Homophobia among animals

submitted by Fourth_stage from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]sylla94 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

when leftists talk about animals being faggots as a means of trying to prove it's "natural" I relentlessly hammer on that animals also naturally murder, cannibalize, eat shit, rape each other, etc and then just proceed to mock the fuck out of them by conflating those things with the homosexual displays.

"my dog recently ate some shit at the park and then immediately went to go hump the other dog responsible. don't gay men enjoy doing this sort of activity too? maybe you should give it a quick google (nsfw)"

"bro, you think it's ok to rape a dudes ass without conformed consent because a pygmy marmoset monkey did it? yikes!"

usually they shut up immediately

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

It's not fair to say all gays are rapists, there are many respectable ones. You might as well say all men are rapists, that's just as true. I'd say that it's very natural for well adjusted humans to love each other. And/or sexually experiment while they're at it.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No it's fair because in my country 50 percent of all sexual assaults on men are caused by homosexuals and 34 percent or somewhere close to that figure of all child sexual abuse involving male boys and offenders is caused by homosexual men.

In other words 1 percent of the population is responsible for half of all sexual assault on male adults and a third of all child sexual abuse. No one is saying 'all gays are rapists' but the fact that they are almost unbelievably overrepresented in terms of sexual crimes pedophilic or otherwise is important.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are no 'respectable' faggots.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Alongside statements of animal homosexuality the Left also follows their arguments along with stating that believing something is immoral because of its unnaturality is a false assumption ("clothes, flying in planes isn't natural"). I don't really get this one, but it is a linchpin in the defense of homosexuality in humans. I wonder, what is your response to that?

[–]sylla94 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

to that argument, just because something isn't necessarily immoral/moral because it is natural does not mean that unnatural things are necessarily moral/immoral

regardless, I would highly contest that creating and using tools isn't natural; we've literally evolved alongside clothing, for instance. without skins and pelts and fibers we would have frozen to death. a tremendous part of our success as a species has been our ability to create tools that benefit us, planes included

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chimps use tools. This term 'natural' seems to be falsely conflated in a kind of Rousseauian way with a primordial existence. Technically speaking everything that exists inside nature is 'natural' even gummy bears, sweeteners and AR-15 rifles. I hate that term so much because like racism it's a term everyone uses constantly but no one thinks about.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you. Important to remember nuance.