QT: Do women have a right to boundaries?

submitted by Penultimate_Penance from (self.GCdebatesQT)

Women have 3 very important reasons to demand single sex spaces.

Dignity, Privacy & Safety

When I walk into a Women's bathroom, locker room, shelter etc. I am consenting to share those other spaces with women. The moment a man who claims to be a woman walks into those spaces it turns into a unisex space without the consent of the women there. If men who claim to be women are allowed in these single sex spaces businesses should be required by law to put unisex on the door so women know exactly what risks they are taking by using those spaces with strangers who are men.

I don't personally care how any individual man identifies, I just don't want to undress in the same room as him or be patted down by him, or have intimate medical care done by him, or have women's fair competitive sports destroyed by a man who has a huge biological advantage over women in sports, or tricked into having a male roommate when I did not consent to a unisex roommate situation, or be forced to accommodate him in women only hobby groups, women only dating apps. I learned the hard way that a far far too high percentage of men are dangerous, the last thing I want is to be in a private space alone with a man who is a stranger or increase the odds of being sexually harassed by male doctors, TSA agents, nurses, caregivers, prison guards etc.

It's basic self preservation that is very effective based on a lifetime of dealing with creepy and straight up predatory men. Nothing personal, but taking these measures has significantly improved my life and reduced how often I have to navigate sexual harassment, threats and de-escalate to prevent violence and assault from men.

That's my boundary. Is it really that hard to respect this? Is it really that hard to give women dignity, privacy and safety when they are out and about in public? Women should absolutely have the freedom to take these basic precautions to reduce the odds of having to deal with male violence, threats, and sexual harassment throughout their lives.

Why should 50% of the population give up basic safeguarding & straight up self preservation to make a fraction of a minority of men feel better about themselves?

P.S. Don't come at me with men who claim to be women aren't safe in men's restrooms, & locker rooms. The vast majority of men would just give them a double take and ignore them. Men are perfectly safe using the men's room no matter how they may personally identify.

Trans Activists what part of no do you not understand?

Edit: Since some people are deliberately misunderstanding. Attacks on trans people are rare enough in most liberal democracies that using the men's restroom/locker room as a transwomen is perfectly safe the vast majority of the time. The histrionics of some trans activists implies that you risk getting assaulted every time you enter the men's room and that just ain't the case.

top 100 commentsshow all 136
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 20 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

Sometimes I ask myself why transwomen don’t get it. Like- they claim to be women and identify with women, so they should be able to understand why we don’t want them in our spaces, sports, etc. If they really were women, they’d get it. If they had any respect for women, even if they didn’t get it, they’d leave our safe spaces and sports etc alone.

I used to think they didn’t understand because they truly thought they were women, so why wouldn’t we be comfortable around other women? But it’s obvious by the way they try to force language changes, the ways they talk over us and tell women who don’t go along with their wishes how we are wrong, the way they pressure others about sex (or don’t speak out when other trans people do so), the way they threaten those who disagree with them openly and dictate to women who play along, the ways they justify deception... I mean I could keep going, but my point is just that they know they aren’t women, even when they claim they are.

They do it because they can. Because they are men. I’m actually starting to think that they do it because they hate us, simply because we are what they can’t ever be.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Spot on.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (22 children)

Because cow-towing to cis oppressors doesn’t advance the cause. Those are our spaces to, and if you don’t like it then you’re free to fucking leave.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

LMFAO!!!

Yeah... Your comment is the shit we are talking about. You just prove my point. Women don’t oppress you, we just want you to stay the fuck away from us. You, like all males, oppress us. You actually may be worse than other men because at least other men stay away from our spaces and sports and don’t try to take our rights for themselves.

Those aren’t your spaces, because you’re not a woman, you’re a man. If you don’t like my comment you’re free to fucking report it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

I’m sorry you feel that way sir, but I’m afraid the law disagrees with you. Now please be a good chap and go huff some paint. I dare say it should clear your head a bit

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Oh god no! you called me sir. The violence. THE LITERAL VIOLENCE!!!!

I don’t know why you keep doing that to women who disagree with you. The people you do it to aren’t mentally ill, so it doesn’t trigger us or hurt us. The fact that you think it would bother us is actually quite hilarious.

Can’t huff any paint for a few more months, sorry. I’m pregnant, you see, (something you’ll never get to experience, unfortunately) and that’s just not good for the baby.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

My good lad, I would never be so Frankenstein like as to bring a child into this world for my own gratification especially given the number of kids needing to be adopted, the very idea seems so profoundly narcissistic as to make me want to gag. Still though have fun having a child who demographically is probably going to consider you a bigot. Cross your cis fingers I guess, eh.

Also wow a cis person saying “you can’t get pregnant” to a trans woman. I bet that’s about as rare as a black person hearing racist shit. My feewings are so hurt 😂

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lmao you posted about uterus transplants for transwomen and kept making hopeful comments about the possibility, but now because you can’t think of a retort, you’re acting like it’s not something you want.

Still though, approval rates for the entire LGBT have dropped due solely to the T, so it’s likely that my son and unborn child won’t in fact see me as a bigot, but will see you as a man.

And I don’t give a fuck about your feelings to care if they are hurt or not, but your comments make it pretty obvious that they are.

[–]AlexisK 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, classic DARVO and direct personal attacks.

/s/GCdebatesQT now looks like trolling circlejerk.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I care about them because I believe they’ll be the death knell to your ideology when they occur, not because I want one myself. I decided long ago that creating a being just because you can is monstrous, especially when so many children need parents. Since I was a child I knew that I wanted to adopt.

Keep telling yourself that when your child thinks you’re a bigot. 50% approval and up among millennials and gen z 😎

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This isn’t helping.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I know that, I just can’t stand them anymore

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

Cis oppressor say what? Have fun being in a world where the law says you’re wrong

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Okay.

