You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yesh baby!

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Somebooodyyy neeeds to go!

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Omg

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you are an atmospheric greenhouse gas

📺

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hold on, I think he makes a valid point. He is openly admitting that others should die, so that he may live and is agreeing that it should be done through subversion. 📺

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit. That is nothing more than globalist propaganda.

Passkeys: A Shattered Dream by Drewski in Security

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

archive.today mirror | archive.org mirror

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because you are an atmospheric greenhouse gas.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

dude we’re overpopulated .. someone needs to go

CreateHealthyHomes.com - Are cell phones safe? What about wifi devices? EMF (Electric and Magnetic Fields) and 5G continue to be taboo topics of discussion. Why is that? Is there a scientific and media bias against exploring these concerns? #EMF #5G #Safety by JasonCarswell in Radiation

[–]Shook71 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CreateHealthy is a community-driven initiative aimed at promoting a holistic approach to well-being, where individuals are empowered to take control of their health. With the concept of BorderFreeHealth the movement transcends geographical, cultural, and socioeconomic barriers to provide inclusive access to health resources and education. By harnessing technology and fostering collaboration, CreateHealthy seeks to create a global network that encourages healthy lifestyles, mental well-being, and preventive care. This approach fosters a supportive environment, ensuring that everyone, regardless of background, has the opportunity to lead a healthier life.

Best Solar product manufacturing company in india by iyrosolar in Solar

[–]iyrosolar[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IYRO Solar is a leading solar manufacturing company. We focus on making every house shine brighter with an independent renewable source of energy. It is our unrelenting efforts to deliver feasible and quality solutions to millions and this mission helps us to become the Best Solar Company in India.

Our Products: * Solar PV Module * Grid Tie inverter * Solar Tubular Battery * PCU: power conditioning unit

IYRO Solar offers numerous products to meet every individual specific requirement. Our continuous focus lies on making it economically available for everyone. Together we stand for creating an ecosystem that is sustainable, clean and green.

Court Rules That Cops Can Physically Make You Unlock Your Phone by newtimer in Freedom

[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...if you are dumb enough to use your tumbprint as the password.

FBI says Chinese hackers preparing to attack US infrastructure by Drewski in Intelligence

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

archive.today mirror

Unearthed in broad daylight: Secrets of the Deep State by boston_blackie in DeepState

[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Archive mirror: https://archive.ph/y2bXE

“Residents are demanding to know why Cloud Seeding operations were conducted the day before the Worst floods in 40 years” by Questionable in environment

[–]Macheetuh 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Amen brother. Only faggot and dyke pedophiles would even think of using that word in such a context.

“Residents are demanding to know why Cloud Seeding operations were conducted the day before the Worst floods in 40 years” by Questionable in environment

[–]Cantbot 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Can you not use the word "seed"? It induces unholy thoughts.

Change Healthcare’s New Ransomware Nightmare Goes From Bad to Worse by Drewski in Security

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

archive.today mirror | archive.org mirror

Tenth consecutive monthly heat record alarms and confounds climate scientists | Climate crisis by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My goodness. These climate scientists sure seem to get confused easily.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"""☀️🌍🌓"""

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They call that a useful idiot. Or in modern terms, Mid-wit.

NYPD teams engaging in ‘unconstitutional policing’ with widespread stop-and-frisk: report by newtimer in Freedom

[–]neolib 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

June 6, 2023

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lots of "smart" people fall for communism.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"My understanding of climate change isn't based on 'them' or 'their motives' or 'who is and isn't an expert.' It's based on reading data. A combination of reading both the scientific publications directly and reading sources I trust to summarize papers without partisan editorializing."

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Government "experts" told farmers, who had only farmed for generations, that they were doing it wrong, and that they could double or triple crop yields by planting seeds closer together. Those crops all failed.

They also ordered farmers to produce steel, which they had no means to produce, so they'd melt down their farm equipment into slag in order to meet their "steel" quota, which would be used to make bridges that would later collapse. But without sparrows to kill bugs, with failed crops due to government farm science, and without farm equipment, they starved to death.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]carn0ld03 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which is generally consistent with a planetary cooling phase.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to NOAA it is 1 foot in the last 100 and 6 inches of that have been in the last 30 years.

10-12 inches in the last 100 years for the US is not the same as a foot globally. Neither is it incompatible with a global mean rise of 8 inches over that time.

