ColonizationWhere to even begin with how yikes this one is

submitted by CleverFoolOfEarth from i.redd.it

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

with consent

Right after telling lesbians our consent doesn't matter. Are these people capable of being logically consistent? I'm beginning to understand that I vastly overestimated the average person's intelligence because of how fucking stupid these idiots are. At what point do we declare they're too stupid to actually be sentient life since they have no self awareness at all?

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish I could find it, but there is a mini-essay on the chans from someone who did cognitive psychology research in the California prison system, within which (he claims) lower-than-population-average IQ predominates. Yes, I know IQ has its flaws, but the point of the post was what various IQ brackets meant for specific cognitive abilities. It turns out that certain kinds of reasoning that I personally take for granted are a struggle for people below, say, 95. For example, hypothetical reasoning: "How would you have felt if you had had X for lunch yesterday rather than Y?" "I don't know what you're talking about, I had Y for lunch." "Yes, but what if you had had X?" "I DIDN'T HAVE X I HAD Y!". Turns out recursive logic is difficult even for people around 100 (population average).

So, yes: a shocking number of people lack the cognitive engine power for any kind of self-awareness.

The conclusion of the post was that criminals may not lack empathy so much as lack any kind of theory-of-mind to support empathy. On the other side, you have high-IQ people who don't have much real empathy but are intelligent enough that they can (and know that they should) simulate it.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh I took that to mean they can be creative with the meaning of consent.

[–]Chocolatepudding 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Unironically celebrating female sexuality (or aspect of) with an image of an amputated breast

Absolutely no disrespect intended to women who undergo mastectomies for medical reasons

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To be honest everytime I see art of characters with such scars I just feel uncomfortable. TRA would scream I feel uncomfortable with trans men or non-binary women. No, I feel uncomfortable how this is straight up fetishized, celebrated as a cool thing. For the fuck's sake. It was once seen as a serious, tough surgery for a severely dysphoric woman. Not quirky fun scar you add to fictional male characters to make then quirky because apparently trans is cool.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Trauma and bottom dysphoria are real but do not preclude any lesbians dating any other lesbians.

Am I right to conclude that "preclude" in this instance means you have no right to reject a "date" from any "lesbian" regardless of how low her balls hang?

[–]Trolley 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is where I'd begin.

Truth: corresponding with reality; veridical.

If these propositions are self-evident truths, I wouldn't need to be reminded of them. Consider, I don't need to be reminded that 0+1=1, it is axiomatic- a self-evident proposition.

If these propositions are true but are nonetheless not self-evident, it is reasonable to expect supporting propositions that are themselves self-evident to authenticate the non-self-evident propositions.

It is not reasonable to expect me to adopt a non-self-evident proposition as true without support for those propositions.

Without support, these statements are as reasonable to adopt as those asserting the world is flat, the king of England lives in Idaho, or green beans taste good.

[–]julesburm1891 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Genital preference is transphobic

Noted.

Queer people get to dismiss heteronormative scripts for sex and can be endlessly creative, with consent.

Let me remind you that you literally just said not consenting to heterosexual sex is transphobic.

[–]strawberrysun 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Celebrating lesbian visibility forever. This is the original OP's reminder that no lesbians will ever want his dick!

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How about we don't begin and just call it the gaslighting nutbaggery that it is.

"Reminder," as always, is how they try to normalize their nonsense by claiming it pre-existed whatever situation—which by definition doesn't include them—they're trying to co-opt for their own gratification.

This makes as much sense as issuing "reminders" that the moon is made of green cheese.

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.