Have fun being in a world where you’re a man who hates women so much that you invade their spaces. That male privilege must feel incredible.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Have fun being in a world where you’ll get fired for expressing your bigotry in public and your friends and family consider you an embarrassment at dinner parties. And yeah I’ll be enjoying the use of my spaces thanks dude

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Lmao I’m overbooked and most people know I’m gc.

My family and friends all agree with me.

And I guess good for you that you’ll continue to make women and girls feel uncomfortable, that you’ll invade their spaces and strip them of their rights. I don’t know why you keep mentioning that, like we don’t already know you’re an invader lol

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Segregationists never win bro, regardless of what you’re bigoted family thinks. From a demographic perspective though I doubt they all agree with you sir

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don’t know why you think most people disagree with me, but go ahead and cling to that. You seem to need to.

And there’s a huge difference between sex based spaces and racial segregation. You may win for a short time, but you and a few other qt have shown me that in due time, you all expose yourselves as mentally unstable misogynists, so I’m sure more women will come to see you for what you really are, and we’ll take back our rights and spaces. Approval rates are dropping, “trans rights” are precarious atm. People are peaking allover- and it’s directly because of trans people themselves, you’re doing our work for us. Thanks

[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Sex-segregation was done as inclusive measure - to include women into social life and sports. While race segregation was the opposite - to exclude black people from social life. Sex segregated sports and spaces are existing as inclusive measure.

And it is opposite even in classes of people - sex-segregation is needed for women, oppressed class. And men taking it away is oppressors taking away inclusion for women - or excluding women from social life and sports. So it is opposite to race segregation.

[–]just_lesbian_things 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have fun being in a world where you’ll get fired for expressing your bigotry in public and your friends and family consider you an embarrassment at dinner parties.

Sounds word for word what homophobes, racists, and misogynists have said to me to try and shame/intimiate me into falling in line with the status quo.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The part where they’re males not women. That’s what they choose to ignore when telling us they’re perfectly safe to sit in our washrooms tweeting about how we should choke to death on their girldick.

[–]censorshipment 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

This would be a good question for libfems or female TRAs who aren't necessarily feminists. Why do women fight for anti-women "trans rights" and throw their own sex under the bus?

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Welp...

I guess the comments showed us all that, no, we can’t have boundaries

[–]grixitperson 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Well put.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (71 children)

P.S. Don't come at me with men who claim to be women aren't safe in men's restrooms, & locker rooms. The vast majority of men would just give them a double take and ignore them. Men are perfectly safe using the men's room no matter how they may personally identify.

This is just wrong. I’ve personally been physically attacked by a group of men in a men’s room and been harassed in them before that. That’s why I stopped using them.

If your demand is to have the option to never interact with or see a trans woman then, that’s what you want but don’t pretend like trans women are safe sharing spaces with men because it just isn’t true.

[–]just_lesbian_things 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Do you think women deserve to have their own spaces away from men like you? Answer the question.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

My preference is single occupancy neutral spaces. As you well know.

Regardless my point was the denial that men hurt trans women in the question.

[–]just_lesbian_things 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

My preference

That doesn't answer the question. Yes or no.

Men hurt other men all the time. It's possibly one of the most common form of violent crime. That's not what we're discussing here. Why should a discussion about women have to center men?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

She brought it up. Denying that we are harmed in isolated spaces with men. She was wrong and I pointed that out.

Men can protect themselves from men. Trans women can’t. Men attack men for reasons, they attack trans women because they hate us and it’s easy. It isn’t the same.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, but do you think women deserve to have their own spaces away from men like you transwomen?

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Give us proof. How often does this happen? Is it at a rate higher than how often women get assaulted? Where are the studies, the news stories of trans women getting attacked in the men's single sex spaces, specifically because they are trans?

You do understand that allowing men who claim to be women in the women's restroom defacto makes it unisex and defeats the whole purpose of banning men from single sex spaces for women in the first place right? Also it makes it no safer for you either, because the men who want to attack other men who claim to be women can just claim to be a woman too and follow you right on in. Especially with self id where any man can say, 'I'm a woman now' and saunter on in.

You are also completely ignoring privacy & dignity. Many women are not okay with changing in front of men no matter how they may personally identify. You are violating women's boundaries by insisting on being in intimate spaces with them when they did not consent to it.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

Most trans women are smart enough to not go into them obviously. But you have 2 personal accounts in this thread from among the minority of members here who are trans. Men hate trans women and we can’t contend with them physically. Being forced into isolated and difficult to escape places with them puts us in danger. It just does and it makes no sense to deny that.

You do understand that allowing men who claim to be women in the women's restroom defacto makes it unisex and defeats the whole purpose of banning men from single sex spaces for women in the first place right?

I don’t agree with that but my preference is single occupancy neutral spaces anyway.

This also isn’t true since at minimum there would be fewer men (and therefore less danger) as well as a higher odds that a non man witness would be present to call for help or ensure that we get care after the attack. But again I prefer single occupancy.

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Here's the deal those stories are anecdotal. I need actual stats. I am fully aware there are homophobic men who will go after men who aren't masculine enough for their own tastes. The solution is to hold these men accountable and change our culture so men tolerate other men who are feminine including men who claim to be women. We need to reduce men's homophobia, misogyny & transphobia. Men need to buck up and act like adult civilized human beings. (Obligatory not all men for the whiners, but too many men.)

I'm glad you are okay with not violating women's boundaries and a neutral space solution, but I am concerned about the trans activists who think that it is okay. The risk of assault and murder on trans identified people has been exaggerated by bad stats. We need a firm basis in reality to have a solid discussion. If a trans person is not a prostitute their risk of murder and assault is very low. Yes it does happen, but male on male violence is a completely different ball field than male on female violence.

