Leftists respond to the "Don't Say Gay" bill

submitted by LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I have seen a lot more than just "say gay" in response. Among the most popular reactions, I see things like "it's just teaching that queer people exist!" or "it technically does not allow teachers to speak about heretrosexual relationships!"

Lots of interesting responses to be analyzed. I however don't see much on side compared to that community as they always are able to debunk one thing or another. We have resources on race realism, statistics, JQ but coverage on LGBT studies on our side is paltry.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I think the theoretical foundation is lacking. A lot of the right-wing opposition is based on dogmatic Christianity. I am interested in developing a scientific understanding of the Homo Question. If anyone is looking for a place to start, I would recommend the book Faggots by Larry Kramer. It's been called a satire, but it has also been said that it's not at all an exaggeration.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps also that many of the scientifiic/sociological/logic-based arguments for homosexuality and transgenderism have only achieved widespread status in recent years, compared to the others that have been discussed for decades/centuries prior. A thread here would be a great place to start with a critical analysis.

I have another one. "Grooming" is a popular topic in this current round of debate. However LGBTs claim to not do so because they do not want to send anyone down a path of oppression. Of course, they believe such identities are natural and they are currently quite oppressed.

Thanks ofor the book recommendations. There is also the Transgender Industrial Complex which is a notable read as well.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Section 3

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good idea, but some would criticize these statistics as being biased, having poor sample sizes, or all products of a lack of social acceptance rather than inherent characteristics. The 1,000+ partners in particular has been rebuked; I wonder if there is an answer. https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debunked:_gay_men_have_500-1000_partners

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am interested in developing a scientific understanding of the Homo Question.

I am interested in developing a solution to the homo question

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And even they've been trying to debunk the opposition to LGBT from a Christian perspective. The whole Arsenokoites/Leviticus/"Sodom & Gomorrah was inhospitality" debate.