Leftists respond to the "Don't Say Gay" bill

submitted by LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps also that many of the scientifiic/sociological/logic-based arguments for homosexuality and transgenderism have only achieved widespread status in recent years, compared to the others that have been discussed for decades/centuries prior. A thread here would be a great place to start with a critical analysis.

I have another one. "Grooming" is a popular topic in this current round of debate. However LGBTs claim to not do so because they do not want to send anyone down a path of oppression. Of course, they believe such identities are natural and they are currently quite oppressed.

Thanks ofor the book recommendations. There is also the Transgender Industrial Complex which is a notable read as well.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Section 3

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good idea, but some would criticize these statistics as being biased, having poor sample sizes, or all products of a lack of social acceptance rather than inherent characteristics. The 1,000+ partners in particular has been rebuked; I wonder if there is an answer. https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debunked:_gay_men_have_500-1000_partners