[–]Greensquidsphone 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I am fully aware there are homophobic men who will go after men who aren't masculine enough for their own tastes

P.S. Don't come at me with men who claim to be women aren't safe in men's restrooms, & locker rooms. The vast majority of men would just give them a double take and ignore them. Men are perfectly safe using the men's room no matter how they may personally identify.

Sure seems like you aren't, bud.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Here's the deal those stories are anecdotal. I need actual stats. I am fully aware there are homophobic men who will go after men who aren't masculine enough for their own tastes.

I’ts bit common because we don’t go there. Your solution is just put us all in as much danger as possible and then once enough of us are attacked maybe act then?

The solution is to hold these men accountable and change our culture so men tolerate other men who are feminine including men who claim to be women.

That is impossible and won’t protect us or the effeminate men. You can’t rehabilitate all the monsters out of male culture. Even if you improve some it only takes one and there will always be enough.

We need to reduce men's homophobia, misogyny & transphobia. Men need to buck up and act like adult civilized human beings.

Sure but we can never be safe with men. Those situations can’t be made safe. There will always be enough that hate us and the ones that don’t wouldn’t help us if we were attacked.

If a trans person is not a prostitute their risk of murder and assault is very low.

What’s your basis for that? Because I’ve been attacked and I know many trans women who have. Just because we aren’t dead doesn’t mean we are safe.

I’m not ignoring your cited concerns but it’s unfair to dismiss the violence against us. We are hated by men and largely incapable of protecting ourselves from them. I wish you would at least acknowledge that. A trans women being attacked by a man is different than a cis man venting attacked by a man. It’s a different ball game.

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551619/

"Findings suggest that transgender people overall may not face a higher risk of being murdered than do cisgender people but that young transgender women of color almost certainly face a higher chance of being murdered."

I am saying the claims of violence against trans people are exaggerated and that is an important point, because many trans people try to use it as a cudgel to demand that women allow their boundaries to be violated. Gay men, especially effeminate gay men are more likely to bullied and attacked, but that does not mean they should be allowed to use women's single sex spaces. Effeminate Gay men use men's restrooms without incident the majority of the time and on extremely rare occasions if they are unlucky they get attacked.

Even with the disturbingly high rate of sexual violence against women we still need to live our lives. Heck getting into a relationship with a man significantly increases a woman's chances of getting raped & sometimes for the really unlucky women murdered by her partner. Is the chance so high that women should forego relationships with men entirely? No it's rare enough that with proper vetting women choose to take that risk all the time. Same thing for trans women in men's single sex spaces. The vast majority of the time men who claim to be women will be able to use the men's restroom with no issue aside from a bit of awkwardness. Most men are not out of control rage monsters, you'll be fine. (This also depends on where you live and how strong homophobia is there. Homophobia & men attacking trans people often go hand in hand.) I support gay & lesbian rights, because they aren't violating women's boundaries.

It seems that men who claim to be women's fear of men is taken more seriously than women's fear. I fear you, the same way you fear men. Actually my fear has an extra edge to it, because of the risk of pregnancy & abortion rights being removed. Knock on wood, but if god forbid I ever got raped, I may very well be forced to carry the resulting pregnancy to term against my will. That's something a trans women will never ever have to fear or experience. Also men who claim to be women are still on average significantly stronger, heavier and larger than the average woman. I know very well that most men could easily kill me with their bare hands including trans women and I plan my life around this fact. It just takes one man with anger management issues and my life is over. If a woman attacked me at least I have a fighting chance.

Male violence has actually happened to me and most women I know. This isn't the only story I have. He snapped his hands around my throat and slammed me into the wall and I couldn't breathe. No matter how hard I fought it was like trying to move a mountain. I'm only alive because he let go just before I suffocated to death. That's the day I learned just how large the gap between a man's strength and a woman's is. Hormone's aren't magic. They don't make trans women shorter, they reduce strength a little but not enough to close the strength & size gap between them and actual women. If a man attacks you, you still have a fighting chance despite the hormones and I do not. That difference fucking matters. If a transwomen put his hands around my throat like that man I still would not have a fighting chance. The strength difference is too large. We are seeing obvious proof of this as more men who claim to be women participate in women's sports and wipe the field taking 1st place with ease and beating women's records without breaking a sweat, showing off their male strength and other physiological advantages

3rd spaces and taking measures to reduce male violence is the only option that I see that is fair to women. Nature isn't fair and biology puts women at a disadvantage against men physically and reproductively, hence single sex spaces and allowing women to ask for female doctors, pat downs, caregivers, roommates etc. Women have different needs, because our bodies are built differently. Women need equity and not equality. Single sex spaces are essential for women's equity in society.

If trans activists fought for their own spaces, and protections without stepping on women's rights I would support them, much in the same way I support taking measures to protect gay men from male violence, but as the movement stands now I am against transgenderism. I am not a sacrificial lamb or a human shield for men who claim to be women. I'm not strong enough to even defend myself. If men actually listened to women male violence wouldn't be a problem. Women can't solve men who claim to be women's problems. If we could, we would've ended male violence and rape a long time ago. This is something men have to sort amongst themselves. Women have been trying for 1000s of years with scant success.

This is the state of the world right now: https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures

Women already have a herculean fight on our hands world wide. We don't have the resources or energy to fight your fights for you. Expecting women to do the dirty work for you is just the same old misogyny, where women are expected to bend over backwards for men at their own movement's expense. Women should absolutely be able to focus exclusively on our needs and our rights without catering to men no matter how they may personally identify.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a brilliant response.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

The actual main finding of that study seems to be that we lack any kind of good data source especially given that trans questions were removed from the census:

Dinno suggests that the most surprising finding, that transgender people overall do not face greater homicide risk than do cisgender people, is because of transgender people becoming adept at strategies to reduce potential harms, such as avoiding certain neighborhoods or being cautious around new people. Although research has found that many transgender people do employ these strategies that limit their freedoms in favor of safety, a claim that transgender people are successfully avoiding their own murders remains dubious. Because of the uncertain nature of both the numerator and denominator in these relative risk calculations, a far more parsimonious explanation would be that these estimates have substantial limitations and that better data and further research are needed to understand the relative risk of homicide for transgender and cisgender people in the United States. In that regard, Dinno’s work cannot provide a definitive answer to the “transgender murder rate” but instead provides a compelling argument for the advancement of more comprehensive data collection strategies to improve the safety of transgender people.

