China bans feminine men from TV

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

I'm hoping at least DAR will ban you if we can't get you removed from SaidIt entirely.

Bingo.

(Amelia told me long ago that you admitted to her that you were actively trying to get me banned. Your comment here indicates that your intentions for a discussion are not genuine. Moreover, your bullying is another indication that your intentions are not genuine when you ask me a question. But you call me a hypocrite.)

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

you admitted to her that you were actively trying to get me banned.

LOL. This is NOT news. I've openly stated it many times - and I'll stand by it. You are a force for evil on SaidIt. Redeem yourself, or leave, or continue to be "persecuted" for perpetually lying and dragging the conversations downward until you finally get banned.

When /u/TheAmeliaMay was admin she told me that I needed to build a case to get you banned - so I did. And you played right into it. Then /u/TheAmeliaMay deleted much of the evidence to your advantage because she was holding a secret grudge against me, delusionally thinking I was a pedo because I told her I made another young friend on SaidIt, across the ocean, who's name and face I won't ever know, nor want to. Her imagination sparked much drama that was resolved.

Your forked tongued whispers have tried to poison me in the minds of SaidIt admins /u/magnora7 and /u/TheAmeliaMay whom I'll respect for their good deeds and I'll call out their bad deeds, but I'll never bow to any "authority" - unlike you.

Your comment here indicates that your intentions for a discussion are not genuine.

Bullshit. You cowardly won't honestly debate the issues in the Jimmy Dore video because you are as much of a fraud as the Squad is. At least I'm open and honest about my agenda.

You keep dragging the conversations downward and deflecting and spreading disinfo.

But you call me a hypocrite.

But you are - as I've pointed out time, and time, and time again with clear obvious examples.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Still at each-other's throats, I see...

Jason, could you please omit the "/u/" from in front of my user-name from now on? (Unless you're speaking to me, of course.) I'm done with this drama and don't want it in my inbox.

The Squad is definitely a fraud, tho. They won't even fight for left-wing economic policy — which is why they were elected. They'll fight for unregulated, taxpayer-funded abortions, though. -.-

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I think he does it so other users can know who he is talking about.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I think he does it so other users can know who he is talking about.

Exactly correct.

I don't want to be talking shit "behind your back" or about you /u/TheAmeliaMay, so I was including you. Of course you can correct me if ever I'm in error or have a different viewpoint.

It also makes it easy for anyone to look up that user, and especially for recent comments from that day, should they need to verify something.

I will omit you from now on. Sorry to bother you.

Still at each-other's throats, I see...

Only when I'm compelled to call out absurd bullshit. Strongly once every week or two.

Today was a rarity because I actually started it this time by asking socks to defend the issues Jimmy Dore's video raised so clearly.

The Squad is definitely a fraud, tho.

Truth.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I don't want to be talking shit "behind your back" or about you /u/TheAmeliaMay, so I was including you.

Thanks for the thought! I ain't mad about it or anything.

I will omit you from now on. Sorry to bother you.

Thanks! You're fine; it was just one comment.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If he does it three times in a comment, does it ping you three different times?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, just once per comment.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Hence - your bullying in every response and your agreement here that you're normally interested in getting me banned - is again evidence that your responses to me are ALWAYS in bad faith (ie. hypocritical). Why should I or anyone you bully respond to these bullying tactics? (I asked you this earlier, but you cannot or will not answer it.)

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

So you can bitch about my alleged bullying and I can bitch about your perpetual bullshit all day - or until /u/d3rr weighs in on it.

Or you can actually try to debunk what Jimmy Dore said.

Or you can try to explain like I'm 5 how I'm a hypocrite and you're not - or how I'm always in bad faith when it's you who are perpetually bullshitting on a site that does not like you.

Why should I or anyone you bully respond to these bullying tactics?

Why should I engage you who keeps calling me a bully when it's you who are lying and keep bullying me?

(I asked you this earlier, but you cannot or will not answer it.)

I answered it several times. You choose not to accept my answers and would rather dwell in /s/Victimhood than have the original discussion that you've been deflecting and procrastinating, about Jimmy Dore's video about the Fraud Squad.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

None of this is happening, for reasons I've already mentioned.

(If you genuinely want to discuss Jimmy Dore, don't bitch-slap the person you want to discuss this with.)

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

None of this is happening, for reasons I've already mentioned.
(If you genuinely want to discuss Jimmy Dore, don't bitch-slap the person you want to discuss this with.)

Alright then. Let's call a truce, be respectful of each other, Jimmy, and the Squad - and let's discuss the OP video.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Perhaps this one

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why would you pick an unrelated, obsolete, and irrelevant video from February 19, 2016 about Republicans when I want to discuss the efficacy of your beloved Democrat progressive Squad?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI3TqgC8uME

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I thought that was rather kind of me - to select a J. Dore topic that addresses a relevant topic. (I've not begun to address your first question.) Regarding a "squad" of Democrats, I think this grossly oversimplifies the work of those people for the sake of entertainment value and to satisfy Dore's donors. It cheapens and debases the discussion so that the substance of the work of those ladies can be avoided and glossed over. Really, I am not the best person to ask about Dore. He's too shallow. There are many others on Saidit who will happily tell you how awesome he is. I don't have videos of "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," but I used to watch that show and the other early morning Sunday political pundit discussions, and would have been more interested in discussing those.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I thought that was rather kind of me - to select a J. Dore topic that addresses a relevant topic.

It was an underhanded jab at "bullies" intended to get a negative reaction from me.

Regarding a "squad" of Democrats

Not A squad, they are THE self-described Squad of progressives within the Democrats. They have leverage and power and refuse to use it effectively to help people.

substance of the work of those ladies

What substantial work have they done besides talk a good talk?

We can discuss George and others after.

Really, I am not the best person to ask about Dore. He's too shallow.

I don't care about your opinion of Dore, or other people's opinions. You're avoiding the issues and substance of what he was talking about.

Did you even watch the video?