Talmudstein2

He had his bizarre aspects (rumours of his personal life and things such as the Amazonian Guard) and he was imperfect in numerous areas, but overall I would actually say that Gadafi was a good leader especially relative to the region where he was. Definitely better than other people from that region who get vocal support in these circles, such as Assad or Saddam. His economic policies achieved a North African country with the highest HDI and GDP in Africa, which was competitive with both the US and many European countries. He provided numerous social security programs which uplifted the average Libyan person, from healthcare to subsidising car ownership, and embarked on infrastructure projects which helped solve many of the issues facing the country (such as the Great Man-Made River). He did all this alongside launching a cultural revolution which re-established traditional Arab and Islamic values in Libya. I definitely think he could be classed as Third Positionist and I admire him as a nationalist who helped benefit his people. I would even go as far as to say there is somethings to learn from him for European nationalists despite cultural differences and I'd recommend people at least read parts of the Green Book (its quite short and easy-to-read anyway).

Like I said he wasn't perfect but just contrast this with the "democratic Libya" built by Obama and NATO's intervention, I'm sure we're all aware of the horror stories about the slave markets, the tribal and ethnic tensions, the outpour of migrants and ISIS. The battlefield of Libya is literally between a bunch of defector military personnel and formerly exiled technocrats who barely lived in Libya prior to the "revolution" who are nothing more than whores for a bunch of foreign powers to secure certain interests.

How this all relates to Whites is that simply a leader like Gaddafi reduces the amount of migrants coming to Europe. He was competent enough to give Libyans a suitable enough life that they'd actually prefer to stay there and he kept economic migrants from sub-Saharan Africa from using Libya as a route for migrations. I support any leader like this.

Additionally, none of these interventions benefit us in any substantial way, except what cheaper petrol prices for a few months or something? And the targeting of Gaddafi and Assad in the Arab Spring generally seemed to be irrational (edit: I know not from POV of the Zionists) policies based only on solving personal vendettas that Jews and certain elements of Western political and security services had against them.

And ye sure, during the Cold War, America and the Western European countries had some issues with him. I'm aware of his role in supporting certain groups (although I am sympathetic to some he supported like the PIRA) that did attacks in Europe, although this was from a time of global proxy conflict. We live in a different era and people like Gadaffi would be our allies.

(Also unrelated but regarding Mugabe, I think the main reason he was overthrown was because the Chinese realised his incompetence was a liability and decided to get rid of him.)