They go on to claim another foot in the next 30 years. This will not happen.

How do you know it won't happen?

They claimed that New York would already be under water.

No one claimed that.

They claimed that the Arctic ocean would be ice free by now.

One paper, looking at the huge drop in sea ice in the summer of 2007 projected that the arctic would be ice free by now.

"Hur dur global warming exists" is not a valid excuse.

"Hur dur sientis lighd" is not a valid argument.

It does not excuse their lies.

Science progresses by correcting errors. No one is lying. It's called finding things out.

It absolutely does not justify drastic and harmful government policies, including those that simply cost a lot of money.

Adaptation is more expensive than amelioration. So we should spend money to ameliorate. Because not doing so will simply cost a lot of money.

Global warming is not an existential threat, it is an inconvenience at best.

This is from the same school of thought that brought us "disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels" by misreporting a paper showing that sea levels were reducing the land area of islands, but some were expanding due to human land filling.

Sorry if I don't trust you, but the denialist industry puts out a lot of lies.

Controlling CO2 will not slow down global warming in any meaningful way.

I don't trust you any more. What's your best proof of that?

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Except that the it is so people have been caught lying in the past

This paper was by Yuxin Zhang,Hao Li,Dong Li,Xiyong Hou,Peng Guo & Jiawei Guo. Can you point to where they have been caught lying in the past, please.

and the it's not so people are relentlessly silenced and slandered.

Funny you should mention slander, having just implied that 5 people have been caught lying in the past, without providing any instances. But who do you claim has been silenced and slandered because they said that the sea level was not rising?

The vast majority of sea level rise happened millions of years ago.

I'm not sure what that even means. The sea level rises and falls primarily with the amount of ice sheet on the planet. What happened "millions of years ago", and how are you accounting for sea level rise to say that "the vast majority" of it happened then?

That kind of sea level rise will never happen again because the vast majority of the ice caps have already melted.

There's about 80 metres of sea level rise left in the ice caps. That would displace nearly a third of the world's population. Surely that's of some concern independent of what happened millions of years ago?

The sea level rise propaganda claims that catastrophic sea level rise will happen in the near future

Can you link me to an example of "sea level rise propaganda"? I don't have a sense of "catastrophic sea level rise" or what you mean by "near future".

But when you call out that propaganda everyone starts shifting the goal posts and claiming they did not say that.

In the current example, a study showed that of 13,000 islands nearly 1000 were shrinking and nearly 800 had grown, the growth mostly due to human land filling.

And this has been reported here as "Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels".

Explain again which side is pushing out propaganda, because I'm not seeing your point of view.

But an inch over 100 years is not significant.

Sea level rise was ten times that thirty years ago. It has accelerated about 30% since then. Currently it's rising an inch in between 7 and 8 years.

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/8/is-the-rate-of-sea-level-rise-increasing/

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well and correctly stated.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

During the last ice age, the concentration of atmospheric CO2 was, on average, 180 ppm. Today it's 423ppm.

The last time it was about 4,000 ppm (which is 10x higher, not 100x higher) was during the Ordovician. That was 500 million years ago, and the surface temperature at that point was an average of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to 59 degrees today.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you aware that before the ice age started the concentration of co2 was 4k ppm and today it is only 400 ppm?

How did we enter into massive global cooling during a time when co2 was 100x higher?

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why should the forests of Europe be so powerful as to change the world's climate? Isn't that just one of those silly "blame everything bad on white people" tropes? 12% of the world's population on 6.8% of the world's land covering 2% of the surface of the planet and it was the slow and primitive manual labor tree felling that started climate change. That sir, is absurd.

Like I said, the change due to the deforestation of Europe was tiny and not noticable by human beings without instruments. But it was measurable with modern instruments. Why Europe? Just because it was the first continent to be deforested. And losing 1% of the world's trees does change the ratio of oxygen to carbon dioxide in a measurable way.

What is the actual mechanism by which humans control the climate?

Our activities change the ratio of oxygen to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Studies show that measurable anthropogenic climate change began with the deforestation of Europe in the Middle Ages.

Why should the forests of Europe be so powerful as to change the world's climate? Isn't that just one of those silly "blame everything bad on white people" tropes? 12% of the world's population on 6.8% of the world's land covering 2% of the surface of the planet and it was the slow and primitive manual labor tree felling that started climate change. That sir, is absurd.

