mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Study

submitted by HiddenFox from theepochtimes.com

all 51 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]HiddenFox[S] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

Wonder if this will make CNN?

[–]SaltyTexan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

More than likely it won't. They don't want to admit that they pushed the vaccine out too quickly and that perhaps it had worse effects than COVID.

[–]HibikiBlack 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Besides that, almost no one is covering the effects that the vaccines are having on fertility. Sterilization is the main method that is being used for the genocide, while the vaccines are more deadly than what people think, they can't kill everyone without leaving an obvious trace, by affecting the birthrate they can just blame everything on the "virus" instead.

Mathematician Says COVID ‘Vaccines’ Are Causing ‘Precipitous Drop’ in Birthrates Across Europe. Supposed birthrate increase can be explained away by them being baby blips, and not booms.

Nine Months Post-COVID mRNA "Vaccine" Rollout, Substantial Birth Rate Drops in 13 European Countries, England/Wales, Australia, and Taiwan. (DailyClout, January, 2023)

Germany's Federal Institute for Population Research: "there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after." Found no association w/COVID or unemployment, only jabs.

Glyphosate being found in children's vaccines. (Microbe Inotech Laboratories 2016) Just 0.01 ppb of glyphosate altered the gene function of over 4,000 genes in the livers and kidneys of rats. (Environmental Health Journal, August, 2015) The CDC has intentionally hidden information about Glyphosate being found in Vaccines. (MAA 2017)

This is all part of the genocide plan involving Big Pharma, Monsanto and Dupont working together under the CIA/Jesuits:

Big Pharma, Monsanto, Dupont, Corruption and Vaccine Injuries Super Compilations and Jesuit role in the genocide plan. All the most relevant figures involved in the current mess can be related to them:

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Jesuit Missionary Congregation.

Bill Gates Reveals Family Goes to Catholic Church.

John D. Rockefeller’s 1882 Organization of the Standard Oil Trust the First in the Commercial History of the World Was Modeled After the Jesuit Order from First-Hand Contact with Mexican Jesuits.

"Dr. Anthony Fauci, point man on coronavirus, is a {Jesuit}Holy Cross alum", Boston-Globe, March 17th 2020.

Catholics interested on research about AI and the soul.

Experts from the Allen Institute for Brain Science, Goethe University, Boston College, and Google will discuss questions regarding AI and whether it can reproduce consciousness, the philosophical challenges of it and what it would mean in relation to Catholic doctrine. (October 2021)

Jesuit Athanasius Kircher played a vital role in developing the Germ Theory of disease.

The Jesuits see themselves as the bringers of The Third Age of Joachim, The Age of The Soul.

Since the Jesuits are Christians, a lot of interesting numerology can be found in the people, events and places of the crisis that are related to the bible. The word "Revelation"= 121 in English Ordinal.

"Coronavirus Outbreak" = 121 (Reverse Full Reduction)

"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" = 121 (Full Reduction)

"World Health Organization" = 121 (Reverse Full Reduction)

Make sure to visit s/Jesuits for more info about them and s/NationalistRevolution if you want to resist the Vatican.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

2025.

T is 20th letter in the alphabet. Y is the 25th letter in the alphabet. Christianity is all about numerology as you say. When Jesus is depicted on a cross his body is always in the shape of a T or a Y.

They have something big planned for 2025.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Besides that, almost no one is covering the effects that the vaccines are having on fertility.

Fertility has increased in the US each year since 2019. Should we attribute that to the vaccines?

It's probably the improved economy since we got Trump out of power.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is really dependent on how well they can control information. If everyone knows they lied about covid then they lose credibility as a news organization. Then they will be forced to do an about face and try to gaslight their audience into thinking that their stance was always neutral and honest. They will only keep lying so long as their audience is too stupid to realize they are lying.

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because the claim is impossible; it's the laziest disinformation to date.

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because it's an obvious lie? It's also the dumbest lie of the expensive anti-vax disinformation machine.

