Economic Anxiety vs. Demographics on the Right: What are your thoughts on this article and thread?

submitted by Fonched from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Welcome to the Jewish Question.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

There are Jews in Europe but the continent will most certainly remain majority White, just because of the entrenched history and culture that says those people need to live there.

America was always founded as a colony, that later rebelled and started crafting their own rules. Even if the goal was to make a white nation forever, the defining culture that says "yeah, but we'll absorb millions of immigrants anyway" straight up killed it. And now with the double whammy that is millions of illegal immigrants who successful crossed the border and enjoy being exploited by both sides, it's the final nail in the coffin.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm afraid that demographics projections tell a different story, Britain will be minority white in 46 years if things don't change and the same will happen in other european countries.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The major difference is why and how people are immigrating to those places. The U.S has a much longer history of absorbing people from all over the world for reasons such as cheap labor, or attracting talent. It also directly borders Mexico which is a country caught up in chaos.

Most European countries border each other, and a lot of refugees don't seem eager to move to Russia, Poland or Hungary without at least being stopped at the border. It's far more optimistic to raise a White family in Europe right now, then sticking around for any of the Ex-colonies.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Dude the u.s. was 90% white in 65 and the reason the demographics changed is due to jewish subversion, the country was created by europeans for europeans, is was literally in the law that immigrants had to be europeans of good character.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The U.S had African slaves, Chinese railroad workers, Native Americans & Mexicans from conquered territory. If the U.S really wanted to maintain some sort of ethnic homogeneity, then not expanding past the original 13 colonies and abolishing slavery right away would have been the way to go.

But that didn't happen because the U.S had already gone into Empire mode, and sought to expand its borders into territories that where clearly non-white, while also importing more of them for cheap labor. The end result couldn't have been more obvious.

Meanwhile, look at Iceland, Poland, Estonia and several other European countries. They have Jews but are still practically ethnostates. Although it also means none of these countries are also going to be wealthy as the USA, ethnic purity comes with a trade off. The countries that want to be super rich and welcoming were involved in diversity and imperialism at some point.

Edit: It's also the same reasons too why France and the UK have caught themselves in similar situations, although their changes in demographics are not as dramatic. For thousands of years, they barely had any contact with non-whites, even within their own continent. But once they sought to expand and conquer them, it's no surprise many of these ruled over subjects now feel entitled to move back, especially with the politics in their home countries being intentionally meddled with by these powers.

Like the Hong Kong situation is a perfect example of a territory Britain should have never taken without the foresight they were going to give it up anyway, but now the natives living there would rather flee than live under Chinese official rule.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You did not read what I've written, the U.S. was by europeans for europeans up until the sumbversionof the jews.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why do other countries with Jews still have homogenous populations? What makes the U.S so special?

The reason for the U.S becoming non-white is no different to any other imperial power. You don't get millions of people to enter your border without giving them a reason to stay. This was true with the slaves, or when they conquered Mexican territory, or when they later invaded Philippines.

Even writing a law that says "well duh, America is clearly European" already represents the first mistake. Why write something like that, if they never actually had plans to mix with other ethnic groups? Because many where already there since the beginning, and they kept adding more as time went on...

They could have either hoped these people would eventually leave, or they thought they could rule over them as second class forever. The later was a failure, and now the first option is becoming obsolete.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The US is the leader of the world and the ideology (creted by jews) that subverted it has been exported to the rest of the west which is also losing it's homogeneity. (UK will be minotiry white by 2066)

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The US is the leader of the world

That title has been around before the U.S existed. And just like past World Empires, once they began to expand too quickly, did they also collapse or suffer catastrophic change. The Ottomans, Roman Empire, Mongols, Britain, Germany etc all come to mind. It's just not possible to rule over large swathes of this planet, with the expectation you can keep them all subjugated or fall in second class. The USA is thus no exception.

that subverted it has been exported to the rest of the west which is also losing it's homogeneity. (UK will be minotiry white by 2066)

How can you export something whose value is imaginary? This is not like oil or gold, which has real practical uses and benefits. If a nation somehow "imports" diversity propaganda and doesn't immediately throw it away, there's probably something else going on that convinces them it's of any value.

It's like religion. Just because I distribute Bibles or the Koran in North Korea, doesn't automatically mean that country is now going to convert to Christendom or Islam. Consider the levels of education and culture in every country. No one is expected to submit to diversity automatically.