It has, but never this quickly without a supervolcano or asteroid in the mix.

Surely you don't claim this is a fact base on science.

What is the actual mechanism by which humans control the climate? Is it number of trees? Are you aware of the fact that there are more trees now then before the Middle Ages?

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Studies show that measurable anthropogenic climate change began with the deforestation of Europe in the Middle Ages.

It was nothing anyone would notice without instruments, though. It's accelerated vastly since the widespread use of oil as a power source.

has it not been in constant flux since the planet formed?

It has, but never this quickly without a supervolcano or asteroid in the mix.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anthropogenic climate change is happening.

It's been happening for centuries and it will continue to happen

Has it always been anthropogenic? Why centuries, has it not been in constant flux since the planet formed?

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My understanding of climate change isn't based on "them" or "their motives" or "who is and isn't an expert."

It's based on reading data. A combination of reading both the scientific publications directly and reading sources I trust to summarize papers without partisan editorializing.

Anthropogenic climate change is happening. It's real. The planet is warming and the oceans are rising.

It's also quite slow on the timeline of a single human life. It's not something that "hasn't happened but is going to." It's been happening for centuries and it will continue to happen, so slowly that any given individual person can barely notice it.

It's also global, and therefore our system of national governments is probably profoundly helpless to stop it.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It all just depends on how you define "catastrophic" and how you define "near future."

That's a funny game called "moving the goal posts". They define it as one thing to demand immediate and drastic action, then redefine it when it is time to show the facts. The fact is that there is nothing alarming about it. So anyone who is alarmed has been greatly misinformed. Bamboozled.

Sea levels have risen about 8 inches since 1900

Oh rly? According to NOAA it is 1 foot in the last 100 and 6 inches of that have been in the last 30 years. They go on to claim another foot in the next 30 years. This will not happen. When it doesn't happen they will move the goal posts and erase all evidence that they made these claims. And people like you will continue claiming that they are the experts and anyone who does not believe them is (enter every slander and insult). The "authorities" are liars. They claimed that New York would already be under water. They claimed that the Arctic ocean would be ice free by now.

"Hur dur global warming exists" is not a valid excuse. It does not excuse their lies. It does not justify continuing to believe them and demand that everyone believe them. It absolutely does not justify drastic and harmful government policies, including those that simply cost a lot of money.

Global warming is not an existential threat, it is an inconvenience at best. The institutions that we used to rely on to give us the facts have been corrupted and turned against us to implement horribly destructive programs that benefit the oligarchs at the expense of everyone else. Controlling CO2 will not slow down global warming in any meaningful way.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is so because it is so.

It is so because we can measure it. Sea levels have risen about 8 inches since 1900. That's not an ideology. It's an observation.

The sea level rise propaganda claims that catastrophic sea level rise will happen in the near future, and that is just not true.

It all just depends on how you define "catastrophic" and how you define "near future."

Miami will be suddenly submerged in 2028? No. Ridiculous.

The Maldives won't have any natural land above water by 2150? Yeah, probably.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because they have.

It is so because it is so.

Except that the it is so people have been caught lying in the past, and the it's not so people are relentlessly silenced and slandered. The vast majority of sea level rise happened millions of years ago. That kind of sea level rise will never happen again because the vast majority of the ice caps have already melted. Miles deep glaciers used to stretch all the way down to what is now Chicago.

The sea level rise propaganda claims that catastrophic sea level rise will happen in the near future, and that is just not true. But when you call out that propaganda everyone starts shifting the goal posts and claiming they did not say that. But an inch over 100 years is not significant.

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]211 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Proof that asians aren't smart

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your explanation sounds plausible.

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The Chinese government wanted to reduce the Chinese population. This "oopsie dasie" gave them exactly what they wanted. How convenient.

By 1958 everyone understood that birds eat bugs and bugs are agricultural pests. If the government wanted to create an artificial famine and prepare an excuse that everyone would instantly buy because they all already understand that bugs destroy crops this would be the perfect premise. If they simply said the bugs came out of nowhere people would demand answers and investigations. They would forever be in fear of it happening again. With this story it is one and done. No questions asked. It was just an honest mistake.

I don't think it killed off enough people for the government's liking so they implemented the one child policy.

