Do you find it odd that no country bans race-mixing [today]? And diversity as a whole is still legal?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Girondin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The vast majority countries are mono-racial and are not being activily replaced, literally no point, homosexuality (and probably transgenderism?) is something that has existed forever (condemnations exist in the Abrahamic religions) which you mention that their is legislation against that among states. Due to recency and lack of practical need for it their is no point in legislation, is their ayahuasca legislation in Africa? That is as rare is race mixing and is in 99.9% of places.

If you do propose legistation and it is accepted you are facing the collective powers of the NATO and globo-homo alliance. you are wrong that their is no country, Israel has a de-facto ban, marriages have to be done by the Rabbinate, their is no civil marriage (despite israel being quite irreligious), who also don't allow mixxed and inter-racial marriages, Ethiopian jews are largely banned from marrying

See this documentary Israelis want to marry but can't

Also most states have laws that make racial replacement impractical, places I thought were de facto white colonies when I was a libtard (Thailand, Phillipines) have laws against foreigners owning land or apartments, you can't just be birthed their and be a citizen, it is based on blood, you can be a citizen if marry your a native, the probability of your child marrying another native is high so their is no real racial replacement.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm confused by that Israel article. It's not just Ethiopians who raised complaints, but it says anyone who was actually converting to Judaism. The article also mentions they can circumvent that ban by simply opening up their own office (which make sense. It's like a black couple going to a White church and being denied marriage. Why not go to one that does accept them?).

The vast majority countries are mono-racial and are not being activily replaced, literally no point, homosexuality (and probably transgenderism?) is something that has existed forever (condemnations exist in the Abrahamic religions) which you mention that their is legislation against that among states. Due to recency and lack of practical need for it their is no point in legislation, is their ayahuasca legislation in Africa? That is as rare is race mixing and is in 99.9% of places.

Using this argument, human beings have been invaded by other tribes for the same amount of time they also saw homosexuality as a threat. And they were just as hostile to outside groups. Native Americans would enslave or ritually sacrifice other tribes for example. So you would think we would see cultures trying to protect themselves and thus forbid cultural mingling.

If you do propose legistation and it is accepted you are facing the collective powers of the NATO and globo-homo alliance.

How is it anymore different than countries who are already under sanctions and boycotts? For example, I really doubt Russia passing a law that says only Whites can marry will help them gain more sympathy. Putin already passed a law against homosexual marriages and the status quo remains for example.

[–]Girondin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It is not like their getting banned from a "white church" imagine if the state church of denmark in the country banned all blacks from marrying, and their is no other way since their is no civil marriages. That is de-facto ban.

different tribes are not different races, this is a recent phenomonen, their wasn't hundreds of thousands of Chinese people entering Italy or millions of blacks coming to North America.

As I said these laws should be very rare, sanctioned countries, do not attract much immigrants so their is no race replacement immigration, and their nearly all mono-racial. Russia is multi-racial but Putin is not based, that is why it wouldn't happened, it's also very rare. I meant many Russians who say they first meet a non-white when they were in their 20s (foreign exchange students).

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It is not like their getting banned from a "white church" imagine if the state church of denmark in the country banned all blacks from marrying, and their is no other way since their is no civil marriages. That is de-facto ban.

So wait, just because the Rabbis refuse to marry them, what exactly changes when they can just go to another country and Israel will recognize it?

"The religious authority for Jewish marriages performed in Israel is the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and the Rabbinical courts. The Israeli Interior Ministry registers marriages on presentation of proper documentation. Israel's religious authorities — the only entities authorized to perform weddings in Israel — are prohibited from marrying couples unless both partners share the same religion. Therefore, interfaith couples can be legally married in Israel only if one of the partners converts to the religion of the other. However, civil, interfaith, and same-sex marriages entered into abroad are recognized by the state.[4]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_Israel

I would naturally assume this applies for race as well.

different tribes are not different races, this is a recent phenomonen, their wasn't hundreds of thousands of Chinese people entering Italy or millions of blacks coming to North America.

The Mongols still invaded Europe. So did Arabs prior to the 21st century.

As I said these laws should be very rare, sanctioned countries, do not attract much immigrants so their is no race replacement immigration, and their nearly all mono-racial. Russia is multi-racial but Putin is not based, that is why it wouldn't happened, it's also very rare. I meant many Russians who say they first meet a non-white when they were in their 20s (foreign exchange students).

Every country started off as mono-racial, so if there was a race replacement immigration (or at least one meant to target just Europeans), what exactly would make aa non-white country like China different from Iceland? Relatively speaking, China is much more likely to bring in more race-mixed couples, especially if you look at all their missions they are doing in places like Africa or even South America.

[–]Girondin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that is a legal loophole (and also expensive), with COVID travel restrictions this has become impossible.

Arab and mongol invasions wasn't similar, at most you had to some border of Europe that was arabic and mongol (they are the closest similar groups to europeans and already neighbors) and were expelled, population genetics show little medieval mongolic and arabic admixture in modern Europeans.

what would make a non-white country like China different from Iceland? Im confused on what you mean, I follow a lot of china vloggers and china journalists, China expelled and deported much of their black population in Guangdong in 2020, their immigrating han chinese into Uygher areas (race replacement) and race mixing makes you socially ostracized, nearly all expats who marry chinese women in china marry divorcees who are already a lower social rung, a lot of chinese youtubers like Naomi Wu hide the fact they have a non-chinese non-asian husband since it brings social ostracization her account)