you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You are correct, but I personally think that those men were more charismatic and vote-worthy than Le Pen and Salvini. They had honesty and courage. The current rise of the European populists is honestly more due to the great replacement being in a more advanced state now, the refugee crisis, the internet, and the escalation from the left.

They simply lived at a bad time. It's like Rockwell and Yockey. They lived in a time when America had a golden age and everyone was content with the status quo. They could've struck gold today. or William Pierce who lived in an age before the internet. He could've gathered a following of millions today.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Zemmour getting 17% out of nowhere is very high. He's also a brilliant intellectual and polemicist. He would crush Macron in a debate.

    By the way, the fact that he gets 5% more than Mélenchon is astonishing.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      So far, yes. But if Zemmour had more political capital he could be even better.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]