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As I've stated before, we need more data. Trans activist need to knock off suppressing research that they don't like. They should also be more conservative in their claims of oppression when they don't have solid data to back them up.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I didn’t say murdered. I said attacked.

Gay men, even effeminate ones are both more capable of protecting themselves and more socially acceptable than trans women.

No it's rare enough that with proper vetting women choose to take that risk all the time. Same thing for trans women in men's single sex spaces. The vast majority of the time men who claim to be women will be able to use the men's restroom with no issue aside from a bit of awkwardness. Most men are not out of control rage monsters, you'll be fine. (This also depends on where you live and how strong homophobia is there. Homophobia & men attacking trans people often go hand in hand.) I support gay & lesbian rights, because they aren't violating women's boundaries.

No, we won’t be fine. That’s my point, I personally was attacked within my first year of transition. If I used men’s spaces again it would certainly happen again. And I can’t protect myself from an attack by men. And noone would help. I don’t know if you are willfully ignoring the danger we face or just live in one of the few places trans people are relatively safe or accepted.

Also (trans women) are still on average significantly stronger, heavier and larger than the average woman.

And smaller and weaker than men.

I know very well that most men could easily kill me with their bare hands ... and I plan my life around this fact.

It’s the same for me. Going into men’s spaces is asking to be attacked and t the only thing stopping a man from killing me is his decision not to. Remember trans panic is an admissible murder defense in 48 states.

It just takes one man with anger management issues and my life is over.

Same for us. That’s what I am saying.

They don't make trans women shorter

This is not true. Many trans women lose several inches in hieght. I lost 2 inches myself.

they reduce strength a little but not enough to close the strength & size gap between them and actual women

My strength is literally half what it was and I go to the gym with women substantially stronger than me. This gap isn’t what you think it is.

If a man attacks you, you still have a fighting chance despite the hormones and I do not.

No, I don’t. Despite exercising literally seven days a week any average dude could easily overpower me. And I’m well more fit than most trans women. We aren’t a match for men. Not even close.

3rd spaces are my preference but you can’t stop male violence. You can’t make trans women safe with men. It’s impossible to make that situation safe.

Trans women are hated basically universally by cis het men and growingly by gay ones. We have almost no material resources and are moving backwards on rights daily. Acting like we can somehow stop men from hurting us is absolutely laughable. The only chance for safety is to stay away from men.

If trans activists fought for their own spaces, and protections without stepping on women's rights I would support them

What do you think this looks like exactly? You are advocating to be able to ban trans women from literally anything up to an including social clubs. And how do separate spaces get funded? You would need a mandate. Which is pretty impossible given state’s are literally in the process of trying to ban medical transition. What is acceptable trans rights to you? What does it look like?

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I seriously doubt your claim to losing two inches in height. If you can find research and studies on height loss as a result of hormone therapy I am very interested, because if that is true that is a fascinating phenomenon. You will still be stronger, bigger and heavier than the average woman and because of that extra strength you still have a better shot at physically defending yourself than women do. My point still stands. Also being personally attacked once in your life does not equal trans women are not safe using men's restrooms/locker rooms the vast majority of the time. That's why we need studies and stats, so we can actually roughly know how common it actually is. Tis a pity many trans rights activists are actively suppressing research that could help them.

Just this year I was followed by a man threatening to kill me while walking. I don't cry it's not safe to walk anymore or demand armed guards at all times. I know full well especially egregious incidents with unhinged men like that are fortunately rare, so I don't get histrionic saying it's not safe for women to walk. It is safe to walk in my neighborhood the vast majority of the time. Every now & again men will threaten me when I go out in public. That's life for women. Once every few years there is a really bad incident that really shakes me up, but that doesn't stop me. I keep going out, because I refuse to allow the violent pricks in the world to prevent me from participating in public life. I figuratively give them the middle finger by being brave and going out and living my life. You can too. You can improve men's acceptance of trans women by being brave and continuing to use the men's room. Women fought tooth and nail and went through hell to finally be able to go to college, to vote, to be able to divorce, to have access to birth control, to have a goddamn credit card in their own name and participate in the workforce. Things can get better, men can get better, but you have to be the change you want to see.

Acceptable Trans Rights that don't put the fucking boot right back on women's necks:

Reasonable accommodations like 3rd spaces.

Access to affordable mental & physical healthcare (This includes proper safeguarding to prevent as much as possible the tragedy of detransitioners who made catastrophic permanent changes to their bodies that will negatively affect them for the rest of their lives)

Physical transition allowed for adults. Key word adults who must be fully aware of the lifelong consequences of physical transition, before signing up for the hormones & the surgery if they so choose. Your body, your choice.

Freedom of association is important. In private groups, and events people should be allowed to exclude whoever they please. If a woman wants to have a women only knitting group she should absolutely have a right to. Some women's groups will include trans women, some will not. If you respect women as full human beings you can respect their agency in this matter. Trans women also should have the right to have transwomen only hobby groups and meetups, because they are the only people who know what it is like to be trans and sometimes it's just nice to hang out with people like you who understand where you are coming from. (I hope this helps you understand why women might want to hang out with just other women from time to time and I can assure you I have interacted with trans women in real life and it is completely different from interacting with other women. Their male socialization was really obvious and I couldn't let my guard down the same way I do around other women. A transwomen's presence completely destroys the vibe of women only spaces and social interactions. They are unaware of it, because they aren't women and will never truly know what women's only spaces are actually like without men present.) It's a bit histrionic to say I'm suggesting banning trans women from literally anything. I just believe women should have just as much a right to freedom of association as anyone else in their private life.

