agree or disagree?

submitted by NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada! from self.debatealtright

http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1627287172665.jpg

all 20 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

don't make women feel there's no chance for redemption

Of course there's a chance for redemption - there always is. All women of this sort can, if they want, reject degeneracy in favor of our cause. One way to do that would be to prevent other women from making the same self-degrading decisions they did. Another way would be to vote for what needs to be voted for. I'm sure there are more.

Don't be surprised when women vote for a Nation's demise when they feel they can't atone for past shitty behavior.

This is a non sequitur and, coupled with use of the word "feel" in the preceding sentence, really underscores the cattiness that sometimes makes it easy for men to dislike women. Our cause is correct, moral, and necessary regardless of anyone's past behavior and regardless of what anyone feels. No one should lose sight of that.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Oh what a load of utter horseshit. White women are the most coddled, praised and obligation free group of human beings in human history. Just recently especially online right wing movements have simply reembraced what has been a perennial critique of the fairer sex since at least the time of ancient Greece. In fact it is mainstream liberal culture where you're seeing some particularly nasty forms of criticism coming towards white women-- the 'Karen' phenomenon is a manifestation of this. Yet single white women haven't embraced traditionalism because of this they continue to vote for societies demise. The whole premise of this is total horseshit.

No one says that women are beyond redemption though. However If the premise of this shitty little question is true and women will out of some kind of malignant spite just do their best to totally destroy a society because someone hurt their feelings then can you actually classify them as moral agents anymore? That's how a spoiled child behaves not a sentient being. Ironically if you were to totally embrace the logic of this shitty question then doesn't it lead to the inevitable conclusion that a guy like anglin is totally right about women?

Must brush up on my schopenhauer.

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada![S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oh what a load of utter horseshit. White women are the most coddled, praised and obligation free group of human beings in human history

No that's Jews. I guess you believe in white privilege? Interesting.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh please don't try and get clever and twist my words. Jews have totally weaponised and exacerbated the tension between the sexes by coddling, praising and completely excusing white women of any responsibility for their actions in the exact same way they've weaponised tension between blacks and whites by doing the same to blacks. Don't put shitty words in my mouth though and try and explain my comment as meaning I endorse 'white privilege' you dishonest creep.

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada![S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How are white women praised? "Women" may be praised as a group but "white women" are not. "White" ANYTHING is not praised. Also real women are considered inferior to troons.

I agree that affluent white women are privileged. Poor white women, not at all. Poor whites are the most oppressed group in modern western society. And rich whites are the biggest anti-white race traitors, but the alt-right screams about women being the enemy and ignores the class struggle.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but the alt-right screams about women being the enemy and ignores the class struggle.

Not true at all. You come here posting some retarded question and rightfully get told this hypothetical situation is retarded then use it as a strawman to pretend we're all obsessed with hating women or some shit.

If you never brought up this stupid question nobody here would be 'screaming about women being the enemy'. If you want to talk about the class struggle and jews make posts talking about them so people discuss those things you fucking moron.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The class element is definitely not ignored by me or most of the people I read on the DR. If you want to discuss it then as markimus points out feel free to make a post. I guarantee you you'll find a lot of agreement here on that issue.

It's a slimy and dishonest tactic though -- gee noticing a pattern here -- to frame the DR's criticism of females as 'screaming'. Whenever DR people have criticisms of women were always 'spewing' them or handing them out in the form of a 'tirade' or 'rant'. Because obviously you and others want to frame the issue as those criticisms merely being the result of some personal emotional problem and not a rational reaction to the situations we're facing.

Like I said I dare you to make a post about the class element to the issues the DR is concerned with and see how many people 'ignore' it.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Redemption? You trying to justify a stripper gf?

I think women know way more than you think about their perceived value in society and what affects it.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They're probably not going to be FemNats if they feel like there's not redemption under that ideology.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Every enemy you create is just digging your own grave one inch deeper.

    [–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1627287172665.jpg

    You can switch it with this link instead for when that link dies: https://i.ibb.co/xzFnxdN/1627287172665.jpg

    [–]TheWorldToCome 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    well, this is why taking the vote away from women is needed

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    How about taking the vote away from the unqualified in general?

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Islam is right about females

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    My priority is improving white people's lives and getting jews out of power. If you're a sex-obsessed whore who just wants to bring attention to your personal lifestyle rather than the struggle there's no place for you anyway.

    [–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada![S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You didn't answer the question.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    'Redemption' for people's anti-social personal lifestyle choices has literally nothing to do with liberating white people from jewry.

    [–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada![S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Well that can be argued. The basic question is whether someone should be allowed to join the movement to liberate white people from jewry, regardless of what they did in the past.

    Note: I did NOT create this picture.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The basic question is whether someone should be allowed to join the movement to liberate white people from jewry, regardless of what they did in the past.

    What does this even mean 'join the movement'? This isn't the masons and there are no initiation rituals or dues to pay. If you want to fight for white people in any way you just do it. No one can stop you from being part of it.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    agree