you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nombre27 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The NEJM article in question

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/

Letter that brought attention to the calculation error.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210615010704/https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Vaccine_safety_in_preg_NEJM_May_28_2021.pdf

Also, from that study it's likely more than 8/10 (104/127) since the 700 of the 827 were not third trimester but that doesn't mean they were all before 20 weeks either.

Second letter

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2113516

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks. For some reason, people on this board are hell bent on believing the establishment on this one issue although they distrust it on everything else.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They have several reasons to have faith in the establishment - all bad.