Is Generation Z the most liberal ever?

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Ah... Brazil. Here we come

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

I don't think it would be as bad as Brazil for numerous factors.

1) Northwest European genes are superior to Iberian ones.

2) East Asian immigration.

3) Only 13% of the US population is black and they're already 25% white on average. (Brazil has 19.6% mean African DNA):

To reduce the potential of bias from studies with different sampling methods, we calculated the mean genetic ancestry weighted by the number of individuals. The weighted mean proportions of European, African, and Native American ancestries were 68.1%, 19.6%, and 11.6%, respectively.

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000400495

Let's say immigration gets as bad as California's demographics nationally which has only 36% whites, California still has an average IQ of 95.5. If the population became homogenous it would still have an IQ of 95 because mixed individuals have an IQ the mean between both races (Example being African-Americans have 85 average IQ and 20-25% white DNA).

Despite that 95 IQ California has a GDP higher than the UK and only 40 million compared to their 60 million population as I've stated in the past. California does have less blacks than the national average but there are also more whites outside of California. I personally don't see why the elites would want to destroy their superpower, so I think the national white mean DNA would remain higher than California's because a 95 IQ superpower could not last long technologically.

[–]Girondin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

if " Northwest European genes are superior to Iberian ones." (what a blanket statement) tell me how "East asians genes and Ashkenazim genes are superior to Northwest European genes" (is superior genes is judge based solely on average IQ they are). You can say that some groups have advantages in certain traits but to say that their "genes are superior" is ridiculous, whites aren't superior to blacks, Indians aren't superior to Arabs they are different.

California is a massive economic hub, home to silicon valley and almost all of the entertainment industry of course it would be richer than the UK.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

"East asians genes and Ashkenazim genes are superior to Northwest European genes" (is superior genes is judge based solely on average IQ they are).

Average IQ, conscientiousness and feats. A study showed Europeans have more conscientiousness than East Asians.

Counter to past studies, the two groups were not significantly different on Agreeableness, and European Americans scored higher on Conscientiousness. The finding that European Americans score higher on Extraversion than people of Asian descent is consistent with past studies (Mastor et al., 2000; McCrae et al., 1998)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630227/

Conscientiousness also correlates highly with success. Anglos built the largest empire on earth, the strongest superpower, and Jews subverted it.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anglos built the largest empire on earth

Spain had the first global empire in history.

[–]oneinchterror 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And that's an incredible feat which ought to be commended, but it still paled in comparison to the British Empire.

[–]Girondin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Personality tests have way more flaws then you think, the psychologist Joe Heinrich in "the weirdest people in the world" lays out compellingly why they should be distrusted, I am not to go as far as him in my distrust of personality, but there are lazy, and dumb Nordics just as like there are with Meds, or Indians or Arabs or Jews or any ethny. "Northwestern genes are not superior to Iberian genes" is retarded. If EVERY single northwestern european had traits vastly superior to Iberians, like humans with worms then maybe you can claim superiority, even then it is a value judgement, no gene is biologically superior, other than ones that spread and replicate.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Personality tests have way more flaws then you think

Conscientiousness is a pretty reliable metric. It correlates higher with success than IQ.

Conscientiousness is the best predictor for long-term success.

but there are lazy, and dumb Nordics just as like there are with Meds, or Indians or Arabs or Jews or any ethny.

That's why we're dealing with averages of course.

"Northwestern genes are not superior to Iberian genes" is retarded. If EVERY single northwestern european had traits vastly superior to Iberians, like humans with worms then maybe you can claim superiority

If Britain conquered peoples in Africa and India many times larger than their own population, innovates better than these populations, and builds better societies than these populations, we can reasonably say Brits are superior to those people on average. Be it specific metrics in IQ, or conscientiousness, they have an overall superiority. Those metrics just help us quantify this superiority and we can apply it to Anglo-Iberian discrepancies.