Striker gave no concrete arguments rebutting Thuletide at all. Birchers have nothing to do with this. Thuletide isn't talking about Jay Dyer-tier conspiracies like Bill Gates is depopulating Africa. He's talking about international technocracy and world government.

World government is something the elites have been openly and explicitly calling for and working towards since the end of WW1. The first step towards this was the establishment of BiS(Bank of International Settlement) and the league of nations.

These were initial attempts at political and economic unification of the world. These groups were the products of decades of globalist planning and debates. The globalist societies first formed in the anglosphere and consisted of two main organizations: The Pilgrims Society(A British-American high society clique) and the British roundtable groups.

After WW1, Britain's weakness became evident to all and the empire was bankrupt from the war. The dollar started to replace the Pound as the world reserve currency and American industrial power began to eclipse that of Western Europe.

So the globalist movement increasingly became America-centric. The American faction of the pilgrims coalesced around the Council of Foreign Relations(CFR) which was founded in 1921 with Rockefeller backing. This became a headquarters of sorts for the American globalists. The CFR united the three pillars of the American elite: The banking community, the industrial barons, and the intelligence community.

The BiS and league of nations, however, failed for the most part due to one issue- The lack of Anglo-American world hegemony.

Central Europe largely maintained independent economies with protectionist policies, local industrial bases, and individual foreign policies. France, Holland, Japan, and Belgium also maintained substantial empires walled off from foreign trade.

The Soviet Union in the east also remained an independent and largely autarkic empire. Plus, they all had independent foreign policies, substantial military strength, and ideological differences with the anglosphere.

The initial globalization effort thus failed to gain much ground. It lost even more ground after the Fed's easy money policies caused the great depression. The rise of fascism in central Europe in response to bolshevik threats and predatory British capitalism also exacerbated the issue.

WW2 provided a big break for globalism. After WW2, Europe was in ruins. All of Western Europe came under American domination and Britain effectively became a vassal to the US. Eastern Europe fell under the control of the Soviets. The Soviets ''won'' WW2 but at the cost of 27 million lives and massive destruction of its lands. Its victory was worse than defeat and set the stage for its ultimate collapse in 1989.

Hitler's many atrocities against slavs, disabled Germans, gypsies, and the general brutality of the German and Japanese militaries greatly discredited fascism. Nationalism was blamed(somewhat justifiably) for the world wars and the elites swore off nationalism, romanticism, and religious zeal. They embraced materialism as their de facto religion.

American capitalism in the meantime provided great wealth and material prosperity for the world. This combined with the scars of the world wars led the world to embrace egalitarianism, pluralism, liberalism, and free trade.

The Cult of Freedom was born.

The world was seduced by American power, beauty, and wealth. The whole world wanted to become her. In order to prevent another nationalist uprising ever again, diversity, feminism, and secularism were adopted by the elites to defang the Western populations and put them to pasture. This was accomplished during the American cultural revolution of the 60s aka the civil rights movement.

The Eastern bloc held on against American globalism for a while but ultimately collapsed due to the communist leaders' inability to reform. The only way the communist states could survive was by taking the Chinese route and morphing towards the de facto national socialist state.

The Chinese communists survived by taking this third way under Deng. After the USSR fell, the US was left as the sole master of the world.

Globalism now had zero competitors.

Wall Street, madison avenue, and Hollywood began a world conquest.

The IMF and World Bank in conjunction with the US treasury and Federal reserve began to integrate global finance. The USD became completely hegemonic due to the petrodollar. Countries were forced to open their markets due to IMF and World bank pressure.

Once the markets were opened, American banks and corporations would sweep in and buy up the economy. Now, American cultural trends would be enforced all across the world by corporations.

Ireland for example was a highly conservative country until the 90s. Then the markets were opened, American corporations like Google and Facebook moved in and massively liberalized Irish society with political pressure, selective donations, and working in conjunction with US NGOs.

The whole world started to watch Hollywood and its cultural memes dominated the world. Today, a Brazilian guy and an Indian guy could sit in Singapore and find common cultural ground on the basis of marvel movies, EA sports games, or Daily Show "Comedy".

The arts faculties of the world follow American books and American academic literature exclusively peddles cultural marxism and bogus Boasian anthropology.

The whole world was on the verge of becoming one: One Hollywood culture, all socializing on the same American social media giants, all employed by the same cross owned multi corporations, all consuming the same Chinese made products, all indebted to the same BlackRock owned banks and the central banks of the world all working under the auspices of the Federal Reserve.

It was only a matter of time before UN laws were made supreme over national law codes in order to ensure smoother corporate operation across national lines.

However, three stumbling blocks came on the road.

Russia revived and rejected western hegemony. China became ever more dominant and also rejected western oligarchic liberalism. It elected to go on a more nationalist trajectory. The CIA predicted in the 90s that with increasing economic prosperity thanks to Western outsourcing, China would liberalize as well or collapse like the USSR.

None happened. China went from strength to strength and now is on the verge of eclipsing the west.

The second problem stemmed from Western decline. The demographic decline of ethnic European populations, excessive debt, excessive financial parasitism, deindustrialization, and diversity fueled crime and instability crippled the western world.

The US is now in the same position in regards to China as the USSR was in regards to the US during the cold war. Its rapidly declining while its nemesis is continuing the pull ahead.

The third problem was an increasing dissatisfaction and disillusionment with the religion of antiracism and the cult of freedom. In the 90s, it was promised that antiracism, feminism, homosexual tolerance, open borders, and secularism would lead to a Star Trek-like techno-utopia. Instead what we're getting is a South Africa-like anarcho-tyranny and mayhem.

People are increasingly repulsed by the left and its trannies, worship of black criminals, extreme sexual decadence, and xenophilia. The honeymoon phase is over and liberalism no longer commands the hearts and minds as it once it. It's no longer the seductive blonde sporting a mini skirt, now it's an obese black tranny with pink hair and a ''feminine penis''.

As such, it longer has its past allure and increasingly has to rely on surveillance, police state tactics, and overt Soviet-style tyranny.

I believe that it's in lieu of this floundering of the globalist project that the great reset, the covid agenda, and climate lockdowns are being fast-tracked. They want a totalitarian world government as fast as possible while the West still remains at the top of the world. The slow approach is no longer feasible.

David Rockefeller headed the American liberal establishment for over 40 years until his death in 2017. He was the Kingpin of the liberal world order and was the closest thing America had to a king. After his death, there seems to be a vacuum on the throne. It increasingly looks as if various factions are working their own projects in parallel directions.

The Soviet Union became rudderless after the death of Yuri Andropov in 1982 and went into a tailspin. It collapsed just 9 years later.

Only time will tell if David Rockefeller's death will herald the same for the US.