The Reason They Are Coming For Russell Brand

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

all 51 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]rubberbiscuit 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I bet his videos get more views now than ever. He will be just fine. No one believes the media any more.

[–]BobOki 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Why would they when the "proof" MEDIA is showing is BLATANTLY and BADLY faked texts. Just look at them, sizing is different, you can see the paste lines, they forgot a time stamp on one of them, etc. This is the kind of fake that only a moron of current times could think is real.

Also... I am PRETTY sure RB won't give two shits what these grown children say or try to cancel, his is not the kind of guy that can be canceled.

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

a moron of current times could think is real

we have no lack ...

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

reads your simp reply yes, yes you are correct.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They just pasted 2 screenshots together.

This is normal for a long message.

Funny how you call other people morons when you can't work something simple like that out yourself.

Neither half is less damning than the other so I don't know why you would think that was an issue anyway.

[–]BobOki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let me reiterate that you are a moron. NO ONE but shills and simps would accept or even remotely believe a photoshopped screenshot of a text message, especially when the screenshot itself is talking about using a condom or not from his then GF and think that it #1 means rape #2 would be accepted by any outlet with ANY journalistic credibility.

Is she taking him to court for rape? The answers is NO because she knows flat out she would have to show said proof that she quite clearly does not have. I am sorry if you have bought in to this obvious political driven attack with the standard left bullshit of trying to pull something up from DECADES ago and expect that the people would have handled themselves in the utter insane way they expect us to handle bullshit today... which btw 95% of this country won't do anyways, fuck your ideology.

Let me guess, you also support Amber Heard huh?

[–]NastyWetSmear 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (24 children)

I remember when Russell Brand was just a charmingly nutty comedian. When did you lose your smile, little clown? :(

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

He was also a nasty wet smear 20 years ago

And at the moment he told folks not to vote, IMO

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Vote harder this time!

Then maybe the newly selected* will be honest politicians.

Voting is consent to be governed.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Of course you and 2 others are easily manipulated by anti-democracy disinformation.

[–]Dragonerne 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Are you jewish?

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]topiary2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    More like schlomo. Your lexicon is more jewish-approved jargon that we have all come to see and expect from kikes.

    [–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    As if some moron named 'topiary' has any credibility

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Says the one named cunninglingus 🙄

    [–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I have the best words.

    [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Of course you and 2 others are easily manipulated by anti-democracy disinformation.

    I've been practicing for the upcoming elections.

    I'm going to vote hard AF!

    [–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    How does one "vote hard", genius? Instead of using a pencil, you'll bring your crayons and color the whole ballot?

    [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    How does one "vote hard", genius?

    That's a good question. People have been doing this for years, and it's not working out for them.

    They should vote harder. ;-)

    [–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    encouraging like minded people to vote ...

    I was disappointed that someone I know who hates biden said he would not vote for trump to get rid of biden

    I will have to ask if he has reconsidered yet

    [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The last election was rigged.

    The prior one was likely, as well. Which would explain Clinton's lack of a concession speech.

    It's possible that they both rigged it in 2016. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump's voter turnout exceeded Clinton's rigging attempts.

    I don't how this could happen worth electronic voting, but it's plausible.

    Seems more probable that Trump's Israeli backers did a better job.

    [–]twolanterns 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    electronic voting

    is the most riggable of all - especially when the voting machines software is not publicly reviewable and the machine dont have that programming locked down to be able to prevent 'making the evidence disappear'

    the whole system would need such measures in place

    the 'mail ins' likewise are highly flawed and subject to fraudulent votes being contrived

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    When was he ever a comedian?

    [–]topiary2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    There was a point where he was plastered all over the television and then it simply stopped out of nowhere. I can only assume that was when he decided to think for himself.

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    They had him as a TV presenter and then he did a bit of acting in Hollywood but he never really had success as a comedian.

    Being a comedian requires a level of creativity and hard work which being a witty host doesn't.

