you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FrenologistSaving the World 1 Cranial Exam at a Time 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

That's how you do lockdowns actually, when you have one or two cases, not when you have thousands.

Then explain Sweden retard.

You have to be retarded to think masks don't work lol

Okay retard

Ok schizo. Acquiesce with speed limit regulations is also enemy, I assume.

No surprise a fucking retard would use a false analogy.

This data is fake

Sure retard

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I just re-read my comment and I'm sorry for too much personal insults. I'm still not convinced by any of your arguments, I literally explained why the survival rate isn't 99.98%. It's more like 98.2%.

I don't disagree with Sweden's approach, it's perfectly valid strategy, but when you compare it to Australia and China it's objectively inferior. Most of our governments are doing the worst possible combo, which is something in between of Sweden and Australia/China.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

it's objectively inferior.

Sweden's approach (without respect to any external threats like "vaccines") is objectively superior.

Being able to enjoy life and gain natural immunity is objectively superior.

If you claim objectivity, so will I.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Objectively refers strictly to data.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The point is that data being used for idiotic conclusions isn't logically useful.

It's useful to nation-wreckers.

A robot can produce data that shows the benefits of eliminating/enslaving humans and that not doing so would produce inferior results.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I am discussing effectiveness of Austrialian/Chinese vs Swedish lockdown and what is better. Yes, it's better to have less disease and it's better to have strict authoritarian short-term measures to ensure that.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, it's better to have less disease and it's better to have strict authoritarian short-term measures to ensure that.

I'd prefer strict authoritarianism that eliminates everyone who [subverts people's nations and lives over idiot-tier globalist propaganda such as "covid" and "climate" hysteria and the like and everyone who pushes these "vaccines" on to others especially on to children] from all positions of influence at minimum.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah damn these vaccine subverters! This is what they're doing for thousands of years!

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Yes.

    [–]FrenologistSaving the World 1 Cranial Exam at a Time 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    What's wrong with Sweden's approach? It appears to be working because Sweden has close to zero covid which, is likely a lot less than China. Would China even tell the world about covid outbreaks?

    Why is mas-vaccination needed for a disease that, as you say, has a 98.20% survival rate? There are literally hundreds of diseases with significantly higher mortality rates. Why aren't we mass-vaccinating for those? Why the push for mass-vaccination rather than a push to improve the overall health of those who are most-vulnerable to the disease? As I'm sure you know, obese people are much more vulnerable to covid so why not mandate better eating habits for fat-ass slobs when they're the people who are vulnerable? Why should healthy people who have almost no chance of death or even severe reaction go out of their way to help fat-fucks maintain their unhealthy lifestyles?

    I don't agree with the assessment that most governments are doing something, "In between of Sweden and Australia/China." Most countries likely already had heard immunity but, decided to continue with masking, distancing, lockdowns, vaccine mandates and now vaccine passports as nothing but, a pure power-play. I caught covid back in Feb 2020 along with just about every person I know. It spread so fast that it burned itself out--that's why cases peaked and then crashed. Covid didn't have a second peak until mass-vaccination began. Using a leaky vaccine is the cause of variants not the ass-backward, newly-minted science that claims variants are a result of the unvaccinated.

    Israel is one of the most-vaccinated countries in the world but, covid is raging there and even the Israeli PM said, "The most vulnerable population at the moment in a paradoxical manner - are the ones who received two vaccination doses but, not the third dose.". So Israel admits the vaccine isn't working and that protection fades over time. Does this make it a forever shot? Will you take the third, fourth, fifth, etc.?