all 14 comments

[–]TrabWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The demographic suicide of Canada never ceases to suprise and sicken me. As an American I could never talk shit on another nation adopting American styled "multiculturalism" but the speed of which Canada is becoming a non-White nation... They were 90+% when I was born

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The White population is diminishing by percentage, but it's not a "genocide" by the standard contemporary definition, or even the second definition. Genocide requires killing of a specific group. Vaccines are killing everyone.

But, by the third definition you might be able to feebly try to argue that it is (by extension) The systematic suppression of ideas or practices on the basis of cultural or ethnic origin; culturicide via drowning the colony of Canada in even newer darker immigrants.

I don't care what colour they are as long as they like freedom and have hot women.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The International definition of genocide:

The CPPCG was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1948[5] and came into effect on 12 January 1951 (Resolution 260 (III)). It contains an internationally recognized definition of genocide which has been incorporated into the national criminal legislation of many countries and was also adopted by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). Article II of the Convention defines genocide as:

any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

  • a: Killing members of the group;

  • b: Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

  • c: Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

  • d: Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

  • e: Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

  • b: check
  • c: check
  • d: check

It is genocide.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But, by the third definition you might be able to feebly try to argue that it is (by extension) The systematic suppression of ideas or practices on the basis of cultural or ethnic origin; culturicide via drowning the colony of Canada in even newer darker immigrants. I don't care what colour they are as long as they like freedom and have hot women.

Latin America is literally your version of "lets give multiculturalism a chance" and the result is they're all dominated by Communism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A3o_Paulo_Forum#Participants

Note: That Brazil map is outdated, since Bolsonaro just lost the elections to Lula. And for a bigger gut punch, it was only the Whitest parts of Brazil that voted for the Right-wing candidate.

https://files.catbox.moe/dodt6f.png

So your theory of "browns will save my freedom" is debunk.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

So your theory of "browns will save my freedom" is debunk.

Unbunked.

That was never my premise.

Also, I don't like the weaponization of immigrants, regardless of shading. Canada already has a housing crisis with 30+M people and Turdaeu wants to magicall bring in another 1.2+M, manufacturing more strife.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Well when you said "I don't care about color, just as long they like freedom" I'm trying to tell you that color does indeed have a correlation.

Even as a nice historical lesson, you wont actually find much freedom outside of Western civilization. The likes of Africa, Asia and Pre-Colombian America were dominated by cultures that either supported slavery or human sacrifice.

It is only logical that seeing White people get replaced or mixed out of existence will therefore bring back these same primitive conditions. Hence why Latin America continues to be the oppressive 3rd world mess that it is.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Racism is either stupid and/or biased people, or the manipulation of stupid people, or reactions to the manipulation of stupid people.

It's just simple-minded stereotypical superficial bias, and weaponizing simple minds is evil and to be expected.

Freedom is a loaded word with amorphous subjective definitions, and Western "civilization" is very limited, much like the rest of the world - and they are a large part of the problem in Latin America.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Racism exists for the same reason why does Red,Orange and Green show up on a Traffic Signal instead of having one mixed color? Nature has decided that groups of Human beings will always be different, based on the simple fact evolution made us that way.

And contrary to what the mainstream media says, there is no evil or malice in recognizing that Blacks, Whites, Asians etc will never be the same.

Everything from IQ studies, to physical appearance, to group behaviors confirms we cannot eliminate these biological gaps no matter how much money we try and throw at it. You can start by asking 2 Black African people to move to Norway and challenge them to produce a child that is completely fair skin, blond hair with blue/green eyes. Chances are, it could never happen. Yet that would be counted as "racism" because African literally people can't create European babies and vice versa.

Freedom is a loaded word with amorphous subjective definitions, and Western "civilization" is very limited, much like the rest of the world - and they are a large part of the problem in Latin America.

So if Freedom is everywhere or even subjective, what exactly would be the point of having Libertarian Parties? Or a constitution that is suppose to protect free speech? Or why do people clearly flee countries 3rd world dictatorships they claim oppress them? Even you should see how flawed that original sentence is.

If there was a venn diagram showing all the nations of the world, and their contributions or respect towards giving people individual rights, then I am willing to bet that Western nations would skew heavily towards that.

And limited in what way? If you're saying that nations come and ago, that might be true. But the people who were responsible didn't just disappear.

I'll use the USA as an example. Technically, it is still a young nation compared to other world players, but remember that Americans can trace their roots back to Europe. Look at what the Europeans did and we'll still see patterns that indicate something special only happens when you have a bunch of White people in a room, compared to say... the thousands of years of what Blacks or Asians had accomplished in their own continents.

[–]JapsDoEverythingRiteBlack Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Indians and Chinese, what a surprise.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Chinese growth seems to have slowed down.

It's the Indians who are multiplying out of control, and swarming every city in Canada. Search any video on real estate in Canada, and it's all Indians now.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=canada+sharing+room

Justin Trudeau also made a deal with India for unlimited flights.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/unlimited-number-of-flights-between-india-canada-soon-justin-trudeau-3520197

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]JapsDoEverythingRiteBlack Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I read somewhere that Canada was seriously considering preventing foreigners from buying real estate.

    [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Seniors (significantly majority White) are about 20% of the population and most of them will be dead in 15-20 years. Steep drop incoming.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    They're in for a rude awakening once they enter the retirement homes.

    They would rather hire 3rd world refugees instead of paying actual Canadians better wages. The joke will be on them soon enough....

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/nova-scotia-long-term-care-refugees-staff-1.6115437

    [–]UserAetheria 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yep its going to be good down here in Australia too. The boomer adjacent generations are going to go into retirement homes and be taken care of by the muslims they let in the to country.

    Funny thing is they want to push for more services and finances going to these generations in their older age. But I really hope it blows up in their faces.