Inb4 hur dur prove it.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Hematomato 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's the actual study:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2024.2329816

Of over 13,000 islands examined, approximately 12% experienced significant shifts in shoreline positions. The total shoreline length of these islands approaches 200,000 km, with 7.57% showing signs of landward erosion and 6.05% expanding seaward. Human activities, particularly reclamation and land filling, were identified as primary drivers of local shoreline transformations, while natural factors have a comparatively minor impact. Moreover, the ongoing rise in sea levels is identified as an exacerbating factor for coastal erosion rather than the primary cause.

In other words, the study found that between 1990 and 2020, reclamation and land filling had a much larger impact on island size than rising sea levels.

Which is not remotely surprising and certainly doesn't "disprove" claims of rising sea levels. In fact, the study fully accepts that sea levels have risen. Because they have.

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Roughly 3% or 3200 acres can be attributed to China if we include all of the island mass that China has ever created in these numbers.

13km/370km

https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options%5Bdetail_level%5D=detailed&q=how+many+islands+has+china+made+in+total%3F

https://www.checkyourmath.com/convert/area/acres_km.php

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels by Questionable in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I’m not a big warmer.

Let me ask this question. Did the Chinese count the new islands they made/are making in contested areas of the Pacific?

I suspect they did. If so, then the finding about land mass increases is questionable.

Sorry, I disagree with the commie “big warming;” it’s a hoax. But this story needs some “‘splaining.”

In 1958 Mao Zedong ordered all the sparrows to be killed because they ate too much grain. This caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history | The Vintage News by Questionable in environment

[–]thomastheglassexpert 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Without going into my hatred of the PRC government just a comment on this = "there is nothing the government won't fuck up claiming it's a good idea and all for the people. It's for the safety of children ya know". I am referencing any/all governments anywhere.

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/02/240221213839.htm claims Russia as a whole doesn't benefit from climate change. Who really benefits from denying climate change? Just some oil and gas people? If the world is on fire and they are universally hated, what do they want to do with their money when they can't visit Venice anymore (because it is under water), visit the Rocky Mountains (because of extreme winds), or ski (because there is no snow anymore)?

It's a scientific fact that lowering CO2 concentrations is good for people (or more specifically higher concentrations are bad for concentration). As such, who can possibly be against that? Whether or not it heats up the planet (spoiler alert from the 1890s: it does), is not even relevant.

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]PsychoTranyRedditMod 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting.

I always suspect agendas when logical fallacies are used.

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A BRILLIANT deboonk.

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]ShoahKahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The claim:

"97% of scientists agree on man-made global warming"

The deboonk:

  • claim based on 12,000 papers
  • 7,930 had no position on the subject, either way
  • 3,896 claimed that humans "contributed to" climate change (how much they "contributed" was not specified)
  • 78 said humans did not contribute to climate change
  • 40 remained undecided
  • the 7,930 papers without a position on the subject, were discarded
  • 12,000 - 7,930 - 78 - 40 = 3,778 => 3,778 / 3,896 x 100 = "97%" 👌😏

🖰 https://realclimatescience.com/

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I downloaded the article. Nothing in it indicates that data was 'manufactured'.

These claims of fabricated data are entirely from Lt. Col. John Shewchuk, but no source is provided as evidence. (Typical for zerohedge.com, which is a disinformation website.)

Who is Lt. Col. John Shewchuk? According to his Twitter page, he's devoted to refuting causes of climate change, spreading that disinformation across several networks he belongs to.

It's John Shewchuk who fabricates data.

As usual, zerohedge.com is spreading disinformation.

Who does this benefit? Who pays for this? Guess.

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No your not. 〠

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember when satellite measurements were supposed to settle everything, but then they started to diverge from the rising ground temperatures, so they started to conjecture about "missing heat."

“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.” 🔥 The whole climate story is a scam from beginning to end. by Questionable in environment

[–]Iswearbymyfloralhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Im fucking shocked

Thousands of LG TVs exposed to the world. Here’s how to ensure yours isn’t one. by PanzersGhost in Security

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Complete destruction is the only answer to the "smart" tv epidemic.

Money, Secrecy, and Power: How Deep Does This Secret Government Program Go? by zyxzevn in DeepState

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Related to the $21 trillion missing that was discovered by Prof Skidmore.

