How is this hate?

submitted by Musky from midi.moe

all 79 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Alphix 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

You call a Jew a Jew and already he is calling you hateful. There is nothing hateful about Lucas Gage's questions except in the paranoid and sick Jewish mind.

[–]Dragonerne 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The irony is that Yom Kippur is about atoning for your sins or wrong doings. Does AGHamilton have any sins he wishes to confess to the rest of the world? Shouldn't jews ponder exactly the questions that Lucas is stating, and precisely during THIS holiday

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

WOW. I didn't know this. The irony is off the charts! I am very amused... =D

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't either. I looked it up on wikipedia because he mentioned it

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Questioning is forbidden.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was gonna type something ... "Thou Shalt Not ... "

[–]MagicMike 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Jews are feminine in the sense that they avoid personal confrontations. They institute crap like WOKE ideology so normal people won’t confront trannies, rioting and murdering nig nogs, college instructors telling white kids the kids are evil because they are white, etcetera. Us being tolerant of evil is their goal.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You are the very real personification of real evil. Someone who is hate-filled, can't stand the world for the diversity in it, hateful toward anyone of another color, intolerant of whites, blacks, Jews, everyone you can think of. You really make white people look like perverted turds. And you've convinced me, white people can never be superior to another race, because of their inferior infantile hate and small minded bigoted ideas.

[–]BobOki 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Stop insulting others and either join the conversation and bring something to the table to explain why they are wrong... or really, fuck off. I will personally be reporting you because evidently on top of not understanding how to speak to people, you also are too lazy to read the site rules.

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Even if he was banned he'll re-spawn under a different moniker. Nothing he says is organic as he's paid to detract and gaslight and is part of a government Internet task force to maintain the status quo. Just fight fire with fire; insult and belittle him. But ignoring him would be the best option. Although it's hard sometimes.

[–]BobOki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It is QUITE hard to do so when they are THIS ignorant. What I have been doing is reporting the posts themselves for dragging the discussion in hopes their mouth dribble will just be deleted or muted. This is not to silence what a person says, but because they are not saying anything, just insulting people, I do not feel this is a bad thing at all. Free speech is very important to me, and I do not ever want to silence the speech of someone I do not agree with, but there also has to be limits IMO. Those limits should be the basics, do not incite violence, not direct threats to a persons life or family, and really now, if the only thing you are doing is literally just insulting people and not actually speaking... well that should also be a hard limit. Again that's IMO, but without some rules you have nothing but Reddit.

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The rules were enforced somewhat at the beginning but the site administrator kind of went MIA maybe two years ago and it's been a bit of a free for all since. Only users advocating violence or posting pornography get banned and spam gets removed at an infrequent pace. There's one site moderator to oversee all of this and she sometimes gets blocked from this site by Cloudflare. Anyway, there's still nice people here to chat and debate with. Just don't waste too much time on the detractors and forum sliders.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Again with the childish threat of "reporting" me. You think I'm going to lose sleep over a twit like you "reporting" me for calling you out for what you are? HAAARRRDDDLLLYY. Go ahead, ya little asshole, see how far you get with your "reporting" and by the way, you can cram you opinions back up your mom's filthy ass where you were spawned from. Oh, and have a nice day!

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh my... looks like you were wrong.

[–]MagicMike 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

One of the basic principles of evolutionary biology is that if populations separate into differing environments, the groups become different. Put one group in an area where plant food in abundant, where it’s warm all the time, and there’s no need for women to select for providers, then that group has no reason to evolve. They stay low IQ non conceptual Neolithic humans. They are our nig nogs.

Put another group where it’s cold and plant food isn’t available all the time. Women need men to hunt. Warm clothing becomes imperative. Outsmarting game animals is a life or death proposition. Planning becomes essential. These are whites and NE Asians.

For this reason, nig nogs need to be kept away from whites and NE Asians, just like you’d keep kids away from violent savage animals.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ohhhh kay, that makes about as much sense as Timothy McVeigh's pathological rantings about his reasons for bombing the Murrah building. So obviously you're deranged in some way and unable to make cohesive thoughts come out of your brain. Again, I think this contributes to your overwhelming sadness and cancerous hatred of other humans. But the conclusions you draw do not follow from any of the so-called "facts" you attempt to state, which are also garbage and utter horseshit. Get some professional help while you still can, if you care enough about yourself.

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On a map, look at the west coast of sub Saharan Africa. You will notice it is very smooth and has few natural harbours. That impedes communication and commerce. Now look at river systems and especially waterfalls. Rivers rarely connect and waterfalls harm river navigation. Then observe that sub Saharan Africa is surrounded by the Sahara Desert and two oceans: once again, it is isolated.

