biological differences exist. This could very plausibly extend to intelligence. I don't buy into the notion that socialization and environment doesn't matter though. Consider the Flynn effect. Look at the massive difference in homicide rates in Atlanta VS Baltimore (two majority black cities). Something is at play that goes beyond genetics.

Jews are preventing a race war.

Implying this is a bad thing.

Wealth inequality isn't a problem as long as non-jewish White people are on top.

This almost doesn't deserve a response. To the extent that it does, pretty much every successful corporation these days is exploiting globalism. So, in practice, someone with your goals basically wants to take em all down.

49% OF BILLIONAIRES ARE JEWS

I'm not white knighting for them. Loot their wealth. Nobody should be a billionare.

You can't be half Jewish. You're a Jew.

Religiously speaking I was raised a Christian and that's, if not my belief, my cultural identity.

But it seems like that's not what you're talking about.

My impression is that you think Jews are a race and race is absolute.

A.) Ashkenazi Jews basically overlap with Southern Italians and Greeks in genetic terms when you do a PCA analysis. They aren't even a distinct "race". Hell, a half Ashkenazi / Anglo mix like myself is probably as close or closer to what's genetically considered "White" than the average Italian person.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/genetics-and-the-jews

B.) Race isn't some absolute category. It's like color. You can be somewhere in between. See link above.

[–]Tallest_Skil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This could very plausibly extend to intelligence.

Probably because it has been demonstrably shown to do so for at least several millennia.

I don't buy into the notion that socialization and environment doesn't matter though.

Fortunately for truth, no one cares what you buy into. It’s still true. The Kansas City Desegregation Experiment and the Minnesota Trans-racial Adoption Study handily prove you wrong.

Something is at play that goes beyond genetics.

Yeah, gun ownership.

Implying this is a bad thing.

It’s a bad thing that they’re preventing it, yes.

This almost doesn't deserve a response.

Then don’t reply at all, coward.

To the extent that it does, pretty much every successful corporation these days is exploiting globalism.

And they all need hanged for it. What’s your point? They’re traitors.

someone with your goals basically wants to take em all down.

Woooooooow. What a fucking surprise.

I'm not white knighting for them. Loot their wealth. Nobody should be a billionare. “OY VEY I’M NOT SUPPORTING JEWS; WATCH AS I INSTANTANEOUSLY SHILL FOR SOMETHING ONLY JEWS HAVE EVER SAID”

Holy shit.

Religiously speaking I was raised a Christian

Jews are a race. Judaism is a government. Christianity is a faith. You’re still a genetic jew, with all that that implies.

My impression is that you think Jews are a race and race is absolute.

That’s literally how objective reality works, yeah.

They aren't even a distinct "race”.

And yet the subspecies is clearly visible.

B.) Race isn't some absolute category.

It is. You’re clinically insane. Genetics is immutable and scientifically definable.

It's like color.

Color has virtually nothing to do with race compared to far more important factors like neurological development, cytolysis, and even fat cell differentiation.

You can be somewhere in between.

Fun fact: those in between have MASSIVE GENETIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS.

[–]liberty_primer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fortunately for truth, no one cares what you buy into. It’s still true. The Kansas City Desegregation Experiment and the Minnesota Trans-racial Adoption Study handily prove you wrong.

If intelligence was 100% genetic, how can you explain the Flynn effect? Has the human genome changed massively in the course of the 20th century. I think not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

I'm insane to think race is an absolute category.

Did you even look at the PCA analysis? It's very clear that Italians have more arab admixture than other white people. So yes ... it's like colors.

Fun fact: those in between have MASSIVE GENETIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS.

So you acknowledge the obvious truth that there are "in-betweens". So which is it? Is race absolute or not?

Jews are a race. Judaism is a government. Christianity is a faith. You’re still a genetic jew, with all that that implies.

I'm just as much Anglo/Germanic as I am Jewish. You keep dancing around that to suit your delusionally black and white worldview. Suppose you're right about race being totally genetic. Those anglo and germanic genes have influenced every bit as much as the Jewish ones (which are largely equivalent to southern Italian genes).

Gun ownership is what makes Atlanta different than Baltimore.