Events like Mitchfest should be able to exist, for women only. If transwomen want a similar event they can make one for themselves without barging in on women's private events and groups. That's what normal mentally healthy people do. If I walk into a social gathering that is strictly for pregnant women I don't throw a fit and send death and rape threats and say they're exclusionary monsters for kicking me out, because I don't qualify for the base requirements to participate in that private social gathering. I just shrug my shoulders and say I don't qualify for that particular group and join one that I do fit the criteria for. It's absurdly entitled to demand that people include you in their private events and hobby groups regardless if your presence even makes sense there.

As for pat downs, doctors, nurses and caregivers. People should have freedom to request services from the same sex in these situations. It is violating to be pat down or physically examined in intimate areas by a member of the opposite sex for many people. Remember everyone's dignity and privacy should be respected in society. Your personal belief in your gender identity does not trump their rights. If you are a TSA agent and male and insist on being allowed to pat down women you are no different from any other creepy man who violates women's boundaries. In that scenario you are the boot.

Roommate situations and dating also include freedom of association. Many women prefer to have only women as roommates for safety reasons. If you lie and present yourself as a biological woman and fail to inform them of your trans status you are violating their boundaries. In dating sex matters. Many people are not interested in dating someone who is the same sex no matter how they personally identify. Smokers being excluded from someone's roommate options isn't a civil rights issue. Same for trans people being excluded, because of their sex. It's not because you are trans that you are excluded in these areas. It is because you are male. Also women's sports should be strictly for women, but I hope that's a no brainer.

Transwomen should only be banned from women's single sex spaces and not be allowed to force themselves on people who do not want them in their private gatherings or professionally when a person's sex really matters such as caregiving, doctors and TSA pat downs. That's it. You get treated the same as any other man. You get the same rights as any other man. I'm arguing that you should not be given any special privileges above other men, because deep down inside you believe you are a woman.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I seriously doubt your claim to losing two inches in height.

Okay, I guess what’s the point in talking if you won’t even take my personal experiences at face value?

But no I couldn’t find any formal research on adult hieght only adolescent. Lots of anecdotal stories but nothing formal.

You will still be stronger, bigger and heavier than the average woman and because of that extra strength you still have a better shot at physically defending yourself than women do.

Still smaller and weaker than men. We can’t fight men any more than you can. That’s the relevant comparison when we are talking about danger from men. Any average dude on the street could kill me if he wanted to and I couldn’t stop him.

You can improve men's acceptance of trans women by being brave and continuing to use the men's room. Women fought tooth and nail and went through hell to finally be able to go to college, to vote, to be able to divorce, to have access to birth control, to have a goddamn credit card in their own name and participate in the workforce. Things can get better, men can get better, but you have to be the change you want to see.

No it can’t. Men will always be be monsters to us in high enough numbers we can’t be made safe in men’s spaces. So many of us tried. So many did exactly what I did of using men’s spaces until men made a point to show us how unwelcome we are through violence. I spent a long time after that literally only going to work, home, or places that I knew had usable neutral restrooms( a key distinction since many places had ones you had to request and could be denied access to on the basis that they are for families with children). The first time I used a women’s room I was literally pulled into it by a female friend.

Leaving aside the medical access question.

In what way is your stance not it’s okay to ban trans women from anything? The structure you set up seems to be exactly that any woman setting up anything can ban trans women including corporate things like festivals. Where’s the line? Technically that freedom of association has come into play in business discrimination cases, so can a pizza shop or grocery store van trans women? If not on what basis is that different than a festival?

I don’t understand why Trans women would want trans women only groups or events. I don’t see a benefit because my sense of kinship is with all women not trans women separately.

That being said do we have the right to deny being searched or cared for by cis men? Can I demand a trans women to search me if I’m arrested? I am just a vulnerable and violated by the touch of a man. I would guess that answer is no and if so why doesn’t our dignity and privacy matter as much as yours?

I’m not taking up dating as an issue. ( it’s not relevant to me so I don’t really have an opinion on it). I don’t think there’s a way to have trans women participate in sports at all but that’s a separate conversation.

The roommate issue raises a lot of housing discrimination warning bells to me. I’m not saying a like shared room dorm style, that I get, but where’s the line? A duplex with just a shared yard and separate lockable doors? Choosing to rent to us a unit in an apartment complex you own?

You get treated the same as any other man. You get the same rights as any other man. I'm arguing that you should not be given any special privileges above other men, because deep down inside you believe you are a woman.

The problem is we aren’t men. We are physically weaker and more vulnerable. We are more hated. We are in average poorer and with less access to material wealth or benefits. You brought up the beed for equity rather than equality. The same applies here. We are less than men and treating us the same isn’t equitable.

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You aren't less than men. Transwomen are transwomen and that's okay. There is nothing inherently wrong with being male. From my perspective it's a neutral descriptor. You are person who happens to be male. I am a person who happens to be female. But your experiences are not the same as mine. You will only have a male's perspective on womanhood, you will never experience womanhood, just a man's idea of what it is to be a woman and that's okay. This applies in the reverse, I will never know what it is like to exist in a male body.