In sum, Africa is and has been a ghetto continent. It’s undeveloped and filled with savages, just like ghettos here.

So, just like with lions, hippos, tigers and so on, sane people stay away from the violent and savage nig nogs.

[–]GuyWhite 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The commenter reinforces the original claim that Jews support censorship.

[–]wristaction 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Antisemitism is when gentiles talk about jews the way jews talk about gentiles (when gentiles talk about jews pseudonymously, in some contexts, in violation of the law, in online ghettos, as jews voice their opinions of gentiles in the pages of the New York Times, the Harvard Review, academic journals, government-commissioned reports, etc.).

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

How is this NOT hate? You'd have to be very unintelligent not to see why this crap is hateful and wrong. First of all - do YOU know who actually controls Proctor and Gamble? Or the lumber industry? Or the cereal industry? I doubt it, and assuming they are Jewish because you hate jews is disgusting in every way. So what? You still get your damn laundry soap and your damn lucky charms, what difference does it make?? Also, comparing Jews to "feminine" people as some kind of childish insult is also hate -- hate toward women, because you see femininity as something low-down and insulting, and hate to Jews because you are more interested in insults than in humanity. Shame on you here for these horrible responses. Of course I know I'm dealing with 14 year olds here, but you need to grow up and stop being infantile assholes all the time.

[–]Musky[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Is there anything factually untrue about what Lucas Gage wrote?

I don't see how saying the truth is hate unless we're just not allowed to acknowledge certain things.

I don't know what you're talking about in most of your comment tho.

[–]LarrySwinger2 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm pretty certain it's a bot designed to increase the tension and make everyone feel unpleasant. He just goes against whatever you have to say in a confrontational way.

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's Socks or his ilk.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No - it's not.

Any user who disagrees with you is not me. A lot of other people disagree with you, online and offline.

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

People disagreeing with me have most often than not been proven to be wrong. Fact.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"fact", says the anonymous comment

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am u/Site_rly_sux_rly_sux AKA u/Megatron95, u/Optimus85 and 2 or or 3 other alts. It is a fact you are a cunt.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're still anonymous, and obviously have no credibility, especially wen you mention something that's not a fact and call it a fact.

[–]Oyveygoyim 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He's already admitted that he's just another mentally ill faggot. So naturally he supports perverts like jews.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I realize that because to understand my comments takes more than a smidgen of inteligence. That's okay, don't keep furrowing your brow in a vain attempt to understand. If you can't see how hate and misinformation aren't "truth" of any kind, that sort of says it all about your neanderthal mentality anyway. I'll not bother trying to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. Go eat and have a nice lie down.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yawn. If you don't have a decent reply don't bother bro.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My replies are absolute brilliance, but it does take mental acuity to see that. Sorry that you don't have what it takes to be a human being.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1/10 troll, you suck at this.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is there anything factually untrue

Yes, see below

I don't see how saying the truth is hate

It's out of context, in order to encourage hatred; see below

https://saidit.net/s/AskSaidIt/comments/bjtd/how_is_this_hate/145bm

[–]BobOki 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'll bite.

Let's tackle these one at a time. Your first point is you have to be stupid to see this is not hateful. You provide no counter argument how this is hateful and just throw ad hominens. Second, you throw a red herring, what does knowing who runs a company have to do with the comments made about Jews? Next you again ad hominen with no point being made other than you are being hateful towards anyone based on a single opinion. Next one is again a red herring, what the hell does soap and cereal have to do with Jews or the conversation? Next you try to take what another commenter said and twist the shit out of it doing the very thing you are saying they are doing as well as ad hominen again and then an equivocation because you are unable to separate a person having a single view from being radical extremist, which you are being. Then you again ad hominen. Ad hominen again. And lastly ad hominen.

Congrats, you have quite literally brought nothing at all to this conversation, stated nothing counter to the points being made, backed up your diatribe with nothing but more hate, have acted like a 12 yr old that thinks they are better than the adults here, and lastly are, to be frank, stupid as fuck. If you want to open the gaping hole in the front of your face at least do the bare minimum and try to be a part of the conversation. This is not Reddit, we do not just attack people and not offer a single shread of counter argument here in what you think is some gotcha moment, and unlike Reddit you will find no one here will back your ignorant echo chamber talking points and insults. if you can't be BOTHERED to join the conversation in anything other then bad faith, stay the fuck in your kiddie pool while the adults actually talk.

