you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The belief that "it's immoral to have such control over other people's very existence" is a belief like any other. You "control" other people with this arbitrary morality. There's no reason why I shouldn't do the same

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I seek to control people as little as possible in a world that fully controls us. All people can agree that they do not wish to be controlled or harmed by others, therefore they should not do the same to others. Wanting to arbitrarily control how people live their lives is Palpatine levels of evil. Actually it's worse, because at least Palpatine didn't care what people did as long as he got to be on the throne.

My final goal is to get everyone out of this matrix once and for all, so this is no longer even a problem.

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I seek to control people as little as possible

Not how morality works

And how a far-right person can be against "controlling" other people is beyond me. You're confusing libertarianism with far-right or extreme supremacism

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The term far right in the current western context is meaningless now. It's just Jewish terminology. It's a propaganda term used to marginalize and persecute perceived enemies, it's meaningless. Are all zionists far right? They practice extreme supremacism. Not in the modern context, because the term only applies to non Jewish whites because of who makes the definition.