None of those people could have achieved it without the backing of the media.

So what are you saying? We should cancel everything then? The media was hostile to Charles Darwin when he first published his works on Evolution. Yet I don't think he actually cared what society thought of him, he was just doing his job. Now hundreds of years later, most people are free to believe in evolution theory without being jailed or murdered for it. Similar to today, I don't actually care what mainstream media thinks. How else did I learn about this board and manage to talk to you if I was brainwashed by Liberals? Answer: every person born with free will has the power to search for the truth on their own.

It's Jews.

So the Jews also lead to the creation of right-wing media? I mean, I don't deny that being a possibility but it only makes the media agenda more irrelevant. Consider that the Soviet Union doesn't even exist anymore, Liberal power is not this unstoppable force that somehow controls the planet. We live in a world that is much more Centre/Centre-Right on average.

They didn't.

So everyone supported slavery? Why? The majority didn't even own them and the ones who did, used it to devalue labor. It was basically a lose-lose situation and that's before going into the moral arguments of why keeping human beings as property was an abomination.

I never said that.

Keep in mind, if there was ever growing resistance against slavery, public mindshare would have begun to reflect it. Similar to how the Vietnam or Iraq Wars had support in the beginning but died near the end, if the act of owning slaves was tied to immense violence, sympathy for it would plummet. In fact, there was a real life example. Abolitionists and Slave owners were already fighting when new territory was being founded. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Kansas

The differences are hardly there. It's mostly show. It was actually the conservatives who legalized it in the UK.

Well, Britain's situation is actually unique. It was the Left who made an argument against it based on religious freedoms. but the Conservatives passed it anyway with bipartisan support. It's fair to say both parties were the same on that issue, but when it came to another like Brexit, then Conservatives represented the majority of Leavers, with Liberals parties voting to stay.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/518474/eu-referendum-voting-intention-by-political-affiliation/

Based on reality. A lot of these Muslims are known to self-segregate. This isn't news.

The article I posted was literally Muslims protesting LGBT education in public school, not private. So the state indoctrination is there in front of them but they still rejected it.

You're so bluepilled it's laughable. Western countries are dictatorships. We just live under dictatorships of global capital. The competition doesn't run our states, and a lot of that competition is controlled opposition.

That only means we can't trust anyone then. I agree.