The FASAB 56, a law that has just passed, protects the Pentagon from disclosing where the money went to. By allowing fake book-keeping.

So there will be more money for drugs, Epstein-style black mails, war-crimes, human trafficking and pedophiles.

Tenth consecutive monthly heat record alarms and confounds climate scientists | Climate crisis by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Weather modification is no longer a "conspiracy theory" as it has been admitted to by many governments. Because of the war in Ukraine, and Europe's reliance on energy from Russia, and the destruction of the gas pipeline, Europe was in a very precarious state going into winter. They would have been absolutely fucked.

By some miracle the jet stream stayed really high over Europe and did not come down until Russia. So Europe had an extraordinarily warm winter while Russia was plunged into the coldest winter in hundreds of years.

The arctic ice also grew more this year than ever before. That puts a damper on climate alarmism, but there are tradeoffs to everything.

Tenth consecutive monthly heat record alarms and confounds climate scientists | Climate crisis by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]GuyWhite 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Warmer winter means less fuel burned for heating. Saved folks money. And the reduction in CO2 should please the big warmers.

So what’s the fuss?

Tenth consecutive monthly heat record alarms and confounds climate scientists | Climate crisis by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/real-climate-science/

Did you mean https://www.realclimate.org/ ?

They suck a lot less:https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/realclimate/

Tenth consecutive monthly heat record alarms and confounds climate scientists | Climate crisis by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]ShoahKahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://realclimatescience.com/

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why are you so interested in my genitals? CO2 discussions inspire you to think of them?

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]TotalAnon1337 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Regarding your genitals

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Regarding what, moron? CO2? lol

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]TotalAnon1337 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pussy

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fact

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nonsense

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's important to note that - when discussing greenhouse gasses and their impact - the total amount of CO2 is at issue, not the percentage of CO2.

From the deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier in the San Francisco Bay, researchers from the University of Washington LAUNCHED trillions of salt particles into the atmosphere with the intent of blocking out the sunlight from earth. by Questionable in environment

[–]noshore4me 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actual info instead of an unhinged tweet: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/geoengineering-test-quietly-launches-salt-crystals-into-atmosphere/

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not what ... all the (both natural and anthropogenic) sources of atmospheric CO2 by percentage per year, ... means.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More of your idiotic protests. Offer an argument or evidence, or STFU.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I'm quite sure your rants are perfectly normal. In a wasting people time through texting competition. Provided you are not paid by the letter, and trying to exhaust the reader through Filibustering. Good grief!

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no evidence of "freaking out". I've merely offered corrections to your (and Big Oil's) false opinions. We can do that on Saidit. Instead of attacking the user, see if you can provide an appropriate argument and evidence.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

estimated cumulative anthropogenic CO2, since 1850!

Yes - as that's the evidence that correlates increased CO2 (and greenhouse gas emissions) with human activity

It'd be interesting, for clarity, to know what all the (both natural and anthropogenic) sources of atmospheric CO2 are, by percentage per year.

Yes - the EPA does this: https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions

It's important to note that - when discussing greenhouse gasses and their impact - the total amount of CO2 is at issue, not the percentage of CO2.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible that Jones is referring to an estimated yearly anthropogenic contribution to the 0.04% of atmospheric CO2.

What Schmidt did, for his 33% number, was to refer to an estimated cumulative anthropogenic CO2, since 1850!

It'd be interesting, for clarity, to know what all the (both natural and anthropogenic) sources of atmospheric CO2 are, by percentage per year.

From the deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier in the San Francisco Bay, researchers from the University of Washington LAUNCHED trillions of salt particles into the atmosphere with the intent of blocking out the sunlight from earth. by Questionable in environment

[–]Titanic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right in time for the eclipse too. Fuck you Bill Gates. There is a special place in hell for you for trying not only to spread salt everywhere and kill all the plants, but also to ruin our eclipse.

Bill, may God have mercy on your soul.

Geoengineering Test Quietly Launches Salt Crystals into Atmosphere by xoenix in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Now illegal in the State of Tennessee.

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/cio1/tennessee_proposes_bill_forbidding_the_release_of/15rry

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Man you are really freaking out about this. Really having a spaz attack. Kind of like your brain is short circuiting or something.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CO2 levels in the atmosphere have reached 421 parts per million, or 0.0421%, according to NASA. That's similar to the amount the person in the video claims is in the atmosphere.