Try lead levels in the water. In other words, environmental toxins.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/environment/bs-md-lead-poisoning-testing-20181023-story.html#:~:text=There%20were%202%2C049%20Maryland%20children,further%20monitoring%20and%20case%20management.

[–]liberty_primer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And yet the subspecies is clearly visible

https://i.imgur.com/K1CuKvn.jpg

Omg ... this is too good. You're a bona fide obtuse idiot. The PCA you showed to "prove" distinct subspecies show Italians, Greeks and Jews overlapping.

I'm more White than the majority of Italians! Guess I get into the ethnostate bro!

Pls keep posting and proving my point for me!

[–]Eisenteddy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Hate against people is always wrong, no matter what they look like, what genitals they have, how numerous they are or where they come from. But once again it's funny to see that smug idiots can't understand this because they don't have their own shortcomings under control and therefore constantly need a scapegoat for their own weaknesses.

[–]liberty_primer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I just wish they'd go with a better scapegoat. There's always gonna be scapegoats. It's a human psychological need. Some scapegoats are actually useful though.

Undermining other races isn't going to do much to make the situation better for White people. Seizing wealth and the means of production from the billionaire classes will. If the races want to fight over the spoils when it's over, fine by me. Fighting each other is pointless now when we all have, what should be, a common enemy.

[–]Eisenteddy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I just wish they'd go with a better scapegoat. There's always gonna be scapegoats. It's a human psychological need. Some scapegoats are actually useful though.

True. At least their scapegoat should be a reasonable choice.

But, of course, everything gets harmful when you mindlessly overdose.

[–]liberty_primer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agree.

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just more evidence that Jews hate us and want us gone. If the purpose was to make reddit a squeaky clean Kindergarten fun time where nobody is a meany to anybody else, then /r/FragileWhiteRedditor and /r/BlackPeopleTwitter would have been banned as well and this would just be a blanket rule. How is allowing people to shit on whites profitable? Hint: it's not. This isn't about money.

So much for """woke capital"""

[–]rubberbiscuit 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Aaaand , I'm done with reddit.

[–]ReincarnatedByrney 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can't make hate speech at anyone, unless it is a white man.

[–]noxae 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think I have a new pet project then. Shit-up every subreddit with anti-"majority" hatespeech until said majority gets tired of getting insulted 24/7 and either stops using reddit or forces a change in rules. It needs to be relevant content of course, not just mindless spamming.

[–]Niggashoeslavender 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why would Huffman do this?

[–]pcpmasterrace 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dude's on the ADL's advisory board.

[–]Fantastic-mastodon 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White people are the minority. If we get "intersectional", white males are a tiny minority of the human population.

[–]BravoVictor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Oh good. At first I thought they were going to allow hate directed at white men. But since neither whites nor men are the majority of an international site like Reddit, I guess that means they're protected!

[–]BravoVictor 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://archive.is/VELay

"While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups or all forms of identity. For example, the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority or who promote such attacks of hate."

Hate is now officially approved by Reddit admins as long as it's directed towards "the majority", whoever they are. Holy shit.

[–]hydr0lyze 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's something I would've written up in a hurry as a placeholder junk filler thing.

[–]aryngeous 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Based on how you interpret it, virtually everyone is in the majority. Hetero people are a majority. Cis people are a majority. Non-disabled people are a majority. 99% of the population is in some majority or other, and thus liable to be attacked. What he really means is that it doesn't protect majority identities. But virtually no one is actually protected as a person from this rule.

[–]stupidmechanic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well bruhfunny should have made it out then, only thing they ever said was crakkka over and over again

(yeah I know they had some really crazy posts about transgenders over there but just saying.)

[–]Zednix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All speech should be legally protected as it is under the 1A, I wish we had that right in my country. Anyone who supports language and thought laws like hate speech laws is not to be trusted because they are poison.

[–]Psylocke01 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think this includes everyone on planet earth.

[–]itsoktobewhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Clown world

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Since we're allowed to post hate speech directed at people of a majority, that therefore means I can post this:

Anyone who disagrees with me on anything should die.

Per Reddits own logic!

[–]jjbosshog 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Indians and Chinese are the majority on earth and then I think it is Africans and Indonesian, whites are the minority.