While I do believe your personal experiences, that doesn't mean they are universal. There are plenty of receipts for the harassment of women and women being assaulted in locker rooms and restrooms especially unisex ones, I haven't seen convincing evidence for transwomen. I am all for gathering more data so we have a more accurate picture of how bad the problem is especially let's say in the United specifically and what can be done to fix it. That transwoman I knew in real life continued using the men's room without incident and he was very androgynous so when I first met him I just thought he was a woman with manly features, but his male socialization gave the game away. He did not psychologically pass at all. I was still polite to him used his preferred pronouns and what not, but he was definitely not a woman and interacting with him was just like interacting with any other man, when I found out for sure he was trans it all made sense. Never once in my life have I met an actual women who behaved exactly like a man. Transwomen though, yes.

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1594/freedom-of-association

For freedom of association we have a clear distinction between public and private life. Public services, businesses and governments should not discriminate. For example someone who owns and rents apartments should not be able to discriminate against renters because they are trans.

But people should have the right to choose who their roommates are in their private lives. It doesn't matter if you disagree with their criteria, their agency matters and no one should be forced to shared the same house/living situation with someone they do not want to share it with. Some women are comfortable with male roommates, some are not and that is okay. Many non smokers do not want to live with smokers. Some quiet people do not want to be roommates with talkative people. I could go on. That's why people often meet to see if they would be compatible as roommates before allowing the new person to sign the lease and move in. I believe it is an egregious overreach when trans rights activists attempt to destroy this fundamental right of association in people's private lives.

A big sticking point is that I do not believe your claim that you are a woman. Not understanding why women would want women only spaces in their private lives only confirms to me that you do not understand what it is actually like to be a woman. Most men just do not get it. Hence why every blue moon I really enjoy being in women only spaces.

As for being able to request opposite sex services let's use the TSA pat down as an example. It's standard for women to pat down women and men to pat down men. This is a compromise, because most women are not okay with being patted down by a man and many if not most women doing the pat downs would not be okay with patting down men. In this scenario sex matters, so I would say it is not okay to force a female TSA agent to pat down a male body. You should be free to request it, but if there are no women on staff who are comfortable with patting down a male body they should not be forced by the law to do so. (Ideally we wouldn't have these pat downs, but that is another discussion.)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

Who laugh reacts to us getting assaulted? That’s pretty awful.

[–]Greensquidsphone 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It's what ive come to expect at this point.

[–]Greensquidsphone 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (48 children)

Seconding this. Got attacked back when I was younger and didn't think i passed enough to use the womens room. Like shit, I get yal think trans people are some immortal cabal or something but if men harrass women, and TW look like women to them, what, do you think we're gonna say, "oh no fellow male I am actually of the xy masterrace no need to harass me today, carry on". I mean besides the fact that letting those kinds of people know you're trans is how you end up dead, the hell do you want me to do? Lying to yourselves to absolve any guilt ain't it chief.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (47 children)

We don’t have to absolve ourselves of any guilt. We don’t have anything to do with male on male violence. That’s the thing- even if TW aren’t safe in male spaces, it has nothing to do with females and we shouldn’t be robbed of our needs and spaces to solve an issue that isn’t related to us.

You can’t place guilt on females because other males may assault you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

Then that’s the stance she should be taking if that’s what she means, not pretending we are safe with men.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

My comment had nothing to do with her stance. My point is safe or unsafe, the issue has nothing to do with women so we (and our spaces) shouldn’t have anything to do with the solution to the problem.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Again if that’s the stance, take it, not everyone cares about harm to other people. But my issue is with the denial that we are harmed at all which OP absolutely made.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Sure, but do you think women deserve to have their own spaces away from men like you transwomen?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I’m not clear what you are asking. Do you mean for trans women?

In that case I’ve said repeatedly single occupancy neutral spaces would be better. I’m obviously not unfamiliar with being uncomfortable being around men while vulnerable. That’s the whole safety concern I’m talking about.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I’m chiming in on your convo with Another poster.

I understand that you think single space occupancy is ideal. My question is, regardless of your preference or even your needs, do you think that women deserve to be able to have spaces that are exclusively just for women (women meaning adult female humans)?

It’s a simple yes or no question.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

It’s not a yes or no question. Because I don’t believe including us would take anything away but it’s also not what I’m advocating for.

I can see why you would want that in things like locker rooms and bathrooms and in the event that there were safe alternatives for trans people I could see the argument for excluding us, but op also talked about things like hobby groups which seems like a discrimiation issue but also why would you want to be involved in a social situation where you weren’t wanted? It’s not as simple as a yes or no on that level.

[–]Greensquidsphone 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (36 children)

Sure, cool, still not going to put myself at risk to protect the feelings of a fringe group who wouldn't offer the time of day to me.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

I didn’t think you’d stop invading female spaces lol. I’m just pointing out that it’s ridiculous to blame women for what other men may do to you.

And it has nothing to do with a fringe group lol. Regardless of whether the women who are in the female spaces you invade feel safe or not, the fact remains it makes no sense to blame women for male on male violence.

[–]Greensquidsphone 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (34 children)

Inherent guilt, acquired from denying that violence against trans people doesn't exist when it clearly does. I'm not blaming anyone, I'm just telling you to quit with the mental gymnastics to absolve yourselves. Just say you're more comfortable with TW being attacked than "invading" a safer space.

And an edit, like circling said, if a single sex space exists, I'm using it first.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao inherent guilt. That’s some original sin level crap and you still say this isn’t a religion you’re pushing.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (31 children)

I didn’t deny anything. It still has nothing to do with females. There’s no guilt on females. It has absolutely nothing to do with women. You’re the one doing mental gymnastics to try to justify telling women it’s our fault that a man may attack you.

What’s to stop a man from noticing you in whatever public space you’re in, and waiting for you to come out of the women’s room? What’s to stop them from waiting for you to exit whatever space you’re in, and beating you up? If somebody wants to attack you, they don’t need to do it in the men’s room, and they’d be more likely to get away with it if they didn’t. People tend to notice when someone comes out of a bathroom looking like they got beat. So invading female spaces saves you from getting attacked in the men’s room specifically, but it does nothing to stop you from getting attacked when you leave.