[–]Hematomato 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (36 children)

The paper starts off with a narrative summary of how the vaccine development was vastly accelerated, ignored established safety procedures, and was biased by political concerns. That's all well-documented, and they give dozens of cites in support.

But then they get to their "money shot" paragraph:

It is imperative to carefully weigh all potential risks associated with the COVID-19 mRNA products. Should substantial harms be linked to their use, the perceived “reward” conveyed by the NNV would necessitate a re-appraisal. For example, assuming an NNV of 119 and an IFR of 0.23% (both conservative estimates), approximately 52,000 vaccinations would be needed to prevent one COVID-19-related death. Thus, for the BNT162b2 injection, a generous estimate would be two lives saved from COVID-19 for every 100,000 courses of the biological. Given the evidence of trial misconduct and data integrity problems (see next section), we conjecture that this estimate is an “upper bound”, and therefore the true benefit is likely to be much lower. Regarding potential harms, assuming 30% false-positive reports and a moderate under-reporting factor of 21, we calculate a risk of 27 deaths per 100,000 doses of BNT162b2. Thus, applying these reasonable, conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.

Not one cite here, and two admissions that they're literally just making numbers up. "Assuming an NNV of 119 and an IFR of 0.23%" (based on apparently nothing) and "assuming 30% false-positive reports and a moderate under-reporting factor of 21" (also based on apparently nothing).

It's at this point that this "scientific paper" becomes about as useful as a Saidit post. Because they didn't do any, um, science. They just made up numbers.

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

This is a brilliant response.

This claim is the dumbest disinformation from the heavily funded anti-vax propaganda machine I've seen to date. So much research is available about the ways in which vaccines prevented numerous deaths, and yet these obvious liers think we should believe this incredibly idiotic premise about the vaccines causing deaths.

[–]Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The homeopathy industry pays trillions in dollars to media all around the world to prevent being smeared!! All the herbal doctors and integralist doctors get their trips, careers and free gadgets to patients to hook them on, and once they are, the supplement industry which is the largest dividend of all being paid for by goverments for the supplement schedule of all children in the world. WHO KNOWS WHAT IS REALLY INSIDE THE SUPPLEMENTS??

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    And this is how everyone now knows you're a dense dumb motherfucker who should shut the fuck up about things you dont understand.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]DETTYLOVESGRAVY 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      says the schizo moron who hasn't a clue about the topic or how to discuss the topic

      please get vaxxed and die.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]DETTYLOVESGRAVY 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        you want to reconsider your comment?

        no.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        the heavily funded anti-vax propaganda machine

        Funded? Like the vaccines which were supported by EVERY MAJOR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, GOVERNMENT, CORPORATION AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA ENTERPRISE WITHOUT OPPOSITION OR SCRUTINY WITH THREAT OF CANCELLATION AND LOSS OF ONES JOB IF YOU QUESTION IT DESPITE NO LONG TERM RESEARCH? Like that? No, because anti-vaxx funding is non-existant, people are allowed to question the questionable. You are a propaganda shill with no moral standards and no valid defense for your position. You should be ashamed of yourself.

        [–]HiddenFox[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

        I think that's why they used "for example" before they stated their case and gave those numbers. We will never have perfect data on what truly happened and the best we can do is use reasonable estimate and draw conclusions. They also state that the assumptions they are using are conservative.

        This paper was also peer reviewed and comes from an accredited medical journal. (The Cureus journal https://www.cureus.com/) To me there is enough here to at least engage in serious debate. I think dismissing this paper would be a mistake.

        [–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

        This paper was also peer reviewed and comes from an accredited medical journal. (The Cureus journal https://www.cureus.com/)

        Sort of.

        Also of note, the two controversial journals Oncotarget and Cureus accounted for over 50% of institutional publications deemed of possible concern.- Assessing Predatory Journal Publishing Within Health Sciences

        Cureus, its reviewing, and its “Scholarly Impact Quotient”

        Some Strange Goings On at Cureus

        Cureus publications? Worth it or just a waste of time

        The journal Cureus has retracted 56 papers nearly two years after it first began to suspect the works were of dubious lineage.

