Britain to liberalise visa access for Indians

submitted by Talmudstein2 from inews.co.uk

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Talmudstein2[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Reason I posted this was just to show that post-Brexit, the British State is doubling down on their globalist-neoliberal agenda. This is not to defend the EU, but it seems that British nationalism ended up fatiguing itself fighting for leaving the EU and subordinating to their Conservative Party for what was in the end was another neoliberal project in disguise (I did a previous post under my old account about this). Rather, it is why I think it is more worthy that other European nationalist groups do not waste political manpower while they themselves are politically weak supporting the centre-right/kosher-right over leaving the EU, rather than concentrating on more urgent issues such as external immigration.

I should point out that this is only a provisional arrangement which will allow around 3000 Indian graduates a year to come to Britain, its expected during negotiations for a full trade deal that India will expect even greater ease for immigration. While 3000 may seem insignificant for now, this alongside the 30k Hong Kongers and the in-general more liberalised immigration pathways for "skilled workers" from third-world states means that British middle-income workers will now face even more competition from cheaper labour. It should be additionally noted that one of the biggest advocates for this and the person who ratified the agreement was ethnic Indian Priti Patel, a supposed "immigration hardliner" who had previously said she wanted Brexit to allow for easier routes for Indians.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Priti Patel, a supposed "immigration hardliner" who had previously said she wanted Brexit to allow for easier routes for Indians.

All immigrants want more of their own kind, for obvious reasons, it's politically, financially (nepotism) and emotionally beneficial. It is the OPPOSITE of our greatest strength, it IS our destruction via imported Balanization. It cannot and will not end in anything but big big trouble.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

They are insane. Actually, they're infested with (((parasites))) bent on their destruction, turning England into a homogeneous mocha industrial zone, like the old grey goo of early nanotech lore.

Indians and Chinese will simply swamp us if we don't fight back. This is obvious to all of us but anyone that's lived near a big city knows just how fucking many of them want and are allowed to move to the West. Something like 90% of houses sold in British Columbia are sold to Chinese.

We fight or we perish from the Earth.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

The UK was already infested around the time of the World Wars. How else did they manage to find the island? Both Hong Kong & India where their colonies.

This is why colonialism was a giant mistake for Europe. You don't conquer these people and plant your flag in their soil. Many now see it as an opportunity to return back, especially as their own countries deteriorate from imperialism's consequences.

You can see the same effect in France. They where dead certain on holding onto their colonies in Africa & Asia instead of letting go of them early.

[–]Nasser 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Or you know the former colonial nations could idk just not let them in. But race traitors and parasites had other ideas.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They tried but they never listened. The best example is Enoch Powell, who was already a WW2 veteran and ran for politics. He made a speech about this and the media denounced him hard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell#%E2%80%99Rivers_of_Blood%E2%80%99_speech

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I find that particular just-so story about immigration which is so popular with its boosters so enraging. What is there some hard law of nature that necessarily means people from former colonial territories just HAVE to migrate to England?

Fuck that. It was a choice our elites made and nothing more. Does Japan have any mass migration from its former colonial territories? Obviously not because the powerful haven't decided -- yet! -- that they want them there.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Everyone will condemn European imperialism, but you won't hear a peep from them about Mongols, Tatars, Ottoman Turks, or Arab and Berber Muslims. All four groups occupied many modern day European nations for hundreds of years, and enslaved millions of European people, from east, south, west and even north. No one will even consider demanding reparations from these people or forcing millions of European immigrants onto them.

    They should be condemned as well. But regardless, I don't actually support massive immigration. I was only pointing out that Colonialism made those countries bigger targets because, as you pointed out, they had already existed as cheap labor. There are other European countries that never dabbled in the same thing and they are still much better off than France and the UK.

    There are very few if any Indians or Chinese in Iceland because they don't actually share any history, nor did Iceland try to scoop them up and have them go fight other nations across the globe.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Unless you have actual numbers, I'm going to have to say you are exaggerating about the amount of non-whites who are actually in those countries.

      Also, every country is going to have foreign immigrants to some extent. Like Japan has Nigerians, Filipinos and Indians too, but the rest of the country is pretty much homogenous. Especially once you go outside the capital or urban centers (i.e Tokyo).

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        95% White is still faaaaaaaaar better situation than where the UK is currently headed. Like the city of London is counted as being 60% White, and the last census was done in 2011 so it's probably at half or even less by now.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_London#Ethnicity

        [–]Lugger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        This is why colonialism was a giant mistake for Europe. You don't conquer these people and plant your flag in their soil. Many now see it as an opportunity to return back, especially as their own countries deteriorate from imperialism's consequences.

        Come on, man... a country colonizing a land isn't obliged to allow its [the land's] population into the metropole. It's purely a question of a will to keep foreign elements out. By the time those people began moving into their ex-masters' states, Europe had already taken the cuck pill and was welcoming them with open arms.

        It didn't help that the war started by a certain moustache-wearing madman left Europe in ruins, either: the governments saw those brown folks as a good source of cheap labor to rebuild their countries.

        If stupid Eurocucks had had the balls, it wouldn't matter if those [ex-]colonized people wanted to immigrate to their respective [ex-]occupiers' countries — they simply wouldn't have been allowed in.

        You can see the same effect in France. They where dead certain on holding onto their colonies in Africa & Asia instead of letting go of them early.

        Well, the French are a special case of European stupidy in regards to brown people, but not for the reason you mentioned. They accepted a shitload of immigrants from their former colonies just to show their hearts of gold; I especially liked how they once let god-knows-how-many North Africans in on the basis that they fought on the French side in a civil war in their (this North African nation's) country. I believe those were the Moroccans?... Don't remember the details.

        No wonder the French are considered one of the most cucked nations in Europe, and — judging by the demographics — France will likely be the first one to fall.

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Come on, man... a country colonizing a land isn't obliged to allow its [the land's] population into the metropole. It's purely a question of a will to keep foreign elements out. By the time those people began moving into their ex-masters' states, Europe had already taken the cuck pill and was welcoming them with open arms. It didn't help that the war started by a certain moustache-wearing madman left Europe in ruins, either: the governments saw those brown folks as a good source of cheap labor to rebuild their countries. If stupid Eurocucks had had the balls, it wouldn't matter if those [ex-]colonized people wanted to immigrate to their respective [ex-]occupiers' countries — they simply wouldn't have been allowed in.

        Apologies for any misunderstanding. I'm not saying the immigration is right, I was just saying colonization served as an excuse to find their way to these countries and stay. Remember, it was only a very select few countries who went to conquer the world and kept in close contact with their territories up until the 2000s. Spain was once like this but funnily enough, they got spared after many of their colonies revolted back in the 18th or 19th century. Same with the Dutch who also had colonies in the new world but they lost control of them much more earlier.

        Basically, it would have been better off if France and Britain had done the same, but even into the 1950s, they were still pushing for Imperialism (i.e see their failed invasion of Egypt in an attempt to try and take back the Suez Canal).

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]