Just say you don’t respect women or our rights lol

Eta-

You: I’m not blaming anyone

Also you: Lying to absolve yourselves of any guilt ain’t it chief

[–]Greensquidsphone 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

God, Sloane it's like I say one thing and you go to Twitter, read something someone else wrote, and the complain to me about it as if I wrote it. Again, I personally am blaming 0 women for the assaults a man would commit. I am telling THE OTHER POSTER (though you're included seeing as you're just as willing to make up shit to justify why actually it's SAFER for me in the men's room or some shit) that claiming it is perfectly safe for me to consistently use men's restrooms to make their argument stronger is mental gymnastics.

I respect plenty of women. Just not most of the ones here. :)

I'm home from work, going to sleep, and it's my weekend so I won't have any reason to look here for a couple days. Lemme do the nicest thing I've ever done Sloane and tell you not to write a lengthy response after somehow interpreting that I get off on the destruction of women's rights because it will not be read. I can't stop you, but you've been warned. Love you, bud. Gnight

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For whoever does read it, though I know squid will lol:

I already said that TW can be victims of violence. I didn’t disagree with you. You are the one who used the word “guilt” first. That’s was what I was responding to.

I didn’t say it would be safer for you in the men’s room at all, I asked you what would stop a man who wants to attack you from attacking you when you exit whatever bathroom you use. It was a genuine question. I don’t see how using the women’s room prevents a man who wants to commit violence against you from figuring out how to do just that. The mental gymnastics are coming from you, not me. You’re misinterpreting my words. I’m literally just asking what would stop a man from following you when you leave an establishment and attacking you, as opposed to attacking you in a men’s room, knowing that eventually you will exit the men’s room and or someone will enter it while he’s attacking you? Like- real women get attacked by men while walking to their cars, or walking in the wrong place, it’s a valid concern and question. But you’d rather try to act as if I’m saying something I’m not, and I’m thinking it’s because you have no answer to my question.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

What’s to stop a man from noticing you in whatever public space you’re in, and waiting for you to come out of the women’s room? What’s to stop them from waiting for you to exit whatever space you’re in, and beating you up?

The fact that it’s a public space and therefore more likely a woman would see and call for help. Also it would be easier for us to run away.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

That’s pretty naive. Women get attacked in public spaces all the time. And as I said, it’s stupid to attack someone in a public bathroom. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, I know it has. I’m saying all women understand that it being a public space doesn’t mean you’re safe. If somebody wants to attack you, they will figure out how to. They don’t need you to be in the men’s room to do it.

Eta- I’m not saying this to argue or debate, I’m being genuine. If you’re thinking you’re safe from attack because you think you can run away or it’s a public space, that’s not necessarily true and I want anyone who may be vulnerable to know that. I’ve heard too many stories of people getting attacked in public spaces or followed (from a public space) and attacked.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

That doesn’t make any sense. Public means witnesses, more likely someone will help a woman or call for help for a trans woman, easier to flee. Isolation in a private one exit space is as dangerous as you could make it. At least in the open I can try to run.

[–]kwallio 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just say you're more comfortable with TW being attacked than "invading" a safer space

You seem to be avoiding a particular fact, which is that male on male violence demands nothing from women. Not inclusion in our spaces, not sympathy nothing. Deal with your own problems.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Absolutely women deserve that. Everything you explained makes complete sense. It's hard to understand why women shouldn't have a right to boundaries. This answer seems so intuitive, it feels weird to think about why it need be asked, but I understand there really is pushback and argument against it, most of the logic revolving around identity and gender identity.

I don't personally care how any individual man identifies, I just don't want to undress in the same room as him or be patted down by him, or have intimate medical care done by him, or have women's fair competitive sports destroyed by a man who has a huge biological advantage over women in sports, or tricked into having a male roommate when I did not consent to a unisex roommate situation, or be forced to accommodate him in women only hobby groups, women only dating apps. I learned the hard way that a far far too high percentage of men are dangerous, the last thing I want is to be in a private space alone with a man who is a stranger or increase the odds of being sexually harassed by male doctors, TSA agents, nurses, caregivers, prison guards etc.

Given what I believe, as a trans person who is biologically male I feel conflicted because I don't know what to necessarily do as an alternative in some scenarios other than to plan and prepare in advance to avoid said scenarios altogether. The boundaries that I want to set for myself are the same ones you want for the same reasons that you want them. To be respectful of the boundaries of women yet maintain my own boundaries, I suppose there are some sacrifices I have to make by just not participating in certain aspects and functions of society, like avoiding the use of sex-segregated public facilities or activities altogether, and avoiding working in certain professions. I'd prefer to not have to disclose my biological sex and history for my own peace, so total avoidance of said scenarios seems like the only way to respect women's boundaries as described in the OP while also maintaining my own.

Don't come at me with men who claim to be women aren't safe in men's restrooms, & locker rooms. The vast majority of men would just give them a double take and ignore them. Men are perfectly safe using the men's room no matter how they may personally identify.

Most males are probably perfectly safe using the men's room, but since the boundaries I feel I need to set for myself are the same ones for the same reasons as in the OP (concerns of safety), then that's just not an option for me. Again, I suppose planning to avoid finding myself faced with such decisions is the only way to respect the boundaries of women as well as my own.

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think third spaces would work pretty well. Small business already have single room restrooms a lot of the time. We can just make those unisex. Many larger businesses, gyms, grocery stores & swimming pools mostly already have unisex family restrooms & changing rooms. We can just require all business to provide this third option in a way that doesn't put too much of a financial burden on them.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree, I think it's probably the best option concerning restrooms. The additional cost of providing said spaces is frequently mentioned when this option is brought up, I'm not sure how to ensure there isn't too much of a financial burden as much as I like the idea.