Are there racists here? Yes. Absolutely but here's the crazy kicker... most of those are moron Reddit implants that have NO CLUE how anyone other than other stuck up their own ass echo chamber brain washed Redditors speak, so they go totally ham sideways trying to ACT like a "alt-right" and the rest of us who are not SCARED shitless to talk to someone with differing views than you can see it a MILE away and laugh at just how PATHETIC people like you are. Go back to Reddit, you are obviously not cut out for what goes on in the real world.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well if I ever needed proof that you're a fucking idiot, you just provided it in black and white for all to see. You have quite literally brought nothing to this conversation except your hate and small minded horseshit, and to be quite honest with you, I don't give a flying fuck about anything you have to say. I am not going to read your responses, just delete them. That's all they are to me, utter garbage, just like you and the people who raised you in a barn. You're one really sick fucked up asshole. And that's always going to be the ultimate cancer that destroys you.

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh look.... deleted. Guess that says who was correct or not.

[–]Site_rly_sux_rly_sux 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The first time I saw ''ad hominem'' was in Arthur Schopenhauer's ''The Art of Always Being Right'' and I had no idea what it meant except for its obvious Latin origin. I inferred from the description and added context that it meant a personal attack. Well, that's where we're at. Shills can no longer make a cogent argument to defend the political quagmire that besets us so need to resort to dirty tactics in an attempt to defeat by emotions rather than logic or facts. Your ideas are bad and you should feel bad.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not necessarily where we're at. It's common on social media, but can be ignored or dealth with in other ways. Engage with those who are addressing the topic; it's that simple. And if you remember your Schopenhauer reading, you might recall that he identifies 3 evils (which sadly are common at Saidit):

pessimism

paranoia

suspicion

[–]BobOki 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have been calling out the logical fallacies that the left only knows how to use now, and NOT logic, facts, truth, hypothesis, debate, for a few years now. I have watched the sharp decline in the ability to even SPEAK to people with differing views, much less be able to debate them on ANY level at this point. If you act like are a brainwashed moron and ask one of these clown exactly what or why they think or say what they are mouth vomiting, they have no clue. Ask their opinion and you will get nothing but buzzwords with no definitions, feewings, and word for word talking points. You can even ask them to define what should be the easiest words that are used the most, and they literally cannot.

Don't get me wrong, because the left can no longer even use words, does not mean the right can. I am also watching the sharp decline of the right being able to speak as well, and for this I blame the echo chambers of the left. They do not have to debate that much anymore because there is no debate anymore, just word salad bullshit... so they are also losing their ability to do so. Granted it is MUCH slower than the left was, but it is certainly happening. hell, I find myself using more personal attacks simply because the utter SHIT that comes out of these utter wastes of air are just so ludicrous I find it hard not to attack them on that level. It has been so refreshing actually getting to talk and debate people on this site again, but it saddens me to see these trash Reddit implants busy trying to make the site look bad by their incompetence.

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Stating facts is not hate. Science just names facts without regard to emotions. Jews think Hitler is under their bed and nig nogs think that human farm equipment built America. Paranoia and victimhood, all in one.

Description is not hate.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Stating falsehoods is hate, plain and simple. I don't doubt you're badly educated and very poorly raised, but that's no reason to misidentify your very mistaken ideas as "science." Your hate comes through so clearly, that it's like watching the cancer progress throughout your whole nervous system. You already are a vacuous and unhappy and miserable person. Don't spread your cancer to other gullible people like yourself.

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a current fad in academia: people actually getting fired for investigating topics that are interesting but controversial. For ex, investigating the mental health of trans people means that you (the scientist) are secretly a Nazi who wants to put trannies on trains for a death camp. Telling black students that they need to show up on time for class is racist. Acknowledging that the Laws of Evolution cause groups of humans to evolve in different ways (cold weather forced Whites and NE Asians to adapt and become smarter) means the scientist is a Klan member out to hang innocent blacks.

Sorry you have a room temperature IQ. If only you had some white ancestors….

[–]Hematomato 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's... obviously meant to scaffold hate.

We all know how it works. The pseudointellectual "just asks questions" in the hopes of inspiring a thug somewhere to "just throw hands."

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Are you Jewish?

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The only context such an effect is observed is in the transmission of antiwiteism from academia and the media to antifa terrorism and stochastic violence against Whites like Andreas Probst and Kaylee White.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, most certainly not the only one. There are two in this tango.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jews should change their behavior so they become less hated. Stop censoring others and stop infiltrating power structures of nations they did not found.
Yom Kippur is about atoning for your wrong doings. Jews have a long list... it can be hard to start. Of course, being jews, thinking they're Gods chosen, they're like narcissists and can't even comprehend the idea that they're at fault. It must be because others are irrationally hateful, not because jews ever did anything wrong.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Any time you see 2 Jews debating each other it's likely because they are two people who like arguing for sport so get chosen because of that.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You don't see anything anti-semitic in that?