However, the claim that humans are only responsible for 3% of that CO2 is wrong, according to Gavin Schmidt, a NASA climate scientist and director of the Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

In 1850, the atmospheric CO2 concentration was about 280 parts per million. The increase to the current level of 421 parts per million is all a result of human activity, Schmidt told USA TODAY in an email. source

So roughly a third, not 3%, of the CO2 currently in the atmosphere has been contributed by humans since 1850.

He lied.

Moreover, "Global temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels are correlated" (contrary to what that disinformation in the video suggests):

Australia was responsible for about 1.4% of human emissions between 1850 and 2021, according to Carbon Brief. This is close to what is stated in the video. But, again, that's 1.4% of one-third of the amount of CO2 currently in the atmosphere, not 1.4% of 3% (or 1.3% of 3%) as claimed in the video.

Additionally, between 1990 and 2019, Australia's per capita CO2 emissions from industry, land use change and agriculture were among the highest in the world, outpacing the U.S., China and Russia, according to Climate Watch.

He lied about that too.

For climate change, total amount of CO2 is more important than proportion of CO2

The fossil fuel industry and that lying asshole want us to think that the proportion of CO2 is more important.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, the oil industry must not get subsidized by taxpayers
(and they should furthermore pay for the disposal of plastics not to mention spills),
and leaks do harm sea life and more generally the environment, etc., etc., etc.,
but that's not was was being discussed, now, was it?

And the question was not 'ignore any and every point being made,
avoid understanding anything,
and mindlessly regurgitate some mantra'.

It was rather:

So, his concerns seem arguably valid, IF his numbers are correct.

Are they correct?

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now, many/most policies currently being proposed aim at curbing anthropogenic carbon production, at great costs to societies/taxpayers/people

Green energy investing, and associated subsidies, create jobs while offering sustainable energy and improving the environment and the future for younger people. Big Oil traditionally gets massive government subsidies, while destroying the environment with non-sustainable fossile fuels. Big corporations like this aren't creating new jobs. They're also destroying sea life when there's an oil leak. There are so many other problems anyone can look up. What Saiditors are supporting are these Big Corp, heavily funded, propaganda campaigns by the far right, while Saiditors complain that politicians are corrupt on the Hill. They can't have it both ways. Address Big Corp propaganda and corruption, or don't.

all the while ignoring that 97% of CO2 production is not anthropogenic.

The link I provide above - https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/causes - offers this:

The industrial activities that our modern civilization depends upon have raised atmospheric carbon dioxide levels by nearly 50% since 17502. This increase is due to human activities, because scientists can see a distinctive isotopic fingerprint in the atmosphere.

In its Sixth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, composed of scientific experts from countries all over the world, concluded that it is unequivocal that the increase of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere over the industrial era is the result of human activities and that human influence is the principal driver of many changes observed across the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and biosphere.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not the one pretending to challenge his arguments,
nor, certainly, spewing labels and insults,
including, ironically, about what a moron he is.

'The rest of the information' that you linked,
i.e. about gases other than CO2,
methane (CH4), at 0.01%, constitutes even (and much) less than CO2,
and as for Nitrous Oxide and/or CFCs, their percentages are even tinier, as in minuscule,
i.e parts per billion of the atmosphere.
The most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere seems to be ... water vapour.

And the CO2 part of the NASA thing you quote and link says

'carbon dioxide (CO2) is released through natural processes (like volcanic eruptions) and through human activities'.

Fine, so, what Mr Jones claims is that
the anthropogenic (human activities) portion
of the (0.04%) CO2 part of the atmosphere
constitutes merely 3% of that 0.04%,
meaning that natural processes contribute 97% of it,
i.e. of the 0.04% part of the atmosphere that is CO2.

Now, many/most policies currently being proposed
aim at curbing anthropogenic carbon production,
at great costs to societies/taxpayers/people
and great profits to the corporations positioned to 'solve the problem',
all the while ignoring that 97% of CO2 production is not anthropogenic.

So, his concerns seem arguably valid, IF his numbers are correct.

Are they correct?

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They lie, cheat, and steal to promote it: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/noel-sheppard/2008/04/22/gore-used-fictional-video-illustrate-inconvenient-truth

Fudge numbers too, cherry-pick them.

