all 5 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's just a way of conning socially conservative people who would otherwise oppose the system entirely into voting for system-affirming bullshit that continues to destroy them. Pat was a good guy and sincere in his beliefs but he was not radical or revolutionary so he was ultimately worthless, the neo-Paleocons of Nick Fuentes and shit is just a GOP operation at this point.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A reactionary dead-end.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hanging on to the rotting corpse of Christianity and American liberalism. Too polite for revolution. It simply doesn't go far enough. It desires to return to the 50s and flash freeze culture there. Its simply not possible

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Paleocons are just neocons but slightly more based. They arenj't reactionary (they aren't even fucking traditionalist), they are literally neocons except they're slightly more skeptical of faggots. They still worship Jews, democracy, and outsiders, and they still believe in capitalism and other such Jewish schemes.

They are far less socially conservative than me and I would bet 90% of the others in the Third position and dissident right. I'd call them moderately conservative at most.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are no social conservatives here. This place is exclusively populated by racist morons who have no other values.