you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

the end goal won't be in their lifetimes. Many elites probably don't like that.

Wrong.
It's never been an end goal. It's a cyclical system and process. Always has been. They play their roles and benefit from it.
They know this.

The queen in 94, Lord Rothschild is 90 something, they want this to accelerate and if it leads to war it won't be on their watch.

They are nothing without their systems that prop them up. They are figureheads that may have a hand on the wheel with countless others. If they kick it their war machine will continue forward regardless.

I wouldn't be bothered if their ruling class machine had a systemic failure and terrible work-place injuries resulted, but their matrix of rigged systems are not only bullet proof, they have underground bunker cities.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

it's a slow process towards an end goal not a cycle. Sometimes big events speed up the process, that's what maher is talking about with a civil war.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sometimes big events speed up the process, that's what maher is talking about with a civil war.

Besides natural events (some may not be), all crisis events are engineered. Plus they have engineered contingency plans for when the natural events occur - disaster capitalism. Global war doesn't just happen by accident. They have been inciting this bullshit for years and decades - all part of the ongoing plan that also includes the aftermath and revitalization of more war. These are all ebbs and flows in their cyclical process of perpetual war.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

yeah so maher is worried about them engineering a civil war. Good ppoint about perpetual war, similar to trotsky's perpetual revolution. Their end goal is just that, the world from 1984 where 2 or more sides of a war are controlled by the same elites and it is used to control for eternity.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A perpetual revolution would be preferable.

The shadow government and deep state have lifers who work there for decades regardless of the administrations.

The problem with revolution is that you simply revolve and come back to the same point in the cycle.

We need to evolve beyond all that authoritarian bullshit and grow alternative decentralized solutions from the bottom up.