    [–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yeah - I've always seen him as a professional bullshitter, not unlike Trump. It's surprising that there are millions of people who want to listen to his bollocks.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    If you sit and listen to most of the content, he follows the same podcast model as many other successful YouTubers like Joe Rogan and Tim Pool. He asks a lot of questions and talks a bit about the impact of those questions on his philosophical equilibrium but ultimately doesn't share a valid opinion one way or another. Unlike Trump who has an opinion on everything. A bit like you.

    [–]SueBoyle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    All of everyone is being used as pawns in a Kings game and when they're usefulness has expired they will be eliminated.

    The LGBT has a very big surprise coming.

    [–]FrancisIsNotCatholic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So does the Catholic Church. But we need a Pope first.

    [–]SueBoyle 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Video: Russell Brand comedy (2hours)

    https://youtu.be/-Fl4V32NFmY?si=f1ChShM_g7DOvqLL

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Probably people who don't like clickbait titles, judging from the screenshot.

      [–]Alan_Crowe 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford

      [–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      He's pointing out many specifics about the system.

      I still think he's probably controlled opposition. He's aight.

      [–]WoodyWoodPecker 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Fake rape like Trump. Get morally loose women to admit to rape from him X years ago who never met him. Duke Lacross all over again.

      [–]Zapped 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      Is his new path the reason "they are coming after him,"? Or, is it the reason they are not protecting him?

      [–]passionflounder 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Or, is it the reason they are not protecting him?

      You may have hit on something IMO. Generally people don't seem to get any cultural or political traction unless they can be leveraged in one way or another.

      The sudden emergence of alleged rape victims when a longer-term public figure begins to speak out against the establishment narrative suggests to me that we need to pay attention to what the famous wrong-speaker has to say.

      [–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Republicans and Torries are happy with the grifting. Democrats, Labour and LibDems aren't properly organized to address consipracy grifters. So I think it's not political. According to a Channel 4 (UK) documentary last night, one person made her complaints known, and her rape, recently, and then another heard about it and went on record, and then another, etc. Thus I'd say this is part of the 'me too' movement to speak out against sexual abuse. One or two of those who protected him are also questioned, or were fired at the time of the abuses.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      They are no longer protecting him purely because they aren't making money out of him anymore. It's not more complicated than that.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      It’s because during coronavirus, he told the truth. They always let people have a few years.

      The tarmac reporter got like 5 years before he was layed to rest.

      [–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      He posts hard hitting conservative videos. The lefties can't have that.

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      He's not conservative.

      [–]topiary2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      No one said he was.

      He is simply providing a platform that leftists/globamists/establicucks deem "problematic."

      I can only assume his numbers have increased or his guests have gotten bigger. In either case, it would justify the establishment to smear him like they always do to anyone gaining relevance to the masses

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      No one said he was.

      As soon as someone types something like this you know they are full of bullshit and just don't give a shit about the truth.

      This is the internet sweetheart. Someone is always saying everything.

      [–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      He's not conservative.

      a reasonable mentality (even a questioning one) IS being "conservative" these days

      [–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      But they hate him like he is a conservative.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      No they don't, because he isn't.

      If he was he wouldn't be well known for screwing around.

      Or did you think conservative values only applied to other people?

      [–]tyranicaloverlord 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      The left will eat this shit up about them. They have gone full retard, and will follow anything that is left of center. If anyone on the right likes a thing, they must hate it, because they have been hypnotized to act that way.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      There is a theory that this is nothing to do with Brand but he is just a way for Murdoch to attack the British establishment, who he hates.

      Brand worked at all the main channels and has been involved with the Labour party.

      If Murdoch can make this into a present day Jimmy Saville scandal he will be able to take out many of his old enemies and create pressure to privatise the BBC and Channel 4.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It nearly always comes down to money, so I wouldn't be surprised.

      [–]Be_incorrigible 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Well I wish all of those little panels linked to the actual content....

      [–]newguy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Because this is a play. He's playing a part, even if he doesn't know it. He dated a Rothschild and got very famous in the last decade. Connect the dots