Excellent thread from Moldbug on the mask tyranny

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

"Fascism" has too many ambiguous understandings and "corporatocracy" is long and often confusing to people who hear it for the first time. GovCorp is perfect, and almost rhymes with tyranny.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Also fascism is the exact inverse of this system

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I disagree.

I think they're fusing the worst of fascism and worst of communism into their ultimate control goal: global totalitarianism without options.

[–]VraiBleuScots Protestant, Ulster Loyalist 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Fascists typically supported things like- traditional gender rolls & cultural values, a socialised economy, preserving nature & militant Nationalism.

How does that in any way resemble today’s economically right wing & socially far-left hellscape of a system?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

traditional gender rolls

The male tactical military roll and the female waltz and somersault roll.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Jelly roll", in the 1920s was slang for making whoopee.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

So, nothing to do with fascism at all then. Just bog standard capitalism/communism, like I said.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I think you've misunderstood the term 'corporatism' much like chomsky. It's a governing ideology that has nothing to do with private corporations. What were looking at is not fascism which as others have pointed out in most ways was and is the opposite of what we see today. What you have today is capitalist and neo-liberal economics coupled with insane levels of social liberalism -- the two perfectly compliment one another. That's literally the opposite of fascism both in ideal and practice and shouldn't be called that.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

'corporatism'

I said "corporatocracy". (((They))) get all the benefits of extremist capitalism monopolies mashed up with the extremist socialism too big to fail bailouts while pulling puppet strings of all government - all in a unified globalist Washington consensus settled upon in their shadow government, deep state, think tanks, and executive boardrooms within which they incestuously intermingle.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Got you I thought you were saying was that what we're living under is Fascism somehow. Carry on, sir.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jason got it right. This new world order is an amalgamation of policies and philosophies, created to appease as many people, and created to be able to shift and change to fit the coming days. They have created a moldable worldwide corporation known as the government. They operate just like a corporation would, not like a respectful group of capable leaders should. It's not really capitalism, fascism, or anything. It's like a homunculi, a many headed hydra.