you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

This isn't complicated or as hypocritical that you think it is. There are issues that are a higher priority than others. Replacing White people and dismantling their culture in their homelands is a higher priority because it secures their power in North America and in Europe. If they don't take measures to secure and retain their power in the western world everything else is a political non starter. They want to be the ones in power to make the decisions not you. Politics is friend vs enemy not about solving problems that affect swathes of the population. edit: Here is examples where leftists can point out hypocrisy with white nationalists.

  • Deporting nonwhites will hurt the economy! How can you secure the White race if your ideas would led to social and economic upheaval!

  • How can you say you care about the environment and White people when your ideas probably will lead to a war because the people in power are against you!

  • Why is race mixing not talked about enough! because don't you know it could lead to the extinction of Whites!

  • You say you don't dislike Black people, but you don't want to live by them! Why yes I have an ethno state in the middle east to run to but it is totally irrelevant!

Why are Jews so central to White nationalism when you are about White self-determination? Answer: because they are the most influential and power group in our countries and responsible for the social, cultural and economic transformation of White countries that we see will eventually lead to the loss of our dominance in our homelands and possible extinction.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Any government that espouses a belief in climate change/environmentalism, has to be aware that airplanes are a source of pollution.

They create new taxes or place restrictions all the time to meet their eco targets, except for when the subject of immigration is mentioned.

And yes, I'm aware that their agenda is replacing European stock, but you would still think someone on the Far-Left side would voice concerns that this particular method is damaging the planet.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They totally understand, they are just anti White. Jews have entire talks about how they are afraid that populists will use climate change as the rationale for closing their borders to the third world. Issues have different priorities.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not disagreeing with you by the way. I know what you mean.

I guess my expectations is I didn't expect them to be THAT extreme that they're willing to sacrifice the planet too.

For example, even Bernie Sanders once admitted mass immigration was bad for growing wages. This is despite him being a woke anti-white activist on other issues.

But practically no Liberal alive today has opened the debate on immigration being environmentally dangerous.

Look at this article. Justin Trudeau announced unlimited plane trips from India to Canada. That's messed up.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/trudeau-announces-unlimited-number-of-flights-between-india-canada-soon/articleshow/95514072.cms

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Politics is friend vs enemy not about solving problems that affect swathes of the population.

Wrong, you're thinking of war.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, all politics is friend vs enemy. Why do politicians act so hypocritically all the time? Friend vs enemy is the only standard that is consistent in every political debate or discussion on whether a policy should be passed. If politics was about solutions we would live in a technocracy based on merit and accountability.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because we're increasingly treating politics like war.