44% Of Young People Say It's Okay To Fire People Who Support Trump

submitted by Chipit from thefederalist.com

all 57 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]america_first_1776 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

This is why the country needs to balkanize. These are irreconcilable differences.

[–]TheJamesRocket 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The big coastal cities are total cancer. Liberal shitholes.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

When the US Constitution is gone, then it's not coming back.

Everyone will be stripped of their human rights.

The NWO beast is planning on culling the herd. The US is high on the priority list.

We need to prevent a civil war.

The globalist billionaires will be the only victors, and they don't plan on getting their hands dirty.

[–][deleted]  (21 children)

[removed]

    [–]america_first_1776 31 insightful - 3 fun31 insightful - 2 fun32 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Trump isn't sending "Gestapo" into US cities. He's just now sending troops to protect federal buildings and businesses from violent anarchists who have killed and wounded more innocent civilians than the police have (at least since the start of George Floyd). I love how people like you completely gloss over the fact that a violent insurrection under false-pretenses (that blacks are oppressed) has been taking place since the George Floyd incident. In addition to the lives lost, you gloss over the countless number of small businesses that were torched by these animals. You gloss over the fact that they are destroying priceless American history without the consent of the majority, despite the claims of how much they just love democracy. You glossed over the fact that they already created an entire different State (Chaz/Chop) because there wasn't enough of a police presence.

    [–]Extract 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Holly hell, that's some heavy shilling. And by a 9-day account, no less.

    Here is a very well structured, simple video for the regular reader here, who wants to better understand the the sheer length the media (and shills like the above) have gone to in order to paddle this bullshit.

    [–]america_first_1776 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    I just looked at her history. I don't know if she's a shill or just a college libertarian girl.

    [–]Extract 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    "At this point, what difference does it make"

    [–]magnora7 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It's a bot, I just banned it. Everything it says has exact word-for-word matches with other pages on google. It's just reading from some text databases and copy-pasting standardized replies

    [–]Turn0ffy0urmind 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's nice have admins that do their jobs, that's why most of use left that other shithole of a site.

    [–]Chipit[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    It's so weird seeing these 1990s right wing conspiracy theories recycled and in the mouths of the far left. Replace black vans with black helicopters and it could be the Michigan militia around 1995.

    We already know what the federal government is capable of. Remember the Branch Davidians? How about Randy Weaver? The left had a good laugh.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Don't advocate violence please.

      [–]Turn0ffy0urmind 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      We remember. Timothy remembered. If anyone doesn't know who Randy Weaver is you need to read his story.

      [–]insta 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The left have steered hard into conspiracies the last few years. These people will call alex jones a conspiracy theorist while claiming black police officers in a black city all have immeasurable and undetectable anti-black bias because of systemic systems of structural institutions.

      [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Remember the Illuminati card game that everyone was shitting their pants over around last election period because of the weird accuracy of a ton of cards?

      [–]BigFatRetard 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      My response to 'gestapo'

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        No advocating violence

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [removed]

          [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          No advocating violence

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          They'll suck their dicks while handing over their guns cause Law & Order and obedience is oh so very important to them, so long as its hurting anyone left of center.

          [–]EuropeanAwakening 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Lol.

          [–]simonp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Not going to lie recent events have made me significantly more sympathetic to Chinese cops in Hong Kong.

          [–]simonp 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

          Just accuse them of supporting trump and then demand their firing. When they protest, accuse them of lying to cover their asses.

          What so many people seem so invested in refusing to understand is that the problem with "fire people for being bad" is not that firing people for being bad is necessarily wrong, it's that the definition of 'bad' is arbitrary and capricious, changes all the time, and is cynically used to get rid of people who aren't actually bad

          I said this four years ago and it's just as relevant now as then: "I'm against punching Nazis. Not because I think Nazis don't deserve to be punched (they most certainly do), but rather because I do not at all trust the people in our society to accurately identify Nazis"

          [–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

          You can explain it to them until you're blue in the face. It won't matter. They will never get it, because if they get it, they would lose everything they are. Their entire existence depends on refusing to argue or debate. There was an inrush of feminists banned from reddit for wrongthink, and maybe they learned something from it? Nope. They immediately started banning people on Saidit for disagreeing with them.

          No, the woke won't debate you. Here's why: https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/woke-wont-debate-you-heres-why/

          [–]simonp 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I've been blue in the face for years, bro.

          Sam Hyde was right.. Except for the part about winning

          [–]chadwickofwv 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Translation: the woke are completely divorced from reality.

          [–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Yup. https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/woke-wont-debate-you-heres-why/

          Please share this link around, it needs to become common knowledge.

          [–]insta 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

          There was an inrush of feminists banned from reddit for wrongthink, and maybe they learned something from it? Nope. They immediately started banning people on Saidit for disagreeing with them.

          They are so useless & dumb. They still patrol language too like they still have cultural power. The same people saying "TERF" is a tantamount to violence and ban it from being used as a hate word would've called all of us a Nazi 6 months ago. It's hilarious to go into their subs and see them flip out at that word as it's just applied to them and they get handwaved away. It's so hilarious to see them freak out at the exact same actions they performed on others last week.

          [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

          Yeah, no one gives so much of a shit about the namecalling. It's the death and rape threats attached to the cancel culture that comes with it.

