you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]peaceful[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Some of our best genetic women, most beautiful, and Whitest, are race mixers. Intermarriage was at a 10% rate and rising in 2010 according to wikipedia.

[–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stop with this 4chan meme.

"Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large."

https://paa2008.princeton.edu/papers/80046#page=23

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Some of our best genetic women, most beautiful, and Whitest, are race mixers.

Oh no! Not our whitest!

Dear Shareblue and Glowie LLC,

Please send better quality shills.

Your's Truly,

-SNS

[–]peaceful[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is that supposed to mean?

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Intermarriage was at a 10% rate and rising in 2010 according to wikipedia.

Where the fuck are you getting this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in_the_United_States

2010 census bureau statistics in 2010 right there and 98% of Whites are married to other Whites.

Do you just make this shit up?

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm guessing it's 10% of new marriages, not 10% of all existing marriages.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well that's not what he claimed. Also it seems that 10 percent of all marriages in the US are interracial but that's not the rate in the White population which counters the entire premise of the post. I think he's getting those two things confused.

[–]peaceful[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia#For_interracial_marriage

At the national level, 0.4% of marriages were interracial in 1960, 2.0% in 1980,[42] 12% in 2013,[43] and 16% in 2015, almost 50 years after Loving.

The sources cited are Pew Research Center.

--==

The Census has some problems:

"The Pew Research estimate of the multiracial population takes into account not just how people describe their own race but also how they describe the races of their parents and grandparents. Using this approach, some 6.9% of U.S. adults could be considered multiracial. The Census Bureau counts people as multiracial only if they self-identify as more than one race. According to census estimates, 2.1% of adults were multiracial in 2013."

A lot of Whites already have Indian ancestry. They don't report themselves as bi-racial.

"among biracial adults who are white and American Indian, only 22% say they have a lot in common with American Indians; 61% say they have a lot in common with whites. And only 19% say they have had a lot of contact with their relatives who are American Indian. In addition, biracial adults who are white and American Indian are among the least likely of mixed-race adults to consider themselves multiracial (only 25% do). " https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/11/american-indian-and-white-but-not-multiracial/

--==

I don't think Whites will be insular over the next 175 years and refuse all racemixing. The only reason there are Whites today is because racemixing was taboo for most of the last 175 years, and there wasn't much multiracialism. Mixing will probably get progressively worse and in my observation it is already very bad. Having 128 pure White recent ancestors seems unlikely for future newborns.