you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Objectively refers strictly to data.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The point is that data being used for idiotic conclusions isn't logically useful.

It's useful to nation-wreckers.

A robot can produce data that shows the benefits of eliminating/enslaving humans and that not doing so would produce inferior results.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I am discussing effectiveness of Austrialian/Chinese vs Swedish lockdown and what is better. Yes, it's better to have less disease and it's better to have strict authoritarian short-term measures to ensure that.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, it's better to have less disease and it's better to have strict authoritarian short-term measures to ensure that.

I'd prefer strict authoritarianism that eliminates everyone who [subverts people's nations and lives over idiot-tier globalist propaganda such as "covid" and "climate" hysteria and the like and everyone who pushes these "vaccines" on to others especially on to children] from all positions of influence at minimum.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah damn these vaccine subverters! This is what they're doing for thousands of years!

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Yes.