          [–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Yeah, no one gives so much of a shit about the namecalling.

          cope harder. lesbians freak out about the TERF word because it's just the new dismissive term used to handwave away lesbians who don't like lady dick. Obfuscate all you want but that word is a bannable offense in many of those subs. Call it "cancel culture" or whatever; it's all the same result of being on the losing side of the cultural war.

          I understand why they hate it too and I agree, it's just hilarious to see people who I do disagree with and who once benefited the language policing and censorship get their comeuppance.

          [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          I'm assuming if you're being deliberately derogatory using any namecalling then it would be a bannable offense. Having society force anyone's junk that you're not attracted to=also a pretty good reason to be pissed. However people have still been using bitch, cunt, dyke, and whatever as an insult while there's this going on there:

          https://www.reddit.com/r/Animemes/comments/i3lfo1/comment/g0cdusi

          It's not a comeuppance that many people are gonna be excluded from.

          [–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          I'm assuming if you're being deliberately derogatory using any namecalling then it would be a bannable offense.

          Yeah, that's the exact hilarious thing. The moment there's a name to slander the lesbians with about not liking ladydick is the moment we're suddenly all principled about name calling. It's a joke, you can keep talking around the issue but it's plain to see.

          No uppity progressive lesbian 1 year ago was so principled about name calling when it came to people they disagreed with but the moment they started losing the language games is suddenly when we're all above name calling and cancel culture. It's so fucking transparent it's laughable you even pushback on it. And we probably agree on all trans related issues aswell I'm just laughing at the hypocrisy of it all.

          [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I've only seen a couple of extremely shitty and damning commentaries there and they were shat on pretty fast by the majority of other women, so I don't have enough evidence to gauge off of and make a solid judgment for myself regarding hypocrisy yet. I do know that it doesn't matter if you're a lesbian, heterosexual, or a toadstool.. if you don't want extraneous dicks in your gym locker changing area and you say something about it, you're going down with the ship. They're not the only ones being drug under, it's anyone opposed. You can see the dilemma there, yeah?

          [–]BigFatRetard 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          "And then they came for the people who said we should hurt those we disagree with, and there was nobody left to speak out for them."

          [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

          Good, we will just start firing people for being democrats then. Simple solution.

          [–]johnnybravo 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

          Ahahah I wonder what the woke employers' reaction will be when they understand that firing someone does not take away their voting rights. I live far away from america but I fucking hope Donnie wins this time around as well, just so faggots who cancel and fire others will seethe, seethe and then seethe some more, and see how much in vain their actions to change people's thoughts were.

          [–]yayblueberries 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          I'm not a Trump fan by any means but I want him to be president again thanks to cancel culture. (Plus I don't want a vegetable in office.) Democrats that could have had me on their side ruined every chance they had of me ever voting Dem ever again due to their stupid cultural war bullshit. I also find it extremely offensive whenever anybody does ANYTHING to ruin their ability to have a job.

          [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          Trump wont win. It will be the saddest thing ever to watch democrats win. They're so fucking intolerable and soon they'll hold even more power.
          It's game over for republicans lol

          [–]johnnybravo 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Sad to hear, still one can hope.

          [–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          And if the tides turn and commies get fired instead, we will have campaigns for the poor commies who are treated this way without any reason.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          It's always ok to sack followers (in a facebash-sense) of a retard. I'd never even hire Trump -nazis -followers.

          The real question is, if you wanna have this on your conscience bc. they wanna eat, too, you know ?

          [–]Chipit[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

          Obvious troll is obvious.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

          The difference between you and me is quite simple: I can look into a mirror even after reading my own comments out loudly.

          Edit: Even while. I just tested it.

          [–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          That's not an argument, that's an insult. That's not what we do at saidit. Consult the pyramid of debate.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Opinions are like assholes. Everyone should look at his own.

          [–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          The only reason you can do so is your lack of a conscience.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          And you won't get into my head also. No matter how hard you try. I define things, that is my real creativity. The asking stays on yourself.

          You both are taking things personal i moved away from yesterday, because they are clear to me now like some last parts fitting into a puzzle.

          Politics always is a pit of snakes, so tell me why a blue mamba shouldn't squash some small black snakes when it is already there anyways.

          Especially these old skulls i like to crush. The crackling sound still fascinates me. Only the crackling sound of heads.

          Even a simple picture like a mirror, you obviously didn't get.

          Your grasping on something emotional in me is just pathetic.I share my emotions with exactly one person on this world and guess what: It ain't you, snowflake.

          [–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Will political opinion become another "protected" class? Can't fire someone for being gay, but you can over a red hat?

          [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Only if conservatives are cucks.

          [–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          So, about 50%. I don't like those odds.

          [–]insta 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Will political opinion become another "protected" class?

          They're even smarter than that. They don't have protected class based on politics, but since all their politics surrounds identity they just make their identities protected classes and therefore they can't get fired for their politics.

          If you fire some uppity BLM person in your company, you can bet your ass you're going to get sued for firing determined on race.

          [–]Tigerbitecrazy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Lol

          [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I was always under the impression that you had respect for the president/leader of a nation regardless of your true feelings. This doesn't mean that you couldn't bitch about it, of course.

          Good, bad, or in between Trump is president at current. People were out there enough in force to vote for him and there will be people voting for him again. Treating someone's personal political belief system as something that can end in employment termination is discrimination.