The Russo-Ukraine War gives me hope because it is a very traditional, conventional war of the sort that we were told shouldn't exist anymore. As it turns out, advancements in technology have reached a point where offensive operations are no longer strongly favored in confrontations between two opposing armies with equal technological capabilities. Thanks to modern telecommunications technology, it is no longer possible to mobilize large amounts of men and materiel in secret and launch surprise blitzkrieg offensives. Army movements can be immediately picked up by satellites and relayed to artillery and missile units, so that within a few minutes of moving out a unit can come under precise enemy fire. This situation has forced both the Russian and Ukrainian armies to revert to a WWI-style form of warfare, consisting of slow, grinding offensives against extensive trenches/fortifications and large artillery formations.
Likewise in the aerial space, the development of air defense technology over the past couple decades, as seen with the S-400 system, has outpaced the ability of airplanes to evade air defenses and efficiently carry out interdiction or close air support (CAS) missions. The Russians seem to be relying on missiles rather than aircraft to carry out both strategic and tactical interdiction, while CAS as a concept seems to be largely abandoned because it is simply too risky in a modern battlefield. The Ukrainian insistence on receiving F-16s as some kind of "gamechanger" is hilarious considering the F-16 is an outdated aircraft from literally half a century ago and will be torn to shreds by modern air defenses. Air forces can be used with decisive effect only against a technologically backwards foe that lacks effective air defenses. ZOG forces carried out extensive aerial operations against Iraq in both 1991 and 2003 prior to commencing land operations, which made the latter a cakewalk. However, in a modern war between two sides with equal technological capabilities, air forces cannot be used with decisive effect, and the absence of air support will further reinforce the importance of traditional land forces that can fight a slow-moving, grinding war of attrition similar to the kind of campaigns seen in WWI.
Why does all this give me hope? Because this kind of war is best-suited for traditional, conservative societies with both large numbers of patriotic men as well as the sufficient industrial capacity to support large armies in the field. The Russo-Ukrainian War shows that all the things we thought weren't so important in modern warfare are actually of decisive importance, while the things we thought were of supreme importance are of less importance. The Russo-Ukrainian War shows that infantry still matters a hell of a lot, artillery still matters a hell of a lot, manpower reserves still matter a hell of a lot, entrenched fortifications still matter a hell of a lot, unit morale and ethnic cohesiveness still matters a hell of a lot, and the ideological willingness to commit hundreds of thousands of men into the battlefield to wage a bloody war of attrition still matters a hell of a lot. This is the kind of war that could be fought by pre-1945 Germany, Imperial Japan, Russia, or even early 20th century France. But ZOG, and especially Weimerica, is totally unsuited for such a war. Let's take a look at some of the problems that Weimerica would have in waging a modern war:
Manpower: Weimerica has a serious shortage of manpower, especially when it comes to the Army. For 2022, the Army missed its recruitment goal by a staggering 25%, the worst since the Vietnam era. Over three-quarters of the eligible Weimerican population is also unfit physically or mentally for military service.
Cohesiveness/Morale: History has shown that ethnically cohesive units fight the best. Historically, the United States had an effective military only because it had one of the largest pools of white men in the world. But modern Weimerica has fewer white men interested in military service than ever before, while the Armed Forces are becoming increasingly diverse with women, minorities, and sexual deviants filling its ranks. The thought of Shaniqua from the Bronx, Jose from El Paso, and some faggot from L.A. all manning a trench while under Russian artillery fire is hilarious.
Ideological motivation: Related to the above, Weimerica simply lacks any kind of ideology that could effectively rally millions of young people to war. Patriotism is at an all time low and distrust in U.S. government institutions is at an all time high, especially among younger white men. Most zoomers don't want to risk their life fighting for feminism, trannies, and anal sex, which are basically the highest values of Weimerica.
Lack of industrial capacity: During WWII, the United States had the largest industrial capacity in the world and was able to manufacture an astonishing quantity of military equipment and supplies, which was critical to the success of the Allies. The US was able to transition much of its civilian manufacturing to wartime manufacturing, and companies like General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, and Bethlehem Steel made trucks, tanks, aircraft, and ships. Today, the industrial centers that were part of the old "Arsenal of Democracy" like Detroit, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh are overrun with negroes and are part of the decaying Rust Belt. America today has a hollowed-out industrial base and an economy owned by Jews that is based on services and financialization as opposed to being the center of global manufacturing that it once was.
When we look at each of these factors and compare them with other countries, we see that there is one country which has a far superior capability to wage a prolonged war of attrition than any other. China, more than any other country on the earth, has a far superior ability to wage a prolonged war of attrition of the sort that we see in Ukraine. Unlike Weimerica, China has a large number of surplus men who are highly nationalistic and willing to die for China. Unlike Weimerica, China is over 90% ethnically Han Chinese with a high degree of cultural cohesiveness. Unlike Weimerica, China isn't waging a cultural war against its own founding population. Unlike Weimerica, China has the world's largest manufacturing base and is the only country on earth that can not only recruit and mobilize millions of soldiers, but also keep them supplied using its own industrial capacity alone. China accounts for an astonishing 28.7% of global manufacturing output, and many of these industries can be easily transitioned for wartime production just as the USA did in the 1940s. In contrast, Weimerica only accounts for 16.8% of global manufacturing output. India, which some people tout as a competitor to China, accounts for a mere 3.1% of global manufacturing output, about the same as south Korea and significantly less than Germany. China's industrial capacity is greater than the total industrial capacities of the USA, Germany, Italy, France, and the UK combined. This is the exact opposite of the situation which prevailed in 1940, when the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan) were overshadowed by the industrial capacity of the USA and the Soviet Union. In a WWIII scenario, China and Russia would have a decisive advantage in BOTH manpower and industry, not to mention morale and ideological motivation for a sustained conflict involving potentially millions of casualties.
This of course assuming that no nuclear weapons or other WMDs are used. But if ZOG is stupid enough to use nukes, then that means the ZOG world order will be destroyed anyway. One does not simply use nuclear weapons (the single greatest taboo since 1945, even bigger than questioning the Holocaust) and then go back to normalcy.
The worst-case scenario would be if ZOG develops some kind of advanced AI technology that allows them to build totally autonomous droids or mobile suits that can take the place of infantry and make humans redundant and unnecessary in warfare. If ZOG develops such a technology, it will lead to a complete dystopia where ZOG will have complete and absolute control without having to worry about ever losing control from within or without. In such a scenario, we will have no choice but to pray to God to send the Mahdi to lead a Butlerian Jihad and destroy all ZOG droids and make it a taboo to ever produce another ZOG droid or mobile suit ever again. But thankfully, it doesn't seem like AI or robotics technology is anywhere close to such a thing, and a fully autonomous combat droid with equal or superior performance to a human infantryman may not even be possible. For the time being, it seems that the situation that I described above will hold, and this is very good news for those that oppose ZOG.