I do.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Not really if there's no issue with complaints about white people being overrepresented. Why is this one segment immune from having to be multicultural and diverse.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Not really if there's no issue with complaints about white people being overrepresented.

The complaint isn't about white people being overrepresented. It's very specifically about Jewish people.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

This is about Jews, but when it's about white people being overrepresented it's not considered racist. That's why we have a black Ariel and commercials full of mixed race families, for inclusion.

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is about Jews

Yeah. It's really clear that it's anti-Semitic.

but when it's about white people being overrepresented it's not considered racist.

I'm not sure you're groking what racism is.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I don't buy into this you can't be racist to white people nonsense if that's what you mean. Here's my gold standard, if you can say it about white people and it's not considered racist then you can say it about anyone and it's not racist.

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't buy into this you can't be racist to white people nonsense if that's what you mean.

There used to be a word "reverse racism". That's not how racism works.

Here's my gold standard, if you can say it about white people and it's not considered racist then you can say it about anyone and it's not racist.

In order for speech to perpetuate a negative racial stereotype, there has to be that negative racial stereotype to perpetuate.

That's why you can say "black people are a tiny minority that finds themselves in influential positions, leading, and in some cases dominating important sectors of a nation in disproportionate numbers to their population", and you won't upset people for being racist.

Even though you're not saying it about white people.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There used to be a word "reverse racism". That's not how racism works.

You're right. There's only one racism, which can be done by anyone. Look up the definition. 'Reverse racism" was a term used by covert racists who believed white people were special.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

used by covert racists who believed white people were special.

Yes - though also by many whites who were annoyed with Affirmative Action in the US. There has been a better term for this in the UK: positive discrimination, which I think is now called positive prejudice, though I've never heard anyone use that term. Though I very much support "levelling up", I am sympathetic to those who missed opportunities though they were much more qualified 'white' males. It's a difficult problem, IMO.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In order for speech to perpetuate a negative racial stereotype, there has to be that negative racial stereotype to perpetuate.

False. Jews often make up lies about whites, like "stupid blondes" or "karens" etc.

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have a standard anymore. I really don't care if something is racist or not. If it's true, I say it

When someone calls you a "racist" for mentioning pakis organized rape of white british girls, then they are defending the rape of whites. I don't fcking care what people defending rape thinks of me.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

It's hatred because Gage has redefined the 'Jewish question' in a manner that is meant to encourage the hatred of Jews. The original question is not primarily about 'influential positions' or a separation from "all humanity". You can dislike individuals if you wish, for these reasons, but these comments are unfairly directed at ALL Jews, and it's not the 'Jewish question'.

In broad, normal terms:

The Jewish question, also referred to as the Jewish problem, was a wide-ranging debate in 19th- and 20th-century Europe that pertained to the appropriate status and treatment of Jews. The debate, which was similar to other "national questions", dealt with the civil, legal, national, and political status of Jews as a minority within society, particularly in Europe during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

and political status of Jews as a minority within society

His questions are listed as part of your own definition. LOL

From the wiki page you linked:

[John T.] Flynn says he does not question the truth of what I said at Des Moines,[21] but feels it was inadvisable to mention the Jewish problem. It is difficult for me to understand Flynn's attitude. He feels as strongly as I do that the Jews are among the major influences pushing this country toward war. He has said so frequently and he says so now. He is perfectly willing to talk about it among a small group of people in private.

.

In Nazi Germany, the term Jewish Question (in German: Judenfrage) referred to the belief that the existence of Jews in Germany posed a problem for the state. In 1933 two Nazi theorists, Johann von Leers and Achim Gercke, both proposed the idea that the Jewish Question could be solved by resettling Jews in Madagascar, or somewhere else in Africa or South America.

Maybe he should've included Madagascar resettlement as an option? Would that have satisfied you?

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

You shouldn't have to work this hard to cherry pick your favorite examples for an argument. I would agree that there are some interesting problems with some of the influential minorities (including MAGAtards) - and we're not so different in this regard - but my argument is that "the Jewish question" is not what's in Gage's Tweet.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

His questions are listed as part of your own definition.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

part of

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yes, his questions are part of your own definition

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Though not the main part

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yes, the main part

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No - it's not. Learn to read.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

and political status of Jews as a minority within society

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Basically, you can't speak of the ruling class.

[–]zherka 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

only white jews

[–]MoeGreene 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kurt Schilling reposted. LOL

[–]clownworlddropout 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jews are generally smart, wealthy, and practice unabashed racial nepotism. It's no big surprise they gravitate to the upper echelons of society.