This is an addendum to my comment below rewriting your comment. The difference is subtle yet bold. This expands on the idea below that this concept is really just a way to try to remove race from the equation.

...

Please remember that the word "hate" has two meanings:

• The ordinary definition: expressing extreme dislike of something
• The newspeak definition: expressing any kind of pro-white thought; that whites are better than another group in some way (or that they don't deserve to be destroyed)

[note: the idea that ANY anti-egalitarian thought is hate is untrue. Leftists hate children and young white men, for example. It is also allowed in other contexts like sports and business. This shows that the left isn't REALLY about "egalitarianism." Egalitarianism is really only used selectively insofar as it helps destroy whites. Where hierarchy is useful in destroying whites, egalitarianism is forgotten about.]

The newspeak definition is used to enforce what is called "anti-whiteness" - the censorship of pro-white speech and the exaltation of anything that harms the West. It's made explicit in the chosen categories; "race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability" are stated, and this means people of color, Muslims, foreigners, immigrants, genderspecials, and disabled people form the anti-white coalition. There is of course an exception for members of the "majority," which means white people.

The definition would never cover "hate" against conservatives because that can't exist; the only purpose the term serves is to destroy and attack white people, and since conservatives are generally white and at least pretend to be for white interests, no amount of hatred would ever count as "hate" against conservatives.