Racial Whiteness | The civic nationalist vs ethnonationalist debate

submitted by Jacinda from counter-currents.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Immigration should stop but my argument is you can live with educated non-whites already here given they are less than 15% of the population.

I think a majoritarian (90% or whatever number a statistician or the local populace comes up with) goal is more reasonable.

The other part of this is not allowing the political enfranchisement of subversives or outsiders/foreigners. Go ahead and work and live and do well for yourself and your family. But you will never have voting rights or be allowed to subversively sway citizens. I suppose a proper outlet for that would be allowing such opinions to be aired in a public forum, possibly with or without consequence, after considering the implications. I don't know if eventual blood quanta cut-offs is also a solution to possible integration or not, but I suppose that could be debated as an option.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think a majoritarian (90% or whatever number a statistician or the local populace comes up with) goal is more reasonable.

I don't know if eventual blood quanta cut-offs is also a solution to possible integration or not, but I suppose that could be debated as an option.

I believe that the allowed percentage of non-whites should first be filled with people who have majority White DNA. Currently as it stands 2.9% of the population identifies as mixed so this wouldn't be a problem if the allowed percentage is 10%. As for voting rights I guess that would be up to the people.