        To me there is enough here to at least engage in serious debate.

        It's weaker than from any other Springer-Nature publication I can think of. But certainly there should be a debate.

        I think dismissing this paper would be a mistake.

        Yeah. We should wait and see if the scientific community dismisses it or not. It is out of line with previous research.

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

        You're very kind and patient.

        It's absolutely disinformation, sponsored by the anti-vax propaganda establishment. For starters, the headline proposes something that is obviously impossible.

        [–]jokerjoker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

        You're very kind and patient.

        It's absolutely disinformation, sponsored by the anti-vax propaganda establishment. For starters, the headline proposes something that is obviously impossible.

        /u/actuallynot wants everyone to get vaxxed,

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

        No reasonable person cares anymore about the vaccine - take it or don't take it.

        [–]jokerjoker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

        No reasonable person cares anymore.

        one of my ex's was healthy until she got vaxxed.. within days, she has severe diabetes, almost cant see, has no feeling in her feet and can barely walk.. another man that i know was healthy, he died the day after he got vaxxed.. i listened to two young(early 30's) females that said that one has blood clots and the other says she had an aneurism..

        whenever anyone asks me if i got vaxxed, i tell them that i got mine downtown.

        https://rumble.com/v1wac7i-world-premier-died-suddenly.html

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

        unrelated illnesses

        [–]jokerjoker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

        unrelated illnesses

        and how could you possibly know this?

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        because I'm not an idiot

        there's a longer answer but, an explanation should not be necessary

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

        Because diabetes ins't one of the adverse events you get from the vaccine.

        But transient myopia or hyperopia and pain and numbness in the legs and feet are symptoms of diabetes. You're listing Diabetes and a few of its common symptoms. The casual observer would suspect that your ex has diabetes, not a serious adverse event from a vaccine.

        i listened to two young(early 30's) females that said that one has blood clots and the other says she had an aneurism.

        Those can be adverse events from the vaccine. They're rare, and the vaccine protects against a higher chance of getting them from the infection.

        https://rumble.com/v1wac7i-world-premier-died-suddenly.html

        Lets see what the skeptics thing of this "documentary":

        The Anti-Vaccine Documentary Died Suddenly Wants You to Feel, Not Think

        Died Suddenly: A tsunami of antivax misinformation and conspiracy theories

        A clot too far: An embalmer dissects antivax misinformation about blood clots in Died Suddenly

        When an antivax physician “dies suddenly”: The case of Dr. Rashid Buttar

        Looks like they're saying it's bullshit. Huh! Who would've guessed?

        [–]SaltyTexan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

        I'm not anti-vax, I believe that vaccinations, especially ones that have gone through thorough testing and trials are actually a good thing. What I don't think you and others like you realize is that this vaccine was released under emergency situations, meaning it wasn't properly tested or vetted in trials before being released to use on the general public.

        That causes a lot of issues, especially when people are starting to show side effects of those vaccines. I don't think that is something any intelligent person should overlook. It wasn't ready to be released and now people are dealing with the side effects. The general population basically were the lab rats.

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        5.6 billion people worldwide have taken the vaccine without complications. Studies of patients requiring temporary bloodthinners after taking the shot show that this was extremely rare, something like 1 in a 500,000 patients.

        SARS virus and vaccine research began in a substantial manner in 2003. For almost 20 years before COVID there were tested SARS vaccines. For the COV 2 strains, there were new tests for those vaccines, lasting approximately 3 months, which is a relatively normal testing period, if working with almost 20 years of vaccine research.

        [–]SaltyTexan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        SARS virus and vaccine research began in a substantial manner in 2003. For almost 20 years before COVID there were tested SARS vaccines. For the COV 2 strains, there were new tests for those vaccines, lasting approximately 3 months, which is a relatively normal testing period, if working with almost 20 years of vaccine research.