Geoengineering Test Quietly Launches Salt Crystals into Atmosphere by xoenix in environment

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Now illegal in the State of Tennessee.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have you, with this, addressed his argument, in any way?

Have you? I've appropriately argued - with evidence - that climate change is NOT only related to CO2. Read the rest of the information at the link I provided. If you have a counter argument, make it, and provide evidence.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]HugodeCrevellier 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You lazily posted statements from and a link to some NASA vulgarization aimed at kids:

'Four Major Gases Contribute to the Greenhouse Effect, Number one: Carbon Dioxide.'

Have you, with this, addressed his argument, in any way?

The statements that you imagine you're somehow challenging thus
is his claims that Carbon Dioxide only constitutes 0.04 % of the Earth's atmosphere,
and that (of that 0.04 %), 3% is anthropogenic, etc.

That's what needs addressing.

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Beware of morons who are as wrong as this idiot grandpa about the problems of climate change. These assholes are contributing to the miserable situation young people find themselves in today.

https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/causes/

Four Major Gases That Contribute to the Greenhouse Effect

Carbon Dioxide

A vital component of the atmosphere, carbon dioxide (CO2) is released through natural processes (like volcanic eruptions) and through human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation.

Methane

Like many atmospheric gases, methane comes from both natural and human-caused sources. Methane comes from plant-matter breakdown in wetlands and is also released from landfills and rice farming. Livestock animals emit methane from their digestion and manure. Leaks from fossil fuel production and transportation are another major source of methane, and natural gas is 70% to 90% methane.

Nitrous Oxide

A potent greenhouse gas produced by farming practices, nitrous oxide is released during commercial and organic fertilizer production and use. Nitrous oxide also comes from burning fossil fuels and burning vegetation and has increased by 18% in the last 100 years.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)

These chemical compounds do not exist in nature – they are entirely of industrial origin. They were used as refrigerants, solvents (a substance that dissolves others), and spray can propellants.

(Sorry to argue with you again today, Questionable, but this guy is all hat and no cattle, and assholes like him are causing additional division and problems. Green energy is profitable and sustainable, whereas fossil fuel energy is not sustainable and causes numerous problems.)

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]Pdiddler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pouring oil and chemicals into the ocean is not good and will kill the fish.

Response: I don't like fish sticks

When rational people tell the truth about CO2 the irrational brainwashed don’t know how to react. It almost short circuits them. by Questionable in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But being a Big Warmer is stylish.

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wow! So if you add more red to a map, it makes it appear hotter?

Good to know.

Officials Force Elderly Couple To Dismantle Home, Citing Blocked Ocean Views by newtimer in Freedom

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The officials are bastards.

In Indonesia, trans women face unique challenges due to climate change by xoenix in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You should read the article. It's a kick.

In Indonesia, trans women face unique challenges due to climate change by xoenix in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What an amazing article. Did a human write it?

Most of them are shut out of the formal economy and survive as buskers and sex workers, occupations that rely on them being able to solicit clients outdoors

Today I learned that, gay dudes in dresses sucking off drunks in back allies is "climate change".

“I no longer want to endure the heat and rain on the streets,” said Wijayanto, who joined trans-led arts group Sanggar Seroja, where she now sings with the theatre company and runs the social media channel.

Kind of sounds like climate change is a good thing for this now former male prostitute.

In Indonesia, trans women face unique challenges due to climate change by xoenix in environment

[–]rubberbiscuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought the title was a joke. Holy crap its real. LMAO

In Indonesia, trans women face unique challenges due to climate change by xoenix in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It makes their mascara run! It’s a crisis!

In Indonesia, trans women face unique challenges due to climate change by xoenix in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no they don't

xz.fail - check if you are affected by the XZ backdoor by PanzersGhost in Security

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unless you explicitly use unstable repo branches, or installed the xz beta package from tarball, then you are not affected.

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Said the godless heathen

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good news. It was a warm month. Not only did it reduce heating bills, but the heat reduced the “evil” CO2 emissions that come with heating to stay warm.

So what do the big warmers do? They bitch about the heat!

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. God doesn't drive an SUV. He more into omnipresence instead of travel.

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]RankAssPalace 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh

Heat in Europe and Asia ends another very warm month for the planet - The Daily Posting by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We've pretty much identified the cause as human rather than divine combustion of fossil fuels.

view more: next ›