There is a rest stop I stumbled on in Nebraska where the women's and men's rooms are split on either side of the store on the inside, and they're essentially single stall rooms lined up in rows on either side, and the toilets have heated seats and bidets--it's extravagant and ridiculously lavish for an average-looking rest stop, so maybe it wouldn't be totally unrealistic to implement that model everywhere (I wish!😂)

[–]Penultimate_Penance[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish in the United States at least that there was a stronger push for general public restrooms provided by the state, so it could help provide 3rd spaces without burdening small businesses and it would also provide more restrooms in places where there aren't many or you have to be a paying customer to use one. As a person with a small bladder this would change my life and help trans people too. Win win. Let's shorten that urinary leash for everyone. That rest stop in Nebraska sounds amazing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

They don’t care about our safety

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It would be nice to have some understanding, but that's not something we should expect or feel owed. It's not their problem, it's ours, they have every right to care as much or as little as they want.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I can only speak for myself, but I tend to think that in the past, women didn’t care about sharing some spaces with TW. I still don’t personally care about bathrooms being shared with TW, though I understand that some women do care and I feel like it’s better to support females in this issue than TW, simply because my being okay with something doesn’t mean that I should support making other females feel uncomfortable and unsafe in female spaces, if that makes sense.

I think the issue is that it feels like if we compromise on anything, if we extend any kindness, be it pronouns or sharing spaces, then more is demanded of us from TW (obligatory not all). So for me, it’s a combination of not wanting to dismiss concerns of other females and fearing that if I submit to even simple, easy requests, more is going to be taken. We used pronouns and shared bathrooms, and now girls and women can’t even participate in female sports without having to compete against males- so they lose out on winning and on scholarships even, and we get vilified for using accurate language to describe our bodies and ourselves. We get told by males what it means to be female and a woman, like- the rhetoric that is going around today is a huge part of why I personally have issues. If TW could just be TW and respect the differences between us and respect boundaries, I would have no issue

All this to say, I don’t think it’s that we don’t understand, it’s that we can’t afford to let our understanding of your plight matter more than our rights.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The way you're articulating that makes sense looking at the bigger picture and implications of concession, especially in light of what has been happening in recent history with women and girls losing rights in order to accommodate TW demands. That's fair, and I appreciate your explanation if at least to know your heart is in the right place and you're doing what you believe is right, thank you for that.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for not immediately dismissing it. I’m glad you’re here on the sub.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well then fucking ditto.

[–]FlanJam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Short answers is yes. Especially when its pertinent those spaces are based on sex.

Longer answer, it depends on how passing the trans-person is, and the specific space in question. I don't agree with the all-or-nothing approach some QT and GC have. It doesn't make sense for a completely non-passing transwoman, who visually appears like a man, to enter women's spaces. And on the other side, it seems a bit extreme to exclude well-passing transwomen from all spaces.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I see why you would say this but doesn’t it make you a little squicked to think about how this is basically ugly people get less rights. That feels... wrong on a deep level.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

“Doesn’t match societal conventions for women’s appearances” is better and more accurate than “ugly”

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

A non passing trans woman is an ugly trans woman. I stand by that. As an ugly trans woman.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

No one is ugly.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Society has appearance standards. Some people don’t meet them. I’m one of them. It’s not the end of the world but, yeah some folk are ugly.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I mean by that logic rich, white, able bodied, young people are the most attractive demographic considering the prejudiced nature of the society we live in. I reject that oppressive logic though. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To a point, but some people are ugly. It’s so bizzare that you object to that.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It’s a viewpoint I utterly disagree with. You’re entitled to your opinion though of course.

[–]FlanJam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well yeah, I admit it doesn't sound nice, but idk any better solution. The other options are far worse imo. Well, third spaces are probably ideal but its not pragmatic.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

For me it’s the opposite, it’s either all in or none in or else we’re just prioritizing convention gender appearances at the expense of non gender conformity, something which already is occurring with cis women who don’t match the normative expectations for women’s appearances.

[–]FlanJam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I see what you're saying, but for me its not so much about appearance, but rather how well someone harmonizes with the space they're entering. I like what Buck Angel said, it doesn't make sense for him to use a women's bathroom because it'd make everyone uncomfortable. It makes far more sense for him to use the men's room. And I'd say the same for a non-passing transwoman who looks like a cis man, it'd make more sense for them to use the men's room.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

And non-trans women who are consistently misgendered for their non-normative appearance? Should the not use the women’s room out of concern for the comfort of others? Non-trans women have been tossed out of and even assaulted for using the women’s room, so this is not a theoretical problem.

[–]FlanJam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well of course a non-trans woman can use the women's restroom. Perhaps I wasn't making myself clear. I don't care about gender conformity, appearance, dress, aesthetic, etc. Its more about the sex rather than gender. A butch lesbian can have the same clothes, hair, makeup, etc as a passing transman. But I think its pretty clear that the butch lesbian belongs in the women's restroom, and the passing transman belongs in the men's restroom.

And to be clear, when it comes to restrooms the bar is pretty low for me. A transwoman doesn't have to be perfectly passing, as long as she's somewhat distinguishable from a cis man. I just don't want someone who looks exactly like a cis man to use the women's room, that doesn't seem right to me.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The part where you are wrong. Those are our spaces to and no cis oppressor will make us leave

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

Women? Sure. Cis women specifically? Nope. You can’t have boundaries around other people’s rights.

[–]AlexisK 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Mask slipped off, if there even was one.

You believe women have no right to say "no", because her saying "no" is infringing someone elses "rights"? It is so male thing to say.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

I’ve never worn the mask of a trans accomplice to cis prejudice. Sorry dude, but legally the law is on my side 😌

[–]AlexisK 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Weird way to call "misogyny", but as you like to call it, mister.