you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

there's a long time struggle within the party between the leftish side and rightish side. It was yet present in 1946. But it's not that streamlined as you may think. Pino Rauti, who was the main pupil of Evola, ended up with an economically left-wing platform when he managed to get the leadership of the party. Also, most of the active base is economically leftish, even if at various degrees. I'm probably very extreme within the party, because I come from the "national socialism" in-party group, which in Italian doesn't sounds like national socialism (it's "socialismo nazionale" instead of "nazionalsocialismo"). We were advocating a platform based on the socialization of every enterprise with more than 100 employees, and a straight nationalization of every strategic and essential ones. But we were also advocating for corporatism and a more strict jus sanguinis, border control etc. So we were both the more leftish and the more rightish of the party, with the national-conservatives beeing more moderate on every point.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is very interesting. Italian politics is so complicated. I know many Italians, all of whom seem to have different political points of view. At the end of the day, it seems they all want stability, which would mean a reduction in crime, immigration, and corruption.