        Yes but anytime you modify something you change it's makeup therefore making it a new thing. I completely understand that COVID is a form of the SARS virus, but even that small difference is enough to make it a new virus altogether. So I stand by what I said about the public being the lab rats. And yeah in clinical trials not everyone will have side effects, because everyone's makeup is different, they are exposed to different things, they eat differently and live in different environments, which is why they use such a large diverse group when doing clinical trials, they have to or the data becomes compromised. You can't pick and choose people who you think would make your drug appear safe. It's like letting a criminal choose their own jury.

        [–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        If you know this much about viruses and vaccines, you'll know that the only update to a SARS vaccine is the inclusion of a small portion of a new virus strain or an mRNA adjustment that attacks a new strain. Differences between updates are incredibly small, related to the new strains. Testing for that vaccine with the tiny new strain would naturally have simiar results as previous tests.

        [–]SaltyTexan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        If you know this much about viruses and vaccines, you'll know that the only update to a SARS vaccine is the inclusion of a small portion of a new virus strain or an mRNA adjustment that attacks a new strain

        Yes which is why I said that ANY change even the most minute change can effect how the vaccine or virus will respond. That is why one corona vaccine may not protect against different strains of COVID. Just because the SARS-CoV-1 is genetically similar to the SARS-CoV-2, doesn't mean they are the same or they will react the same when presented in the same host, or when introduced to the same vaccine. They are more like cousins, alike but also vastly different. We've had how many different stains of COVID now and it's only been around for about 4-5 years. Depending on who you believe about when it really got out.

        [–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        We will never have perfect data on what truly happened and the best we can do is use reasonable estimate and draw conclusions.

        We can absolutely do better than that. We can gather new data, carefully study the data we do have, and create mathematical models with upper and lower bounds. That's what we do, for example, when we try to estimate the mortality from a war.

        These authors don't seem to do any of that. They're just like "Here's some numbers we made up; I promise they feel conservative to me; here's the conclusion we draw from them."

        This paper was also peer reviewed and comes from an accredited medical journal.

        Sadly, that means nothing. It's a pay-to-play industry these days, and garbage non-science makes it into peer-reviewed medical journals every single month.

        To me there is enough here to at least engage in serious debate.

        To me, there's enough here to engage in further study. "Debate" gets us nowhere. Debate is just two guys with their dicks out, waving around rulers and insisting one of them is bigger than the other with ever bothering to measure.

        [–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        The extremely toxic RNA were designed to kill people.
        There is nothing in the "vaccine" that helps to increase the immunity against the virus. The respiratory virus can easily avoid the IgG antibodies. The immune respond will only cause more inflammation, which causes severe disease. This is why people get Covid right after injections. But they are usually counted as "unvaccinated" due to the extreme corruption in the medical system.

        The spike protein changes rapidly, but is also the most toxic. The mRNA causes more auto-immunity instead of virus immunity. We see this in the mycarditis, turbo-cancers and brain damage.

        The most common brain damage is the inability to think critically. This is caused due to the injection-induced spike-protein blocking a neural process that orders and cleans the memories. It is often reported as "brain-fog". Just look at some replies here, how some people are clearly unable to think for themselves, and are just repeating the Big Pharma lies.

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        Cureus has a dubious peer review process, and this is way out of line with what previous studies have shown.

        This is a case where we need to wait for responses from the academic community before we know if this is fair or not.

        [–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

        They're more trustworthy because they dare publish studies the medical industry doesn't like

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        It's an (open access) journal, Jimmy. They publish whatever makes their (rapid and perhaps somewhat cursory) peer review.

        There's no checking who likes it, barring any reviewers. The same goes for most scholarly journals.

        [–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Best to just publish, don't let corrupt elites review it and gate keep. If you read it, you can tell it's a good accurate study.

        [–]HiddenFox[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Agreed.